Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record ListNCT01577602
Standard Medication Reconciliation Protocol in the Primary Care Office-based Setting
A study testing Printed medication list, Open ended question and Combined intervention in people with Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record List, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if two basic medical office visit interventions improve the agreement of medication lists between electronic medical record and patient self, home-based report. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record List
- What is being tested?
- Printed medication list, Open ended question and Combined intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 424 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to May 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over 18 years of age
- English speaking
- Current medication list has at least 2 medications listed
Who cannot join
- less than 18 years of age
- English is not primary language
- Less than 2 medications on medication list
- Enrollment only applies to one visit. Patients cannot be enrolled more than one time on the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Standard Medication Reconciliation Protocol in the Primary Care Office-based Setting: A Focused Investigation of Two Interventions
The purpose of this study is to determine if two basic medical office visit interventions improve the agreement of medication lists between electronic medical record and patient self, home-based report. The interventions are:
- giving patients a printed list of medications before the visit
- asking the patients about their medications with a scripted, open ended question.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized clinical trial of the implementation and initial effectiveness of two interventions for improving medication reconciliation in primary care offices. The interventions we will test are 1) patients reviewing a printed paper copy of their EMR medication list just prior to seeing the physician and 2) medical assistants beginning the interview with an open-ended question. We will test the following two hypotheses:
- Providing patients a paper copy of their EMR medication list upon check-in, to review for accuracy prior to their office visit, will improve the agreement between the EMR medication list and patient report during a phone interview within one week of the office visit.
- The medical assistant practice of routinely using an open-ended question to introduce the medication review will improve the agreement between the EMR medication list and patient report during a phone interview within one week of the office visit.
The main outcome measure for this study is full agreement of prescription medications between the medication list in the electronic medical record at the conclusion of patient's office visit and the list generated by pharmacists during a phone interview performed within a week of the office visit.
The study will take place at 2-4 Cleveland Clinic Health Centers in primary care offices. A sample size of 400 patients will be enrolled: 20 pairs of physicians and medical assistants will be invited to volunteer for the study, and 20 patients per MD/MA pair will be recruited. Medical assistants will be trained in using scripted open-ended questions to begin reviewing medications with patients. The study coordinator will implement the printed list intervention by providing a paper list to patients.
Consenting patients will be randomized to one of four groups (A-D):
A: NO patient review of printed medication list \& NO open-ended question B: Patient review of printed medication list ONLY C: Open-ended question ONLY D: BOTH patient review of printed medication list \& open-ended question
To document the medications that patients report taking, a pharmacist will conduct a detailed phone interview with the patient and/or caretaker within a week of the office visit using a prepared script. The pharmacist will note any discrepancies between the EMR and the patient's/caretaker's self report. In order to be considered in full agreement, the medication list and patient report must agree on the five following elements: 1) name, 2) dose, 3) frequency, 4) route, and 5) PRN status.
Our goal is to statistically test whether the proportion of medication lists in agreement with patient report differs in the intervention group compared to the non-intervention group. First, an unadjusted analysis utilizing a difference of proportions test and linear contrasts as described in the above planned comparisons. Then, a multivariable mixed model will be used to determine the significance of the intervention with adjustment.
If the interventions are successful, they will be incorporated into a standard medication reconciliation protocol for Cleveland Clinic primary care office practice. If highly successful, this protocol could serve as a new standard for medication reconciliation in outpatient primary care practice in the United States.
- Conditions
- Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record List
- Being tested
- Printed medication list, Open ended question, Combined intervention
- Keywords
- Medication reconciliation, Self report, Electronic medical record medication list
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Printed medication listOther
Provide a list of patient's current medication list as noted in the EMR
Open ended questionOther
medical assistants begin medication reconciliation with a scripted open ended question.
Combined interventionOther
Combines the printed medication list with the open ended question
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard practice | No intervention | Not described |
| Printed list intervention | Experimental | Providing patients a list of their current medications before they see medical assistant and begin their visit. Receives: Other: Printed medication list |
| Open ended question intervention | Experimental | Medical assistants begin the medication review with a scripted, open ended question (i.e., "tell me about your medications") Receives: Other: Open ended question |
| Combined intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Combined intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of EMR medication lists and patient report agreement
To document medications patients report taking, a pharmacist will conduct a detailed phone interview with the patient within a week of the office visit using a prepared script. The pharmacist will note any discrepancies between the EMR and the patient's self report. In order to be considered in full agreement, the medication list and patient report must agree on the five following elements: 1) name, 2) dose, 3) frequency, 4) route, and 5) PRN status.
Measured: Within one week of enrolled patient's visit
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assessment of number of medication list discrepancies
Data will be collected in same manner as primary outcome. The secondary outcome focuses on the actual number of discrepancies and what may have caused the discrepancy.
Measured: Within one week of patients' visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record ListStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Hickner, The Cleveland Clinic
- Investigators
- John Hickner, MD, MSc, Study director, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01577602
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11-667
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Standard Medication Reconciliation Protocol in the Primary Care Office-based Setting: A Focused Investigation of Two Interventions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01577602
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11-667
- Conditions
- Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record List
- Keywords
- Medication reconciliation, Self report, Electronic medical record medication list
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if two basic medical office visit interventions improve the agreement of medication lists between electronic medical record and patient self, home-based report. The interventions are:
- giving patients a printed list of medications before the visit
- asking the patients about their medications with a scripted, open ended question.
Detailed description
This is a randomized clinical trial of the implementation and initial effectiveness of two interventions for improving medication reconciliation in primary care offices. The interventions we will test are 1) patients reviewing a printed paper copy of their EMR medication list just prior to seeing the physician and 2) medical assistants beginning the interview with an open-ended question. We will test the following two hypotheses:
- Providing patients a paper copy of their EMR medication list upon check-in, to review for accuracy prior to their office visit, will improve the agreement between the EMR medication list and patient report during a phone interview within one week of the office visit.
- The medical assistant practice of routinely using an open-ended question to introduce the medication review will improve the agreement between the EMR medication list and patient report during a phone interview within one week of the office visit.
The main outcome measure for this study is full agreement of prescription medications between the medication list in the electronic medical record at the conclusion of patient's office visit and the list generated by pharmacists during a phone interview performed within a week of the office visit.
The study will take place at 2-4 Cleveland Clinic Health Centers in primary care offices. A sample size of 400 patients will be enrolled: 20 pairs of physicians and medical assistants will be invited to volunteer for the study, and 20 patients per MD/MA pair will be recruited. Medical assistants will be trained in using scripted open-ended questions to begin reviewing medications with patients. The study coordinator will implement the printed list intervention by providing a paper list to patients.
Consenting patients will be randomized to one of four groups (A-D):
A: NO patient review of printed medication list \& NO open-ended question B: Patient review of printed medication list ONLY C: Open-ended question ONLY D: BOTH patient review of printed medication list \& open-ended question
To document the medications that patients report taking, a pharmacist will conduct a detailed phone interview with the patient and/or caretaker within a week of the office visit using a prepared script. The pharmacist will note any discrepancies between the EMR and the patient's/caretaker's self report. In order to be considered in full agreement, the medication list and patient report must agree on the five following elements: 1) name, 2) dose, 3) frequency, 4) route, and 5) PRN status.
Our goal is to statistically test whether the proportion of medication lists in agreement with patient report differs in the intervention group compared to the non-intervention group. First, an unadjusted analysis utilizing a difference of proportions test and linear contrasts as described in the above planned comparisons. Then, a multivariable mixed model will be used to determine the significance of the intervention with adjustment.
If the interventions are successful, they will be incorporated into a standard medication reconciliation protocol for Cleveland Clinic primary care office practice. If highly successful, this protocol could serve as a new standard for medication reconciliation in outpatient primary care practice in the United States.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard practice | No intervention | – |
| Printed list intervention | Experimental | Other: Printed medication listProviding patients a list of their current medications before they see medical assistant and begin their visit. |
| Open ended question intervention | Experimental | Other: Open ended questionMedical assistants begin the medication review with a scripted, open ended question (i.e., "tell me about your medications") |
| Combined intervention | Experimental | Other: Combined intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Over 18 years of age
- English speaking
- Current medication list has at least 2 medications listed
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- less than 18 years of age
- English is not primary language
- Less than 2 medications on medication list
- Enrollment only applies to one visit. Patients cannot be enrolled more than one time on the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Printed medication listProvide a list of patient's current medication list as noted in the EMR | Other | Printed list intervention |
| Open ended questionmedical assistants begin medication reconciliation with a scripted open ended question. | Other | Open ended question intervention |
| Combined interventionCombines the printed medication list with the open ended question | Other | Combined intervention |
Primary outcome
Assessment of EMR medication lists and patient report agreement
Time frame: Within one week of enrolled patient's visit
To document medications patients report taking, a pharmacist will conduct a detailed phone interview with the patient within a week of the office visit using a prepared script. The pharmacist will note any discrepancies between the EMR and the patient's self report. In order to be considered in full agreement, the medication list and patient report must agree on the five following elements: 1) name, 2) dose, 3) frequency, 4) route, and 5) PRN status.
1 secondary outcome
Assessment of number of medication list discrepancies
Time frame: Within one week of patients' visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2013.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Hickner, MD, MSc study director
The Cleveland Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Printed medication list, Open ended question and Combined intervention in people with Medication Reconciliation Between Patients' Self Report and Electronic Medical Record List, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of EMR medication lists and patient report agreement (time frame: Within one week of enrolled patient's visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2013.