Pharmacogenetic TestingNCT01600846
Pharmacogenetic Testing in Primary Care
An observational study of Pharmacogenetic Testing, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to further integrate pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into clinical practice by educating physicians about pharmacogenetics and offering testing to their patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pharmacogenetic Testing
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Physician population will be physicians practicing at the two clinics part of Duke University Medical Center Patient population will be patients who receive primary care at one of the two participating clinics.
Who may be able to join
- must be a patient or physician at one of the participating clinics
- patients must be prescribed a medication that has PGx testing available
- 18 years of age or older
- English-speaking
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27708
About this study
Official title: Delivery of Pharmacogenetic Testing in a Primary Care Setting
The purpose of this study is to further integrate pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into clinical practice by educating physicians about pharmacogenetics and offering testing to their patients. Pharmacogenetic testing may help physicians choose the best drug and dosage for their patients which can reduce side effects, increase effectiveness, and improve patient adherence.
Two clinics will be involved. One clinic will have a pharmacist on-site as a resource to physicians and to advise what patients may benefit from PGx testing; the other clinic will have a pharmacist on call.
Read more
Patient and physician perspectives about PGx testing and their utilization will be examined via surveys.
The investigators hypothesize that with education about PGx testing, more physicians will utilize testing.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to assess two delivery models of PGx testing (physician-initiated and pharmacist-initiated) for commonly prescribed drugs in primary care practices and evaluate the delivery of testing from three perspectives: physician, patient, and practice setting. We hypothesize that greater utilization will be influenced by increased physician knowledge and awareness of drugs with PGx testing, comfort in discussing PGx testing with patients and applying results to therapeutic decision-making and positive attitudes towards the testing process. We hypothesize that the pharmacist-initiated approach will result in the most effective use and rapid uptake of PGx testing given the hands-on educational approach with the pharmacist providing expert guidance. We also hypothesize that having a pharmacist with PGx testing expertise as part of the medical team will result in greater physician comfort with test ordering and application of results as compared with the physician-initiated model. In addition, an economic analysis will be conducted to evaluate and compare the costs of each model.
We will also examine patient perspectives about PGx testing and their utilization of test results. We hypothesize that patients who have experienced adverse responses or a poor drug outcome (no response) in the past, are taking chronic medications, and those who are older will be more likely to consent to PGx testing. We hypothesize that patients' increased awareness about their genetic predisposition to adverse responses will result in greater discussion with prescribing physicians and pharmacists about the PGx results when new treatments are prescribed, with greater attention to adverse effects of new drugs and potentially greater medication compliance.
We will implement and evaluate two delivery models of PGx testing into primary care practices: physician-initiated testing and pharmacist-initiated testing. Each practice will be provided an educational intervention and will be surveyed prior to the seminar and following the intervention period to assess primary care practitioner (PCP) knowledge and attitudes about PGx testing. These surveys will take about 10-15 minutes to complete and will be available through an online system like SurveyMonkey.
In the pharmacist-initiated group, a pharmacist based within the practice will identify prescribed drugs with available PGx testing through chart review and provide specific information and recommendations about PGx testing to the ordering physician. In the physician-initiated group, physicians will order testing as they deem necessary, but will also have on-call pharmacist support to consult.
Patients who are offered PGx testing will also be surveyed: once after deciding whether or not to pursue PGx testing and then, if they consent to testing, after they receive their test results. These surveys will take about 10-15 minutes to complete and will be on paper (pretest) and online through a system like SurveyMonkey (post-test). The pretest survey will have 3 sections: demographics, perceived risks and benefits of PGx testing, and satisfaction with test results. The post-test will assess information-seeking behavior, medication adherence, and knowledge of adverse drug reactions.
Chart reviews will be conducted throughout the study to collect various data-points. All extracted data-points will be coded; the key will be stored in a separate file to minimize any breach of privacy. In summary, the medical records of patients scheduled to be seen at either clinic during the first or second phase of the study (see Figure 1) will be reviewed to identify those patients that were prescribed a drug from Table 1. A post-intervention (the third and final phase of the study) chart review will be conducted to monitor the number of new prescriptions for drugs listed in Table 1, the frequency with which PGx testing is ordered, by which physicians, and for which drugs.
We will conduct chart reviews at the end of each phase of the study (pre-intervention period, intervention period, and post intervention period) of patients prescribed targeted medications. No HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) identifiers will be recorded.
All PCPs practicing at the two clinics involved in the study are eligible to participate. All physicians who participate in the educational intervention in either arm will be invited to participate in the pre and post-intervention surveys.
The patient survey population will include patients who were offered and consented or declined testing. All patients 18 years and older who were prescribed a drug for which PGx testing is available and offered a PGx test by their physician during the intervention period will be asked to participate in the initial survey. Patients must be English-speaking and able to complete the survey without assistance.
Chart review will include all patients who were scheduled an appointment at either of the clinics within the designed study period. Data abstracted (full chart review) will be limited to those patients who were prescribed a target drug during the designated period.
- Conditions
- Pharmacogenetic Testing
- Keywords
- Pharmacogenetic testing, pharmacokinetics, Pharmacogenomics, genetics, pharmacy, drug response
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Use of PGx testing
Measured: 6 months, 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of adverse drug reactions
Measured: 6 months, 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionJul 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pharmacogenetic TestingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susanne Haga, PhD, Principal investigator, Duke Unviersity Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01600846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00031122
- Other IDs
- 2R01GM081416-04
- Status last verified
- Aug 2014
- First submitted
- 15 May 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delivery of Pharmacogenetic Testing in a Primary Care Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01600846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00031122
- Conditions
- Pharmacogenetic Testing
- Keywords
- Pharmacogenetic testing, pharmacokinetics, Pharmacogenomics, genetics, pharmacy, drug response
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to further integrate pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into clinical practice by educating physicians about pharmacogenetics and offering testing to their patients. Pharmacogenetic testing may help physicians choose the best drug and dosage for their patients which can reduce side effects, increase effectiveness, and improve patient adherence.
Two clinics will be involved. One clinic will have a pharmacist on-site as a resource to physicians and to advise what patients may benefit from PGx testing; the other clinic will have a pharmacist on call.
Patient and physician perspectives about PGx testing and their utilization will be examined via surveys.
The investigators hypothesize that with education about PGx testing, more physicians will utilize testing.
Detailed description
This study aims to assess two delivery models of PGx testing (physician-initiated and pharmacist-initiated) for commonly prescribed drugs in primary care practices and evaluate the delivery of testing from three perspectives: physician, patient, and practice setting. We hypothesize that greater utilization will be influenced by increased physician knowledge and awareness of drugs with PGx testing, comfort in discussing PGx testing with patients and applying results to therapeutic decision-making and positive attitudes towards the testing process. We hypothesize that the pharmacist-initiated approach will result in the most effective use and rapid uptake of PGx testing given the hands-on educational approach with the pharmacist providing expert guidance. We also hypothesize that having a pharmacist with PGx testing expertise as part of the medical team will result in greater physician comfort with test ordering and application of results as compared with the physician-initiated model. In addition, an economic analysis will be conducted to evaluate and compare the costs of each model.
We will also examine patient perspectives about PGx testing and their utilization of test results. We hypothesize that patients who have experienced adverse responses or a poor drug outcome (no response) in the past, are taking chronic medications, and those who are older will be more likely to consent to PGx testing. We hypothesize that patients' increased awareness about their genetic predisposition to adverse responses will result in greater discussion with prescribing physicians and pharmacists about the PGx results when new treatments are prescribed, with greater attention to adverse effects of new drugs and potentially greater medication compliance.
We will implement and evaluate two delivery models of PGx testing into primary care practices: physician-initiated testing and pharmacist-initiated testing. Each practice will be provided an educational intervention and will be surveyed prior to the seminar and following the intervention period to assess primary care practitioner (PCP) knowledge and attitudes about PGx testing. These surveys will take about 10-15 minutes to complete and will be available through an online system like SurveyMonkey.
In the pharmacist-initiated group, a pharmacist based within the practice will identify prescribed drugs with available PGx testing through chart review and provide specific information and recommendations about PGx testing to the ordering physician. In the physician-initiated group, physicians will order testing as they deem necessary, but will also have on-call pharmacist support to consult.
Patients who are offered PGx testing will also be surveyed: once after deciding whether or not to pursue PGx testing and then, if they consent to testing, after they receive their test results. These surveys will take about 10-15 minutes to complete and will be on paper (pretest) and online through a system like SurveyMonkey (post-test). The pretest survey will have 3 sections: demographics, perceived risks and benefits of PGx testing, and satisfaction with test results. The post-test will assess information-seeking behavior, medication adherence, and knowledge of adverse drug reactions.
Chart reviews will be conducted throughout the study to collect various data-points. All extracted data-points will be coded; the key will be stored in a separate file to minimize any breach of privacy. In summary, the medical records of patients scheduled to be seen at either clinic during the first or second phase of the study (see Figure 1) will be reviewed to identify those patients that were prescribed a drug from Table 1. A post-intervention (the third and final phase of the study) chart review will be conducted to monitor the number of new prescriptions for drugs listed in Table 1, the frequency with which PGx testing is ordered, by which physicians, and for which drugs.
We will conduct chart reviews at the end of each phase of the study (pre-intervention period, intervention period, and post intervention period) of patients prescribed targeted medications. No HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) identifiers will be recorded.
All PCPs practicing at the two clinics involved in the study are eligible to participate. All physicians who participate in the educational intervention in either arm will be invited to participate in the pre and post-intervention surveys.
The patient survey population will include patients who were offered and consented or declined testing. All patients 18 years and older who were prescribed a drug for which PGx testing is available and offered a PGx test by their physician during the intervention period will be asked to participate in the initial survey. Patients must be English-speaking and able to complete the survey without assistance.
Chart review will include all patients who were scheduled an appointment at either of the clinics within the designed study period. Data abstracted (full chart review) will be limited to those patients who were prescribed a target drug during the designated period.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Physician population will be physicians practicing at the two clinics part of Duke University Medical Center Patient population will be patients who receive primary care at one of the two participating clinics.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- must be a patient or physician at one of the participating clinics
- patients must be prescribed a medication that has PGx testing available
- 18 years of age or older
- English-speaking
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Use of PGx testing
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
1 secondary outcome
Number of adverse drug reactions
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2017.
Related trials for Pharmacogenetic Testing
RecruitingObservational study
Reduction of Adverse Drug Events and Readmissions
Pharmacogenomic Testing for Medication Management
RecruitingPhase 4
Mechanistic Clinical Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Metoprolol in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Low vs. High Polygenic Score
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
Pharmacogenomic Testing in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients
Pediatric Cancer
Recruiting
Personalized Pharmacotherapy Using Pharmacogenetics in Veterans
Pharmacogenetic Testing to Determine Pharmacological Treatment in PTSD
Recruiting
An Evaluation of the Impact of Pharmacist Comprehensive Medication Management With Pharmacogenomic Results to Improve Depression Outcomes in Community Pharmacies.
Pharmacogenetics, Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susanne Haga, PhD principal investigator
Duke Unviersity Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pharmacogenetic Testing, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Use of PGx testing (time frame: 6 months, 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2017.