Stress Urinary IncontinenceURINE&MENCT01583166
Voiding Function After Mid-Urethral Slings With and Without Local Anesthetic: Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Bupivacaine, Saline and Epinephrine in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in post-operative voiding function between subjects receiving local anesthetic and those receiving placebo at the time of mid-urethral sling placement. The secondary objective is to evaluate pain after the procedure in the two groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Bupivacaine, Saline and Epinephrine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled to undergo mid-urethral sling for incontinence without concomitant procedures
Who cannot join
- Undergoing procedure in addition to the sling
- Not competent to give consent
- Using intermittent self catheterization pre-operatively
- Known allergy to local anesthetic
- Undergoing spinal anesthesia for the procedure
- Prisoners
Show all 9Show fewer
- Non-English speaker
- Under 18 years of age
- Has a condition that would contra-indicate the use of local anesthetic or epinephrine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Massachusetts
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in post-operative voiding function between subjects receiving local anesthetic and those receiving placebo at the time of mid-urethral sling placement. The secondary objective is to evaluate pain after the procedure in the two groups.
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Being tested
- Bupivacaine, Saline, Epinephrine
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BupivacaineDrug
Also called Marcaine
10ml 0.5% bupivacaine
SalineDrug
Also called Sodium Chloride
10ml 0.9% sodium chloride
EpinephrineDrug
1:200,000 epinephrine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine + epinephrine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine; Drug: Epinephrine |
| Saline + epinephrine | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects Who Passed the Voiding Trial After a Midurethral Sling
Study team assessment of whether the use of local anesthetic has any affect on the percentage of patients who pass their post-operative bladder challenge. This is determined by their voided volume and post-void residual.
Measured: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Post-operative Pain Scores at 2-3 Hours Post op
Visual analog score at 2 hours post op will be compared in the two groups. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (unbearable pain)
Measured: 2-3 hours
Post-operative Pain Scale at 6-7 Hours Post op
Visual analog score at 6 hours post op will be compared in the two groups. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (unbearable pain)
Measured: 6-7 hours
Visual Analog Scale for Pain: Pre-operative.
Participants asked to report on pre-operative level of pain using a Visual Analog Scale. The scale is participant reported and ranges from 0 representing no pain to 10 representing unbearable pain.
Measured: At enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Flynn, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Investigators
- Michael Flynn, MD, Principal investigator, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01583166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14197
- Acronym
- URINE&ME
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Duenas-Garcia OF, Patterson D, De la Luz Nieto M, Leung K, Flynn MK. Voiding Function After Midurethral Slings With and Without Local Anesthetic: Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000343.
PubMed 27682748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Voiding Function After Mid-Urethral Slings With and Without Local Anesthetic: Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01583166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- URINE&ME / 14197
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, WorcesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Nov 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in post-operative voiding function between subjects receiving local anesthetic and those receiving placebo at the time of mid-urethral sling placement. The secondary objective is to evaluate pain after the procedure in the two groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine + epinephrine | Active comparator | Drug: Bupivacaine, Drug: Epinephrine |
| Saline + epinephrine | Placebo comparator | Drug: Saline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Scheduled to undergo mid-urethral sling for incontinence without concomitant procedures
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Undergoing procedure in addition to the sling
- Not competent to give consent
- Using intermittent self catheterization pre-operatively
- Known allergy to local anesthetic
- Undergoing spinal anesthesia for the procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BupivacaineAlso: Marcaine10ml 0.5% bupivacaine | Drug | Bupivacaine + epinephrine |
| SalineAlso: Sodium Chloride10ml 0.9% sodium chloride | Drug | Saline + epinephrine |
| Epinephrine1:200,000 epinephrine | Drug | Bupivacaine + epinephrine |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects Who Passed the Voiding Trial After a Midurethral Sling
Time frame: 2 weeks
Study team assessment of whether the use of local anesthetic has any affect on the percentage of patients who pass their post-operative bladder challenge. This is determined by their voided volume and post-void residual.
3 secondary outcomes
Post-operative Pain Scores at 2-3 Hours Post op
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Post-operative Pain Scale at 6-7 Hours Post op
Time frame: 6-7 hours
Visual Analog Scale for Pain: Pre-operative.
Time frame: At enrollment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27682748Duenas-Garcia OF, Patterson D, De la Luz Nieto M, Leung K, Flynn MK. Voiding Function After Midurethral Slings With and Without Local Anesthetic: Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000343.
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Active, not recruiting
A Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the UrOActive® Artificial Urinary sPHincter (AUS)
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Recruiting
Comparing the Effect of Two Types of Pelvic Floor Muscle Stimulation Devices to Improve Symptoms of Urinary Incontinence in Women.
Urinary Incontinence, Mixed Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Recruiting
Effect of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Technology in the Treatment of SUI in Chinese Men Undergone Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Prostatectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Flynn, MD principal investigator
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bupivacaine, Saline and Epinephrine in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects Who Passed the Voiding Trial After a Midurethral Sling (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01583166, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.