AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseNCT01574339

Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on LES Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With GERD

A study testing EndoStim LES Stimulation System in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, run by EndoStim Inc. at 10 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The EndoStim LES Stimulation System is an investigational device intended to improve the LES pressure and restore Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) function in individuals suffering from Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
What is being tested?
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
10 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Aug 2011to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is between 21 - 70 years of age.
  • Subject has a history of heartburn, regurgitation or both for > 12 month prompting physician recommendation of continual daily use of PPI before study entry.
  • Baseline GERD HRQL heartburn score following 10-14 days off PPI which is ≥ 20 and at least 10 points higher than the on PPI score
  • Subject who are on standard medical therapy for 12 months or longer and experience discomfort or who are otherwise dissatisfied with GERD symptoms
  • Subjects with a GERD condition that in the opinion of the PI justifies a minimally invasive reversible procedure prior to attempting anatomical change such as Nissen fundoplication
  • Subject has an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II (or comparable local classification if any).
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subject has exhibited excessive lower esophageal acid exposure during 24-hour pHmetry of antisecretory therapy performed within 6 months of screening visit; pH < 4 for > 5% of total time.
  • Subject has a resting LES end expiratory pressure > 5mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg on a high resolution manometry within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Subject has esophagitis ≤ Grade C (LA classification) on upper endoscopy within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Subject has esophageal body contraction amplitude > 30 mmHg for > 50% of swallows and > 50% peristaltic contractions on high resolution manometry.
  • Subject has signed the informed consent form and is able to adhere to study visit schedule.

Who cannot join

  • Subject has any non-GERD esophageal motility disorders.
  • Subject has gastroparesis.
  • Subject has any significant multisystem diseases.
  • Subject has an autoimmune or a connective tissue disorder (e.g. scleroderma, dermatomyositis, Calcinosis-Raynaud's-Esophagus, Sclerodactyly Syndrome (CREST), Sjogren's Syndrome, Sharp's Syndrome), requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
  • Subject has Barrett's epithelium (> M2; > C1) or any grade of dysplasia.
  • Subject has a hiatal hernia larger than 3 cm.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Subject has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2.
  • Subject has Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Subject has uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1c > 9.5 in the previous 6 months, or has T2DM for > 10 years.
  • Subject has a history of suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer.
  • Subject has esophageal or gastric varices.
  • Subject has significant cardiac arrhythmia or ectopy or significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Subject has an existing implanted electrical stimulator (e.g., pacemaker, AICD).
  • Subject requires chronic anticoagulant therapy.
  • Subject has dysphagia or esophageal peptic stricture, excluding Schatzki's ring.
  • Subject of child-bearing potential who is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the trial period.
  • Subject is currently enrolled in other potentially confounding research.
  • History of any malignancy in the last 2 years.
  • History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including nissen fundoplication.
  • Subject has any condition that, at the discretion of the investigator or sponsor, would preclude participation in the trial.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 8 countries.

10 sites in 8 countries

Netherlands3 sites
  • AMC Amsterdam

    Amsterdam, 1105

  • UMC Maastrcht

    Maastricht

  • UMC Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3508

Other trials in Netherlands

Chile1 site
  • Hospital Clinico de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Colombia1 site
  • San Ignacio

    Bogotá

Other trials in Colombia

Hong Kong1 site
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) / Prince of Whales

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

India1 site
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

    Hyderabad, 500082

Other trials in India

Mexico1 site
  • . Zalvador Zubiran National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition

    Mexico City

Other trials in Mexico

New Zealand1 site
  • North Shore Hospital

    Auckland, Takapuna

Other trials in New Zealand

United Kingdom1 site
  • St. Thomas Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: An Investigation of the Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

The EndoStim LES Stimulation System is an investigational device intended to improve the LES pressure and restore Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) function in individuals suffering from Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Read the detailed description

EndoStim has developed an investigational medical device specifically designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the LES and has completed two clinical feasibility studies using an external version of the EndoStim stimulation system in fifteen subjects. In these two short-term studies, electrical stimulation resulted in significant increases in LES pressure.

This study will further evaluate the safety of the procedure and its feasibility for use in this group of patients.

Being tested
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Keywords
GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EndoStim LES Stimulation SystemDevice

    The EndoStim LES Stimulation System comprises three components: an electrical stimulation lead, an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and an external programmer.

    The IPG and stimulation lead are to be implanted within the subject's body using conventional laparoscopy. The device programmer is to be used by the study investigator and/or a technical representative.

Study groups in NCT01574339
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment ArmExperimentalEndoStim LES Stimulation System
Receives: Device: EndoStim LES Stimulation System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence and severity of adverse events

    Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 24 months of follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change in GERD-HRQL

    Change from baseline in GERD-HRQL. The full title of this scale is GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire. The scale is as follows, with the worst outcome scored as a 5:

    0=No Symptoms

    1. Noticeable, but not bothersome
    2. Noticeable, bothersome, but not every day
    3. Bothersome daily
    4. Bothersome and affects daily activities
    5. Incapacitating to do daily activities

    Measured: Change in GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaire score when available from baseline (as measured off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Heartburn and regurgitation scores will be calculated separately.

  2. Change in GERD symptoms

    Changes in GERD symptoms measured by the SF-12 questionnaire at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline.

    The full name of the scale is SF-12v2® PRO Health Survey which is a short-form patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement that captures physical and mental well-being across eight health domains, for a variety of diseases, conditions, and treatment groups. It's made of two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). the practical ranges observed in a large U.S. general population are

    • PCS: 11.1 to 69.4
    • MCS: 7.4 to 73.2 Higher scores on both PCS and MCS indicate better health

    Measured: Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the SF-12 questionnaire will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 6, 12, and 24 months.

  3. Change in GERD symptoms

    Change from baseline GERD symptoms measured by patient diary.

    Measured: Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months Vs. baseline.

  4. Change in LES pressure

    Change from baseline in LES baseline and expiratory pressure

    Measured: Baseline LES end expiratory pressure (LESPpre) will be compared with the end expiratory pressure (LESPpost) at 3 and 6 months.

  5. Change in GI symptoms

    Change from baseline in GI symptoms (while on and off PPI)

    Measured: Symptoms will be compared between baseline (as measured while on and off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

  6. Change in esophageal acid exposure

    Change in percent 24-hour esophageal pH <4.0 at baseline compared to value at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Measured: pH will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

  7. Change in esophageal acid exposure

    Change in number of reflux events > 1 minute at baseline compared to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Measured: Number of reflux events >1 minute will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

  8. Change in esophageal acid exposure

    Change in number of reflux events > 5 minutes at baseline compared to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Measured: Number of reflux events >5 minutes will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

  9. Change in medication usage

    Change from baseline in antisecretory medication use

    Measured: The use of antisecretory medication will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

  10. Change in sleep-related quality of life

    Change from baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. The full name of the scale Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a one-month time interval. Each component score of the PSQI ranges from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction or disturbance. The seven component scores are then summed to obtain a global PSQI score, which ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality, with a score greater than 5 suggesting significant sleep difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality questionnaire.

  11. Change in work productivity

    Change from baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire scores. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire is a 6-item instrument designed to measure impairments in work and activities over the past 7 days. It assesses four main domains:

    1. Absenteeism (work time missed)
    2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness)
    3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism)
    4. Activity impairment It produces scores for each domain expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity

    Measured: Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality and Work productivity questionnaires

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
All enrolled subjects will receive a functioning device and have stimulation delivered throughout the study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01574339
Sponsor's protocol ID
CS005
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
22 Mar 2012
Last updated
14 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sidhu AS, Triadafilopoulos G. Neuro-regulation of lower esophageal sphincter function as treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb 21;14(7):985-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.985.

    PubMed 18286675
  • Sanmiguel CP, Hagiike M, Mintchev MP, Cruz RD, Phillips EH, Cunneen SA, Conklin JL, Soffer EE. Effect of electrical stimulation of the LES on LES pressure in a canine model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008 Aug;295(2):G389-94. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90201.2008.

    PubMed 18687754
  • Kappelle WF, Bredenoord AJ, Conchillo JM, Ruurda JP, Bouvy ND, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Chiu PW, Booth M, Hani A, Reddy DN, Bogte A, Smout AJ, Wu JC, Escalona A, Valdovinos MA, Torres-Villalobos G, Siersema PD. Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower oesophageal sphincter for refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - interim results of an international multicentre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):614-25. doi: 10.1111/apt.13306. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

    PubMed 26153531

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EndoStim LES Stimulation System in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, run by EndoStim Inc. at 10 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Netherlands, Chile, Colombia, Hong Kong, India and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence and severity of adverse events (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01574339, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in