DiabetesNCT01598610

Performance Evaluation of an Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System

A study testing CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System in people with Diabetes, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that untrained subjects who have diabetes can operate the Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) and obtain valid glucose results. Read more about this study

Who is it for?: Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for: Diabetes
What is being tested?: CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System
Type of treatment: Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?: No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people: 220 participants
Where: 2 sitesUnited States
Study dates: May 2012to May 2012
Phase: Interventional
Are there results?: Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 18 years and older
All sexes
No healthy volunteers
Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

Males and females, 18 years of age and older
Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
Able to speak, read, and understand English
Willing to complete all study procedures

Who cannot join

Pregnancy
Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
Previously participated in a study using the CONTOUR PLUS system
Working for a medical laboratory, hospital or other clinical setting that involves training on and clinical use of blood glucose monitors.
Working for a competitive medical device company, or having an immediate family member or someone who is not a family member but is living within the household of someone who works for such a company.
A condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, would put the person or study conduct at risk (reason for exclusion will be clearly documented by investigator or designee).

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites

Consumer Product Testing Co.
Fairfield, New Jersey, 07004
Midwest Institute For Clinical Research
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Performance of the CONTOUR® PLUS Blood Glucose Monitoring System With CONTOUR® PLUS Strip

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that untrained subjects who have diabetes can operate the Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) and obtain valid glucose results.

Conditions: Diabetes
Being tested: CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System
Medical subject headings: Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring SystemDevice
Untrained subjects with diabetes perform self Blood Glucose (BG) tests with capillary fingerstick and palm blood using the CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System. Study staff test subject venous blood. All Blood Glucose (BG) results are compared to a reference laboratory glucose method.

Study groups in NCT01598610
Study group	Role	What they receive
Intended Users of the Monitoring System	Experimental	Untrained subjects with diabetes use CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System. Receives: Device: CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Untrained subjects with diabetes self-test fingerstick blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). BGMS results are compared with capillary plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results are used to calculate the number of BGMS results within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) or +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) of the reference method results.
Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (5)

Percent of Glucose Results From Alternative Site Testing (AST) of the Palm Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Untrained subjects with diabetes self-test Alternative Site (AST) Palm blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). BGMS AST results are compared with capillary plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results are used to calculate the number of AST BGMS results within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) or +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) of the reference method results.
Measured: 1 hour
Percent of Venous Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Study staff tested subject venous blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). Venous BGMS results are compared with venous plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. Venous plasma BG results are used to calculate the number of BGMS results within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL YSI venous plasma) or +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL YSI venous plasma) of the reference method results.
Measured: 1 hour
Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 5to15mg/dL (<100mg/dL) or Within +/- 5to15% (>=100mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Untrained subjects with diabetes self-test fingerstick blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). BGMS results are compared with capillary plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results are used to calculate the number of BGMS results within +/- 5to15mg/dL (<100mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) or +/- 5to15% (>=100mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) of the reference method results.
Measured: 1 hour
Percent of Subject Fingerstick BG Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method When Tested by Study Staff
Study staff test subject fingerstick blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). BGMS results are compared with capillary plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results are used to calculate the number of BGMS results within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) or +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) of the reference method results.
Measured: 1 hour
Number of Subject Responses 'Strongly Agree' 'Agree' or 'Neutral' With Questionnaire Statements
Subjects respond to statements read by study staff to provide feedback on the labeling materials and system ease of use. Subjects may respond 'Strongly Agree' 'Agree' 'Neutral' 'Disagree' or 'Strongly Disagree'.
Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

May 2012May 2012

First posted15 May 2012 (estimated)
Study startMay 2012
Primary completionMay 2012
Study completionMay 2012

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase N/A
Primary purpose: Diagnosis
Allocation: Not applicable
Intervention model: Single group
Masking: None (open label)
Enrolment: 220 participants (actual)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01598610
Sponsor's protocol ID: CTD-2012-002-01
Status last verified: Jan 2016
First submitted: 13 May 2012
Last updated: 29 Feb 2016
Results posted: Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Data monitoring committee: No

Want to know more?

The sponsor has not listed a contact. The official record may have more details.

Talk to your doctor first and take this page with you. Only the study team can confirm whether you can join.

Questions to ask the study team

What is the study trying to find out?
What would I need to do, and how often would I visit?
Could I receive a placebo instead of the treatment?
What are the possible risks and benefits for me?
Will it cost me anything? Are travel or time paid for?
Can I keep seeing my own doctor during the study?
What happens when the study ends?

See locations

Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)

All Diabetes trials

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: Performance of the CONTOUR® PLUS Blood Glucose Monitoring System With CONTOUR® PLUS Strip
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01598610
Acronym / sponsor ID: CTD-2012-002-01
Conditions: Diabetes
Study type: Interventional
Recruitment status: Completed
Enrolment: 220 participants (actual)
Lead sponsor: Ascensia Diabetes CareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
Study start: May 2012
Primary completion: May 2012 (actual)
Study completion: May 2012 (actual)
First posted: 15 May 2012 (estimated)
Results: Posted 30 Jul 2013

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that untrained subjects who have diabetes can operate the Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) and obtain valid glucose results.

Study design

Primary purpose: Diagnosis
Allocation: Not applicable
Intervention model: Single group
Masking: None (open label)
Number of arms: 1

Arm	Type	Receives
Intended Users of the Monitoring System	Experimental	Device: CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring SystemUntrained subjects with diabetes use CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System.

Who may qualify

Ages: 18 years and older
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Adult, Older adult

Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)

Males and females, 18 years of age and older
Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
Able to speak, read, and understand English
Willing to complete all study procedures

Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)

Pregnancy
Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
Previously participated in a study using the CONTOUR PLUS system
Working for a medical laboratory, hospital or other clinical setting that involves training on and clinical use of blood glucose monitors.
Working for a competitive medical device company, or having an immediate family member or someone who is not a family member but is living within the household of someone who works for such a company.

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Intervention	Type	Arms
CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring SystemUntrained subjects with diabetes perform self Blood Glucose (BG) tests with capillary fingerstick and palm blood using the CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System. Study staff test subject venous blood. All Blood Glucose (BG) results are compared to a reference laboratory glucose method.	Device	Intended Users of the Monitoring System

Primary outcome

Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Time frame: 1 hour
Untrained subjects with diabetes self-test fingerstick blood using an investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS). BGMS results are compared with capillary plasma BG results obtained with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results are used to calculate the number of BGMS results within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) or +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL YSI capillary plasma) of the reference method results.

5 secondary outcomes

Percent of Glucose Results From Alternative Site Testing (AST) of the Palm Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Time frame: 1 hour
Percent of Venous Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Time frame: 1 hour
Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 5to15mg/dL (<100mg/dL) or Within +/- 5to15% (>=100mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method
Time frame: 1 hour
Percent of Subject Fingerstick BG Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method When Tested by Study Staff
Time frame: 1 hour
Number of Subject Responses 'Strongly Agree' 'Agree' or 'Neutral' With Questionnaire Statements
Time frame: 1 hour

Results and safety

Results posted to the registry on 30 Jul 2013, as reported by the sponsor. Figures are copied from the record, not re-analysed. Full results on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Participant flow

Group	Started	Completed
Intended Users of the Monitoring System	220	219

Primary outcome: Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method

Time frame: 1 hour. Number. Unit: percentage of BG Test Results

Measure	Intended Users of the Monitoring System n = 216
Value	100

Population analysed: 216 (220-4) blood test results were analyzed. Blood data for 2 subjects were not evaluable because time, defined in protocol, was exceeded between meter test and blood sample preparation for reference method. No fingerstick results were obtained for 2 subjects.

5 secondary outcomes are reported in the full results.

Adverse events

Other adverse events reported at 0% frequency or more

Group	Serious adverse events	Other adverse events	Deaths
Intended Users of the Monitoring System	0 of 220 (0%)	2 of 220 (0.9%)	Not reported

Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Feb 2016.
Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.

Related trials for Diabetes

Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

Phillip D Toth, MD, FACP principal investigator

Midwest Institute For Clinical Research

Michael Caswell, PhD principal investigator

Consumer Product Testing Co.

2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CONTOUR® PLUS Investigational BG Monitoring System in people with Diabetes, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Self-Test Fingerstick Blood Glucose Results Within +/- 15mg/dL (<75mg/dL) or Within +/- 20% (>=75mg/dL) of Laboratory Glucose Method (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01598610.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2016.