AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaGOCNCT01565642

Goals of Care: A Nursing Home Trial of Decision Support for Advanced Dementia

A study testing Goals of care decision support in people with Dementia, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster randomized controlled trial is to examine whether decision support for goals of care can improve quality of communication and decision-making and improve the quality of palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dementia
What is being tested?
Goals of care decision support
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
302 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2012to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Surrogate for nursing home resident with advanced dementia, paired with resident with advanced dementia

Who cannot join

  • Non-related legal surrogate without personal knowledge of resident

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

Other trials in United States

About this study

This cluster randomized controlled trial is to examine whether decision support for goals of care can improve quality of communication and decision-making and improve the quality of palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Conditions
Dementia
Being tested
Goals of care decision support
Keywords
Dementia, decision making
Medical subject headings
Dementia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Goals of care decision supportBehavioural

    Decision aid and care plan meeting

Study groups in NCT01565642
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Decision support interventionExperimentalDecision aid and care plan meeting
Receives: Behavioral: Goals of care decision support
ControlNo interventionAttention control information on dementia care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Communication and Decision-making

    The Quality of Communication (QOC) score with its End of Life (EOL) subscale score. Scores range 0-10 on QOC and its subscales, with higher scores indicating better communication quality.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of Palliative Care Domains in Care Plan

    Index score ranging from 0-10 with one point given for care plan addressing each domain: prognosis, goals of care, physical symptoms, emotional needs, spiritual needs, resuscitation, artificial feeding, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, hospitalization. Higher scores indicate better palliative care.

    Measured: 9 months

  2. Satisfaction With Care

    Satisfaction with Care at the End of Life in Dementia (SWC-EOLD) scale; 10 items rated 1-4 and summed with total potential range 10-40. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.

    Measured: 9 months

  3. Comfort in Dying

    Comfort Assessment in Dying for Dementia (CAD-EOLD) includes 14 items rated on a 3 point scale, summed for a total potential score of 14-42. Higher scores indicate better comfort.

    Measured: 9 months

  4. Alzheimer Disease Related Quality of Life

    The Alzheimer Disease Related Quality of Life scale (ADRQL) ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: 9 months

  5. Quality of Dying

    Quality of Dying in Long-term Care (QOD-LTC) instrument has 11 items in 3 subscales measuring personhood, closure and preparation for dying, for total scores ranging 5-55. Higher scores indicate better quality of the dying experience.

    Measured: 9 months

  6. Frequency of Communication

    Number of participants who report discussions of goals of care with providers -- physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nursing home staff -- counted during follow-up

    Measured: 9 months

  7. Hospice Referral

    Number of participants with a referral to hospice services

    Measured: 9 months

  8. Hospitalizations

    Number and timing of transfer to hospital from nursing home care, measured as hospital transfers per 90 person-days of follow-up, with follow-up censored at death.

    Measured: 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
302 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01565642
Sponsor's protocol ID
10-0699
Other IDs
R01AG037483
Acronym
GOC
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
26 Mar 2012
Last updated
10 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Ernecoff NC, Zimmerman S, Mitchell SL, Song MK, Lin FC, Wessell KL, Hanson LC. Concordance between Goals of Care and Treatment Decisions for Persons with Dementia. J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1442-1447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0103. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

    PubMed 29957095
  • Hanson LC, Zimmerman S, Song MK, Lin FC, Rosemond C, Carey TS, Mitchell SL. Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.

    PubMed 27893884
  • Hanson LC, Song MK, Zimmerman S, Gilliam R, Rosemond C, Chisholm L, Lin FC. Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):599-604. doi: 10.1177/1740774516650863. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PubMed 27271683

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Goals of care decision support in people with Dementia, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Communication and Decision-making (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01565642, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in