CatherizationPhase 2/3NCT01594684
Cotavance™ Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-stent Restenosis in SFA and Popliteal Arteries
A Phase 2/3 study testing balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.) and uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic) in people with Catherization, run by Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar Tepe at 6 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
In stent restenosis in peripheral artery disease (superficial and popliteal artery) either treated with uncoated or paclitaxel coated balloons. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Catherization
- What is being tested?
- balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.) and uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 112 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- In-stent restenosis or re-occlusion at the target lesion due to an interventional treatment > 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Has evidence of ≥ 70% stenosis or occlusion in the SFA and/or popliteal confirmed by angiography that is 3-27 cm long.
- Reference vessel diameter of 3 to 7 mm (reference vessel diameter = normal vessel diameter 1 cm proximal of the index lesion)
- Patients (men and women) with PAD disease category 2 to 5 according to Rutherford classification.
- Patient is eligible for an operative vascular intervention in case of complications during the procedure.
- Female patients of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test 7 days at theprior to the time of intervention.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Fully informed and signed consent must be obtained from each patient.
- Patients must be willing and able to continue study participation following study procedure in order to ensure completion of all procedures and observations required by protocol.
- Patient has evidence of at least one run off vessel that does not also require treatment for significant (≥ 50% stenosis or occlusion) stenosis during the index procedure to the ankle/foot of the limb to be treated. Treatment of infrapopliteal lesions must be staged at least 30 days before or after the index procedure.
- If restnosis occurs in both arms 30 days or later (re-re-sternosis)- treament with two drug eluting balloons at the same location (double dose)
Who cannot join
- Patients with more than two lesions in the target vessel requiring treatment (if the distance between two lesions is less than 2 cm, the lesions should be counted as one lesion). The second lesion should also be treated with either coated or uncoated balloons (according to the randomization)
- Guidewire cannot cross lesion and/or an intentional subintimal approach in the stented lesion is required.
- Patients with stent fractures grade 2-4.
- Inflow lesion (proximal to the study lesion) with flow limitation not being successfully treated prior to treatment of the study lesion.
- Acute thrombosis of the study lesion requiring lysis or thrombectomy prior to the treatment of the study lesion.
- Acutely occurring symptoms with a lyses or an operation as a therapeutic option within the last 6 weeks within the study limb.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Potential loss of leg due to critical or acute ischemia.
- No patent distal run-off vessel.
- Aneurysm in the blood vessel intended for intervention in this study.
- Blood platelet count < 100.000/mm3 or >700.000/mm3, leukocyte count < 3.000/mm3.
- Contra-indication to anticoagulation, or any anti-platelet agent (e.g. aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, abciximab), or paclitaxel.
- Known intolerance or contra-indication (e.g. severe hepatic (with ALAT and/or ASAT > 3 times the normal reference range) or renal (creatinine > 1.1 mg/dl in women and >1.5 mg/dl in men) to contrast agents which cannot be adequately pre-treated, e.g. with adequate hydration.
- Severe illnesses such as cancer, liver or renal diseases, myocardial insufficiency leading to protocol deviations and/or a reduced life expectancy of less than 2 years.
- Manifest hyperthyreosis.
- Latent hyperthyreosis without adequate therapy, e.g., previous blocking with Natriumperchlorat (Irenat®).
- Significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage within the previous 6 months prior to study participation.
- History of hemorrhagic diathesis or coagulopathy or rejection of blood transfusions.
- Medical reason against double anti-platelet therapy in anti-coagulated patient, e.g., receiving coumadine.
- Any severe medical condition that might interfere with the interpretation of the data or result in an unacceptable risk for the patient's participation in the study, according to the judgment of the clinical investigator.
- Female patient who is pregnant or lactating.
- Patient under 18 years of age.
- Participation in another clinical study up to 30 days prior to study entry.
- Previous participation in the same trialstudy (only one leg can be treated within the study).
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Germany6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73000
Thomas Zeller, MD, 076334022431, thomas.zeller@herzzentrum.de
Thomas Zeller, MD
- Recruiting
Jüdisches Krankenhaus
Berlin, DE, 0001
Stefan Duda, MD, stefan.duda@t-online.de
Stefan Duda, MD
- Recruiting
Klinikum Neukölln
Berlin, DE, 0001
Thomas Albrecht, MD, 030-2983366, thomas.albrecht@t-online.de
Thomas Albrecht, MD
- Recruiting
Klinikum Neumünster
Neumünster, Schleswig-Holstein, 24534
Thomas Jahnke, MD, 04321 405-4910, thomas.jahnke@fek.de
Thomas Jahnke, MD
- Recruiting
Tepe
Rosenheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 83022
Gunnar Tepe, MD, 80313653551, gunnar.tepe@ro-med.de
Gunnar Tepe, MD
- Recruiting
Uniklinik Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73022
Klaus Brechtel, MD, 070712983371, klaus.brechtel@uni-tuebingen.de
About this study
Official title: Cotavance™ Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-stent Restenosis in SFA and Popliteal Arteries COPA CABANA Study
In stent restenosis in peripheral artery disease (superficial and popliteal artery) either treated with uncoated or paclitaxel coated balloons.
- Conditions
- Catherization
- Being tested
- balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic), balloon inflation, drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)
- Keywords
- restenosis, stent, drug eltuing balloon, peripheral arterial disease
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)Device
balloon inflation
drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)Device
Balloon inflation
uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic)Device
balloon inflation
balloon inflation, drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)Device
ballon inflation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| drug eluting balloon | Active comparator | treatment with drug eltuing balloon Receives: Device: balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.); Device: drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.) |
| uncoated balloon | Placebo comparator | treatment with uncoated balloon Receives: Device: uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic) |
| double drug eluting balloon | Active comparator | if treatment fails 30 days or later Receives: Device: balloon inflation, drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
- Late lumen loss (difference between the angiographic minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately and at 6 months post index procedure) evaluated by quantitative angiography. Analysis will be performed by an independent Angiographic Core Laboratory
Measured: 6 +/-2 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
• Procedural success
- Procedural success defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following the procedure at the target lesion (after prolonged dilation and stenting, if necessary)
Measured: after intervention
Target lesion revascularization (TLR)
- Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6, 12 and 24 months. Target lesion revascularization is defined as any reintervention or artery bypass graft surgery involving the target lesion.
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
- Target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6, 12 and 24 months
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Binary restenosis rate
- Binary restenosis rate at 6, 12 and 24 months.
- Binary restenosis defined as > 50% diameter stenosis via angiography or PVR ≥ 2.4 via duplex ultrasound. In cases where results are available for both angiography and duplex ultrasound, angiographic results (if conducted within follow-up window) will be used to determine binary restenosis
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Rutherford category
Change of Rutherford category post index procedure and at 6, 12, and 24 months as compared to baseline
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Ancle Brachial index (ABI)
- Change in ABI at 6, 12, and 24 months as compared to baseline
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Late lumen loss (LLL)
- LLL at 24 months
Measured: 24 months
Minimum lumen diameter (MLD)
- MLD at 12 and 24 months
Measured: 12 and 24 months
Hospitalization
- Hospitalization (extra days due to complications of the index procedure) and hospitalization between the follow-up visits due to the index lesion and index leg
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
safety
- Evaluation of 30 days freedom from procedure related death, unplanned amputation, and TLR.
Measured: 30days
resteosis pattern
- Characterization of restenosis patterns between the two therapies
Measured: 6 and 24 months
Target lesion revascularization (TLR), clinical success and angiographic outcome (restenosis rate, late lumen loss) after second therapy
clinical success, restensosis, TLR and LLL after second use of drug eluting balloons if initial therapy failed 30 days or later
Measured: after intervention, 6, 12 and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionJan 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CatherizationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar Tepe
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zeller, Duda, Albrecht, Reimer, Brechtel, Diehm, Strausinsky, Jahnke, Huppert, Amendt
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar Tepe, Klinikum Rosenheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01594684
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EK 11108
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 3 May 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ma GW, Bernatchez J, Yarranton B, Dueck AD, Rajan DK, Forbes TL, de Mestral C, Kayssi A. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 10;8:CD011319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011319.pub3.
PubMed 42573020Tepe G, Schroeder H, Albrecht T, Reimer P, Diehm N, Baeriswyl JL, Brechtel K, Speck U, Zeller T. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: The COPA CABANA Trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):276-286. doi: 10.1177/1526602820907917. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
PubMed 32096451
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cotavance™ Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-stent Restenosis in SFA and Popliteal Arteries COPA CABANA Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01594684
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EK 11108
- Conditions
- Catherization
- Keywords
- restenosis, stent, drug eltuing balloon, peripheral arterial disease
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar TepeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zeller, Duda, Albrecht, Reimer, Brechtel, Diehm, Strausinsky, Jahnke, Huppert, Amendt
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In stent restenosis in peripheral artery disease (superficial and popliteal artery) either treated with uncoated or paclitaxel coated balloons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| drug eluting balloon | Active comparator | Device: balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), Device: drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)treatment with drug eltuing balloon |
| uncoated balloon | Placebo comparator | Device: uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic)treatment with uncoated balloon |
| double drug eluting balloon | Active comparator | Device: balloon inflation, drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)if treatment fails 30 days or later |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- In-stent restenosis or re-occlusion at the target lesion due to an interventional treatment > 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Has evidence of ≥ 70% stenosis or occlusion in the SFA and/or popliteal confirmed by angiography that is 3-27 cm long.
- Reference vessel diameter of 3 to 7 mm (reference vessel diameter = normal vessel diameter 1 cm proximal of the index lesion)
- Patients (men and women) with PAD disease category 2 to 5 according to Rutherford classification.
- Patient is eligible for an operative vascular intervention in case of complications during the procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Patients with more than two lesions in the target vessel requiring treatment (if the distance between two lesions is less than 2 cm, the lesions should be counted as one lesion). The second lesion should also be treated with either coated or uncoated balloons (according to the randomization)
- Guidewire cannot cross lesion and/or an intentional subintimal approach in the stented lesion is required.
- Patients with stent fractures grade 2-4.
- Inflow lesion (proximal to the study lesion) with flow limitation not being successfully treated prior to treatment of the study lesion.
- Acute thrombosis of the study lesion requiring lysis or thrombectomy prior to the treatment of the study lesion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)balloon inflation | Device | drug eluting balloon |
| drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)Balloon inflation | Device | drug eluting balloon |
| uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic)balloon inflation | Device | uncoated balloon |
| balloon inflation, drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.)ballon inflation | Device | double drug eluting balloon |
Primary outcome
Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
Time frame: 6 +/-2 months
• Late lumen loss (difference between the angiographic minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately and at 6 months post index procedure) evaluated by quantitative angiography. Analysis will be performed by an independent Angiographic Core Laboratory
12 secondary outcomes
• Procedural success
Time frame: after intervention
Target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Binary restenosis rate
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Rutherford category
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Ancle Brachial index (ABI)
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Late lumen loss (LLL)
Time frame: 24 months
Minimum lumen diameter (MLD)
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
Hospitalization
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
safety
Time frame: 30days
resteosis pattern
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Target lesion revascularization (TLR), clinical success and angiographic outcome (restenosis rate, late lumen loss) after second therapy
Time frame: after intervention, 6, 12 and 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42573020Ma GW, Bernatchez J, Yarranton B, Dueck AD, Rajan DK, Forbes TL, de Mestral C, Kayssi A. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 10;8:CD011319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011319.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32096451Tepe G, Schroeder H, Albrecht T, Reimer P, Diehm N, Baeriswyl JL, Brechtel K, Speck U, Zeller T. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: The COPA CABANA Trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):276-286. doi: 10.1177/1526602820907917. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
Related trials for Catherization
Not yet recruiting
TR Band Combined With Adrenaline Drops Versus TR Band Alone for Radial Artery Hemostasis After Cardiac Catheterization
Radial Artery Hemostasis
RecruitingPhase 4
Betadine vs Sterile Water for Periurethral Preparation
Catherization, Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial
Not yet recruiting
Neonatal Umbilical Catheter Pathway Simulator
Simulator Training, Neonates and Preterm Infants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing balloon angiolplasty - drug coated balloon (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.), drug coated balloon inflation (Cotavance, Medrad Inc.) and uncoated balloon (e.g. Admiral, Medtronic) in people with Catherization, run by Prof. Dr. med. Gunnar Tepe at 6 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Late Lumen Loss (LLL) (time frame: 6 +/-2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01594684, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2012.