AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular Thrombosis Mural Following Myocardial InfarctionNCT01556659

LV Thrombus After Acute AMI: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Absence of vitamin K antagonist in people with Ventricular Thrombosis Mural Following Myocardial Infarction, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Left Ventricular (LV) thrombus formation is witnessed in at least 10% of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is a feared complication since it might increase the risk of thrombo-embolic events, including stroke. Guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonist treatment in these patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Absence of vitamin K antagonist
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Mar 2012to Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Suspected Left Ventricular thrombus on echocardiography or routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Ongoing treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy according to ESC/ACC-AHA guidelines at the time of randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Younger than 18
  • Clinically or hemodynamically unstable
  • Treatment with vitamin K antagonist prior to PCI or other expected indication for vitamin K antagonist treatment (e.g. atrium fibrillation) within the next 6 months
  • Previous stroke or transient ischemic attack
  • Scheduled for major surgery (including Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) during the course of the study
  • Active bleeding or high risk for bleeding contraindicating treatment with vitamin K antagonists
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Contra-indication for vitamin K antagonist treatment
  • Chronic treatment with NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors for more than 4 days per week anticipated to continue during the study
  • Congenital cardiac disease
  • Presence of supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias
  • Expected candidate for ICD implantation with the next 6 months
  • Severe renal impairment (estimated CrCl calculated by Cockcroft-Gault equation 5 30mL/min)
  • Known or symptomatic brain disease (such as brain tumor)
  • Women who are pregnant.
  • Any contraindication for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (such as pacemaker, cerebrovascular clips, known contrast allergy, claustrophobia)
  • Follow-up impossible (for example no fixed abode)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Left Ventricular Thrombus Formation After Acute Myocardial Infarction - a Randomized Multi-center Trial Comparing Two Different Anti-thrombotic Regimens

Left Ventricular (LV) thrombus formation is witnessed in at least 10% of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is a feared complication since it might increase the risk of thrombo-embolic events, including stroke. Guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonist treatment in these patients. However patients with STEMI nowadays undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent placement and consequently require dual anti-platelet therapy (ascal and P2Y12 inhibitors) to prevent stent thrombosis. Consequently, STEMI patients with LV thrombus are currently treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, e.g. clopidogrel (75 mg/d) and vitamin K antagonist). Patients treated with triple antithrombotic therapy are subject to a strongly increased bleeding risk with a yearly incidence of 3.7% for dual anti-platelet therapy as compared to 12% for triple antithrombotic therapy. About 10% of these bleedings are cerebral. The mortality of such haemorrhagic strokes is 25%. A recent retrospective analysis did not show any beneficial effects of addition of vitamin K antagonist to dual anti-platelet therapy to prevent stroke. If vitamin K antagonist-therapy could be omitted, morbidity and mortality due to post-PCI bleedings will decrease. Therefore, a randomized trial is warranted to address this issue.

Design: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, two non-inferiority trial. The objective of the study is to determine in a randomized fashion the risks and benefits of the addition of vitamin K antagonists to dual anti-platelet therapy or dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with PCI-treated STEMI and LV thrombus formation on baseline echocardiography or baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Read the detailed description

Design: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine in a randomized fashion the risks as well as the benefits of the addition of vitamin K antagonists to dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with PCI-treated STEMI and LV thrombus formation

Patients: Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI and LV thrombus on baseline echocardiography or baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging. (MRI)

Methods: After written informed consent has been obtained, echocardiography and MRI are performed between 7-12 days after PCI. When LV thrombus is present on baseline MRI, patients are randomized to

  1. Triple antithrombotic therapy (aspirin (100 mg/d), thienopyridine class antiplatelet agent,) and vitamin K antagonist (goal INR is 2.0 to 3.0))
  2. Dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin (100mg/d) and thienopyridine class antiplatelet agent, e.g. clopidogrel (75 mg/d).

Primary Endpoint: Primary outcome is defined as the proportions of patients with new cerebral micro-infarcts at 6 months relative to baseline measured by MRI.

Secondary Endpoints: The secondary endpoints as assessed at 6 and 12 months are:

  • the composite of vascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism
  • presence of new cerebral mirco-bleeds
  • the occurrence of major and minor bleeding
  • neurological status and quality of life.
Being tested
Absence of vitamin K antagonist
Keywords
Left ventricular thrombus, Acute myocardial infarction, Anticoagulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Absence of vitamin K antagonistDrug

    Also called warfarin

    Dual anti-platelet therapy

Study groups in NCT01556659
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin K antagonist +No interventionTreatment with carbasalaatcalcium 100 mg/day, P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel 1x 75mg, ticagrelor 2x 90 mg or prasugrel 1x 10mg/day) and vitamin K antagonist (acenocoumarol)
vitamin K antagonist -Active comparatorTreatment with carbasalaatcalcium 100 mg/day, P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel 1x 75mg, ticagrelor 2x 90 mg or prasugrel 1x 10mg/day)
Receives: Drug: Absence of vitamin K antagonist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The proportions of patients with new cerebral micro-infarcts at 6 months relative to baseline measured by MRI.

    Primary outcome is defined as the proportions of patients with new cerebral micro-infarcts at 6 months relative to baseline measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

    Measured: 6 months relative to baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The presence of new cerebral micro-bleeds assessed by MRI

    Measured: At 6 months and 12 months relative to baseline

  2. Occurrence of major and minor bleeding

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months relative to baseline

  3. Neurological status

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months relative to baseline

  4. Quality of life using a validated checklist

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months relative to baseline

  5. Composite of vascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months relative to baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2018
  4. Study completionJun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01556659
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-004265-32
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
12 Mar 2012
Last updated
25 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Absence of vitamin K antagonist in people with Ventricular Thrombosis Mural Following Myocardial Infarction, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The proportions of patients with new cerebral micro-infarcts at 6 months relative to baseline measured by MRI. (time frame: 6 months relative to baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in