AzTrials
AzTrials

Moderate to Severe Atopic EczemaNCT01569906

Narrowband UVB for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema

An observational study of Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema, run by Royal Victoria Infirmary at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess prospectively, the response of moderate to severe atopic eczema to a standard course of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy by using validated objective and subjective scoring systems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema
What is being tested?
Narrowband Ultraviolet B phototherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Apr 2009to Aug 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Children aged 3-16 years

Who may be able to join

  • Children aged 3-16 years with moderate to severe atopic eczema (as defined by the modified Hannifin and Rajka criteria) in whom there is a clinical indication for phototherapy (as deemed by their specialist Dermatology consultant).

Who cannot join

  • Children under the age of 3 years or any child who lacks the maturity needed to stand in the phototherapy cabinet unsupervised.
  • Mild disease (defined as a Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score <10)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Narrowband Ultraviolet B Phototherapy in Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema- an Observational Prospective Controlled Study

To assess prospectively, the response of moderate to severe atopic eczema to a standard course of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy by using validated objective and subjective scoring systems.

Read the detailed description

Children with moderate to severe atopic eczema prescribed a course of narrowband UVB phototherapy were scored (using validated scoring systems) objectively and subjectively before, during and after the course of treatment, as well as 3 and 6 months post treatment (to determine length of remission). Their scores were compared to a control group. The control group comprised children with moderate to severe atopic eczema who were offered UVB but were unable to undertake the treatment.

Being tested
Narrowband Ultraviolet B phototherapy
Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Narrowband Ultraviolet B phototherapyRadiation

    Twice weekly exposures for a total of 24 exposures using a standard phototherapy protocol.

Study groups in NCT01569906
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
UVBChildren with moderate to severe atopic eczema who undertook a standard course of narrowband Ultraviolet B (NBUVB) phototherapy
Receives: Radiation: Narrowband Ultraviolet B phototherapy
ControlsChildren with moderate to severe atopic eczema who were offered UVB but were unable to undertake treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score at the end of treatment compared to the control group

    Measurement of Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score and percentage surface area affected of those treated with narrowband UVB as compared to a control group

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Subjective scores at the end of treatment as compared to controls

    Subjective scoring using Patient Outcome Eczema Measure (POEM), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI), Visual analogue scale (VAS) for itch and sleep loss

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. objective scores at 3 months post treatment compared to controls

    Objective Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score and percentage surface area affected in the treated group at 3 months post treatment as compared to controls.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Association of filaggrin status with outcome

    To determine if response to phototherapy is determined by the presence of a homozygous or compound heterozygous filaggrin mutation.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Subjective scores at 3 months post treatment compared to controls

    Subjective scores (Patient Outcome Eczema Measure (POEM),Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for itch and sleep loss) in the treated group at 3 months post treatment as compared to controls.

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Subjective scores at 6 months post treatment compared to controls

    Subjective scores (Patient Outcome Eczema Measure (POEM),Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for itch and sleep loss) in the treated group at 6 months post treatment as compared to controls.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Objective scores at 6 months post treatment compared to controls

    Objective Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score and percentage surface area affected in the treated group at 6 months post treatment as compared to controls.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2010
  4. Study completionAug 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
58 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01569906
Sponsor's protocol ID
4795
Other IDs
7282
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
30 Mar 2012
Last updated
5 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema, run by Royal Victoria Infirmary at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score at the end of treatment compared to the control group (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in