Extubation FailuresRIPENCT01598246
Study to Evaluate Causes of Failure to Extubate
An observational study of Extubation Failures, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective chart review of all extubations in the pediatric intensive care unit. Over a one year period all extubations in the unit are to be recorded on a designated form and standard variables charted and compared. All data will be collected from the chart, retrospectively after the extubation event. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Extubation Failures
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2012to 30 Jun 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children aged 0 to 18 years, admitted in pediatric intensive care unit and required intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Who may be able to join
- All planned extubations in pediatric Intensive care unit
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Montefiore Medical center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
Official title: Prospective Observational Study on Factors Influencing Re-Intubation Following a Planned Extubation (RIPE) in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Identifying Targets for a Quality Improvement Initiative
This is a prospective chart review of all extubations in the pediatric intensive care unit. Over a one year period all extubations in the unit are to be recorded on a designated form and standard variables charted and compared. All data will be collected from the chart, retrospectively after the extubation event. Patients who fail extubation will be compared to those who succeed. We aim to identify factors which contribute to extubation failures in the unit, to come up with a unit specific extubation policy
Read the detailed description
Description of project- This is a prospective chart review to identify factors influencing a successful extubation event.
Hypothesis- Successful extubation in a pediatric intensive care unit is dependent on variables, which can be identified and the chances of success predicted. A clinical practice based upon such a prediction model, will improve the quality of care provided to the patients.
Type- Prospective chart review .
Procedure- Over 1 year period, all planned extubations in the intensive care unit to be recorded on a designated form and standard variables charted. All extubation decisions are to be made by the covering attending physician and at no time, the study protocol will affect/influence or alter the standard patient care. All data will be collected retrospectively after the extubation event. All included patients will be assigned a unique identification number (UID) by the investigator, who will secure the patient identifiers in an encrypted electronic file. Extubation failure will be defined as reintubation within 72 hours of a planned extubation and will be further classified as early (<12 hours) and late (12-72 hours) extubation failure. The cause of extubation failure will be recorded (as identified by the attending physician on service, who is not involved in the study).
Data collection and statistical analysis- The data will be collected on a standard form. The data collected will be periodically logged in an electronic data base and analyzed. Investigators will perform an interim analysis at the end of 6 months and a final analysis of the data at the end of 1 year period. Since this is an observational study, all the extubations in the time period, will be included. Based on 2010 data collected, for monitoring unplanned extubations (300 extubations) and considering recent expansion in their unit, investigators expect about 500 extubations in the time period.
For statistical analysis, group that fail extubation, will be compared, with the group that was an extubation success. Standard demographics (age, sex), patient disease related factors (diagnosis, duration of intubation, secretions, sedation level), care factors (CPAP trials, cuff leak test, use of pre-extubation decadron, p/f ratio prior to extubation), and post extubation care (post extubation respiratory support, stridor, blood gas) along with any complication during extubation and reintubation and reasons for reintubation will be collected and compared. As two groups are being compared, bivariate analyses utilizing Chi-square tests or univariate logistic regression for categorical variables and Student t -tests for interval variables, will be done. Based on 9.9% extubation failure rate in 2010, investigators expect ~50 extubation failures in the time frame. From the preliminary data, investigators also expect a 40% difference in the primary variables of comparison (age, secretions, sedation level). For statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval and 80% power, investigators will be able to detect differences between groups in proportions of approximately 20% with the expected sample size or differences of 25% with a 99% CI. The investigators also will conduct multivariate logistic regression analysis using extubation failure as the dependent variable and calculate the independent odds ratio for significant predictor variables. Early Vs late extubation failures, will also be compared. From literature, investigators assume 80% of extubation failures to be early (from their estimate, 40 early extubation failures and 10 late extubation failures, in 1 year period). They do not expect statistically significant results from the numbers in present trial period, however they expect to get trends to plan a further study.
- Conditions
- Extubation Failures
- Keywords
- Extubation failures, Sedation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Extubation Success | Patients who do not require re-intubation, upto 72 hours after a planned extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit. | |
| Extubation failure | Patients who required re-intubation within 72 hours after a planned extubation in pediatric intensive care unit. To be further classified as early <12 hour and late 12-72 hour, extubation failures. |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completion30 Jun 2013
- Study completion30 Jun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Extubation FailuresStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Montefiore Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sandeep Tripathi, M.D, Principal investigator, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01598246
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-02-051E
- Acronym
- RIPE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 11 May 2012
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Observational Study on Factors Influencing Re-Intubation Following a Planned Extubation (RIPE) in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Identifying Targets for a Quality Improvement Initiative
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01598246
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIPE / 12-02-051E
- Conditions
- Extubation Failures
- Keywords
- Extubation failures, Sedation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective chart review of all extubations in the pediatric intensive care unit. Over a one year period all extubations in the unit are to be recorded on a designated form and standard variables charted and compared. All data will be collected from the chart, retrospectively after the extubation event. Patients who fail extubation will be compared to those who succeed. We aim to identify factors which contribute to extubation failures in the unit, to come up with a unit specific extubation policy
Detailed description
Description of project- This is a prospective chart review to identify factors influencing a successful extubation event.
Hypothesis- Successful extubation in a pediatric intensive care unit is dependent on variables, which can be identified and the chances of success predicted. A clinical practice based upon such a prediction model, will improve the quality of care provided to the patients.
Type- Prospective chart review .
Procedure- Over 1 year period, all planned extubations in the intensive care unit to be recorded on a designated form and standard variables charted. All extubation decisions are to be made by the covering attending physician and at no time, the study protocol will affect/influence or alter the standard patient care. All data will be collected retrospectively after the extubation event. All included patients will be assigned a unique identification number (UID) by the investigator, who will secure the patient identifiers in an encrypted electronic file. Extubation failure will be defined as reintubation within 72 hours of a planned extubation and will be further classified as early (<12 hours) and late (12-72 hours) extubation failure. The cause of extubation failure will be recorded (as identified by the attending physician on service, who is not involved in the study).
Data collection and statistical analysis- The data will be collected on a standard form. The data collected will be periodically logged in an electronic data base and analyzed. Investigators will perform an interim analysis at the end of 6 months and a final analysis of the data at the end of 1 year period. Since this is an observational study, all the extubations in the time period, will be included. Based on 2010 data collected, for monitoring unplanned extubations (300 extubations) and considering recent expansion in their unit, investigators expect about 500 extubations in the time period.
For statistical analysis, group that fail extubation, will be compared, with the group that was an extubation success. Standard demographics (age, sex), patient disease related factors (diagnosis, duration of intubation, secretions, sedation level), care factors (CPAP trials, cuff leak test, use of pre-extubation decadron, p/f ratio prior to extubation), and post extubation care (post extubation respiratory support, stridor, blood gas) along with any complication during extubation and reintubation and reasons for reintubation will be collected and compared. As two groups are being compared, bivariate analyses utilizing Chi-square tests or univariate logistic regression for categorical variables and Student t -tests for interval variables, will be done. Based on 9.9% extubation failure rate in 2010, investigators expect ~50 extubation failures in the time frame. From the preliminary data, investigators also expect a 40% difference in the primary variables of comparison (age, secretions, sedation level). For statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval and 80% power, investigators will be able to detect differences between groups in proportions of approximately 20% with the expected sample size or differences of 25% with a 99% CI. The investigators also will conduct multivariate logistic regression analysis using extubation failure as the dependent variable and calculate the independent odds ratio for significant predictor variables. Early Vs late extubation failures, will also be compared. From literature, investigators assume 80% of extubation failures to be early (from their estimate, 40 early extubation failures and 10 late extubation failures, in 1 year period). They do not expect statistically significant results from the numbers in present trial period, however they expect to get trends to plan a further study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Extubation Success | – | –Patients who do not require re-intubation, upto 72 hours after a planned extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit. |
| Extubation failure | – | –Patients who required re-intubation within 72 hours after a planned extubation in pediatric intensive care unit. To be further classified as early <12 hour and late 12-72 hour, extubation failures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children aged 0 to 18 years, admitted in pediatric intensive care unit and required intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All planned extubations in pediatric Intensive care unit
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Extubation Failures
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Combined RSBI, TOF, and BIS for Prediction of Extubation Success
Extubation Success, Extubation Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Acute Airway/Respiratory Complications and Intervention Requirements in Extubations Performed During On-Hours Versus Off-Hours
Extubation Failures, Extubation
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Weaning Practices in ICUs of Global South Countries
Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, Weaning Failure
Not yet recruiting
Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation After Extubation in Neonates
Extubation Failure in Neonates
Not yet recruiting
One-Hour Positive Pressure Ventilation After a T-Piece Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Airway Extubation, Extubation Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sandeep Tripathi, M.D principal investigator
Montefiore Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Extubation Failures, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.