OsteoporosisPhase 1NCT01588509
Transition From Alendronate to Romosozumab (AMG 785)
A Phase 1 study testing Romosozumab in people with Osteoporosis, run by Amgen at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to estimate the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) following multiple-dose administrations of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low BMD previously treated with alendronate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Romosozumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2012to 21 Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Postmenopausal women, defined as no vaginal bleeding or spotting for ≥ 12 months
- Low bone mineral density at screening [defined by a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤ -2.0 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine (L1 to L4; or BMD T-score of evaluable vertebrae), total hip, or femoral neck]
- Currently taking alendronate (70 mg weekly or equivalent) exclusively for ≥ 1 year with verbal agreement that the subject has taken ≥ 80% of their doses with good tolerance
Who cannot join
- History of vertebral fracture, or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis after age 50; or recent bone fracture within 6 months prior to screening
- History of metabolic or bone disease such as Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome
- Vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25-OH-VitD levels < 20 ng/mL)
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Research Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Research Site
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Research Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Research Site
Seattle, Washington, 98144
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85711
Research Site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Research Site
West Haverstraw, New York, 10993
Research Site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Randomized Study to Estimate the Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density After 3 Months of AMG 785 Administration in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density Previously Treated With Alendronate
The purpose of this study is to estimate the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) following multiple-dose administrations of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low BMD previously treated with alendronate.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Romosozumab
- Keywords
- AMG 785, bone mineral density, alendronate
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RomosozumabDrug
Also called AMG 785, EVENITY™
Administered by subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab 140 mg | Experimental | Participants received romosozumab 140 mg administered subcutaneously once a month for 3 months. Receives: Drug: Romosozumab |
| Romosozumab 210 mg | Experimental | Participants received romosozumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously once a month for 3 months. Receives: Drug: Romosozumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and analyzed by a central imaging lab.
Measured: Baseline and day 85
Secondary outcomes (7)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Femoral Neck
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and analyzed by a central imaging lab.
Measured: Baseline and day 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Total Hip
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and analyzed by a central imaging lab.
Measured: Baseline and day 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-1 Aminoterminal Propeptide (P1NP)
Measured: Baseline and days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide (sCTX)
Measured: Baseline and days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant.
Laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered adverse events.
A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was an adverse event assessed by the investigator as possibly related to the investigational product, indicated by a "yes" response to the question: Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the investigational product?
A serious adverse event was defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:
- fatal,
- life-threatening,
- required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,
- resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity,
- congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or
- other medically important serious event.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to day 85
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-romosozumab Antibodies
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-romosozumab antibodies. An electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding romosozumab. Samples testing positive in the immunoassay were further tested in a competitive binding bioassay for neutralizing activity against romosozumab. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Participants who developed anti-romosozumab antibodies were those with a negative result at baseline and a positive result at any time postbaseline.
Measured: Baseline and days 29, 57, and 85
Mean Serum Concentration of Romosozumab
Measured: Days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71 and 85
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study start30 Mar 2012
- Primary completion21 Nov 2012
- Study completion21 Nov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01588509
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20110253
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Randomized Study to Estimate the Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density After 3 Months of AMG 785 Administration in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density Previously Treated With Alendronate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01588509
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20110253
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- AMG 785, bone mineral density, alendronate
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Mar 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) following multiple-dose administrations of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low BMD previously treated with alendronate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab 140 mg | Experimental | Drug: RomosozumabParticipants received romosozumab 140 mg administered subcutaneously once a month for 3 months. |
| Romosozumab 210 mg | Experimental | Drug: RomosozumabParticipants received romosozumab 210 mg administered subcutaneously once a month for 3 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Postmenopausal women, defined as no vaginal bleeding or spotting for ≥ 12 months
- Low bone mineral density at screening [defined by a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤ -2.0 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine (L1 to L4; or BMD T-score of evaluable vertebrae), total hip, or femoral neck]
- Currently taking alendronate (70 mg weekly or equivalent) exclusively for ≥ 1 year with verbal agreement that the subject has taken ≥ 80% of their doses with good tolerance
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History of vertebral fracture, or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis after age 50; or recent bone fracture within 6 months prior to screening
- History of metabolic or bone disease such as Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome
- Vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25-OH-VitD levels < 20 ng/mL)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RomosozumabAlso: AMG 785, EVENITY™Administered by subcutaneous injection | Drug | Romosozumab 140 mg, Romosozumab 210 mg |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine
Time frame: Baseline and day 85
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and analyzed by a central imaging lab.
7 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Femoral Neck
Time frame: Baseline and day 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Total Hip
Time frame: Baseline and day 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-1 Aminoterminal Propeptide (P1NP)
Time frame: Baseline and days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide (sCTX)
Time frame: Baseline and days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, and 85
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to day 85
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-romosozumab Antibodies
Time frame: Baseline and days 29, 57, and 85
Mean Serum Concentration of Romosozumab
Time frame: Days 4, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71 and 85
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Romosozumab in people with Osteoporosis, run by Amgen at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine (time frame: Baseline and day 85). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2019.