Surgical Site InfectionNCT01566422
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vancomycin Powder in High Risk Spine Surgery Patients
A study testing Vancomycin powder in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Despite the use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics and improved surgical technique, surgical site infections remain a serious concern. The incidence of deep infection after spine surgery has been lowered with systemic antibiotics, yet after instrumented fusion for traumatic injuries infection rates remain as high as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- Vancomycin powder
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years undergoing posterior spine fusions at Vanderbilt University Medical Center for the treatment of traumatic injuries will be considered for inclusion
Who cannot join
- have a known allergy to vancomycin
- do not agree to participate
- had previous spine surgery at the injury level within 6 months
- are pregnant
- have a history of Steven's Johnson Syndrome
- have a history of infections at the surgical site
Show all 9Show fewer
- have a history of cancer or radiation treatment at the injured level
- have open spine fractures
- have traumatic injuries to non-spine organ systems that limit their functional capacity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
About this study
Despite the use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics and improved surgical technique, surgical site infections remain a serious concern. The incidence of deep infection after spine surgery has been lowered with systemic antibiotics, yet after instrumented fusion for traumatic injuries infection rates remain as high as 10%. The impact on patients and cost of treating such infections is profound. With diminishing healthcare dollars and policy that refuses to reimburse for postoperative infections, it is critical that physicians and hospital systems seek out cost effective ways of decreasing postoperative infections. Local delivery of antibiotics into the surgical site have been found to significantly decrease infection rates in those undergoing posterior spine fusion for traumatic injuries as studied in a retrospective manner by the investigators of this grant. In this proposal the investigators will prospectively randomize patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization for traumatic injuries into either receiving vancomycin powder into the surgical site (treatment) versus not receiving vancomycin powder (control) and subsequently follow infection rate, complications, and cost of care. The investigator's hypothesis is that i) vancomycin powder will decrease infection rates ii) have no systemic toxicity iii) and be a cost saving advancement in the safety of delivering spine surgical care.
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Being tested
- Vancomycin powder
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vancomycin powderDrug
patients randomized to this group will receive vancomycin powder in the surgical incision after posterior spinal fusion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin powder | Experimental | 80 randomized patients will be given vancomycin powder in the surgical sites prior to closure following spinal surgery. Receives: Drug: Vancomycin powder |
| Control | No intervention | 80 participants who were not randomized to receive Vancomycin powder will receive no intervention at the conclusion of their surgery. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine efficacy of using local vancomycin powder
Patient demographics and perioperative information obtained will include: comorbidities known to increase the risk of infection, body mass index, level of injury, presence of neurologic deficit, prealbumin level, evidence of an open fracture elsewhere, injury severity score, operative time, estimated blood loss, and blood creatinine levels. All wounds will be assessed 4-6 weeks after surgery to address early surgical site infection (SSI).
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Why it stopped: unable to enroll any participants
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01566422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Vanc-1510
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bibbo C, Patel DV. The effect of demineralized bone matrix-calcium sulfate with vancomycin on calcaneal fracture healing and infection rates: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jul;27(7):487-93. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700702.
PubMed 16842714Branstetter JG, Jackson SR, Haggard WO, Richelsoph KC, Wenke JC. Locally-administered antibiotics in wounds in a limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):1106-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22216.
PubMed 19651846Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. [Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins]. Chirurg. 1970 Nov;41(11):511-5. No abstract available. German.
PubMed 5487941Burdon DW. Principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis. World J Surg. 1982 May;6(3):262-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01653540. No abstract available.
PubMed 7113232Calderone RR, Garland DE, Capen DA, Oster H. Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996 Jan;27(1):171-82.
PubMed 8539047Cavanaugh DL, Berry J, Yarboro SR, Dahners LE. Better prophylaxis against surgical site infection with local as well as systemic antibiotics. An in vivo study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1907-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01237.
PubMed 19651948Dahners LE, Funderburk CH. Gentamicin-loaded plaster of Paris as a treatment of experimental osteomyelitis in rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jun;(219):278-82.
PubMed 3581579Edin ML, Miclau T, Lester GE, Lindsey RW, Dahners LE. Effect of cefazolin and vancomycin on osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Dec;(333):245-51.
PubMed 8981903Gitelis S, Brebach GT. The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a biodegradable antibiotic-impregnated implant. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2002 Jun;10(1):53-60. doi: 10.1177/230949900201000110.
PubMed 12401922Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson JR. Salvage of instrumental lumbar fusions complicated by surgical wound infection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Sep 15;21(18):2163-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609150-00021.
PubMed 8893444Gold HS, Moellering RC Jr. Antimicrobial-drug resistance. N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 7;335(19):1445-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611073351907. No abstract available.
PubMed 8875923O'Neill KR, Smith JG, Abtahi AM, Archer KR, Spengler DM, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder. Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.025. Epub 2011 May 19.
PubMed 21600853
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vancomycin Powder in High Risk Spine Surgery Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01566422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Vanc-1510
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: unable to enroll any participants
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite the use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics and improved surgical technique, surgical site infections remain a serious concern. The incidence of deep infection after spine surgery has been lowered with systemic antibiotics, yet after instrumented fusion for traumatic injuries infection rates remain as high as 10%. The impact on patients and cost of treating such infections is profound. With diminishing healthcare dollars and policy that refuses to reimburse for postoperative infections, it is critical that physicians and hospital systems seek out cost effective ways of decreasing postoperative infections. Local delivery of antibiotics into the surgical site have been found to significantly decrease infection rates in those undergoing posterior spine fusion for traumatic injuries as studied in a retrospective manner by the investigators of this grant. In this proposal the investigators will prospectively randomize patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization for traumatic injuries into either receiving vancomycin powder into the surgical site (treatment) versus not receiving vancomycin powder (control) and subsequently follow infection rate, complications, and cost of care. The investigator's hypothesis is that i) vancomycin powder will decrease infection rates ii) have no systemic toxicity iii) and be a cost saving advancement in the safety of delivering spine surgical care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin powder | Experimental | Drug: Vancomycin powder80 randomized patients will be given vancomycin powder in the surgical sites prior to closure following spinal surgery. |
| Control | No intervention | –80 participants who were not randomized to receive Vancomycin powder will receive no intervention at the conclusion of their surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years undergoing posterior spine fusions at Vanderbilt University Medical Center for the treatment of traumatic injuries will be considered for inclusion
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- have a known allergy to vancomycin
- do not agree to participate
- had previous spine surgery at the injury level within 6 months
- are pregnant
- have a history of Steven's Johnson Syndrome
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin powderpatients randomized to this group will receive vancomycin powder in the surgical incision after posterior spinal fusion. | Drug | Vancomycin powder |
Primary outcome
Determine efficacy of using local vancomycin powder
Time frame: 2 years
Patient demographics and perioperative information obtained will include: comorbidities known to increase the risk of infection, body mass index, level of injury, presence of neurologic deficit, prealbumin level, evidence of an open fracture elsewhere, injury severity score, operative time, estimated blood loss, and blood creatinine levels. All wounds will be assessed 4-6 weeks after surgery to address early surgical site infection (SSI).
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 16842714Bibbo C, Patel DV. The effect of demineralized bone matrix-calcium sulfate with vancomycin on calcaneal fracture healing and infection rates: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jul;27(7):487-93. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700702.
- Background: PubMed 19651846Branstetter JG, Jackson SR, Haggard WO, Richelsoph KC, Wenke JC. Locally-administered antibiotics in wounds in a limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):1106-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22216.
- Background: PubMed 5487941Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. [Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins]. Chirurg. 1970 Nov;41(11):511-5. No abstract available. German.
- Background: PubMed 7113232Burdon DW. Principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis. World J Surg. 1982 May;6(3):262-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01653540. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8539047Calderone RR, Garland DE, Capen DA, Oster H. Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996 Jan;27(1):171-82.
- Background: PubMed 19651948Cavanaugh DL, Berry J, Yarboro SR, Dahners LE. Better prophylaxis against surgical site infection with local as well as systemic antibiotics. An in vivo study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1907-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01237.
- Background: PubMed 3581579Dahners LE, Funderburk CH. Gentamicin-loaded plaster of Paris as a treatment of experimental osteomyelitis in rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jun;(219):278-82.
- Background: PubMed 8981903Edin ML, Miclau T, Lester GE, Lindsey RW, Dahners LE. Effect of cefazolin and vancomycin on osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Dec;(333):245-51.
- Background: PubMed 12401922Gitelis S, Brebach GT. The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a biodegradable antibiotic-impregnated implant. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2002 Jun;10(1):53-60. doi: 10.1177/230949900201000110.
- Background: PubMed 8893444Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson JR. Salvage of instrumental lumbar fusions complicated by surgical wound infection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Sep 15;21(18):2163-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609150-00021.
- Background: PubMed 8875923Gold HS, Moellering RC Jr. Antimicrobial-drug resistance. N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 7;335(19):1445-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611073351907. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21600853O'Neill KR, Smith JG, Abtahi AM, Archer KR, Spengler DM, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder. Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.025. Epub 2011 May 19.
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vancomycin powder in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine efficacy of using local vancomycin powder (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01566422, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2018.