Lung CancerISRUSAL01NCT01580332
Non-Invasive Biomarkers For Early Detection Of Lung Cancers
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Douglas W. Johnson MD, FACR at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Recent studies have shown that low-dose chest CT scans can detect lung cancers in high-risk populations (age >50yo, >30 pack-years of tobacco use), and can lower cancer mortality. Unfortunately, the vast majority of "positive" findings on these CT scans are benign (>95%). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: any patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer (any histology, any stage) who has not yet begun definitive treatment, and who has no prior history of cancer of any type
Who may be able to join
- newly diagnosed cancer, prior to treatment
Who cannot join
- prior treatment for this cancer
- a history of any other cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Baptist Cancer Institute, Baptist Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
About this study
Official title: NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKERS FOR EARLY DETECTION OF LUNG CANCERS: ELEMENT 1: NON-RANDOMIZED PHASE II EVALUATION AND VALIDATION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED LUNG CANCER PATIENTS
Recent studies have shown that low-dose chest CT scans can detect lung cancers in high-risk populations (age >50yo, >30 pack-years of tobacco use), and can lower cancer mortality. Unfortunately, the vast majority of "positive" findings on these CT scans are benign (>95%). Currently, an inordinate amount of expensive follow-up testing is required for these patients to try to prove who among them truly has a cancer.
Several new emerging non-invasive and potentially cheaper tests are now being investigated to help differentiate patients with cancers versus just benign lung nodules. These new tests include a new type of sputum analysis, a breath analysis, a blood test measuring certain tumor markers, a blood test looking for auto-antibodies, and a standard PET/CT scan. Each of these tests have different sensitivity and specificity rates when looking for lung cancer, and it is unclear which test is best.
This study will employ a panel of all 5 of these non-invasive tests on an initial cohort of 50 patients with recently diagnosed lung cancer to try to measure the sensitivity of the tests. A follow-on study will then perform the same panel of tests on 300 lung nodule patients to see which test, or combination of tests, gives the best overall accuracy in terms of predicting who really has lung cancer. It is hoped that the use of such a panel could lead to dramatically decreased need for expensive and morbid invasive testing for this population.
Read the detailed description
The study revolves around specifying the exact signatures and accuracy associated with discriminating between benign and malignant SPNs for each of the biomarkers in the specific high risk cohort under the NLST screening protocol. To help identify and quantify these signatures, we will evaluate specifically the volatile signature in the exhaled breath, the accuracy of LuCED sputum detection, the profile of tumor markers and the specifications of auto-antibodies through immunoassays and Orbitrap technology, and the PET/CT in patients already diagnosed with lung cancer.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- biomarkers, lung cancer, solitary pulmonary nodules, SPN, breath analysis, VOC, volatile organic compounds, sputum, auto-antibodies
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Douglas W. Johnson MD, FACR
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Douglas W. Johnson MD, FACR, Baptist Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Douglas W Johnson, MD, Principal investigator, Baptist Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01580332
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ISRUSAL01
- Acronym
- ISRUSAL01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKERS FOR EARLY DETECTION OF LUNG CANCERS: ELEMENT 1: NON-RANDOMIZED PHASE II EVALUATION AND VALIDATION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED LUNG CANCER PATIENTS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01580332
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISRUSAL01 / ISRUSAL01
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- biomarkers, lung cancer, solitary pulmonary nodules, SPN, breath analysis, VOC, volatile organic compounds, sputum
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Douglas W. Johnson MD, FACRUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recent studies have shown that low-dose chest CT scans can detect lung cancers in high-risk populations (age >50yo, >30 pack-years of tobacco use), and can lower cancer mortality. Unfortunately, the vast majority of "positive" findings on these CT scans are benign (>95%). Currently, an inordinate amount of expensive follow-up testing is required for these patients to try to prove who among them truly has a cancer.
Several new emerging non-invasive and potentially cheaper tests are now being investigated to help differentiate patients with cancers versus just benign lung nodules. These new tests include a new type of sputum analysis, a breath analysis, a blood test measuring certain tumor markers, a blood test looking for auto-antibodies, and a standard PET/CT scan. Each of these tests have different sensitivity and specificity rates when looking for lung cancer, and it is unclear which test is best.
This study will employ a panel of all 5 of these non-invasive tests on an initial cohort of 50 patients with recently diagnosed lung cancer to try to measure the sensitivity of the tests. A follow-on study will then perform the same panel of tests on 300 lung nodule patients to see which test, or combination of tests, gives the best overall accuracy in terms of predicting who really has lung cancer. It is hoped that the use of such a panel could lead to dramatically decreased need for expensive and morbid invasive testing for this population.
Detailed description
The study revolves around specifying the exact signatures and accuracy associated with discriminating between benign and malignant SPNs for each of the biomarkers in the specific high risk cohort under the NLST screening protocol. To help identify and quantify these signatures, we will evaluate specifically the volatile signature in the exhaled breath, the accuracy of LuCED sputum detection, the profile of tumor markers and the specifications of auto-antibodies through immunoassays and Orbitrap technology, and the PET/CT in patients already diagnosed with lung cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- any patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer (any histology, any stage) who has not yet begun definitive treatment, and who has no prior history of cancer of any type
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- newly diagnosed cancer, prior to treatment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- prior treatment for this cancer
- a history of any other cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2014.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Douglas W Johnson, MD principal investigator
Baptist Cancer Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Douglas W. Johnson MD, FACR at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2014.