Type 1 Diabetes MellitusNCT01588093
IGF-I Induced Muscle Glucose Uptake and Interstitial IGF-I Concentrations
A study testing Increlex and 0.9% Saline in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Peter Bang at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Hormonal disturbances in the GH-IGF-I axis are considered important for the deterioration of glycemic control in T1DM particularly in adolescents. In addition it may have direct implications on the development of insulin resistance and long-term complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 23 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Increlex and 0.9% Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 23 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 1 diabetes duration at least two years and assumed C-peptide negativity
- Chronological age from 18 to 25 years
- Tanner stage > 4 (Girls: Tanner B4 or more, Boys: Testis > 15 ml)
- Levemir or Lantus as basal analogue or CSII
- IGF-1 < -1.0 SDS and HbA1C < 73 mmol/mol with screening or within past three months
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- 1. Development of hypoglycemia that can not be controlled with increased glucose infusion-rate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute & University Hospital
Stockholm, SE-17176
About this study
Official title: Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-I) Induced Muscle Glucose Uptake and Interstitial IGF-1 Concentrations.
Hormonal disturbances in the GH-IGF-I axis are considered important for the deterioration of glycemic control in T1DM particularly in adolescents. In addition it may have direct implications on the development of insulin resistance and long-term complications.
The Investigators hypothesis is that low circulating IGF-I and compensatory hyper-secretion of GH, in the presence of peripheral insulin excess, results in increased local IGF-I expression explaining both the deterioration in metabolic control and the increased risk for microvascular complications. Correction of imbalance in circulating and tissue-specific levels of IGF-I could lead to both better early metabolic control and to prevention of early diabetic complications in type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients.
Aim of the present study is to validate the microdialysis technique as a useable tool to predict local biological effects of IGF-1 and to understand the pharmacokinetics of local IGF-I actions after sc injection of Increlex in type 1 diabetic patients.
Read the detailed description
Background:
In healthy subjects, the liver extracts approximately 50 % of insulin. Therefore insulin given subcutaneously results in a relative insulin deficiency in the portal circulation of the liver, and a relative insulin excess in peripheral tissues. In comparison, normal physiological delivery of insulin from the pancreas to the portal circulation, results in markedly higher hepatic insulin exposure. The importance of hepatic insulin exposure for GH induced IGF-I synthesis comes from studies demonstrating that circulating IGF-I levels can be normalized by direct portal insulin infusion (1) or nearly normalized with intra-peritoneal insulin delivery (2). Approximately 80 % of circulating IGF-I is liver derived. Whether the GH induction of IGF-I production in other tissues such as fat, muscle and the growth plate is also insulin dependent has not been studied in humans. While locally produced IGF-I is important for linear growth, circulating IGF-I is essential for insulin sensitivity (3). Portal insulin deficiency results in uncoupling of GH induced IGF-I synthesis and subnormal circulating IGF-I levels in T1DM children with conventional therapy (4).
In newly diagnosed T1DM subcutaneous insulin treatment increases circulating IGF-I (5). The beneficial effects of 12 weeks adjuvant IGF-I treatment on metabolic control was demonstrated in conventionally insulin treated T1DM adolescents (6). There is also strong evidence for the role of IGF-I in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease, atherosclerosis and proliferative retinopathy (7, 8, 9).
Interestingly, recent reports suggest an important role of IGF-I in stimulating beta cell regeneration (10). Thus a role for improvement of IGF-I in prolonging endogenous insulin secretion in the early phase of T1DM disease appears promising.
The Investigators have previously developed a microdialysis approach to measure local IGF-I protein levels from the human muscle tissue. The Investigators were in that study able to show that exercise increases local IGF-I levels. (11, 12) However, no further analysis concerning tissue-specific glucose metabolism was performed.
The Investigators hypothesis is that low circulating IGF-I and compensatory hyper-secretion of GH, in the presence of peripheral insulin excess, results in increased local IGF-I expression explaining both the deterioration in metabolic control and the increased risk for microvascular complications.
In conclusion, correction of imbalance in circulating and tissue-specific levels of IGF-I could lead to both better early metabolic control and to prevention of early diabetic complications in type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients.
Study Design:
This is a placebo controlled crossover study of the effect of sc IGF-1 (Increlex) administration on glucose infusion rate (whole body glucose utilization) and interstitial muscle IGF-1 concentrations under euglycemic clamp conditions in T1DM adolescents and young adults (18-23 y of age). Each subject is studied twice and randomized to receive IGF-1 (120 μg/ kg, Increlex®, Ipsen) or placebo. Glucose control is optimized by CSII (Continuous Subcutaneus Insulin Infusion) for 2 days and subjects are studied after an overnight fast using a constant low rate insulin infusion to block hepatic glucose production. After a single s.c. bolus of IGF-1, the effects of IGF-1 on the peripheral glucose disposal rate will be assessed based on the rate of a variable glucose infusion. Local muscle IGF-1 measured by microdialysis will be related to the peripheral glucose disposal rate (mainly determined by muscle glucose uptake). Patients with T1DM will be studied for several reasons: 1) They are a target group for long term treatment, 2) They are IGF-I deficient and thus more likely to have a significant effect of sc IGF-I injections, 3) muscle levels may or may not be low.
The following assessments will be performed:
- Height \& Weight
- Glucose utilization rate (normoinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp)
- Blood parameters: P-glucose, Growth Hormone (GH), IGF-1, Insulin Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins 1-3 (IGFBP1-3) and Glucagon
- Microdialysis IGF-1
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Increlex, 0.9% Saline
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IncrelexDrug
Increlex 120 micrograms/kg body weight single subcutaneous injection
0.9% SalineDrug
Placebo (0,1 ml of 0.9% Saline) single subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Saline | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: 0.9% Saline |
| Increlex | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Increlex |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in MD (microdialysate) IGF-1 over time (expressed as AUC or peak microdialysate IGF-I) between saline and IGF-I injection.
Measured: 0-4 hours from injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peter Bang
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Peter Bang, Karolinska University Hospital
- Investigators
- Peter Bang, Professor, Principal investigator, Karolinska University Hospital, Pediatric Endicrinology Unit, Dept of Women´s and Children´s Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01588093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDIGF-1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-I) Induced Muscle Glucose Uptake and Interstitial IGF-1 Concentrations.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01588093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MDIGF-1
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Peter BangUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hormonal disturbances in the GH-IGF-I axis are considered important for the deterioration of glycemic control in T1DM particularly in adolescents. In addition it may have direct implications on the development of insulin resistance and long-term complications.
The Investigators hypothesis is that low circulating IGF-I and compensatory hyper-secretion of GH, in the presence of peripheral insulin excess, results in increased local IGF-I expression explaining both the deterioration in metabolic control and the increased risk for microvascular complications. Correction of imbalance in circulating and tissue-specific levels of IGF-I could lead to both better early metabolic control and to prevention of early diabetic complications in type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients.
Aim of the present study is to validate the microdialysis technique as a useable tool to predict local biological effects of IGF-1 and to understand the pharmacokinetics of local IGF-I actions after sc injection of Increlex in type 1 diabetic patients.
Detailed description
Background:
In healthy subjects, the liver extracts approximately 50 % of insulin. Therefore insulin given subcutaneously results in a relative insulin deficiency in the portal circulation of the liver, and a relative insulin excess in peripheral tissues. In comparison, normal physiological delivery of insulin from the pancreas to the portal circulation, results in markedly higher hepatic insulin exposure. The importance of hepatic insulin exposure for GH induced IGF-I synthesis comes from studies demonstrating that circulating IGF-I levels can be normalized by direct portal insulin infusion (1) or nearly normalized with intra-peritoneal insulin delivery (2). Approximately 80 % of circulating IGF-I is liver derived. Whether the GH induction of IGF-I production in other tissues such as fat, muscle and the growth plate is also insulin dependent has not been studied in humans. While locally produced IGF-I is important for linear growth, circulating IGF-I is essential for insulin sensitivity (3). Portal insulin deficiency results in uncoupling of GH induced IGF-I synthesis and subnormal circulating IGF-I levels in T1DM children with conventional therapy (4).
In newly diagnosed T1DM subcutaneous insulin treatment increases circulating IGF-I (5). The beneficial effects of 12 weeks adjuvant IGF-I treatment on metabolic control was demonstrated in conventionally insulin treated T1DM adolescents (6). There is also strong evidence for the role of IGF-I in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease, atherosclerosis and proliferative retinopathy (7, 8, 9).
Interestingly, recent reports suggest an important role of IGF-I in stimulating beta cell regeneration (10). Thus a role for improvement of IGF-I in prolonging endogenous insulin secretion in the early phase of T1DM disease appears promising.
The Investigators have previously developed a microdialysis approach to measure local IGF-I protein levels from the human muscle tissue. The Investigators were in that study able to show that exercise increases local IGF-I levels. (11, 12) However, no further analysis concerning tissue-specific glucose metabolism was performed.
The Investigators hypothesis is that low circulating IGF-I and compensatory hyper-secretion of GH, in the presence of peripheral insulin excess, results in increased local IGF-I expression explaining both the deterioration in metabolic control and the increased risk for microvascular complications.
In conclusion, correction of imbalance in circulating and tissue-specific levels of IGF-I could lead to both better early metabolic control and to prevention of early diabetic complications in type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients.
Study Design:
This is a placebo controlled crossover study of the effect of sc IGF-1 (Increlex) administration on glucose infusion rate (whole body glucose utilization) and interstitial muscle IGF-1 concentrations under euglycemic clamp conditions in T1DM adolescents and young adults (18-23 y of age). Each subject is studied twice and randomized to receive IGF-1 (120 μg/ kg, Increlex®, Ipsen) or placebo. Glucose control is optimized by CSII (Continuous Subcutaneus Insulin Infusion) for 2 days and subjects are studied after an overnight fast using a constant low rate insulin infusion to block hepatic glucose production. After a single s.c. bolus of IGF-1, the effects of IGF-1 on the peripheral glucose disposal rate will be assessed based on the rate of a variable glucose infusion. Local muscle IGF-1 measured by microdialysis will be related to the peripheral glucose disposal rate (mainly determined by muscle glucose uptake). Patients with T1DM will be studied for several reasons: 1) They are a target group for long term treatment, 2) They are IGF-I deficient and thus more likely to have a significant effect of sc IGF-I injections, 3) muscle levels may or may not be low.
The following assessments will be performed:
- Height \& Weight
- Glucose utilization rate (normoinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp)
- Blood parameters: P-glucose, Growth Hormone (GH), IGF-1, Insulin Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins 1-3 (IGFBP1-3) and Glucagon
- Microdialysis IGF-1
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Saline | Placebo comparator | Drug: 0.9% Saline |
| Increlex | Active comparator | Drug: Increlex |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 23 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes duration at least two years and assumed C-peptide negativity
- Chronological age from 18 to 25 years
- Tanner stage > 4 (Girls: Tanner B4 or more, Boys: Testis > 15 ml)
- Levemir or Lantus as basal analogue or CSII
- IGF-1 < -1.0 SDS and HbA1C < 73 mmol/mol with screening or within past three months
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Development of hypoglycemia that can not be controlled with increased glucose infusion-rate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IncrelexIncrelex 120 micrograms/kg body weight single subcutaneous injection | Drug | Increlex |
| 0.9% SalinePlacebo (0,1 ml of 0.9% Saline) single subcutaneous injection | Drug | Saline |
Primary outcome
Difference in MD (microdialysate) IGF-1 over time (expressed as AUC or peak microdialysate IGF-I) between saline and IGF-I injection.
Time frame: 0-4 hours from injection
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2012.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Bang, Professor principal investigator
Karolinska University Hospital, Pediatric Endicrinology Unit, Dept of Women´s and Children´s Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Increlex and 0.9% Saline in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Peter Bang at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in MD (microdialysate) IGF-1 over time (expressed as AUC or peak microdialysate IGF-I) between saline and IGF-I injection. (time frame: 0-4 hours from injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2012.