Acute Kidney InjuryNCT01573104
Evaluating Novel Biomarkers in Acute Kidney Injury
A study testing Proteomic assay, Blood sampling and Biomarker sampling in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Dr Robert Docking at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The investigators have a new technique of looking at urine to see whether it contains protein fragments that are released by damaged kidneys. These fragments seem to be more accurate than the current blood tests that the investigators use to diagnose renal failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Kidney Injury
- What is being tested?
- Proteomic assay, Blood sampling and Biomarker sampling
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass
- mental capacity
- able to understand written English
Who cannot join
- patient refusal
- surgical refusal
- chronic renal replacement therapy
- emergency procedures
- peri-operative use of ventricular assist devices
- pregnancy
Show all 9Show fewer
- pre-operative exercise function NYHA IV
- severe chronic renal failure (eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2).
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluating the Utility of Urinary Proteomics and Novel Biomarkers in Acute Kidney Injury
The investigators have a new technique of looking at urine to see whether it contains protein fragments that are released by damaged kidneys. These fragments seem to be more accurate than the current blood tests that the investigators use to diagnose renal failure. This technique needs to be validated with a group of patients that have a relatively high incidence of renal failure, cardiopulmonary bypass.
The investigators hypothesise that using novel markers of renal dysfunction will identify patients who go on to develop renal failure earlier, and in a higher number than the standard blood tests.
The investigators aim to collect urine from patients before going onto bypass, and then at Day 1 and Day 2 after bypass. This urine will be analysed for protein fragments, as well as other new markers of renal dysfunction. The investigators will also take blood at baseline and for the first two days in Cardiac Intensive Care, and compare the accuracy of the new tests with the 'gold standard' that is creatinine.
Read the detailed description
The diagnosis of acute renal failure has been problematic, with a review showing 35 working definitions being used in the literature. This lack of clarity gave rise to the ADQI group creating the terminology of acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI has been used to give foundation to both the RIFLE and AKIN criteria, which have been shown to perform well in predicting critical care and hospital mortality. Their criteria are based on measuring increases of serum creatinine from baseline levels, and tallying this with weight-based urinary volumes. Problems with these techniques lie in having accurate baseline creatinine values, with the MDRD formula often proving inaccurate. Criticisms have also been levelled at using serum creatinine at all, given its variance with different body-mass compositions and fluid-balance status, as well as its relatively late rise in AKI compared to its utility in chronic renal failure.
Many novel biomarkers have been investigated in AKI, either serum or urine (cystatin-C, Il-18, KIM-1, NGAL). Results have been varied, with potential problems being lack of specificity to AKI, cost and the heterogeneous nature of patient populations in the various studies. NGAL has emerged as potentially the most specific to early AKI and additionally a number of commercially available assays are now available. Interest has been shown in the use of biomarker panels, allowing for improved sensitivity, albeit at a higher cost. Urinary proteomic analysis has been used as an investigative technique for AKI for the last ten years, but diverse populations and lack of blinding hampered early studies. A recent paper used techniques developed by collaborators on this proposal to improve the performance of proteomic assays, with impressive performance of these assays when looking at critically ill patients with AKI.
A problem with assessing the utility of diagnostic or screening tools for AKI in the critically ill is the heterogeneity of pathological insults, and the unpredictable early clinical course. This leads to difficulties in identifying control groups, and in capturing the evolution of AKI. We propose investigating the use of these novel biomarkers and proteomic techniques in the more homogenous group of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. This carries with it the benefits of thorough pre-operative testing with stable baseline measurements and a clearly definable renal insult in the form of bypass time. Post-bypass renal failure requiring RRT is estimated to occur in 1.5-2% of coronary artery grafting cases, and around 5% of combined graft/valve replacement cases; however, there is a far higher incidence of AKI as measured by creatinine rise and/or oliguria.
As part of standard operative technique patient's bladders are catheterised prior to the start of surgery and the first 100mls urine voided will be collected as the baseline sample. Venous blood will be taken at cannulation with serum spun and frozen for later analysis of NGAL (and any emergent biomarkers of AKI of interest). Finger prick blood sampling will be performed for baseline point of care analysis of NGAL/brain natriuretic peptide using the Alere platform.
Details of intra-operative conduct will be gathered from the computerised anaesthetic record and the cardiac perfusionist records including anaesthetic technique (volatile/TIVA), duration of bypass and perfusion pressures on bypass.
When in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) further 100mls urine will be collected at 24hrs after induction of anaesthesia, and at 48 hours. This will be a 'clean' sample (ie not from urine lying overnight). Accompanying laboratory values of serum creatinine will be collected for diagnosis of AKI and comparison to proteomic values. At the same point blood will be taken and stored for NGAL as well as finger prick measures using point of care NGAL/BNP.
Copies of the corresponding electronic ICU physiological records will be collated for data relating to cardiovascular parameters, diagnosis of AKI and use of vasopressors. APACHE-II scores will be calculated at 24 hours post admission in addition to daily SOFA scores. AKI will be defined as AKIN stage I (increase of serum creatinine >50% of baseline measurement, and/or urinary output <0.5ml/kg/hour for six hours) or RRT up to 48 hours post-surgery. Patient outcomes will be recorded in respect to CICU mortality, 90-day mortality, need for ongoing RRT, development of chronic kidney disease (moving from eGFR >60ml/min/1.73m2 pre-admission to eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 at hospital discharge).
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury
- Being tested
- Proteomic assay, Blood sampling, Biomarker sampling
- Keywords
- Diagnosis, Acute Kidney Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Kidney Injury, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Proteomic assayOther
Urine will be taken for proteomic assay at baseline, day 1 and day 2
Blood samplingOther
Point of care testing of blood for NGAL/BNP at baseline, day 1 and day 2
Biomarker samplingOther
Urine will be taken at baseline and day 1, day 2 for evaluation of renal biomarkers at later date
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker group | Experimental | Patients undergoing CPB having proteomic assays, blood sampling and biomarker assays performed on D0, D1, D2 and D3 Receives: Other: Proteomic assay; Other: Blood sampling; Other: Biomarker sampling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Development of acute kidney injury
Development of AKI will be defined by stage 1 of AKIN criteria (ie serum Creatinine >25% of baseline, or oliguria <0.5ml/kg/hr for 6 hours.
Measured: Within two days of cardiopulmonary bypass
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionJan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Kidney InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr Robert Docking
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dr Robert Docking, University of Glasgow
- Investigators
- John Kinsella, MD, FRCA, Principal investigator, University of Glasgow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01573104
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RID-001
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 27 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Utility of Urinary Proteomics and Novel Biomarkers in Acute Kidney Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01573104
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RID-001
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury
- Keywords
- Diagnosis, Acute Kidney Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr Robert DockingUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators have a new technique of looking at urine to see whether it contains protein fragments that are released by damaged kidneys. These fragments seem to be more accurate than the current blood tests that the investigators use to diagnose renal failure. This technique needs to be validated with a group of patients that have a relatively high incidence of renal failure, cardiopulmonary bypass.
The investigators hypothesise that using novel markers of renal dysfunction will identify patients who go on to develop renal failure earlier, and in a higher number than the standard blood tests.
The investigators aim to collect urine from patients before going onto bypass, and then at Day 1 and Day 2 after bypass. This urine will be analysed for protein fragments, as well as other new markers of renal dysfunction. The investigators will also take blood at baseline and for the first two days in Cardiac Intensive Care, and compare the accuracy of the new tests with the 'gold standard' that is creatinine.
Detailed description
The diagnosis of acute renal failure has been problematic, with a review showing 35 working definitions being used in the literature. This lack of clarity gave rise to the ADQI group creating the terminology of acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI has been used to give foundation to both the RIFLE and AKIN criteria, which have been shown to perform well in predicting critical care and hospital mortality. Their criteria are based on measuring increases of serum creatinine from baseline levels, and tallying this with weight-based urinary volumes. Problems with these techniques lie in having accurate baseline creatinine values, with the MDRD formula often proving inaccurate. Criticisms have also been levelled at using serum creatinine at all, given its variance with different body-mass compositions and fluid-balance status, as well as its relatively late rise in AKI compared to its utility in chronic renal failure.
Many novel biomarkers have been investigated in AKI, either serum or urine (cystatin-C, Il-18, KIM-1, NGAL). Results have been varied, with potential problems being lack of specificity to AKI, cost and the heterogeneous nature of patient populations in the various studies. NGAL has emerged as potentially the most specific to early AKI and additionally a number of commercially available assays are now available. Interest has been shown in the use of biomarker panels, allowing for improved sensitivity, albeit at a higher cost. Urinary proteomic analysis has been used as an investigative technique for AKI for the last ten years, but diverse populations and lack of blinding hampered early studies. A recent paper used techniques developed by collaborators on this proposal to improve the performance of proteomic assays, with impressive performance of these assays when looking at critically ill patients with AKI.
A problem with assessing the utility of diagnostic or screening tools for AKI in the critically ill is the heterogeneity of pathological insults, and the unpredictable early clinical course. This leads to difficulties in identifying control groups, and in capturing the evolution of AKI. We propose investigating the use of these novel biomarkers and proteomic techniques in the more homogenous group of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. This carries with it the benefits of thorough pre-operative testing with stable baseline measurements and a clearly definable renal insult in the form of bypass time. Post-bypass renal failure requiring RRT is estimated to occur in 1.5-2% of coronary artery grafting cases, and around 5% of combined graft/valve replacement cases; however, there is a far higher incidence of AKI as measured by creatinine rise and/or oliguria.
As part of standard operative technique patient's bladders are catheterised prior to the start of surgery and the first 100mls urine voided will be collected as the baseline sample. Venous blood will be taken at cannulation with serum spun and frozen for later analysis of NGAL (and any emergent biomarkers of AKI of interest). Finger prick blood sampling will be performed for baseline point of care analysis of NGAL/brain natriuretic peptide using the Alere platform.
Details of intra-operative conduct will be gathered from the computerised anaesthetic record and the cardiac perfusionist records including anaesthetic technique (volatile/TIVA), duration of bypass and perfusion pressures on bypass.
When in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) further 100mls urine will be collected at 24hrs after induction of anaesthesia, and at 48 hours. This will be a 'clean' sample (ie not from urine lying overnight). Accompanying laboratory values of serum creatinine will be collected for diagnosis of AKI and comparison to proteomic values. At the same point blood will be taken and stored for NGAL as well as finger prick measures using point of care NGAL/BNP.
Copies of the corresponding electronic ICU physiological records will be collated for data relating to cardiovascular parameters, diagnosis of AKI and use of vasopressors. APACHE-II scores will be calculated at 24 hours post admission in addition to daily SOFA scores. AKI will be defined as AKIN stage I (increase of serum creatinine >50% of baseline measurement, and/or urinary output <0.5ml/kg/hour for six hours) or RRT up to 48 hours post-surgery. Patient outcomes will be recorded in respect to CICU mortality, 90-day mortality, need for ongoing RRT, development of chronic kidney disease (moving from eGFR >60ml/min/1.73m2 pre-admission to eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 at hospital discharge).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker group | Experimental | Other: Proteomic assay, Other: Blood sampling, Other: Biomarker samplingPatients undergoing CPB having proteomic assays, blood sampling and biomarker assays performed on D0, D1, D2 and D3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass
- mental capacity
- able to understand written English
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- patient refusal
- surgical refusal
- chronic renal replacement therapy
- emergency procedures
- peri-operative use of ventricular assist devices
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Proteomic assayUrine will be taken for proteomic assay at baseline, day 1 and day 2 | Other | Biomarker group |
| Blood samplingPoint of care testing of blood for NGAL/BNP at baseline, day 1 and day 2 | Other | Biomarker group |
| Biomarker samplingUrine will be taken at baseline and day 1, day 2 for evaluation of renal biomarkers at later date | Other | Biomarker group |
Primary outcome
Development of acute kidney injury
Time frame: Within two days of cardiopulmonary bypass
Development of AKI will be defined by stage 1 of AKIN criteria (ie serum Creatinine >25% of baseline, or oliguria <0.5ml/kg/hr for 6 hours.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2015.
Related trials for Acute Kidney Injury
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
Early Biomarker Kidney Injury Assessment After Acumen Directed Fluid Management in Cardiac Surgery
Renal Injury, Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Acute Kidney Injury and Ultra-endurance Running
AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) Due to Trauma
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diastolic Shock Index for Predicting Hemodynamic Instability During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury, Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Kinsella, MD, FRCA principal investigator
University of Glasgow
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Proteomic assay, Blood sampling and Biomarker sampling in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Dr Robert Docking at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Development of acute kidney injury (time frame: Within two days of cardiopulmonary bypass). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2015.