Ulcerative ColitisPhase 2NCT01586533
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Zoenasa® Versus Mesalamine Enema in Subjects With Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 2 study testing Zoenasa-1:4 and Mesalamine Enema in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis, run by Altheus Therapeutics, Inc. at 45 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled Phase II study is designed to establish the safety and efficacy of Zoenasa Rectal Gel compared to mesalamine enema in subjects with left-sided ulcerative colitis, as measured by the modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI), over 6 weeks of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis, Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis, Distal Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Zoenasa-1:4 and Mesalamine Enema
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female subjects are eligible if they are ≥ 18 years of age and ≤ 64 years.
- They have a documented history of idiopathic ulcerative colitis based on endoscopic and/or histologic findings involving the left side of the colon, with mild to moderate active disease.
- Eligible subjects will have a documented history of ulcerative colitis, and a modified UCDAI score of 4-10, inclusive, with a Physician's rating of disease score of 2 points or less (mild or moderate active ulcerative colitis), rectal bleeding score of 1 or more (based on subject diary), and mucosal appearance score (based on endoscopy) of 1 point or more at baseline.
- Laboratory data:
- White blood cell count between 4.0 - 12.0 K/mm3
- Platelet count: 150 - 500 K/mm3
Show all 17Show fewer
- Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL
- Total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL
- Aspartate aminotransferase < 100 u/dL
- Alanine aminotransferase < 100 u/dL
- Alkaline phosphatase < 250 u/dL
- Blood urine nitrogen < 40 mg/dL
- Creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL
- Satisfies one of the following:
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening; surgically sterile, post-menopausal, abstinent, or patient or partner agree to use a medically appropriate form of birth control from screening to until 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
- Male subjects must be surgically sterile, abstinent, or patient or partner compliant with a contraceptive regimen from screening to until 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
- They are able to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of study procedures.
Who cannot join
- They have documented history of proximal or universal ulcerative colitis, proctitis or active proctitis confined to 15cm or less from the anal verge.
- They demonstrate signs and symptoms of fulminant colitis, bowel stricture, toxic megacolon, an anticipated need for blood transfusion for gastrointestinal bleeding, or demonstrate evidence of peritonitis.
- They receive a Physician's rating of disease severity as part of the modified UCDAI of 3 (severe disease) or an aggregate score of 11 or greater.
- They have shown prior documented history of evidence of high grade dysplasia on biopsy from endoscopic examinations.
- Their stool contains enteric pathogens or Clostridium difficile toxins.
- They have a history of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.
Show all 19Show fewer
- They have prior history of biologic therapy within the previous 4 years.
- They have received systemic steroids or immunosuppressants within the previous 4 weeks.
- Treatment in the last 14 days that included antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic medications, or rectally administered steroids (e.g. Cortenema®) or mesalamine enema (Rowasa®).
- Treatment in the last 7 days that included mesalamine (5-ASA) via oral administration (e.g. Asacol®, Lialda®, balsalazide, etc).
- They have a history of cancer (defined as malignancy within 5 years except for squamous cell or basal cell cancers of the skin), asthma, or bronchospasm.
- Positive pregnancy test or lactating subjects.
- There is evidence of chemical substance abuse.
- They have had repeated anti-inflammatory drug treatment (longer than 3 days at doses that exceed those available without a prescription) within the previous 7 days (with exception of aspirin at doses of 325mg/day or less for prophylaxis of cardiac disease), or initiated new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) treatment within the last 30 days.
- They have a known allergy to N-acetylcysteine or mesalamine, or have a history of serious AEs related to their use (including, but not limited to pancreatitis or hepatitis).
- They have a history of failure to retain enemas.
- Other clinically significant diseases that could interfere with the protocol compliance appear. These would include clinically important hematological, renal, hepatic, metabolic, psychiatric, central nervous system (CNS), pulmonary or cardiovascular disease.
- Use of any investigational medication within the previous 90 days.
- Any condition which the study physician judges to preclude safe participation in the study or to confound the evaluation of the study outcome.
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 1 country.
45 sites in 1 country
United States45 sites
NCH Medical Group
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60004
Asheville Gastroenterology Associates, P.A.
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Tri-County Research
Athens, Georgia, 30606
Digestive Healthcare of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Dr. Jason Bozdin, M.D.
Berkley, Michigan, 48072
Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
New River Valley Research Institute
Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073
Greater Cincinnati Gastroenterology
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Gastrointestinal Clinic of Quad Cities
Davenport, Iowa, 52807
Carolina Digestive Health Associates
Davidson, North Carolina, 28036
The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
Digestive Disease Associates
Gainesville, Florida, 32605
Gastro One
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Memphis Gastroenterology Group
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Long Island Clinical Research Associates
Great Neck, New York, 11021
LeBauer Research Associates, P.A.
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Digestive Medical Associates
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
The Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Houston Digestive Disease Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77090
GI Associates and Endoscopy Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology
Lakewood, Colorado, 80214
Clinical Trials Management of Louisiana
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Miami Gastroenterology Consultants P.A.
Miami, Florida, 33156
South Medical Research Group
Miami, Florida, 33186
Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Gastroenterology of Naples
Naples, Florida, 34102
Research Associates of New York
New York, New York, 10028
Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Central Sooner Research
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Advanced Gastroenterology Associates
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Digestive Health Associates of Texas
Plano, Texas, 75075
St. Josephs Candler Health System
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Digestive Disease Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Advanced Research Institute
South Ogden, Utah, 84405
Franciscan Research Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Options Health Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Gastroenterology United Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Professional Research Network of Kansas
Wichita, Kansas, 67203
Shafran Gastroenterology
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Gregory Cammel, MD PLC
Wyoming, Michigan, 48418
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Double-blind, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Zoenasa™ Rectal Gel (Mesalamine Plus N-acetylcysteine) in Subjects With Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis
This double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled Phase II study is designed to establish the safety and efficacy of Zoenasa Rectal Gel compared to mesalamine enema in subjects with left-sided ulcerative colitis, as measured by the modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI), over 6 weeks of treatment. In this study, two cohorts of subjects will receive either Zoenasa-1:4 (1.0g NAC; 4.0g 5-ASA) investigational drug enema therapy or comparator mesalamine enema (4.0g 5-ASA). The study will enroll subjects randomized equally into the 2 cohorts. Each cohort will enroll approximately 60 subjects. The two arms of the trial will be enrolled concurrently in a randomized fashion.
- Being tested
- Zoenasa-1:4, Mesalamine Enema
- Keywords
- ulcerative colitis, UC, left-sided ulcerative colitis, distal ulcerative colitis, Zoenasa, mesalamine, mesalazine, 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid, N-acetylcysteine, acetylcysteine, NAC, enema, rectal gel
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Zoenasa-1:4Drug
Zoenasa Rectal Gel (4.0g mesalamine [5-ASA], 1.0g N-acetylcysteine [NAC]; 60ml)
Mesalamine EnemaDrug
Mesalamine Rectal Suspension Enema (4.0g mesalamine [5-ASA], 60ml)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Zoenasa-1:4 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Zoenasa-1:4 |
| Mesalamine Enema | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Mesalamine Enema |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in modified UCDAI at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in the modified Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (modified UCDAI) score at the end of the 6 week treatment period of Zoenasa™ Rectal Gel compared with mesalamine
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in modified UCDAI at 3 weeks
Change from baseline in the modified Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (modified UCDAI) score at the end of the 3 week treatment period of Zoenasa™ Rectal Gel compared with mesalamine
Measured: 3 weeks
Clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 6 weeks
Proportion of patients in clinical and endoscopic remission at 6 weeks compared to baseline
Measured: 6 weeks
Clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 3 weeks
Proportion of patients in clinical and endoscopic remission at 3 weeks compared to baseline
Measured: 3 weeks
Clinical improvement rate after 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Clinical improvement rate after 3 weeks
Measured: 3 weeks
Endoscopic improvement rate at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Endoscopic improvement rate at 3 weeks
Measured: 3 weeks
Change from baseline in endoscopic appearance after 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in endoscopic appearance after 3 weeks
Measured: 3 weeks
Time to resolution of rectal bleeding
Measured: Up to 6 weeks
Relapse rates at 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionApr 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Altheus Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01586533
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZA-201
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Double-blind, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Zoenasa™ Rectal Gel (Mesalamine Plus N-acetylcysteine) in Subjects With Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01586533
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZA-201
- Keywords
- ulcerative colitis, UC, left-sided ulcerative colitis, distal ulcerative colitis, Zoenasa, mesalamine, mesalazine, 5-ASA
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Altheus Therapeutics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled Phase II study is designed to establish the safety and efficacy of Zoenasa Rectal Gel compared to mesalamine enema in subjects with left-sided ulcerative colitis, as measured by the modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI), over 6 weeks of treatment. In this study, two cohorts of subjects will receive either Zoenasa-1:4 (1.0g NAC; 4.0g 5-ASA) investigational drug enema therapy or comparator mesalamine enema (4.0g 5-ASA). The study will enroll subjects randomized equally into the 2 cohorts. Each cohort will enroll approximately 60 subjects. The two arms of the trial will be enrolled concurrently in a randomized fashion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Zoenasa-1:4 | Experimental | Drug: Zoenasa-1:4 |
| Mesalamine Enema | Active comparator | Drug: Mesalamine Enema |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Male and female subjects are eligible if they are ≥ 18 years of age and ≤ 64 years.
- They have a documented history of idiopathic ulcerative colitis based on endoscopic and/or histologic findings involving the left side of the colon, with mild to moderate active disease.
- Eligible subjects will have a documented history of ulcerative colitis, and a modified UCDAI score of 4-10, inclusive, with a Physician's rating of disease score of 2 points or less (mild or moderate active ulcerative colitis), rectal bleeding score of 1 or more (based on subject diary), and mucosal appearance score (based on endoscopy) of 1 point or more at baseline.
- Laboratory data:
- Satisfies one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- They have documented history of proximal or universal ulcerative colitis, proctitis or active proctitis confined to 15cm or less from the anal verge.
- They demonstrate signs and symptoms of fulminant colitis, bowel stricture, toxic megacolon, an anticipated need for blood transfusion for gastrointestinal bleeding, or demonstrate evidence of peritonitis.
- They receive a Physician's rating of disease severity as part of the modified UCDAI of 3 (severe disease) or an aggregate score of 11 or greater.
- They have shown prior documented history of evidence of high grade dysplasia on biopsy from endoscopic examinations.
- Their stool contains enteric pathogens or Clostridium difficile toxins.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Zoenasa-1:4Zoenasa Rectal Gel (4.0g mesalamine [5-ASA], 1.0g N-acetylcysteine [NAC]; 60ml) | Drug | Zoenasa-1:4 |
| Mesalamine EnemaMesalamine Rectal Suspension Enema (4.0g mesalamine [5-ASA], 60ml) | Drug | Mesalamine Enema |
Primary outcome
Change in modified UCDAI at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in the modified Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (modified UCDAI) score at the end of the 6 week treatment period of Zoenasa™ Rectal Gel compared with mesalamine
11 secondary outcomes
Change in modified UCDAI at 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Clinical improvement rate after 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Clinical improvement rate after 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Endoscopic improvement rate at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Endoscopic improvement rate at 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Change from baseline in endoscopic appearance after 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in endoscopic appearance after 3 weeks
Time frame: 3 weeks
Time to resolution of rectal bleeding
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Relapse rates at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2014.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
45 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Zoenasa-1:4 and Mesalamine Enema in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis, run by Altheus Therapeutics, Inc. at 45 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in modified UCDAI at 6 weeks (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2014.