AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic Detrusor OveractivityPhase 3NCT01565694

A Study to Assess the Long Term Effect, Safety and Metabolism of a Solifenacin Liquid Suspension in Participants 5 to 18 Years of Age With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity

A Phase 3 study testing Solifenacin succinate in people with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity, run by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. at 21 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate a medicine for the treatment of symptoms and complications of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children and adolescents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
What is being tested?
Solifenacin succinate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
21 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
14 Aug 2012to 28 Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Documented diagnosis of NDO, confirmed by urodynamics
  • Practicing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC)
  • Currently on treatment with an antimuscarinic drug

Who cannot join

  • Known genitourinary condition (other than NDO) that may cause incontinence
  • Bladder augmentation surgery
  • Current Faecal impaction
  • Electro-stimulation therapy within 2 weeks prior to screening and at any time during the study
  • Subjects with the following gastro-intestinal problems: partial or complete obstruction, decreased motility like paralytic ileus, subjects at risk of gastric retention
  • Reflux grade 3 or 4
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Current urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Subject has severe renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min)
  • Subject has severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score > 9).
  • Subject has received intra-vesical botulinum toxin within 9 months prior to screening

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 10 countries.

21 sites in 10 countries

Brazil5 sites
  • Site BR5507

    Campinas, 13060-803

  • Site BR5504

    Campinas, 13083-887

  • Site BR5506

    Curitiba, 80240-060

  • Site BR5503

    Porto Alegre, 90035-903

  • Site BR5505

    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000

Other trials in Brazil

Poland3 sites
  • Site PL4803

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Site PL4805

    Gdansk, 80803

  • Site PL4801

    Warsaw, 04-730

Other trials in Poland

United States2 sites
  • Site US1010

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039

  • Site US1008

    Tarrytown, New York, 10591

Other trials in United States

Mexico2 sites
  • Site MX5203

    León, 37000

  • Site MX5205

    Mexico City, C.P. 06700

Other trials in Mexico

Philippines2 sites
  • Site PH6301

    Manila, 1015

  • Site PH6302

    Quezon City, 1101

Other trials in Philippines

South Korea2 sites
  • Site KR8207

    Seoul, 110744

  • Site KR8201

    Seoul, 120752

Other trials in South Korea

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Site TR9003

    Ankara, 6100

  • Site TR9002

    Izmir, 35100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Belgium1 site
  • Site BE3201

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark1 site
  • Site DK4501

    Aarhus, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

Hungary1 site
  • Site HU3602

    Miskolc, 3526

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Baseline-controlled, Multicenter, Sequential Dose Titration Study to Assess the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety, and the Pharmacokinetics of Solifenacin Succinate Suspension in Patients From 5 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO)

The purpose of this study was to investigate a medicine for the treatment of symptoms and complications of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children and adolescents.

Read the detailed description

The NDO often occurs in patients with spina bifida or other spinal cord damage where the bladder muscle contracts more than normal during filling. These patients often have an inability to void, so that catheterization is required to empty the bladder.

The medicine being tested in this study is called solifenacin succinate. Solifenacin tablets are given to adults for the treatment of overactive bladder. A new liquid suspension has been developed to treat children and adolescents in this and other studies.

The efficacy and safety of the solifenacin suspension was investigated. The take-up and length of time that the solifenacin suspension stays in the body was also investigated during this study. Effectiveness was measured by urodynamics (the filling and emptying of the bladder) and the urine volumes during catheterization together with the diary responses relating to the number of incontinence episodes or incontinence free days.

Safety assessments included analysis of the blood and urine, review of the electrocardiogram (ECG), ultrasound of the kidney, simple memory and understanding tests (cognitive function) and the ability to see near and far objects (visual accommodation).

Being tested
Solifenacin succinate
Keywords
Cognitive Function, Phase 3, Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity, Pharmacokinetics, Ocular Accommodation, Urodynamics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Solifenacin succinateDrug

    Also called YM905

    Oral suspension administered once a day via syringe.

Study groups in NCT01565694
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Solifenacin succinateExperimentalParticipants aged 5 years to < 18 years received solifenacin orally once a day, with sequential titrated doses for 12 weeks to identify the optimal dose during the dose-titration period. The initial dose was pediatric equivalent dose (PED) 5 mg. After completing the dose titration period participants entered the fixed-dose period during which solifenacin was taken orally once a day for 40 weeks or until the end of study visit (Week 52).
Receives: Drug: Solifenacin succinate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC)

    During urodynamic assessments, the bladder was filled until voiding/leakage begins, or until it was stopped because either the participant experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached. MCC is the maximum bladder capacity reached during filling cystometry before either leakage or pain/discomfort was observed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Change From Baseline to Last Possible Titration Step in Maximum Cystometric Capacity

    During urodynamic assessments, the bladder was filled until voiding/leakage begins, or until it was stopped because either the participant experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached. MCC is the maximum bladder capacity reached during filling cystometry before either leakage or pain/discomfort was observed. Based on study requirements, the last possible titration step was Week 9 for participants enrolled under versions 1.0 and 1.1 and Week 12 under later versions.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 9 or Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance

    Bladder compliance gives an indication of the elasticity of the bladder wall and was calculated by dividing the change in volume by the change in detrusor pressure during the filling of the bladder.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume (mL) Until First Detrusor Contraction > 15 cmH2O as a Percentage of Expected Bladder Capacity (EBC)

    Change from baseline in the bladder volume was calculated using urodyanamic assessments. During urodynamic assessments, the bladder is filled until voiding/leakage begins, or until it is stopped because either the subject experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached. If no detrusor contraction of at least 15 cmH2O occurs, the bladder volume was imputed with MCC.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at 30 cmH2O Detrusor Pressure

    Bladder volumes at 30 cm H2O detrusor pressure was calculated using the urodynamic assessments. During urodynamic assessments, the bladder is filled until voiding/leakage begins, or until it is stopped because either the participants experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at 40 cmH2O Detrusor Pressure

    Bladder volumes at 40 cm H2O detrusor pressure were calculated using urodynamic assessments. During urodynamic assessments, the bladder is filled until voiding/leakage begins, or until it is stopped because either the subject experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Number of Overactive Detrusor Contractions (> 15 cmH2O) Until End of Bladder Filling

    Change from baseline in number of overactive detrusor contractions until end of bladder filling was measured by urodynamic testing. If leakage occurred, the "Detrusor pressure at leakage" was recorded otherwise the volume of fluid instilled into the bladder was recorded.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at the End of Bladder Filling

    The bladder was filled until voiding/leakage began or until it was stopped because either the participant experiences pain or discomfort or 135% of expected bladder capacity for age has been reached. Pressure was recorded for an extra 5 minutes after leakage began or the end of bladder-filling, whichever is sooner.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Average Catheterized Volume Per Catheterization

    The average catheterized volume per catheterization was calculated using all available (non-zero) catheterized volumes recorded over both of the 2 measuring days in the diary, whether or not these 2 days are concurrent.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Maximum Catheterized Volume

    The maximum catheterized volume per day was calculated using all available (non-zero) catheterized volumes recorded for the 2 measuring days in the diary, whether or not these 2 days were concurrent. The maximum value was calculated separately for each measuring day and the mean of these two values was used.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Average First Morning Catheterized Volume

    The average first morning catheterized volume was calculated as the average of the available first morning catheterized volumes recorded for the 2 measuring days in the diary, whether or not these 2 days are concurrent.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The mean of the number of incontinence episodes per 24h was calculated as the mean over the valid diary days in the 7-day diary.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Number of Dry (Incontinence-Free) Days Per 7 Days

    The number of incontinence-free days was calculated from the 7-day micturition diary.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Number of Dry (Incontinence-Free) Nights Per 7 Days

    The number of incontinence-free nights was calculated from the 7-day micturition diary.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  14. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life [QoL] (PinQ Questionnaire Score)

    Pediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ) is a 20-item questionnaire addressing quality of life for participants with bladder disorders. Each question was answered on a scale from 0 (no, never) to 4 (all the time). The total score ranged from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicated more impact on the quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  15. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event observed after starting administration of the first dose of study medication on Day 1. All adverse events collected within 7 days after taking the last dose of study drug were counted as a TEAE.

    Measured: Baseline to End of Study Visit (Week 52)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start14 Aug 2012
  3. Primary completion28 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01565694
Sponsor's protocol ID
905-CL-047
Other IDs
2011-000330-11
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
27 Mar 2012
Last updated
14 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Tannenbaum S, den Adel M, Krauwinkel W, Meijer J, Hollestein-Havelaar A, Verheggen F, Newgreen D. Pharmacokinetics of solifenacin in pediatric populations with overactive bladder or neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00684. doi: 10.1002/prp2.684.

    PubMed 33231929
  • Franco I, Hoebeke P, Baka-Ostrowska M, Bolong D, Davies LN, Dahler E, Snijder R, Stroosma O, Verheggen F, Newgreen D, Bosman B, Vande Walle J. Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: results from two phase 3 prospective open-label studies. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):180.e1-180.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.12.012. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

    PubMed 32007426

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Solifenacin succinate in people with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity, run by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. at 21 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in Brazil, Poland, United States, Mexico, Philippines and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01565694, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in