OsteoarthritisEarly Phase 1NCT01576159
Serum Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Levels After 12 Weeks of Different Exercises
A Early Phase 1 study testing Running exercise, Cycling exercise and Swimming Exercise in people with Osteoarthritis and Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, run by Middle East Technical University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Acute effects of physical exercise on the deformational behavior of articular cartilage and changes in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) are definite. However, conclusive positive effects of fitness exercise on functional adaptation of articular cartilage have not been proved.Therefore, in this parallel-group… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, Degenerative Lesion of Articular Cartilage of Knee
- What is being tested?
- Running exercise, Cycling exercise and Swimming Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- body mass index lower than 30
- availability of participants for the tests and attendance to training sessions
Who cannot join
- osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint disease
- intra-articular steroid injection
- mal-alignment of the knees (varus/valgus) larger than 15°
- recent (within six months) fracture of lower extremity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Middle East Technical University, Medical Center and Physical Education and Sports Dep.
Ankara, Cankaya, 06531
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Mechanical Loading During Sports Exercises on Degradation of Human Articular Cartilage
Acute effects of physical exercise on the deformational behavior of articular cartilage and changes in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) are definite. However, conclusive positive effects of fitness exercise on functional adaptation of articular cartilage have not been proved.Therefore, in this parallel-group randomized control trial, the investigators tested the hypothesis that adequate amount of physical exercise with enough impact would be able to stimulate the functional behavior of articular cartilage.
The investigators evaluated 44 healthy males for their physical fitness levels and their blood samples were obtained before, immediately after and 0.5 h after a 30-min walking exercise. Thereafter, participants were assigned to the running, the cycling, the swimming and the control groups. At the end of 12-weeks of intervention, same measurement procedures were applied. Mixed repeated-measures ANOVA design was used for statistics. (Level of evidence: 2)
Read the detailed description
Design
A prospective, parallel-group randomized control trial was designed. Mustafa Kemal University (MKU) Ethical Board approved the study (B.30.2.MKU.0.01.01.00/255). The exact nature of the study was explained to participants and they were asked to sign a written consent. The tests were carried out at Middle East Technical University Medical Center, Ankara, Turkey between January and June 2008. The independent variables were groups (n=4) and time (n=2). The dependent variable was serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) levels measured at three phases of exercise: before (Recovery), immediately after (Fatigue), and 30-min after the exercise (Regeneration). Participants were subjected to the following tests prior to and at the end of the intervention period: body mass index (BMI), isokinetic leg muscle strength, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) and serum COMP levels.
Participants
115 applicants volunteered to take part in this study. Eligibility screening was performed according to inclusion criteria. From 104 eligible applicants, 48 healthy, sedentary male university students aged between 18 to 25 years old (Mage = 21.8±1.9) were selected by a simple drawing. However, study completed with 44 participants, because of 4 dropouts. Participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1:1 ratio to parallel groups, three exercise groups (swimming, cycling and running) and one control. In order to have a random allocation, each participant received a number unknown to researchers which was written on a piece of paper and then drawn from a box that allowed to assign individuals to the control and exercise groups. Baseline blood samples were stored in -80°C and they were not analyzed during participants' allocation. Exclusion criteria, surveyed by a questionnaire, were: osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint disease, intra-articular steroid injection, mal-alignment of the knees (varus/valgus) larger than 15°, and recent (within six months) fracture of lower extremity. Active athletes and volunteers with previous sports background were not included. During the intervention period, one participant was excluded from the study because of sudden kidney disease and another one decided to withdraw from further participation. In addition, two participants were excluded from the study before biochemical analyses since one subject from running group didn't meet minimum requirement of 75% of exercise session attendance, and one subject from control group didn't complete the posttests. Descriptive data of participants are presented in.
Interventions
After the first measurements, participants were randomly and equally assigned to the swimming, the running, the cycling and the control groups. All exercise groups participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks. Each session began with a five minutes warm-up, continued with a main set of 30-min exercise at their individual target heart rate zone (60-70% of heart rate reserve), and finished with a five minute cool-down period. The individual target heart rate zone was determined according to the Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription of American College of Sport Medicines [1]. Swimming exercises composed of front crawl swimming and kicking drills. During the main sets, the participants performed front-crawl swimming at their individual heart rate zones which were determined by the Karvonen formula [2]. Cyclers exercised between 60-80 repetition per minute (RPM) on an ergometer (Monark E 834, Varberg, Sweden), which was adjusted for each individual in order to maintain the target heart rate zone. The running group participants exercised on a treadmill with a 1.5 % incline. The speed of the treadmill was determined according to individual heart rate zone. Throughout the 12 weeks of training, Heart Rate Reserves (HRR) was held constant (60-70%) while the speed increased according to individual progression. Individuals of the control group were instructed not to participate in any organized or structured exercise during the 12 weeks of intervention.
Physical and Physiological Measurements
Body Mass Index was calculated as the ratio of body weight to height square (Heyward \& Stolarczyk 1996). VO2max was measured by the standard Bruce Protocol (Bruce, Kusumi \& Hosmer 1973) on a Jager LE 200 CE (Hochberg, Germany) treadmill. Measurements were performed with the VIASYS Healthcare ergospirometry line using the MasterScreen CPX (Wuerzburg, Germany) device. Results were presented in ml/kg/min (milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute). Isokinetic quadriceps strength was recorded with the Biodex System Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Inc, Shirley, NY). Participants were placed in a comfortable position that allowed unrestricted motion of the knee from 90 degrees of flexion to terminal extension on a bicycle ergometer, and asked to warm-up for five minutes at which point they stretched their extremities. Before the test trials, participants were instructed to perform their maximum efforts. Then five isokinetic concentric knee flexion and extension at 60°/sec with their dominant legs were recorded. After, peak torque to body weight ratio (PT/BW) was measured.
Blood Sampling and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Procedures
Blood obtaining procedures were modified from Mundermann et al. [3]. Participants were asked to limit their physical activity 48 hours prior to the experiment. On the day of the experiment, participants made their breakfast within one hour after waking up and the experiment started two to three hours after breakfast. In addition, participants were seated on a chair for 15-min immediately before the experiment. Five-milliliter blood samples were obtained by a certified research nurse from the same antecubital vein immediately before, immediately after, and 0.5 hours after a 30-min walking exercise. During the walking exercise of the test protocol, participants walked at a pace of 5 km/h on a treadmill with 1.5 % incline. After the walking exercise, participants sat on an office chair for 30-min and were asked to rest.
Blood sample collection and storage procedures were described previously [4]. Venous blood samples were obtained from vena mediana cubitii. After clotting for 60 min at room temperature, samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10-min. The serum samples were stored at -80°C until analysis.
Serum COMP concentrations were analyzed with a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on two monoclonal antibodies: COMP ELISA and AnaMar Medical (Sweden). ELISA analysis was performed in a private institution and assay procedures were followed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The order of blood samples was mixed and biochemist was blind to allocation of samples. All blood samples were analyzed simultaneously to maintain uniform specificity across individuals.
Statistical Procedures
The effects of 12 weeks interventions on general fitness and serum COMP concentrations at pre-tests and post-tests were analyzed using 4x2 (groups and time) mixed repeated measures ANOVA for each variable. Paired-samples t-tests were employed for comparison of the serum COMP concentrations during rest, fatigue and recovery states. In order to decrease the probability of committing type-1 error, a method of multiple comparisons by Bonferroni confidence interval adjustment was performed.
Sample size calculation was performed to eliminate type II error. Sample size was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.3 (Heinrich-Heine-University) software [5]. Significance level was set at 0.05 and a medium effect size (0.25) with two-sided calculation was used. Effect size contains the magnitude of difference between groups and values of 0.25, indicates medium effect of treatment [6]. By these assumptions, to achieve a power of 0.80, a sample size of 36 participants was necessary. Conservatively, 48 subjects were recruited since we expected a 20% dropout rate due to the demanding nature of the intervention program and our previous experience.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, Degenerative Lesion of Articular Cartilage of Knee
- Being tested
- Running exercise, Cycling exercise, Swimming Exercise
- Keywords
- Biochemical Marker, Fitness Exercises, Impact, Articular Cartilage
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Tooth, Impacted
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Running exerciseOther
During this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed weight-bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks
Cycling exerciseOther
During this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed a partial weight-bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks
Swimming ExerciseOther
During this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed a non-weight bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-Impact Loading | Experimental | Performed high-impact running exercise during intervention period. Receives: Other: Running exercise |
| Moderate-Impact Loading | Experimental | Performed moderate-impact cycling exercise during intervention period. Receives: Other: Cycling exercise |
| Non-Impact Loading | Experimental | Performed low-impact swimming exercise during intervention period. Receives: Other: Swimming Exercise |
| Control Group | No intervention | Didn't participate any organized physical exercises |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Serum COMP Accumulation, Triggered by Acute Exercise, After 12 Weeks of Different Regular Exercises
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Physical (Body Mass Index) Changes of Participants
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Physiological (Maximum Oxygen Consumption) Changes of Participants
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Middle East Technical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Feza Korkusuz, Middle East Technical University
- Investigators
- Ozgur Celik, PhD, Study director, Middle East Technical UniversityFeza Korkusuz, PhD, Principal investigator, Middle East Technical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01576159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BAPK06K07K03K00K17
- Other IDs
- 107S112
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mundermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP, King KB. Serum concentration of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is sensitive to physiological cyclic loading in healthy adults. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.09.007.
PubMed 15639635Andersson ML, Thorstensson CA, Roos EM, Petersson IF, Heinegard D, Saxne T. Serum levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) increase temporarily after physical exercise in patients with knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Dec 7;7:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-98.
PubMed 17156423Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PubMed 17695343Johnson EP. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
Bompa TO. Periodization : theory and methodology ot training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.
Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners. London: Sage Publications, Inc., 2000
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Mechanical Loading During Sports Exercises on Degradation of Human Articular Cartilage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01576159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BAPK06K07K03K00K17
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, Degenerative Lesion of Articular Cartilage of Knee
- Keywords
- Biochemical Marker, Fitness Exercises, Impact, Articular Cartilage
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Middle East Technical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute effects of physical exercise on the deformational behavior of articular cartilage and changes in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) are definite. However, conclusive positive effects of fitness exercise on functional adaptation of articular cartilage have not been proved.Therefore, in this parallel-group randomized control trial, the investigators tested the hypothesis that adequate amount of physical exercise with enough impact would be able to stimulate the functional behavior of articular cartilage.
The investigators evaluated 44 healthy males for their physical fitness levels and their blood samples were obtained before, immediately after and 0.5 h after a 30-min walking exercise. Thereafter, participants were assigned to the running, the cycling, the swimming and the control groups. At the end of 12-weeks of intervention, same measurement procedures were applied. Mixed repeated-measures ANOVA design was used for statistics. (Level of evidence: 2)
Detailed description
Design
A prospective, parallel-group randomized control trial was designed. Mustafa Kemal University (MKU) Ethical Board approved the study (B.30.2.MKU.0.01.01.00/255). The exact nature of the study was explained to participants and they were asked to sign a written consent. The tests were carried out at Middle East Technical University Medical Center, Ankara, Turkey between January and June 2008. The independent variables were groups (n=4) and time (n=2). The dependent variable was serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) levels measured at three phases of exercise: before (Recovery), immediately after (Fatigue), and 30-min after the exercise (Regeneration). Participants were subjected to the following tests prior to and at the end of the intervention period: body mass index (BMI), isokinetic leg muscle strength, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) and serum COMP levels.
Participants
115 applicants volunteered to take part in this study. Eligibility screening was performed according to inclusion criteria. From 104 eligible applicants, 48 healthy, sedentary male university students aged between 18 to 25 years old (Mage = 21.8±1.9) were selected by a simple drawing. However, study completed with 44 participants, because of 4 dropouts. Participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1:1 ratio to parallel groups, three exercise groups (swimming, cycling and running) and one control. In order to have a random allocation, each participant received a number unknown to researchers which was written on a piece of paper and then drawn from a box that allowed to assign individuals to the control and exercise groups. Baseline blood samples were stored in -80°C and they were not analyzed during participants' allocation. Exclusion criteria, surveyed by a questionnaire, were: osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint disease, intra-articular steroid injection, mal-alignment of the knees (varus/valgus) larger than 15°, and recent (within six months) fracture of lower extremity. Active athletes and volunteers with previous sports background were not included. During the intervention period, one participant was excluded from the study because of sudden kidney disease and another one decided to withdraw from further participation. In addition, two participants were excluded from the study before biochemical analyses since one subject from running group didn't meet minimum requirement of 75% of exercise session attendance, and one subject from control group didn't complete the posttests. Descriptive data of participants are presented in.
Interventions
After the first measurements, participants were randomly and equally assigned to the swimming, the running, the cycling and the control groups. All exercise groups participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks. Each session began with a five minutes warm-up, continued with a main set of 30-min exercise at their individual target heart rate zone (60-70% of heart rate reserve), and finished with a five minute cool-down period. The individual target heart rate zone was determined according to the Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription of American College of Sport Medicines [1]. Swimming exercises composed of front crawl swimming and kicking drills. During the main sets, the participants performed front-crawl swimming at their individual heart rate zones which were determined by the Karvonen formula [2]. Cyclers exercised between 60-80 repetition per minute (RPM) on an ergometer (Monark E 834, Varberg, Sweden), which was adjusted for each individual in order to maintain the target heart rate zone. The running group participants exercised on a treadmill with a 1.5 % incline. The speed of the treadmill was determined according to individual heart rate zone. Throughout the 12 weeks of training, Heart Rate Reserves (HRR) was held constant (60-70%) while the speed increased according to individual progression. Individuals of the control group were instructed not to participate in any organized or structured exercise during the 12 weeks of intervention.
Physical and Physiological Measurements
Body Mass Index was calculated as the ratio of body weight to height square (Heyward \& Stolarczyk 1996). VO2max was measured by the standard Bruce Protocol (Bruce, Kusumi \& Hosmer 1973) on a Jager LE 200 CE (Hochberg, Germany) treadmill. Measurements were performed with the VIASYS Healthcare ergospirometry line using the MasterScreen CPX (Wuerzburg, Germany) device. Results were presented in ml/kg/min (milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute). Isokinetic quadriceps strength was recorded with the Biodex System Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Inc, Shirley, NY). Participants were placed in a comfortable position that allowed unrestricted motion of the knee from 90 degrees of flexion to terminal extension on a bicycle ergometer, and asked to warm-up for five minutes at which point they stretched their extremities. Before the test trials, participants were instructed to perform their maximum efforts. Then five isokinetic concentric knee flexion and extension at 60°/sec with their dominant legs were recorded. After, peak torque to body weight ratio (PT/BW) was measured.
Blood Sampling and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Procedures
Blood obtaining procedures were modified from Mundermann et al. [3]. Participants were asked to limit their physical activity 48 hours prior to the experiment. On the day of the experiment, participants made their breakfast within one hour after waking up and the experiment started two to three hours after breakfast. In addition, participants were seated on a chair for 15-min immediately before the experiment. Five-milliliter blood samples were obtained by a certified research nurse from the same antecubital vein immediately before, immediately after, and 0.5 hours after a 30-min walking exercise. During the walking exercise of the test protocol, participants walked at a pace of 5 km/h on a treadmill with 1.5 % incline. After the walking exercise, participants sat on an office chair for 30-min and were asked to rest.
Blood sample collection and storage procedures were described previously [4]. Venous blood samples were obtained from vena mediana cubitii. After clotting for 60 min at room temperature, samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10-min. The serum samples were stored at -80°C until analysis.
Serum COMP concentrations were analyzed with a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on two monoclonal antibodies: COMP ELISA and AnaMar Medical (Sweden). ELISA analysis was performed in a private institution and assay procedures were followed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The order of blood samples was mixed and biochemist was blind to allocation of samples. All blood samples were analyzed simultaneously to maintain uniform specificity across individuals.
Statistical Procedures
The effects of 12 weeks interventions on general fitness and serum COMP concentrations at pre-tests and post-tests were analyzed using 4x2 (groups and time) mixed repeated measures ANOVA for each variable. Paired-samples t-tests were employed for comparison of the serum COMP concentrations during rest, fatigue and recovery states. In order to decrease the probability of committing type-1 error, a method of multiple comparisons by Bonferroni confidence interval adjustment was performed.
Sample size calculation was performed to eliminate type II error. Sample size was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.3 (Heinrich-Heine-University) software [5]. Significance level was set at 0.05 and a medium effect size (0.25) with two-sided calculation was used. Effect size contains the magnitude of difference between groups and values of 0.25, indicates medium effect of treatment [6]. By these assumptions, to achieve a power of 0.80, a sample size of 36 participants was necessary. Conservatively, 48 subjects were recruited since we expected a 20% dropout rate due to the demanding nature of the intervention program and our previous experience.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-Impact Loading | Experimental | Other: Running exercisePerformed high-impact running exercise during intervention period. |
| Moderate-Impact Loading | Experimental | Other: Cycling exercisePerformed moderate-impact cycling exercise during intervention period. |
| Non-Impact Loading | Experimental | Other: Swimming ExercisePerformed low-impact swimming exercise during intervention period. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Didn't participate any organized physical exercises |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- body mass index lower than 30
- availability of participants for the tests and attendance to training sessions
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint disease
- intra-articular steroid injection
- mal-alignment of the knees (varus/valgus) larger than 15°
- recent (within six months) fracture of lower extremity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Running exerciseDuring this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed weight-bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks | Other | High-Impact Loading |
| Cycling exerciseDuring this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed a partial weight-bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks | Other | Moderate-Impact Loading |
| Swimming ExerciseDuring this type of exercise intervention, subjects performed a non-weight bearing exercise. This group participated in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks | Other | Non-Impact Loading |
Primary outcome
Changes in Serum COMP Accumulation, Triggered by Acute Exercise, After 12 Weeks of Different Regular Exercises
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
2 secondary outcomes
Physical (Body Mass Index) Changes of Participants
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Physiological (Maximum Oxygen Consumption) Changes of Participants
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15639635Mundermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP, King KB. Serum concentration of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is sensitive to physiological cyclic loading in healthy adults. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.09.007.
- Background: PubMed 17156423Andersson ML, Thorstensson CA, Roos EM, Petersson IF, Heinegard D, Saxne T. Serum levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) increase temporarily after physical exercise in patients with knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Dec 7;7:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-98.
- Background: PubMed 17695343Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Results publicationJohnson EP. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
- Results publicationBompa TO. Periodization : theory and methodology ot training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.
- Results publicationField AP. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners. London: Sage Publications, Inc., 2000
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ozgur Celik, PhD study director
Middle East Technical University
Feza Korkusuz, PhD principal investigator
Middle East Technical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Running exercise, Cycling exercise and Swimming Exercise in people with Osteoarthritis and Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, run by Middle East Technical University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Serum COMP Accumulation, Triggered by Acute Exercise, After 12 Weeks of Different Regular Exercises (time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01576159, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2015.