Breast CancerPhase 2VELVETNCT01565083
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab Given in Combination With Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in Participants With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER) 2-Positive Breast Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 80 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This two-cohort, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study will assess the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and vinorelbine in first line participants with metastatic or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 213 participants
- Where
- 80 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2012to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed and documented adenocarcinoma of the breast with metastatic or locally advanced disease not amenable to curative resection
- HER2-positive as assessed by local laboratory on primary or metastatic tumor
- At least one measurable lesion and/or non-measurable disease evaluable according to RECIST v1.1 criteria
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 55%
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
Who cannot join
- Previous systemic non-hormonal anti-cancer therapy in the metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer setting
- Previous approved or investigative anti-HER2 agents in any breast cancer treatment setting, except trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
- Disease progression while receiving trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
- Disease-free interval from completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic non-hormonal treatment to recurrent disease of less than 6 months
- History of persistent Grade 2 or higher (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI-CTC], Version 4.0) hematological toxicity resulting from previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy
- Radiographic evidence of central nervous system metastases that are not well controlled with local therapy (irradiation or surgery)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Current peripheral neuropathy of NCI-CTC, version 4.0 Grade 3 or greater
- History of other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, Stage 1 uterine cancer, or cancers with a similar curative outcome as those mentioned above
- Serious uncontrolled concomitant disease that would contraindicate the use of any of the investigational drugs used in this study or would put the participants at high risk for treatment-related complications
- Inadequate hematologic, liver, or renal function
- Uncontrolled hypertension or clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Current chronic daily treatment with corticosteroids (>/= 10 mg/day methylprednisolone or equivalent), excluding inhaled steroids
Trial locations and contacts
80 sites in 7 countries.
80 sites in 7 countries
Germany20 sites
Study site
Cologne, 50677
Study site
Dortmund, 44263
Study site
Dresden, 01307
Study site
Frankfurt am Main, 60389
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79110
Study site
Georgsmarienhütte, 49124
Study site
Goslar, 38642
Study site
Gütersloh, 33332
Study site
Hamburg, 20357
Study site
Heidelberg, 69115
Study site
Kaiserslautern, 67655
Study site
Kassel, 34119
Study site
Lebach, 66822
Study site
Leer, 26789
Study site
Moers, 47441
Study site
München, 80335
Study site
München, 80639
Study site
Neumarkt, 92318
Study site
Ravensburg, 88212
Study site
Würselen, 52146
United States17 sites
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Study site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Study site
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22408
Study site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77090
Study site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Study site
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960
Study site
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Study site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Study site
Stanford, California, 94305-5151
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
France14 sites
Study site
Avignon, 84082
Study site
Bobigny, 93009
Study site
Caen, 14076
Study site
La Tronche, 38700
Study site
Mont-de-Marsan, 40024
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Paris, 75908
Study site
Périgueux, 24000
Study site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Study site
Plérin, 22190
Study site
Rouen, 76038
Study site
Strasbourg, 67065
Study site
Tours, 37044
Study site
Villejuif, 94805
Italy10 sites
Study site
Aviano, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33081
Study site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Study site
Cremona, Lombardy, 26100
Study site
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
Study site
Lido di Camaiore, Tuscany, 55043
Study site
Monza, Lombardy, 20900
Study site
Negrar, Veneto, 37024
Study site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56100
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00189
Study site
Terni, Umbria, 05100
Spain10 sites
Study site
Badajoz, Badajoz, 06080
Study site
Barbastro, Huesca, 22300
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28223
Study site
Málaga, Malaga, 29010
Study site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006
Study site
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
Study site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, 38320
Study site
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Study site
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08227
Study site
Valencia, Valencia, 46014
Brazil5 sites
Study site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Study site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20560-120
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01308-050
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01317-000
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04039-901
Denmark4 sites
Study site
Herlev, 2730
Study site
Herning, 7400
Study site
København Ø, 2100
Study site
Odense, 5000
About this study
Official title: A Two-cohort, Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab Given in Combination With Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in First Line Patients With HER2-positive Advanced (Metastatic or Locally Advanced) Breast Cancer
This two-cohort, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study will assess the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and vinorelbine in first line participants with metastatic or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Participants will receive pertuzumab and trastuzumab administered sequentially as separate intravenous (IV) infusions (followed by vinorelbine) and conventional sequential administration of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in separate infusion bags, followed by vinorelbine.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Vinorelbine
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PertuzumabDrug
Also called Perjeta
Loading dose of 840 mg on Day 1 of first 21-day cycle, followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle.
TrastuzumabDrug
Also called Herceptin
Loading dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of first 21-day cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 or 2 of each subsequent cycle.
VinorelbineDrug
A dose of 25 mg/m^2 followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Days 2 and 9 of the first 21-day cycle and on Days 1 and 8 (or Days 2 and 9) of each subsequent cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Separate Infusion | Experimental | Pertuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of the first treatment cycle (1 cycle = 21 days) as a loading dose of 840 milligrams (mg), followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Trastuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 2 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 8 mg per kilogram (mg/kg), followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 2 of each subsequent cycle. Vinorelbine IV infusion (will be administered after trastuzumab) on Day 2 and Day 9 of the first treatment cycle at a dose of 25 mg per meter-squared (mg/m^2) followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Day 2 and Day 9 of each subsequent cycle. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab will be administered sequentially in separate infusion bags, followed by vinorelbine until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or predefined study end (up to 47 cycles). Receives: Drug: Pertuzumab; Drug: Trastuzumab; Drug: Vinorelbine |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Single Infusion | Experimental | Pertuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 840 mg, followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Trastuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 2 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Vinorelbine IV infusion on Day 2 and Day 9 of the first treatment cycle at a dose of 25 mg/m^2 followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each subsequent cycle. If administration of all 3 drugs is well tolerated in Cycle 1, then on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle, pertuzumab 420 mg and trastuzumab 6 mg/kg will be administered in a single infusion bag, followed by vinorelbine until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or predefined study end (up to 47 cycles). Receives: Drug: Pertuzumab; Drug: Trastuzumab; Drug: Vinorelbine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Tumor response was assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1. BOR was defined as percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total or pathological nodes (with short axis [SA] of at least (>/=) 15 millimeter [mm]) were identified as target lesions (TLs) and measured and recorded at baseline. A sum of diameters (longest for non-nodal lesions, SA for nodal lesions) for all TLs was calculated and reported as baseline sum of diameters (SD). All other lesions (or sites of disease) were identified as non-TLs. CR: disappearance of all TLs and SA reduction to less than (<) 10 mm for nodal TLs/ non-TLs. PR: >/=30 percent (%) decrease in SD of TLs, taking as reference baseline SD. Confirmation of response at 2 consecutive tumor assessments >/=4 weeks apart was required. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using Clopper-Pearson approach.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Time to Response as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
For participants with a BOR of CR or PR, time to response = (Date of first confirmed CR/PR - Date of first study treatment) + 1. For participants without a CR or PR, time to response = (Date of adequate last tumor assessment - Date of first study treatment) + 1. For participant with no tumor assessment (or if all assessments were progressive disease [PD]) the censoring day was set to date of first study treatment +1. CR: the disappearance of all TLs and SA reduction to <10 mm for nodal TLs/ non-TLs. PR: >/=30% decrease in SD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SD. Confirmation of response at 2 consecutive tumor assessments >/=4 weeks apart was required. PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The 95% CI was computed using log-log transformation.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
DOR, in participants with a BOR of CR or PR, was defined as the period from the date of initial PR or CR until the date of PD or death from any cause. Participants with no documented PD or death after CR or PR were censored at the last date at which they were known to have had the CR or PR, respectively (regardless of the response at intermediate assessments). CR: the disappearance of all TLs and SA reduction to <10 mm for nodal TLs/ non-TLs. PR: >/=30% decrease in SD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SD. Confirmation of response at 2 consecutive tumor assessments >/=4 weeks apart was required. PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The 95% CI was computed using log-log transformation.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause
PD was defined as >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Percentage of participants with radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause was reported.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
PFS was defined as the time from first intake of any study medication until the first radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants with no PFS events were censored at the time of the last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants with no baseline or no tumor assessment after the baseline visit were censored on the date of first study treatment. PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who had radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or died due to any cause were considered as having an event. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using log-log transformation.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
PD was defined as >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Percentage of participants with radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
TTP was defined as the time from first intake of any study medication until the first radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Participants who did not have a radio-graphically documented PD and had died due to reason other than PD were censored on the last available tumor assessment prior to the death date. Participants with no baseline or no tumor assessment after the baseline visit were censored on the date of first study treatment. PD was defined as >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SD recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Participants who had radio-graphically documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 were considered as having an event. The median TTP was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using log-log transformation.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause was reported.
Measured: Baseline until death (up to approximately 3.5 years)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from first intake of any study medication to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. Participants who were known to be alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up assessment. Participants without follow-up assessment were censored at the day of last study treatment, and participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of first study treatment plus 1 day. Participants who died due to any cause were considered as having an event. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using log-log transformation.
Measured: Baseline until death (up to approximately 3.5 years)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
EQ-5D VAS: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life (QoL) in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, thereafter every 3 cycles from Cycle 3 to Cycle 45 (each cycle = 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Questionnaire Score
FACT-B questionnaire is used for assessment of health-related QoL in participants with breast cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical (7 items), functional (7 items), social/family (7 items); all 3 ranged from 0 to 28, emotional (6 items) ranging from 0 to 24, and breast cancer subscale (9 items) ranging from 0 to 36; high subscale score represents a better QoL. All single-item measures ranges from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.
Measured: Baseline, thereafter every 3 cycles from Cycle 3 to Cycle 45 (each cycle = 21 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2012
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01565083
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MO27782
- Other IDs
- 2011-003308-18
- Acronym
- VELVET
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Perez EA, Lopez-Vega JM, Petit T, Zamagni C, Easton V, Kamber J, Restuccia E, Andersson M. Safety and efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: VELVET Cohort 1 final results. Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0773-6.
PubMed 27955684
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Two-cohort, Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab Given in Combination With Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in First Line Patients With HER2-positive Advanced (Metastatic or Locally Advanced) Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01565083
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VELVET / MO27782
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Nov 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This two-cohort, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study will assess the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and vinorelbine in first line participants with metastatic or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Participants will receive pertuzumab and trastuzumab administered sequentially as separate intravenous (IV) infusions (followed by vinorelbine) and conventional sequential administration of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in separate infusion bags, followed by vinorelbine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Separate Infusion | Experimental | Drug: Pertuzumab, Drug: Trastuzumab, Drug: VinorelbinePertuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of the first treatment cycle (1 cycle = 21 days) as a loading dose of 840 milligrams (mg), followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Trastuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 2 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 8 mg per kilogram (mg/kg), followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 2 of each subsequent cycle. Vinorelbine IV infusion (will be administered after trastuzumab) on Day 2 and Day 9 of the first treatment cycle at a dose of 25 mg per meter-squared (mg/m^2) followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Day 2 and Day 9 of each subsequent cycle. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab will be administered sequentially in separate infusion bags, followed by vinorelbine until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or predefined study end (up to 47 cycles). |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Single Infusion | Experimental | Drug: Pertuzumab, Drug: Trastuzumab, Drug: VinorelbinePertuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 840 mg, followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Trastuzumab will be administered as IV infusion on Day 2 of the first treatment cycle as a loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Vinorelbine IV infusion on Day 2 and Day 9 of the first treatment cycle at a dose of 25 mg/m^2 followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each subsequent cycle. If administration of all 3 drugs is well tolerated in Cycle 1, then on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle, pertuzumab 420 mg and trastuzumab 6 mg/kg will be administered in a single infusion bag, followed by vinorelbine until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or predefined study end (up to 47 cycles). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed and documented adenocarcinoma of the breast with metastatic or locally advanced disease not amenable to curative resection
- HER2-positive as assessed by local laboratory on primary or metastatic tumor
- At least one measurable lesion and/or non-measurable disease evaluable according to RECIST v1.1 criteria
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 55%
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Previous systemic non-hormonal anti-cancer therapy in the metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer setting
- Previous approved or investigative anti-HER2 agents in any breast cancer treatment setting, except trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
- Disease progression while receiving trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
- Disease-free interval from completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic non-hormonal treatment to recurrent disease of less than 6 months
- History of persistent Grade 2 or higher (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI-CTC], Version 4.0) hematological toxicity resulting from previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PertuzumabAlso: PerjetaLoading dose of 840 mg on Day 1 of first 21-day cycle, followed by 420 mg on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. | Drug | Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Separate Infusion, Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Single Infusion |
| TrastuzumabAlso: HerceptinLoading dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of first 21-day cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg on Day 1 or 2 of each subsequent cycle. | Drug | Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Separate Infusion, Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Single Infusion |
| VinorelbineA dose of 25 mg/m^2 followed by 30-35 mg/m^2 on Days 2 and 9 of the first 21-day cycle and on Days 1 and 8 (or Days 2 and 9) of each subsequent cycle. | Drug | Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Separate Infusion, Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine: Single Infusion |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Tumor response was assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1. BOR was defined as percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total or pathological nodes (with short axis [SA] of at least (>/=) 15 millimeter [mm]) were identified as target lesions (TLs) and measured and recorded at baseline. A sum of diameters (longest for non-nodal lesions, SA for nodal lesions) for all TLs was calculated and reported as baseline sum of diameters (SD). All other lesions (or sites of disease) were identified as non-TLs. CR: disappearance of all TLs and SA reduction to less than (<) 10 mm for nodal TLs/ non-TLs. PR: >/=30 percent (%) decrease in SD of TLs, taking as reference baseline SD. Confirmation of response at 2 consecutive tumor assessments >/=4 weeks apart was required. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using Clopper-Pearson approach.
10 secondary outcomes
Time to Response as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by Investigator According to RECIST v 1.1
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause
Time frame: Baseline until death (up to approximately 3.5 years)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Baseline until death (up to approximately 3.5 years)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time frame: Baseline, thereafter every 3 cycles from Cycle 3 to Cycle 45 (each cycle = 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Questionnaire Score
Time frame: Baseline, thereafter every 3 cycles from Cycle 3 to Cycle 45 (each cycle = 21 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27955684Perez EA, Lopez-Vega JM, Petit T, Zamagni C, Easton V, Kamber J, Restuccia E, Andersson M. Safety and efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: VELVET Cohort 1 final results. Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0773-6.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
80 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 80 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 80 sites in Germany, United States, France, Italy, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Nov 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (time frame: Baseline, every 3 cycles up to 36 months, and every 6 cycles thereafter if progression free after 36 months, 28 days after end of treatment, every 3 months thereafter (maximum up to approximately 3.5 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01565083, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2016.