Head and Neck CancerNCT01576939
Feasibility of IMRT Modulation to Account for Scattered Radiation From Dental Fillings in Head and Neck Cancer
A study testing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of optimizing the IMRT treatment plan based on dosimeter measurements of mucosal radiation dose adjacent to the dental fillings to reduce such dose to < 35 Gy without compromising tumor coverage and/or increasing the dose to the remaining oral cavity or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with HNC undergoing radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy at Stanford University
- At least 18 years old
- Metallic filling present
- Planned radiation dose to the tumor > 60 Gy at 1.8 to 2.2 Gy/fx
- Able to understand and sign a written informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant
- Nursing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: A Feasibility Study of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy) Modulation to Account for Scattered Radiation From Dental Fillings in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of optimizing the IMRT treatment plan based on dosimeter measurements of mucosal radiation dose adjacent to the dental fillings to reduce such dose to < 35 Gy without compromising tumor coverage and/or increasing the dose to the remaining oral cavity or nearby parotid glands.
Read the detailed description
Using radiation dosimeter, we will perform measurement of the doses received by the mucosa adjacent to the dental fillings in patients receiving IMRT for head and neck cancer. If the mucosa dose is estimated to be greater than 35 Gy for the entire radiation course, we will generate and implement a "filling" optimized IMRT plan, provided that this new plan does not compromise tumor coverage or increase dose to the rest of the oral mucosa or parotid glands. Dosimeter will be used to measure the mucosal dose delivered by this new IMRT plan. Patient's mucositis grade, narcotic use and self-reported mouth and throat soreness scores will be recorded and correlated to mucosal dose. We hypothesize that modulation of an IMRT plan to reduce the dose delivered to adjacent normal mucosa surrounding the dental filling can decrease the severity and duration of radiation-related oral mucositis. Here we propose to use thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT plan that is normally delivered in the clinic.
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Being tested
- Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intensity Modulated Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called IMRT
We are using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment) plan that is normally delivered in the clinic. If the measured mucosal dose exceeds 35 Gy, we will generate a "filling" optimized IMRT plan to reduce it to < 35 Gy. The new plan will be deemed acceptable and implemented only if it does not (1) compromise the tumor coverage, (2) increase the dose to either the remaining oral cavity or the spared parotid gland(s).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IMRT Modulation | Experimental | All patients will undergo a computed tomography (CT) simulation study +/- a positron emission tomography (PET) scan using ≤ 3mm slices for radiation treatment planning. A standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) plan will be generated and patients will be treated with megavoltage radiation over a course of > 6 weeks with a planned tumor dose of > 60 Gy. A medical doctor will perform weekly mucositis evaluation and grading for the measured site once a week during radiation therapy
Modulation of an IMRT plan to reduce the dose to less than 35 Gy delivered to adjacent normal mucosa surrounding the dental filling without compromising normal tissue or tumor doses. Receives: Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time Until the Maximum Oral Mucositis Measured From the Start of Radiation Treatment.
The time to onset of oral mucositis was measured from the start of radiation treatment until oral mucositis was visual observed by a clinician during the weekly checkup for the first time. Analysis done by Kaplan-Meier.
Adverse events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version (V) 4.0. Medical doctor performed evaluation and grading of clinical and functional mucositis for the measured site weekly during the radiation treatment course and biweekly after completion of radiation until oral mucositis was < grade 2. A pain medication assessment was done for each mucositis time point. Patients completed the Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck cancer (OMWQ-HN) during and after treatment until oral mucositis is < grade 2.
Measured: 3 years
Duration of Grade 2 or Higher Oral Mucositis After First Oral Mucositis Was Observed.
The duration of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis was measured as the time from the first time oral mucositis was observed by a clinician at the weekly checkup until the oral mucositis was resolved.
The data was analyzed in a mixed effects model to account for the within subject correlation, since each patient contributed two measurements to the data set. The model was limited to those subjects who had experienced mucositis and then the outcome was the duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis. This allowed us to model the data in a mixed effects model with the continuous outcome of duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Relationship Between the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose and the Amount of Narcotic Use
The narcotics use was a patient reported measurement that was documented in the medical note in the patient chart. Patient self reported measurements are generally known to be unreliable.
Measured: 3 years
How Does Increase in Soreness Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose
The quality of life questionnaire was the HNC adaptation of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMWQ). It is designed to assess the severity and impact of the oral mucositis by evaluating mouth and throat soreness and the degree to which the mouth and throat soreness interferes with activities of daily life such as eating, swallowing, drinking, talking and sleeping.
This outcome measures soreness in both the mouth and throat.
This outcome is not a combination of several sub-scales. This outcome was the response to the single question: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how would you rate your OVERALL MOUTH AND THROAT SORENESS during the past 24 hours?"
Mouth and throat soreness was measured as a single scale from 0 (no soreness) to 10 (worst soreness possible).
Measured: 3 years
How Does Increase in Pain Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose?
The quality of life questionnaire was the HNC adaptation of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ). It is designed to assess the severity and impact of the oral mucositis by evaluating mouth and throat soreness and the degree to which the mouth and throat soreness interferes with activities of daily life such as eating, swallowing, drinking, talking and sleeping.
This outcome measures pain in the mouth only.
This outcome is not a combination of several sub-scales. This outcome was the response to a single question: "On a scale from 0 to 10, what number best describes the MOUTH PAIN that you experienced in the past 24 hours?"
Mouth pain scale was measured as a single scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Head and Neck CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Varian Medical Systems
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Quynh-Thu Le, MD, Principal investigator, Professor of Radiation Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01576939
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-21777
- Other IDs
- SU-08102011-8266, ENT0032
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 14 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Feasibility Study of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy) Modulation to Account for Scattered Radiation From Dental Fillings in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01576939
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-21777
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Varian Medical Systems
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jun 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of optimizing the IMRT treatment plan based on dosimeter measurements of mucosal radiation dose adjacent to the dental fillings to reduce such dose to < 35 Gy without compromising tumor coverage and/or increasing the dose to the remaining oral cavity or nearby parotid glands.
Detailed description
Using radiation dosimeter, we will perform measurement of the doses received by the mucosa adjacent to the dental fillings in patients receiving IMRT for head and neck cancer. If the mucosa dose is estimated to be greater than 35 Gy for the entire radiation course, we will generate and implement a "filling" optimized IMRT plan, provided that this new plan does not compromise tumor coverage or increase dose to the rest of the oral mucosa or parotid glands. Dosimeter will be used to measure the mucosal dose delivered by this new IMRT plan. Patient's mucositis grade, narcotic use and self-reported mouth and throat soreness scores will be recorded and correlated to mucosal dose. We hypothesize that modulation of an IMRT plan to reduce the dose delivered to adjacent normal mucosa surrounding the dental filling can decrease the severity and duration of radiation-related oral mucositis. Here we propose to use thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT plan that is normally delivered in the clinic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IMRT Modulation | Experimental | Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation TherapyAll patients will undergo a computed tomography (CT) simulation study +/- a positron emission tomography (PET) scan using ≤ 3mm slices for radiation treatment planning. A standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) plan will be generated and patients will be treated with megavoltage radiation over a course of > 6 weeks with a planned tumor dose of > 60 Gy. A medical doctor will perform weekly mucositis evaluation and grading for the measured site once a week during radiation therapy Modulation of an IMRT plan to reduce the dose to less than 35 Gy delivered to adjacent normal mucosa surrounding the dental filling without compromising normal tissue or tumor doses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with HNC undergoing radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy at Stanford University
- At least 18 years old
- Metallic filling present
- Planned radiation dose to the tumor > 60 Gy at 1.8 to 2.2 Gy/fx
- Able to understand and sign a written informed consent document.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant
- Nursing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity Modulated Radiation TherapyAlso: IMRTWe are using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment) plan that is normally delivered in the clinic. If the measured mucosal dose exceeds 35 Gy, we will generate a "filling" optimized IMRT plan to reduce it to < 35 Gy. The new plan will be deemed acceptable and implemented only if it does not (1) compromise the tumor coverage, (2) increase the dose to either the remaining oral cavity or the spared parotid gland(s). | Radiation | IMRT Modulation |
Primary outcome
Time Until the Maximum Oral Mucositis Measured From the Start of Radiation Treatment.
Time frame: 3 years
The time to onset of oral mucositis was measured from the start of radiation treatment until oral mucositis was visual observed by a clinician during the weekly checkup for the first time. Analysis done by Kaplan-Meier. Adverse events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version (V) 4.0. Medical doctor performed evaluation and grading of clinical and functional mucositis for the measured site weekly during the radiation treatment course and biweekly after completion of radiation until oral mucositis was < grade 2. A pain medication assessment was done for each mucositis time point. Patients completed the Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck cancer (OMWQ-HN) during and after treatment until oral mucositis is < grade 2.
Duration of Grade 2 or Higher Oral Mucositis After First Oral Mucositis Was Observed.
Time frame: 3 years
The duration of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis was measured as the time from the first time oral mucositis was observed by a clinician at the weekly checkup until the oral mucositis was resolved. The data was analyzed in a mixed effects model to account for the within subject correlation, since each patient contributed two measurements to the data set. The model was limited to those subjects who had experienced mucositis and then the outcome was the duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis. This allowed us to model the data in a mixed effects model with the continuous outcome of duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis.
3 secondary outcomes
Relationship Between the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose and the Amount of Narcotic Use
Time frame: 3 years
How Does Increase in Soreness Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose
Time frame: 3 years
How Does Increase in Pain Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose?
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Head and Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Quynh-Thu Le, MD principal investigator
Professor of Radiation Oncology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time Until the Maximum Oral Mucositis Measured From the Start of Radiation Treatment. (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2017.