AzTrials
AzTrials

Crack Abuse or DependenceNCT01558726

Case Management for Crack Users Who Seek Treatment in CAPSad in Brazil

A study testing Case Management (Strength-Based) and Usual Treatment in people with Crack Abuse or Dependence, run by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Case Management (CM) intervention in crack users applied in Psychosocial Care Centers - Alcohol and Drugs (CAPSad) by trained social workers, in comparison to CAPSad conventional treatment on 30 and 90 days, considering the following outcomes: treatment… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Crack Abuse or Dependence
What is being tested?
Case Management (Strength-Based) and Usual Treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Oct 2011to Aug 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of crack abuse or dependence
  • > 18 years old
  • Initiating treatment (maximum of 1 month)

Who cannot join

  • Homeless without permanent contact
  • Psychotic symptoms during the intake interview

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Flavio Pechansky, PhD contact

55-51-3359-7480

fpechans@uol.com.br

Felix HP Kessler, PhD contact

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Center for Drug and Alcohol Research (CPAD) of Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

    Flavio Pechansky, PhD, 55-51-3359-7480, fpechans@uol.com.br

    Felix HP Kessler, PhD, 55-51-3359-7480, kessler.ez@terra.com.br

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Case Management for Crack Users Who Seek Treatment in CAPSad in Six Brazilian Capitals

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Case Management (CM) intervention in crack users applied in Psychosocial Care Centers - Alcohol and Drugs (CAPSad) by trained social workers, in comparison to CAPSad conventional treatment on 30 and 90 days, considering the following outcomes: treatment retention, abstinence and changes in severity scores of the sixth version of Addiction Severity Index (ASI6) scale. The study hypothesis are: 1) The CM is going to improve the retention of crack users (cases) during the 3-month follow-up compared with usual care (controls); 2)Individuals who received the intervention with GC are going to present a higher rate of abstinence; 3)The summary scores of the ASI6 will be significantly lower in cases than in controls, at the end of 3 months follow-up.

Being tested
Case Management (Strength-Based), Usual Treatment
Keywords
Case Management, Crack abuse/dependents, Evaluation, Inpatient, ASI, Treatment retention, Abstinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Case Management (Strength-Based)Behavioural

    To improve the cases sharing between CAPSad and other health institutions and individuals and increase the strengths of the patient to cope with problems related to the crack use.

  • Usual TreatmentBehavioural

    The usual treatment used for regular patients of CAPSad

Study groups in NCT01558726
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Case managementExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Case Management (Strength-Based)
Usual treatmentActive comparatorUsual treatment of the CAPSad
Receives: Behavioral: Usual Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Treatment retention

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Crack abstinence

    Measured: 3 months

  2. ASI subareas scores

    ASI (Addiction Severity Index)

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2012 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01558726
Sponsor's protocol ID
10-0176
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
17 Mar 2012
Last updated
20 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Case Management (Strength-Based) and Usual Treatment in people with Crack Abuse or Dependence, run by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Flavio Pechansky, PhD (55-51-3359-7480, fpechans@uol.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Treatment retention (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in