Critical Limb IschemiaPhase 4DEBATE-BTKNCT01558505
Drug Eluting Balloon in peripherAl inTErvention For Below The Knee Angioplasty Evaluation
A Phase 4 study testing PEB and POBA in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Leonardo Bolognese, MD at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Drug-eluting balloon showed positive results in terms of restenosis reduction in peripheral intervention (PTA). The aim of the study is to investigate in a randomized fashion the efficacy and safety of Paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) (In.Pact Amphirion, Invatec, Brescia, Italy) versus non drug-eluting balloon (NEB)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- PEB and POBA
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 142 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age>18 years
- angiographic stenosis>50% or occlusion of one below-knee vessel
Who cannot join
- allergy to Paclitaxel
- contraindication for combined antiplatelet treatment
- life expectancy <1 year
- hypersensitivity or contraindication to one of the study drugs
- lack of consent
- need for amputation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Drug Eluting Balloon in peripherAl inTErvention For Below The Knee Angioplasty Evaluation: the DEBATE-BTK Study
Drug-eluting balloon showed positive results in terms of restenosis reduction in peripheral intervention (PTA). The aim of the study is to investigate in a randomized fashion the efficacy and safety of Paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) (In.Pact Amphirion, Invatec, Brescia, Italy) versus non drug-eluting balloon (NEB) (Amphirion deep, Invatec, Brescia, Italy) in diabetic patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) undergoing PTA of below-the-knee (BTK) vessels.
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Being tested
- PEB, POBA
- Keywords
- critical limb ischemia, drug-eluting balloon, restenosis
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEBDevice
paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty
POBADevice
conventional balloon angioplasty
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| standard PTA | Active comparator | conventional balloon angioplasty Receives: Device: POBA |
| Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty | Experimental | paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty Receives: Device: PEB |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
angiographic binary restenosis
incidence of binary restenosis
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
major amputation
incidence of major amputation
Measured: 24 motnhs
target lesion revascularization
incidence of target lesion revascularization
Measured: 24 months
vessel reocclusion
incidence of vessel reocclusion
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leonardo Bolognese, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Leonardo Bolognese, MD, Ospedale San Donato
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01558505
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Arezzo005
- Acronym
- DEBATE-BTK
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ma GW, Bernatchez J, Yarranton B, Dueck AD, Rajan DK, Forbes TL, de Mestral C, Kayssi A. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 10;8:CD011319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011319.pub3.
PubMed 42573020Liistro F, Porto I, Angioli P, Grotti S, Ricci L, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Turini F, Bellandi G, Bolognese L. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK): a randomized trial in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001811.
PubMed 23797811
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Drug Eluting Balloon in peripherAl inTErvention For Below The Knee Angioplasty Evaluation: the DEBATE-BTK Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01558505
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEBATE-BTK / Arezzo005
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Keywords
- critical limb ischemia, drug-eluting balloon, restenosis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 142 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leonardo Bolognese, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Drug-eluting balloon showed positive results in terms of restenosis reduction in peripheral intervention (PTA). The aim of the study is to investigate in a randomized fashion the efficacy and safety of Paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) (In.Pact Amphirion, Invatec, Brescia, Italy) versus non drug-eluting balloon (NEB) (Amphirion deep, Invatec, Brescia, Italy) in diabetic patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) undergoing PTA of below-the-knee (BTK) vessels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| standard PTA | Active comparator | Device: POBAconventional balloon angioplasty |
| Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty | Experimental | Device: PEBpaclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age>18 years
- angiographic stenosis>50% or occlusion of one below-knee vessel
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- allergy to Paclitaxel
- contraindication for combined antiplatelet treatment
- life expectancy <1 year
- hypersensitivity or contraindication to one of the study drugs
- lack of consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEBpaclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty | Device | Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty |
| POBAconventional balloon angioplasty | Device | standard PTA |
Primary outcome
angiographic binary restenosis
Time frame: 12 months
incidence of binary restenosis
3 secondary outcomes
major amputation
Time frame: 24 motnhs
target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 24 months
vessel reocclusion
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42573020Ma GW, Bernatchez J, Yarranton B, Dueck AD, Rajan DK, Forbes TL, de Mestral C, Kayssi A. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 10;8:CD011319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011319.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23797811Liistro F, Porto I, Angioli P, Grotti S, Ricci L, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Turini F, Bellandi G, Bolognese L. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK): a randomized trial in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001811.
Related trials for Critical Limb Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
miRNAs in Critical Limb Ischemia (miRNACLI)
Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Recruiting
Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Vessel Recoil in Specific CLTI Populations
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing PEB and POBA in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Leonardo Bolognese, MD at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
angiographic binary restenosis (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01558505, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2013.