AzTrials
AzTrials

Abortion, InducedNCT01597726

Cervical Priming Before Dilation & Evacuation

A study testing Misoprostol and Laminaria in people with Abortion, Induced, run by Ibis Reproductive Health at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of buccal misoprostol cervical priming to laminaria priming among women undergoing D\&E at 13-20 weeks gestation in the Western Cape Province, South Africa Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Abortion, Induced
What is being tested?
Misoprostol and Laminaria
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
159 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
May 2012to Jun 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Woman seeking TOP between 13 and 20 weeks gestation as determined by ultrasound
  • Age 18 or greater
  • Willingness to participate in randomized study
  • Fluency in English, Afrikaans or Xhosa
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Staying within one hour travel time of Tygerberg Hospital for the night prior to the D\&E
  • Ability to be contacted by telephone

Who cannot join

  • Active cervicitis
  • Multiple gestation
  • Fetal demise confirmed by ultrasound examination
  • History of bleeding disorder or current anticoagulation therapy
  • Allergy to misoprostol
  • Currently breastfeeding and unwilling or unable to temporarily discard milk
  • More than one prior cesarean delivery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Tygerberg Hospital

    Cape Town, 7505

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Cervical Priming Before Dilation & Evacuation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of buccal misoprostol cervical priming to laminaria priming among women undergoing D\&E at 13-20 weeks gestation in the Western Cape Province, South Africa

Read the detailed description

As misoprostol is increasingly being used for cervical preparation, concerns about its use and about the proportion of women expelling the fetus prior to the D\&E and other side effects mean that rigorous data on possible advantages of osmotic dilators are needed. To address this gap in the literature, we propose to perform an RCT comparing two methods of cervical preparation prior to D\&E:

  1. Misoprostol 400 mcg administered buccally approximately 3-6 hours prior to D\&E, repeated once 3 hours after the first dose (a modified version of the current protocol)
  2. Laminaria tents inserted into the cervix 18 to 24 hours prior to D\&E
Being tested
Misoprostol, Laminaria
Keywords
Abortion, Induced, Laminaria, Misoprostol, Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MisoprostolDrug

    Misoprostol 400 mcg administered buccally approximately 3-6 hours prior to D\&E, repeated once 3 hours after the first dose if needed

  • LaminariaDevice

    Laminaria tents inserted into the cervix 18 to 24 hours prior to D\&E

Study groups in NCT01597726
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MisoprostolActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Misoprostol
LaminariaExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Laminaria

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of women with fetal expulsion prior to dilation and evacuation

    Measured: Prior to D&E procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Proportion of women requiring additional dilation (manual or pharmacologic)

    Measured: At time of D&E procedure

  2. Duration of dilation and evacuation procedure

    Measured: End of D&E procedure

  3. Frequency of major complications

    Major complications to include:

    • Death
    • Admission to the ward after the procedure
    • Readmission after discharge
    • Abdominal surgical procedure
    • Suspected uterine perforation
    • Seizure
    • Hemorrhage requiring transfusion
    • Loss to follow-up after placement of laminaria

    Measured: Recorded at TOP visit and/or follow-up visit (target 7 days after procedure)

  4. Frequency of Minor Complications

    Minor complications to include:

    • Hemorrhage not requiring transfusion
    • Infection requiring outpatient treatment
    • Trauma to cervix or vagina
    • Transfer to another facility to complete the procedure
    • Need for repeat surgical evacuation of the uterus

    Measured: Recorded at TOP visit and/or follow-up visit (target 7 days after procedure)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
159 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01597726
Sponsor's protocol ID
32020
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
10 May 2012
Last updated
7 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Constant D, Kluge J, Harries J, Grossman D. An analysis of delays among women accessing second-trimester abortion in the public sector in South Africa. Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

    PubMed 31029655
  • Grossman D, Constant D, Lince-Deroche N, Harries J, Kluge J. A randomized trial of misoprostol versus laminaria before dilation and evacuation in South Africa. Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PubMed 24929888

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Misoprostol and Laminaria in people with Abortion, Induced, run by Ibis Reproductive Health at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of women with fetal expulsion prior to dilation and evacuation (time frame: Prior to D&E procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01597726, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in