Atrial FibrillationNCT01593150
Early Versus Late DC-cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Effect on Atrial Remodeling,Inflammatory and Neurohumoral Markers and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Pradaxa, TEE and Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversion in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia present in 1% of population under 60 years of age and reaching up to 15% at 80 years. AF is associated with reduced quality of life, increased morbidity, mortality and health economic costs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Pradaxa, TEE and Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversion
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 141 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to department of cardiology OUH Svendborg Hospital or referred to outpatient clinic with symptomatic persistent AF, duration more than 48 hours and indication for DC cardioversion. Atrial fibrillation must be verified by a 12 lead ECG. All patients must be over 18 years of age, and must provide written informed consent prior to inclusion.
Who cannot join
- Reversible causes for AF (thyrotoxicosis, infection, pulmonary embolism), acute coronary syndrome and absolute contraindications of TEE (oesophageal spasm, stricture, perforation and diverticula). Patients with diminished mental capability will not be included.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
OUH; Department of Medical Research, Svendborg Hospital
Svendborg, 5700
About this study
Official title: Early Versus Late DC-cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Effect on Atrial Remodeling,Inflammatory and Neurohumoral Markers and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia present in 1% of population under 60 years of age and reaching up to 15% at 80 years. AF is associated with reduced quality of life, increased morbidity, mortality and health economic costs.
Presentation of AF differs substantially among patients ranging from self-limiting short episodes (paroxysmal AF), longstanding episodes (persistent AF) where direct current (DC) cardioversion is needed, to chronic atrial fibrillation. Treatment of AF is individually tailored in accordance to symptoms, type of AF and thromboembolic risk. The standard treatment of symptomatic persistent AF is DC-cardioversion preceded by anticoagulant treatment with Warfarin. According to guidelines DC-cardioversion can be performed when anticoagulation treatment has been in therapeutic range for at least 4 weeks. However introduction of Pradaxa (Dabigatran) has enabled an earlier DC cardioversion, reducing time to cardioversion to a 3 week period. During anticoagulation treatment persistence of AF contributes to left atrial remodeling and increases in inflammatory and neurohumoral biomarkers. The prolonged duration of AF and the remodeling of the left atrium increase the risk of AF recurrence after DC-cardioversion.
Read more
Early cardioversion of patients with persistent AF is possible if preceded by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The TEE guided DC- cardioversion, as demonstrated in the ACUTE study, is a safe and efficient alternative to conventional treatment. This treatment regime is not routinely used in clinical practice.
The aim of this study is to compare early DC-cardioversion (within 72 hours) to conventional treatment (Pradaxa prior to DC-cardioversion). 140 patients with persistent AF will be randomized to early cardioversion preceded by TEE in accordance with guidelines or conventional treatment with Pradaxa for 4 weeks prior to DC-cardioversion.
The investigators will determine the outcome in the two groups regarding:
- Left atrial function and size assessed by left atrial strain, left atrial ejection fraction and left atrial volume.
- Inflammatory and neurohumoral biomarkers including ANP, BNP,IL6 and CRP.
- Time to recurrence of AF (AF documented by ECG or Holter monitoring)
Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, 12 lead ECG, biomarkers and Holter monitoring will be performed at the time of randomization, 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post DC-cardioversion. Furthermore all patients will be followed for symptomatic AF recurrence for a period of one year. AF recurrence will be documented by 12 lead ECG.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, present in about 1 % of the population under 60 years of age and significantly higher among the older population, reaching up to 15 % in patients at 80 years. Worldwide, the proportion of people aged over 60 years is growing faster than any other age group. This will inevitably result in an increased prevalence of AF in the overall population. This is supported by the fact that the incidence of AF has increased over the past two decades. Furthermore a number of diseases which are associated with a higher prevalence of AF, such as ischemic heart disease (IHD), valvular heart disease, diabetes and hypertension are also expected to increase in prevalence due to the aging population. This again will contribute to an increased incidence of AF. Atrial fibrillation is associated with significant increase in mortality, morbidity and a reduction in quality of life.
The mechanisms behind AF including proliferation of fibroblasts, enhanced connective tissue deposition and fibrosis, all play an important part in structural remodeling of the left atrium. The structural remodeling leads to electrical deterioration which is fundamental for initiation of AF. The persistence of AF induces further electrophysiological remodeling, shortening of atrial refractoriness and in the end persistence of AF. The vicious cycle can, be reversed by restoration of sinus rhythm.
The treatments available today range from DC cardioversion, pharmacological rhythm and rate control, radiofrequency ablation to anticoagulation treatment.
If rhythm control is desired, cardioversion to sinus rhythm is achievable by DC-cardioversion. If AF is present less than 48 hours DC-cardioversion can be performed without further precautions. If AF is present more than 48 hours, DC cardioversion should be preceded by anticoagulation treatment with Warfarin for a minimum of 4 weeks or alternatively Pradaxa for 3 weeks prior to DC-cardioversion. Early cardioversion of patients with persistent AF > 48 hours is possible if preceded by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and exclusion of thrombus as demonstrated in the ACUTE trial.
Discrepancy of the results and the limitations of the earlier studies lead to inconclusive results. Tendencies favouring early DC-cardioversion and an increase in haemorrhages in the conventional treatment group underline the need for a randomized study with a primary aim to asses' differences in effect of conventional vs. early DC-cardioversion treatment.
To the investigators knowledge no randomised study has assessed the effect of early versus late DC-cardioversion in patients with persistent AF.
Hypothesis:
Early DC-cardioversion of persistent AF will improve left atrial function and remodeling, decrease inflammatory /neurohumoral markers and increase time to recurrence of AF compared to conventional treatment.
Aims:
- To determine, if there is difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically.
- To determine, if there is difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 \& CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP \& BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
- To determine, if there is difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Descriptive aims:
- To determine whether there is any difference in correlation between left atrial size and function and neurohumoral or inflammatory biomarker levels pre/post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
- To determine, whether there is any difference in strain when analyzing TEE versus transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images of the left atrium, in patient's receiving early cardioversion.
Methods :
Inclusion criteria
Patients admitted to department of cardiology OUH Svendborg Hospital or referred to outpatient clinic with symptomatic persistent AF, duration more than 48 hours and indication for DC cardioversion. Atrial fibrillation must be verified by a 12 lead ECG. All patients must be over 18 years of age, and must provide written informed consent prior to inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
Reversible causes for AF (thyrotoxicosis, infection, pulmonary embolism), acute coronary syndrome and absolute contraindications of TEE (oesophageal spasm, stricture, perforation and diverticula). Patients with diminished mental capability will not be included.
Study design
The patients will undergo unblinded randomization in two groups with PROBE design which includes blinded analysis of echocardiography, Holter monitoring and biomarker results.
Group one will receive conventional treatment with Pradaxa for a period of minimum 3 weeks prior to DC cardioversion. Group two will undergo TEE followed by early DC cardioversion within 72 hours. Post cardioversion treatment with Pradaxa will be applied according to guidelines for a minimum of 4 weeks.
Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, 12 lead ECG, biomarkers and Holter monitoring will be performed at the time of randomization, 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post DC-cardioversion. Furthermore all patients will be followed for symptomatic AF recurrence for a period of one year, AF recurrence will be documented by 12 lead ECG.
Procedures :
Transesophageal echocardiography Patients will be examined in the fasting state, after the application of topical pharyngeal anaesthesia. Left atrium and left atrial appendage will be viewed in order to exclude thrombus and dynamic spontaneous echo contrast. Tissue Doppler and 2D images of the left atrium from 0,30,60 and 90 degrees will be acquired for the offline strain analysis.
Transthoracic echocardiography Two dimensional images and tissue doppler images (TDI) of the left atrium and the left ventricle will be acquired for offline strain analysis. Standard evaluation of systolic function (EF, WMSI); diastolic function (E/a, DT, e', s', atrial volume) and evaluation of mitral and aortic valves will be performed. Blinded offline strain analysis will be performed with commercially available software. "Time to peak standard deviation"(TPSD)a reliable measurement of overall left atrial dyssynchrony, peak strain and global atrial strain will all be computed during the offline analysis.
Blood specimen Will be drawn prior to cardioversion and 4 weeks post cardioversion. The blood samples will be stored immediately after the collection in a - 80°C refrigerator. Neurohumoral and inflammatory markers (IL 6, ANP, BNP, CRP, ect.) will be analyzed en bloc.
Holter monitoring /12 lead ECG 48 hour Holter monitoring and a 12 lead ECG will take place 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post cardioversion. A recurrence of AF will be defined as AF for a period of minimum 30 seconds on Holter or AF verified by 12 lead ECG.
Sample size Based on previous studies of changes in peak strain following DC cardioversion the investigators expect a mean change in peak strain of 5.8 in the control group. The investigators expect a minimum relevant difference (MIREDIF) between the two groups of ½ standard deviation ( 4.05 %). With an α of 0.05 and a β of 0.80 the investigators must include a minimum of 63 patients in each treatment group. With an expected dropout of 10% the total sample size is 140 patients included. A thorough review of medical records for a period of 01/01/2010 - 01/10/2010 show that DC-cardioversions has been performed 121 times at OUH, Svendborg Hospital during a period of 10 month. Based on the number of previous DC-cardioversions the investigators expect an inclusion period of approximately 18 month.
Data Analysis Outcome and explanatory variables will be tested for normality and transformed when appropriate. Univariate analyses of changes in atrial strain and neurohumeral response between the two groups will be performed using unpaired t-test and simple regression. Multivariate regression analysis will be used to analyze significant covariates. Analysis of repeated measures will be performed in a Mixed Model approach. Time to recurrence will be analysed using log-rank test and Cox Proportional Hazards Model.
Ethical Considerations This clinical trial will be performed in accordance with ethical principles based on the Declaration of Helsinki and will be approved by the ethics comity. Prior to inclusion all patients will receive a thorough explanation of this trials nature; participation will be based on signing of an informed consent. The patients may, at any given time withdraw from the trial. The trial itself will be approved by ethical and scientific counsels. Furthermore both patient groups will receive an already established and approved treatment, and patients will therefore not be submitted to experimental treatments and/or risks that such treatments may present.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Pradaxa, TEE, Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversion
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, TEE, Early versus late DC cardioversion.
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PradaxaDrug
Pradaxa for 3 weeks prior to DC
TEEProcedure or surgery
Transesophageal echo to exclude LAA thrombus, followed by early DC.
Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversionOther
compare the two groups, TEE followed by early DC cardioversion with Dabigatran for 3 weeks followed by DC cardioversion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Experimental | Conventional treatment Pradaxa prior to DC cardioversion Receives: Drug: Pradaxa |
| TEE | Experimental | Transesophageal echo prior to DC cardioversion (early DC) Receives: Procedure: TEE |
| Early versus Late DC cardioversion | Active comparator | Comparing early versus late DC cardioversion. Patients randomized to either early or late DC cardioversion, follow-up time after intervention 12 month. Receives: Other: Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically
Difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically
Measured: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Measured: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 & CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP & BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 \& CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP \& BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Measured: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Secondary outcomes (1)
Difference in correlation between left atrial size and function and neurohumoral or inflammatory biomarker levels pre/post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Difference in correlation between left atrial size and function and neurohumoral or inflammatory biomarker levels pre/post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Measured: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Armin Osmanagic, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01593150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- project nr.: S-20110075
- Status last verified
- Feb 2015
- First submitted
- 2 May 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Versus Late DC-cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Effect on Atrial Remodeling,Inflammatory and Neurohumoral Markers and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01593150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- project nr.: S-20110075
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, TEE, Early versus late DC cardioversion.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia present in 1% of population under 60 years of age and reaching up to 15% at 80 years. AF is associated with reduced quality of life, increased morbidity, mortality and health economic costs.
Presentation of AF differs substantially among patients ranging from self-limiting short episodes (paroxysmal AF), longstanding episodes (persistent AF) where direct current (DC) cardioversion is needed, to chronic atrial fibrillation. Treatment of AF is individually tailored in accordance to symptoms, type of AF and thromboembolic risk. The standard treatment of symptomatic persistent AF is DC-cardioversion preceded by anticoagulant treatment with Warfarin. According to guidelines DC-cardioversion can be performed when anticoagulation treatment has been in therapeutic range for at least 4 weeks. However introduction of Pradaxa (Dabigatran) has enabled an earlier DC cardioversion, reducing time to cardioversion to a 3 week period. During anticoagulation treatment persistence of AF contributes to left atrial remodeling and increases in inflammatory and neurohumoral biomarkers. The prolonged duration of AF and the remodeling of the left atrium increase the risk of AF recurrence after DC-cardioversion.
Early cardioversion of patients with persistent AF is possible if preceded by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The TEE guided DC- cardioversion, as demonstrated in the ACUTE study, is a safe and efficient alternative to conventional treatment. This treatment regime is not routinely used in clinical practice.
The aim of this study is to compare early DC-cardioversion (within 72 hours) to conventional treatment (Pradaxa prior to DC-cardioversion). 140 patients with persistent AF will be randomized to early cardioversion preceded by TEE in accordance with guidelines or conventional treatment with Pradaxa for 4 weeks prior to DC-cardioversion.
The investigators will determine the outcome in the two groups regarding:
- Left atrial function and size assessed by left atrial strain, left atrial ejection fraction and left atrial volume.
- Inflammatory and neurohumoral biomarkers including ANP, BNP,IL6 and CRP.
- Time to recurrence of AF (AF documented by ECG or Holter monitoring)
Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, 12 lead ECG, biomarkers and Holter monitoring will be performed at the time of randomization, 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post DC-cardioversion. Furthermore all patients will be followed for symptomatic AF recurrence for a period of one year. AF recurrence will be documented by 12 lead ECG.
Detailed description
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, present in about 1 % of the population under 60 years of age and significantly higher among the older population, reaching up to 15 % in patients at 80 years. Worldwide, the proportion of people aged over 60 years is growing faster than any other age group. This will inevitably result in an increased prevalence of AF in the overall population. This is supported by the fact that the incidence of AF has increased over the past two decades. Furthermore a number of diseases which are associated with a higher prevalence of AF, such as ischemic heart disease (IHD), valvular heart disease, diabetes and hypertension are also expected to increase in prevalence due to the aging population. This again will contribute to an increased incidence of AF. Atrial fibrillation is associated with significant increase in mortality, morbidity and a reduction in quality of life.
The mechanisms behind AF including proliferation of fibroblasts, enhanced connective tissue deposition and fibrosis, all play an important part in structural remodeling of the left atrium. The structural remodeling leads to electrical deterioration which is fundamental for initiation of AF. The persistence of AF induces further electrophysiological remodeling, shortening of atrial refractoriness and in the end persistence of AF. The vicious cycle can, be reversed by restoration of sinus rhythm.
The treatments available today range from DC cardioversion, pharmacological rhythm and rate control, radiofrequency ablation to anticoagulation treatment.
If rhythm control is desired, cardioversion to sinus rhythm is achievable by DC-cardioversion. If AF is present less than 48 hours DC-cardioversion can be performed without further precautions. If AF is present more than 48 hours, DC cardioversion should be preceded by anticoagulation treatment with Warfarin for a minimum of 4 weeks or alternatively Pradaxa for 3 weeks prior to DC-cardioversion. Early cardioversion of patients with persistent AF > 48 hours is possible if preceded by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and exclusion of thrombus as demonstrated in the ACUTE trial.
Discrepancy of the results and the limitations of the earlier studies lead to inconclusive results. Tendencies favouring early DC-cardioversion and an increase in haemorrhages in the conventional treatment group underline the need for a randomized study with a primary aim to asses' differences in effect of conventional vs. early DC-cardioversion treatment.
To the investigators knowledge no randomised study has assessed the effect of early versus late DC-cardioversion in patients with persistent AF.
Hypothesis:
Early DC-cardioversion of persistent AF will improve left atrial function and remodeling, decrease inflammatory /neurohumoral markers and increase time to recurrence of AF compared to conventional treatment.
Aims:
- To determine, if there is difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically.
- To determine, if there is difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 \& CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP \& BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
- To determine, if there is difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Descriptive aims:
- To determine whether there is any difference in correlation between left atrial size and function and neurohumoral or inflammatory biomarker levels pre/post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
- To determine, whether there is any difference in strain when analyzing TEE versus transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images of the left atrium, in patient's receiving early cardioversion.
Methods :
Inclusion criteria
Patients admitted to department of cardiology OUH Svendborg Hospital or referred to outpatient clinic with symptomatic persistent AF, duration more than 48 hours and indication for DC cardioversion. Atrial fibrillation must be verified by a 12 lead ECG. All patients must be over 18 years of age, and must provide written informed consent prior to inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
Reversible causes for AF (thyrotoxicosis, infection, pulmonary embolism), acute coronary syndrome and absolute contraindications of TEE (oesophageal spasm, stricture, perforation and diverticula). Patients with diminished mental capability will not be included.
Study design
The patients will undergo unblinded randomization in two groups with PROBE design which includes blinded analysis of echocardiography, Holter monitoring and biomarker results.
Group one will receive conventional treatment with Pradaxa for a period of minimum 3 weeks prior to DC cardioversion. Group two will undergo TEE followed by early DC cardioversion within 72 hours. Post cardioversion treatment with Pradaxa will be applied according to guidelines for a minimum of 4 weeks.
Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, 12 lead ECG, biomarkers and Holter monitoring will be performed at the time of randomization, 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post DC-cardioversion. Furthermore all patients will be followed for symptomatic AF recurrence for a period of one year, AF recurrence will be documented by 12 lead ECG.
Procedures :
Transesophageal echocardiography Patients will be examined in the fasting state, after the application of topical pharyngeal anaesthesia. Left atrium and left atrial appendage will be viewed in order to exclude thrombus and dynamic spontaneous echo contrast. Tissue Doppler and 2D images of the left atrium from 0,30,60 and 90 degrees will be acquired for the offline strain analysis.
Transthoracic echocardiography Two dimensional images and tissue doppler images (TDI) of the left atrium and the left ventricle will be acquired for offline strain analysis. Standard evaluation of systolic function (EF, WMSI); diastolic function (E/a, DT, e', s', atrial volume) and evaluation of mitral and aortic valves will be performed. Blinded offline strain analysis will be performed with commercially available software. "Time to peak standard deviation"(TPSD)a reliable measurement of overall left atrial dyssynchrony, peak strain and global atrial strain will all be computed during the offline analysis.
Blood specimen Will be drawn prior to cardioversion and 4 weeks post cardioversion. The blood samples will be stored immediately after the collection in a - 80°C refrigerator. Neurohumoral and inflammatory markers (IL 6, ANP, BNP, CRP, ect.) will be analyzed en bloc.
Holter monitoring /12 lead ECG 48 hour Holter monitoring and a 12 lead ECG will take place 4 weeks, 3 month and 6 month post cardioversion. A recurrence of AF will be defined as AF for a period of minimum 30 seconds on Holter or AF verified by 12 lead ECG.
Sample size Based on previous studies of changes in peak strain following DC cardioversion the investigators expect a mean change in peak strain of 5.8 in the control group. The investigators expect a minimum relevant difference (MIREDIF) between the two groups of ½ standard deviation ( 4.05 %). With an α of 0.05 and a β of 0.80 the investigators must include a minimum of 63 patients in each treatment group. With an expected dropout of 10% the total sample size is 140 patients included. A thorough review of medical records for a period of 01/01/2010 - 01/10/2010 show that DC-cardioversions has been performed 121 times at OUH, Svendborg Hospital during a period of 10 month. Based on the number of previous DC-cardioversions the investigators expect an inclusion period of approximately 18 month.
Data Analysis Outcome and explanatory variables will be tested for normality and transformed when appropriate. Univariate analyses of changes in atrial strain and neurohumeral response between the two groups will be performed using unpaired t-test and simple regression. Multivariate regression analysis will be used to analyze significant covariates. Analysis of repeated measures will be performed in a Mixed Model approach. Time to recurrence will be analysed using log-rank test and Cox Proportional Hazards Model.
Ethical Considerations This clinical trial will be performed in accordance with ethical principles based on the Declaration of Helsinki and will be approved by the ethics comity. Prior to inclusion all patients will receive a thorough explanation of this trials nature; participation will be based on signing of an informed consent. The patients may, at any given time withdraw from the trial. The trial itself will be approved by ethical and scientific counsels. Furthermore both patient groups will receive an already established and approved treatment, and patients will therefore not be submitted to experimental treatments and/or risks that such treatments may present.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Experimental | Drug: PradaxaConventional treatment Pradaxa prior to DC cardioversion |
| TEE | Experimental | Procedure: TEETransesophageal echo prior to DC cardioversion (early DC) |
| Early versus Late DC cardioversion | Active comparator | Other: Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversionComparing early versus late DC cardioversion. Patients randomized to either early or late DC cardioversion, follow-up time after intervention 12 month. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients admitted to department of cardiology OUH Svendborg Hospital or referred to outpatient clinic with symptomatic persistent AF, duration more than 48 hours and indication for DC cardioversion. Atrial fibrillation must be verified by a 12 lead ECG. All patients must be over 18 years of age, and must provide written informed consent prior to inclusion.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Reversible causes for AF (thyrotoxicosis, infection, pulmonary embolism), acute coronary syndrome and absolute contraindications of TEE (oesophageal spasm, stricture, perforation and diverticula). Patients with diminished mental capability will not be included.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PradaxaPradaxa for 3 weeks prior to DC | Drug | Conventional |
| TEETransesophageal echo to exclude LAA thrombus, followed by early DC. | Procedure or surgery | TEE |
| Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversioncompare the two groups, TEE followed by early DC cardioversion with Dabigatran for 3 weeks followed by DC cardioversion. | Other | Early versus Late DC cardioversion |
Primary outcome
Difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically
Time frame: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically
Difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Time frame: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Difference in time to recurrence of, ECG or Holter verified AF, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment.
Difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 & CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP & BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Difference in levels of inflammatory (IL-6 \& CRP) and neurohumoral markers (ANP \& BNP) prior to and post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
1 secondary outcome
Difference in correlation between left atrial size and function and neurohumoral or inflammatory biomarker levels pre/post cardioversion, when comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2015.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pradaxa, TEE and Compare TEE guided cardioversion to Dabigatran + DC cardioversion in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in function and size of the left atrium, prior to and post cardioversion comparing early cardioversion to conventional treatment group. The data for comparison will be acquired echocardiographically (time frame: Baseline compared to 12 months post DC cardioversion). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2015.