Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/RefractoryPhase 2NCT01555541
Intensive Consolidation and Stem Cell Mobilization Therapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-risk Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Ofatumumab, Etoposide and Cytarabine in people with Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/Refractory, run by C. Babis Andreadis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to show that incorporating ofatumumab instead of rituximab in combination with etoposide and cytarabine (OVA) is successful in collecting autologous stem cells for use in an autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and to examine its effectiveness in eliminating residual… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/Refractory
- What is being tested?
- Ofatumumab, Etoposide and Cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 May 2012to 1 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of refractory or relapsed biopsy-proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
- Age 18 years or older
- Refractory to or relapse following a rituximab/anthracycline first-line regimen
- High-risk disease as defined by one of the following:
- First relapse after CR within 12 months of initiation of front-line therapy
- Less than CR to front-line therapy
Show all 20Show fewer
- Second-line age-adjusted International Prognostic Index score (sAAIPI) of 1 or higher at the time of relapse
- Receipt of no more than three prior chemotherapy regimens. Monoclonal antibody therapy alone and involved field radiotherapy are not included in this number. Prior use of ofatumumab is allowed if there has been no disease progression following that therapy (i.e. ofatumumab-based salvage regimens are allowed)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
- Eligibility to proceed to OVA
- Chemosensitive disease as defined by at least a partial response to salvage therapy by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) criteria.
- Bone marrow with less than 15% lymphoma cells following salvage therapy. No evidence of myelodysplasia.
- Patients must have adequate organ function with serum creatinine <2.0 mg/dL, total bilirubin ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤3 times the ULN.
- Neutrophils >1,000/μL and platelets >100,000/μL prior to day 0
- No active uncontrolled infection.
- Eligibility to proceed to CBV ASCT
- Patients must be out of the hospital after OVA for a minimum of 4 weeks.
- Adequate peripheral blood stem cell collection with cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) cell dose ≥2 X 106 /kg (actual body weight).
- No evidence of disease progression on day 42 assessment
- Approved by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Bone Marrow Transplant Committee to proceed with ASCT.
Who cannot join
- Presence of disease transformation from a previously diagnosed low-grade lymphoma
- Progression following prior ofatumumab-based therapy
- Active central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Patients with a history of central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement must be in a documented remission by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluation and contrast MRI imaging for at least 3 months prior to study entry.
- Evidence of myelodysplasia on any bone marrow biopsy.
- Treatment with any known non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 5 terminal half-lives or 4 weeks prior to enrollment, whichever is longer, or currently participating in any other interventional clinical study.
- Other past or current malignancy. Subjects who have been free of malignancy for at least 3 years, or have a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer, or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Chronic or current infectious disease requiring systemic antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral treatment such as, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis, tuberculosis and active Hepatitis C.
- History of significant cerebrovascular disease in the past 6 months or ongoing event with active symptoms or sequelae
- Known HIV infection
- Clinically significant cardiac disease including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within six months prior to randomization, congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV), and arrhythmia unless controlled by therapy, with the exception of extra systoles or minor conduction abnormalities.
- Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease which in the opinion of the investigator may represent a risk for the patient.
- Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HbsAg and a detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA viral load. If negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a HBV DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be excluded. If HBV DNA is negative, subject may be included but must undergo at least every 2-month HBV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing from the start of treatment during the treatment course. Prophylactic antiviral therapy may be initiated at the discretion of the investigator.
- Positive serology for hepatitis C (HC) defined as a positive test for hepatitis C antibody (HCAb), in which case reflexively perform a hepatitis C virus (HCV) PCR to confirm the result
- Pregnant or lactating women. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
- Women of childbearing potential, including women whose last menstrual period was less than one year prior to screening, unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy. Adequate contraception is defined as hormonal birth control, intrauterine device, double barrier method or total abstinence.
- Male subjects unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception methods from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy.
- Subjects who have received live virus vaccination within the 4 weeks prior to planned initiation of study treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study of Intensive Consolidation and Stem Cell Mobilization Therapy With Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and High-dose Ara-C (OVA), Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-risk Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
The goal of this clinical trial is to show that incorporating ofatumumab instead of rituximab in combination with etoposide and cytarabine (OVA) is successful in collecting autologous stem cells for use in an autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and to examine its effectiveness in eliminating residual diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients.
Read the detailed description
Patients with relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) who are refractory to or relapse within 12 months of first-line rituximab-based therapy, have poor outcomes with conventional approaches to autologous stem cell transplantation as detailed above. The investigators hypothesize that the intensive mobilization strategy developed can overcome some of the obstacles to successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) by both eliminating residual disease following salvage therapy and by facilitating stem cell collection. Even though there is clinical experience in the cooperative group setting with intensive pre-ASCT mobilization, it has never been prospectively validated in DLBCL and concerns exist as to its ability to improve outcomes with ASCT in this high-risk, and heavily pretreated group of patients. Furthermore, most patients in the study site's registry treated with intensive mobilization were rituximab-naïve and the findings may not translate in the rituximab-refractory population. The investigators also believe that ofatumumab, a novel monoclonal antibody against a distinct cluster of differentiation antigen 20 (CD20) epitope may in fact overcome rituximab resistance in DLBCL patients and through more effective complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) may eliminate minimal residual disease in the patient and contaminating tumor cells in the stem cell graft.
General Design
This is a single-institution, single-arm, prospective phase II study. Patients with high-risk DLBCL (defined as either achieving less than complete remission (CR) to initial rituximab-containing therapy or relapsing within 12 months of initial therapy) will be enrolled on this study and will undergo staging prior to receiving intensive mobilization with ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose ara-C (OVA). Following successful stem cell collection, patients will proceed to standard autologous transplantation with cyclophosphamide, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), and etoposide (CBV) preparative regimen. Response evaluation will occur after salvage therapy, following intensive mobilization therapy (d42), at day +90 after ASCT, and at 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Event-free, progression-free, and overall survival will also be assessed until 48 months. The primary study endpoint is mobilization-adjusted complete metabolic response rate (maCR) following OVA. Subjects who are not chemosensitive to salvage therapy (i.e. do not achieve a partial response or complete response) will be re-evaluated after an additional salvage regimen. If they are still not chemosensitive at this point, they will be withdrawn from the study and replaced.
- Being tested
- Ofatumumab, Etoposide, Cytarabine
- Keywords
- relapsed, refractory, DLBCL, lymphoma, B-cell, diffuse
- Medical subject headings
- Recurrence, Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OfatumumabDrug
Also called Arzerra, GSK1841157, HuMax-CD20
1000 mg IV days 0, 7, 14, 21
EtoposideDrug
Also called Vespid®, VP-16
10 mg/Kg IV over 24 hours daily, days 1-4
CytarabineDrug
Also called Cytosar-U®, Ara-C, Cytosine arabinoside
2000 mg/m2 IV twice daily, days 1-4
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single-arm study | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ofatumumab; Drug: Etoposide; Drug: Cytarabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients Achieving Complete Response (CR) to the Treatment Upon Successful Stem Cell Mobilization
CR will be calculated based on the PET/CT scan following 2 cycles of salvage therapy using the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for a lymphoma response. This includes: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, Post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET-, Spleen and/or liver, if enlarged before therapy based on physical exam or CT scan, should not be palpable on physical exam and should be considered normal size by imaging studies, and nodules related to lymphoma should disappear, If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. Biopsy sample must be adequate (with goal of > 20 mm unilateral core). If sample is indeterminate by morphology, it should be negative by immunohistochemistry. A sample that is negative by immunohistochemistry but demonstrates small population of clonal l
Measured: Day 42
Number of Patients Achieving Mobilization-adjusted Complete Response (maCR)
Number of patients achieving maCR to the treatment upon successful stem cell mobilization, defined as at least 2 x10^6 cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)+cells/Kg of actual body weight. Patients who require use of plerixafor or an autologous bone marrow harvest are considered mobilization failures and will be treated as non-responders.
Measured: Day 42
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Patients Who Received OVA and Then Met Criteria to Proceed to ASCT and Achieved a CR/Partial Response (PR) Post-ASCT
Determination of CR or PR must meet the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for lymphoma response
Measured: Up to 5 months
Number of Patients Who Advance From Partial Response (PR) to Complete (CR)
Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) conversion rate was used determined the number of participants who improved following OVA Treatment.
Measured: Up to 5 months
Number of Participants With Successful Neutrophil Engraftments
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of 3 consecutive days with absolute neutrophil count of >500 cells/microlitre (uL). Response evaluation will occur at day +90 after ASCT, and at 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter
Measured: Up to 24 months after ASCT
Number of Participants With Successful Platelet Engraftments
Platelet engraftment is defined as the first of three consecutive measurements for which the platelet count was > 20,000/uL, and must be at least 24 hours following the last platelet transfusion. Response evaluation will occur at day +90 after ASCT, and at 6, 12 and 24 months after ASCT
Measured: Up to 24 months after ASCT
Median Time to Progression
Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time from treatment after OVA until documented lymphoma progression or receipt of anti-lymphoma therapy (except for planned post-ASCT radiotherapy) or death due to lymphoma. Patients are to be censored at the time of last followup or death due to another cause
Measured: Up to 48 months
Progression Free Survival Rate
The percentage of participants in the study still alive at time of censoring. The time frame defined as the time from day 0 of OVA treatment until lymphoma progression, receipt of anti-lymphoma therapy (except for planned post-ASCT radiotherapy), or death as a result of any cause. Patients will be censored at the time of median follow-up.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Overall Survival Rate (OS)
The percentage of participants in the study still alive at time of censoring. The time frame is defined as the time from day 0 of OVA treatment until death as a result of any cause. Patients will be censored at the time of last followup
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study start25 May 2012
- Primary completion6 Jul 2017
- Study completion1 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/RefractoryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C. Babis Andreadis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco, GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, C. Babis Andreadis, University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- Charalambos Andreadis, MD, MSCE, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01555541
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 112525
- Other IDs
- NCI-2012-00863
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Thiruvengadam SK, Hunter B, Varnavski A, Fakhri B, Kaplan L, Ai WZ, Pampaloni M, Huang CY, Martin T 3rd, Damon L, Andreadis CB. Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PubMed 33288485
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study of Intensive Consolidation and Stem Cell Mobilization Therapy With Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and High-dose Ara-C (OVA), Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-risk Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01555541
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 112525
- Keywords
- relapsed, refractory, DLBCL, lymphoma, B-cell, diffuse
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C. Babis AndreadisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco, GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- 25 May 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to show that incorporating ofatumumab instead of rituximab in combination with etoposide and cytarabine (OVA) is successful in collecting autologous stem cells for use in an autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and to examine its effectiveness in eliminating residual diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients.
Detailed description
Patients with relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) who are refractory to or relapse within 12 months of first-line rituximab-based therapy, have poor outcomes with conventional approaches to autologous stem cell transplantation as detailed above. The investigators hypothesize that the intensive mobilization strategy developed can overcome some of the obstacles to successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) by both eliminating residual disease following salvage therapy and by facilitating stem cell collection. Even though there is clinical experience in the cooperative group setting with intensive pre-ASCT mobilization, it has never been prospectively validated in DLBCL and concerns exist as to its ability to improve outcomes with ASCT in this high-risk, and heavily pretreated group of patients. Furthermore, most patients in the study site's registry treated with intensive mobilization were rituximab-naïve and the findings may not translate in the rituximab-refractory population. The investigators also believe that ofatumumab, a novel monoclonal antibody against a distinct cluster of differentiation antigen 20 (CD20) epitope may in fact overcome rituximab resistance in DLBCL patients and through more effective complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) may eliminate minimal residual disease in the patient and contaminating tumor cells in the stem cell graft.
General Design
This is a single-institution, single-arm, prospective phase II study. Patients with high-risk DLBCL (defined as either achieving less than complete remission (CR) to initial rituximab-containing therapy or relapsing within 12 months of initial therapy) will be enrolled on this study and will undergo staging prior to receiving intensive mobilization with ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose ara-C (OVA). Following successful stem cell collection, patients will proceed to standard autologous transplantation with cyclophosphamide, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), and etoposide (CBV) preparative regimen. Response evaluation will occur after salvage therapy, following intensive mobilization therapy (d42), at day +90 after ASCT, and at 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Event-free, progression-free, and overall survival will also be assessed until 48 months. The primary study endpoint is mobilization-adjusted complete metabolic response rate (maCR) following OVA. Subjects who are not chemosensitive to salvage therapy (i.e. do not achieve a partial response or complete response) will be re-evaluated after an additional salvage regimen. If they are still not chemosensitive at this point, they will be withdrawn from the study and replaced.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single-arm study | Experimental | Drug: Ofatumumab, Drug: Etoposide, Drug: Cytarabine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Diagnosis of refractory or relapsed biopsy-proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
- Age 18 years or older
- Refractory to or relapse following a rituximab/anthracycline first-line regimen
- High-risk disease as defined by one of the following:
- Receipt of no more than three prior chemotherapy regimens. Monoclonal antibody therapy alone and involved field radiotherapy are not included in this number. Prior use of ofatumumab is allowed if there has been no disease progression following that therapy (i.e. ofatumumab-based salvage regimens are allowed)
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Presence of disease transformation from a previously diagnosed low-grade lymphoma
- Progression following prior ofatumumab-based therapy
- Active central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Patients with a history of central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement must be in a documented remission by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluation and contrast MRI imaging for at least 3 months prior to study entry.
- Evidence of myelodysplasia on any bone marrow biopsy.
- Treatment with any known non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 5 terminal half-lives or 4 weeks prior to enrollment, whichever is longer, or currently participating in any other interventional clinical study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OfatumumabAlso: Arzerra, GSK1841157, HuMax-CD201000 mg IV days 0, 7, 14, 21 | Drug | Single-arm study |
| EtoposideAlso: Vespid®, VP-1610 mg/Kg IV over 24 hours daily, days 1-4 | Drug | Single-arm study |
| CytarabineAlso: Cytosar-U®, Ara-C, Cytosine arabinoside2000 mg/m2 IV twice daily, days 1-4 | Drug | Single-arm study |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients Achieving Complete Response (CR) to the Treatment Upon Successful Stem Cell Mobilization
Time frame: Day 42
CR will be calculated based on the PET/CT scan following 2 cycles of salvage therapy using the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for a lymphoma response. This includes: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, Post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET-, Spleen and/or liver, if enlarged before therapy based on physical exam or CT scan, should not be palpable on physical exam and should be considered normal size by imaging studies, and nodules related to lymphoma should disappear, If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. Biopsy sample must be adequate (with goal of > 20 mm unilateral core). If sample is indeterminate by morphology, it should be negative by immunohistochemistry. A sample that is negative by immunohistochemistry but demonstrates small population of clonal l
Number of Patients Achieving Mobilization-adjusted Complete Response (maCR)
Time frame: Day 42
Number of patients achieving maCR to the treatment upon successful stem cell mobilization, defined as at least 2 x10^6 cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)+cells/Kg of actual body weight. Patients who require use of plerixafor or an autologous bone marrow harvest are considered mobilization failures and will be treated as non-responders.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients Who Received OVA and Then Met Criteria to Proceed to ASCT and Achieved a CR/Partial Response (PR) Post-ASCT
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Number of Patients Who Advance From Partial Response (PR) to Complete (CR)
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Number of Participants With Successful Neutrophil Engraftments
Time frame: Up to 24 months after ASCT
Number of Participants With Successful Platelet Engraftments
Time frame: Up to 24 months after ASCT
Median Time to Progression
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Progression Free Survival Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Overall Survival Rate (OS)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 33288485Thiruvengadam SK, Hunter B, Varnavski A, Fakhri B, Kaplan L, Ai WZ, Pampaloni M, Huang CY, Martin T 3rd, Damon L, Andreadis CB. Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/Refractory
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Combination Targeted Therapy (ViPOR) for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax, Ibrutinib, Prednisone, Obinutuzumab, and Revlimid (ViPOR) in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of MK-1045 With Zilovertamab Vedotin in Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (MK-1045-010)
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charalambos Andreadis, MD, MSCE principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ofatumumab, Etoposide and Cytarabine in people with Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Relapsed/Refractory, run by C. Babis Andreadis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients Achieving Complete Response (CR) to the Treatment Upon Successful Stem Cell Mobilization (time frame: Day 42). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01555541, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2022.