AzTrials
AzTrials

Sickle Cell AnemiaNCT01589926

Bi-Level Positive Airway Ventilation for Acute Chest Syndrome

A study testing Bi-level positive airway pressure device in people with Sickle Cell Anemia and Acute Chest Syndrome, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a frequent complication of sickle cell disease and is diagnosed by having findings on a chest x-ray and one of the following: chest pain, fever, or trouble breathing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Sickle Cell Anemia, Acute Chest Syndrome
What is being tested?
Bi-level positive airway pressure device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
3 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2012to 8 Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients diagnosed with Hemoglobin SS (HB SS), the most common type of sickle cell disease
  • patients diagnosed with Hemoglobin SC (HB SC), the second most common type of sickle cell disease.
  • patients diagnosed with Hemoglobin sickle beta-zero thalassemia ( HB SB0thal) or Hemoglobin sickle thalassemia (HB SBthal)
  • Must meet clinical criteria for ACS- an infiltrate on Chest X-ray and one of the following:
  • Respiratory symptoms/signs (patients pulse oximetry < 92% or oxygen saturation < 2% below their baseline, tachypnea, cough, and increased work of breathing)
  • Fever
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Chest pain AND
  • Patients' eligible for a simple transfusion based on one of the following criteria:
  • Hypoxemia (patients pulse oximetry < 92% or oxygen saturation < 2% below their baseline)
  • Hemoglobin < 5 gm/dl
  • Increased work of breathing

Who cannot join

  • Patient requires exchange transfusion within first 24 hours of admission
  • Patient requires PCCU transfer within first 24 hours of admission
  • Hemoglobin > 9gm/dl secondary to these patients requiring an exchange transfusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital @ Montefiore

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Early Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Ventilation for Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) - a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a frequent complication of sickle cell disease and is diagnosed by having findings on a chest x-ray and one of the following: chest pain, fever, or trouble breathing. Patients with Acute Chest Syndrome can get very sick and require an exchange transfusion (special large blood transfusion) and mechanical ventilation. Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (also known as BLPAP or BiPAP) is a device that blows air into a patients lungs via a mask that covers the nose. The goal of this study is to determine whether giving children BiPAP when they have ACS, in addition to providing standard clinical care for ACS, alters the clinical course of these patients. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving effective BiPAP will have milder clinical courses resulting in shorter hospital stays and fewer transfers to the intensive care unit and exchange transfusions.

Read the detailed description

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a frequent complication of sickle cell disease and is diagnosed by a new infiltrate on chest x-ray and one of the following: chest pain, fever, or respiratory signs or symptoms (tachypnea, cough, new onset hypoxemia, or increased work of breathing.)The treatment for acute chest syndrome is focused on supportive care with hydration, antibiotics, blood transfusions and respiratory support. Unfortunately, despite these treatments many patients fail to have improvements in their respiratory status, or have respiratory decompensation. These patients require more aggressive treatments, which frequently include exchange transfusions, pediatric intensive care unit (PCCU) management, and respiratory support.

The study objective is to perform a prospective double blind randomized control trial to investigate if early initiation of effective BiPAP in addition to providing standard clinical care for ACS alters the clinical course of these patients vs. sham BiPAP and standard clinical care. Investigators hypothesize that participants receiving effective BiPAP will have milder clinical courses resulting in shorter hospital stays and fewer transfers to PCCU and exchange transfusions.

Being tested
Bi-level positive airway pressure device, Sham CPAP
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Sickle Cell, Acute Chest Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bi-level positive airway pressure deviceDevice

    BiPAP initiated for at least 16 hours per day for a minimum of 48hrs.

  • Sham CPAPDevice

    Sham CPAP initiated for at least 16 hours per day for a minimum of 48hrs.

Study groups in NCT01589926
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure DeviceExperimentalBiPAP initiated for at least 16 hours per day for a minimum of 48hrs.
Receives: Device: Bi-level positive airway pressure device
Sham CPAPSham comparatorPhysiologic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) initiated for at least 16 hours per day for a minimum of 48hrs.
Receives: Device: Sham CPAP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of Stay as Measured by the Time From Initial Diagnosis of ACS Until Meeting Discharge Criteria.

    Length of stay as measured by the time from initial diagnosis of ACS until meeting discharge criteria. It is anticipated length of stay will correlate to efficacy of treatment: shorter stay is theorized to indicate more efficient treatment.

    Measured: From diagnosis of ACS until meeting discharge criteria- Average 7 days.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Rate of Exchange Transfusions.

    Measured: Diagnosis until discharge. Average 7 days.

  2. Determine Parent and Patient Acceptability of BLPAP Administration in the Setting of ACS.

    Measured: Upon completion of intervention at 48hrs.

  3. Rate of PCCU Transfers.

    Measured: Diagnosis until discharge. Average 7 days.

  4. Difference in Respiratory Rate.

    Measured: 48hrs after initiation of treatment

  5. Difference in Pulmonary Function Tests.

    Measured: 48hrs after initiation of treatment

  6. Difference in Mean SpO2 Recording During Sleep.

    Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) is an estimate of the amount of oxygen in the blood. It is the percentage of haemoglobin containing oxygen compared to the total amount of haemoglobin in the blood (i.e. oxygenated haemoglobin vs oxygenated and non-oxygenated haemoglobin).

    Measured: 48hrs after initiation of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completion8 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion8 Sep 2016

Why it stopped: Low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01589926
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-04-139
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
30 Apr 2012
Last updated
11 Dec 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bi-level positive airway pressure device in people with Sickle Cell Anemia and Acute Chest Syndrome, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of Stay as Measured by the Time From Initial Diagnosis of ACS Until Meeting Discharge Criteria. (time frame: From diagnosis of ACS until meeting discharge criteria- Average 7 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in