Venous ThromboembolismREMARKNCT01602445
Pro-coagulant Markers and Anticoagulant Failure in Cancer Patients at Risk for Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism
An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 5 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The presence of clots in the veins of arms and/or legs or lungs of Cancer patients decreases their quality of life, delays their treatment and may cause death. The best way to avoid new clots is by giving blood thinners before clots are formed, but even some patients who are taking blood thinners may form blood clots. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboembolism, Deep-Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Referrals of cancer patients to the Thrombosis clinic at each participating center at the time that an acute episode of VTE has been confirmed ( within 0 +/- 1 day) from the start of anticoagulation treatment. Our centers provide VTE treatment for all the cancer patients in our regions given the design of the Ontario Cancer Program, ensuring a generalizable patient population.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with any type of cancer (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) and at any stage of the disease or treatment
- Confirmed newly diagnosed acute symptomatic VTE (proximal DVT, PE, Arm DVT, Multiple SSPE only)
- Planned treatment of VTE with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
- Age 18 years old or older.
Who cannot join
- Planned cell transplant
- Patient receiving anticoagulation due to other clinical indications
- Patient who has received more than one therapeutic dose of LMWH
- Unable or unwilling to provide written, informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Canada5 sites
Capital Health District Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 0A6
London Health Science Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9
CHUM-Notre-Dame Hospital
Montreal, Quebec
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Pro-coagulant and Thrombin-generation Markers for the Prediction of Therapeutic Failure in Cancer Patients at Risk for Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism: A Pilot Study
The presence of clots in the veins of arms and/or legs or lungs of Cancer patients decreases their quality of life, delays their treatment and may cause death. The best way to avoid new clots is by giving blood thinners before clots are formed, but even some patients who are taking blood thinners may form blood clots. A major problem is that it is difficult to know which patients form clots while they are receiving blood thinners, a situation called treatment failure. Several studies have shown that by doing blood tests that measure the formation of clots, the investigators could know if the patient is responding to the blood thinners. If this is proven, the investigators will be able to apply these tests to all patients.
Read the detailed description
Therapeutic failure in cancer patients at high risk for recurrence of Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be as high as 20% and the risk of death from a recurrent episode of pulmonary embolism is at least 8%. Studies that have used pro-coagulant and thrombin generation markers support the notion that cancer is associated with a hypercoagulability state and that intensified doses of anticoagulation may be necessary to suppress this state. Thus, it may be possible that by using these tests, we would identify the patients that do not respond to standard doses of anticoagulation. To date, only few small studies have evaluated the use of pro-coagulant markers in cancer patients but this data is promising. Our study will measure pro-coagulant markers in cancer patients at risk for VTE recurrence to determine if there is a relationship between the changes in the levels of pro-coagulant markers and VTE recurrence while taking anticoagulation with low-molecular weight-heparin (LMWH). The evaluation of the pro-coagulant markers may enable new treatment strategies in cancer patients who fail their initial treatment. Patients will be stratified by a risk model developed by our group and will be validate with this study. This new approach has the potential to improve the recovery of patients, to reduce death and disability due to clots in the veins of legs or arms and/or lungs.
- Keywords
- Venous Thrombosis, Coagulation factors, Cancer, Blood
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cancer patients | All cancer patients with a diagnosed acute symptomatic VTE episode. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relative changes on biochemical markers
The following pro-coagulant and thrombin-generation markers will be measured:
- Prothrombin fragments F1+2;
- D-dimer,
- thrombin-antithrombin (TAT)
- Soluble P-selectin.
For each patient, we will calculate baseline values and the relative changes (delta) of procoagulant and thrombin generation markers. The relative changes (delta) will be defined by the percentage of change in the marker at each visit relative to baseline measurement.
Measured: at initiation of anticoagulation (baseline); at 7-14 days; 21-35 days; 37- 44 days; 83-97 days; and 173-187 days after initiation of anticoagulation.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Rates of treatment failure
This outcome will be measured by the proportion of cancer patients who might develop recurrent VTE while on 6-month treatment with anticoagulation within the time-frame of the study.
Measured: 6 months
Correlation between treatment failure and markers
This outcome will be assessed by determining the best cutoff for each marker that would correctly classify success or failure to anticoagulation treatment
Measured: 6 months after treatment failure
Compliance to anticoagulation treatment
Compliance to medication will be measured by review of the patient medication diary.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionOct 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Venous ThromboembolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philip S Wells, MD, Principal investigator, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01602445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSFO-000524
- Other IDs
- 20120208-01H
- Acronym
- REMARK
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 16 May 2012
- Last updated
- 11 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Noble S, Pasi J. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of cancer-associated thrombosis. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 13;102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605599.
PubMed 20386546Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindier MJ, Osanto S, van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Mar;4(3):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01804.x.
PubMed 16460435Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A, Bernardi E, Simioni P, Girolami B, Marchiori A, Sabbion P, Prins MH, Noventa F, Girolami A. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood. 2002 Nov 15;100(10):3484-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0108. Epub 2002 Jul 12.
PubMed 12393647Coleman R, MacCallum P. Treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 13;102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605601.
PubMed 20386545Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M; Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer (CLOT) Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):146-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025313.
PubMed 12853587Weitz IC, Israel VK, Waisman JR, Presant CA, Rochanda L, Liebman HA. Chemotherapy-induced activation of hemostasis: effect of a low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin sodium) on plasma markers of hemostatic activation. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Aug;88(2):213-20.
PubMed 12195692Traby L, Kaider A, Schmid R, Kranz A, Quehenberger P, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. The effects of low-molecular-weight heparin at two different dosages on thrombin generation in cancer patients. A randomised controlled trial. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul;104(1):92-9. doi: 10.1160/TH09-12-0863. Epub 2010 May 10.
PubMed 20458441Kirwan CC, McDowell G, McCollum CN, Kumar S, Byrne GJ. Early changes in the haemostatic and procoagulant systems after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Oct 7;99(7):1000-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604620. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
PubMed 18766191Louzada ML, Carrier M, Lazo-Langner A, Dao V, Kovacs MJ, Ramsay TO, Rodger MA, Zhang J, Lee AY, Meyer G, Wells PS. Development of a clinical prediction rule for risk stratification of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2012 Jul 24;126(4):448-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.051920. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PubMed 22679142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Pro-coagulant and Thrombin-generation Markers for the Prediction of Therapeutic Failure in Cancer Patients at Risk for Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01602445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMARK / HSFO-000524
- Keywords
- Venous Thrombosis, Coagulation factors, Cancer, Blood
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The presence of clots in the veins of arms and/or legs or lungs of Cancer patients decreases their quality of life, delays their treatment and may cause death. The best way to avoid new clots is by giving blood thinners before clots are formed, but even some patients who are taking blood thinners may form blood clots. A major problem is that it is difficult to know which patients form clots while they are receiving blood thinners, a situation called treatment failure. Several studies have shown that by doing blood tests that measure the formation of clots, the investigators could know if the patient is responding to the blood thinners. If this is proven, the investigators will be able to apply these tests to all patients.
Detailed description
Therapeutic failure in cancer patients at high risk for recurrence of Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be as high as 20% and the risk of death from a recurrent episode of pulmonary embolism is at least 8%. Studies that have used pro-coagulant and thrombin generation markers support the notion that cancer is associated with a hypercoagulability state and that intensified doses of anticoagulation may be necessary to suppress this state. Thus, it may be possible that by using these tests, we would identify the patients that do not respond to standard doses of anticoagulation. To date, only few small studies have evaluated the use of pro-coagulant markers in cancer patients but this data is promising. Our study will measure pro-coagulant markers in cancer patients at risk for VTE recurrence to determine if there is a relationship between the changes in the levels of pro-coagulant markers and VTE recurrence while taking anticoagulation with low-molecular weight-heparin (LMWH). The evaluation of the pro-coagulant markers may enable new treatment strategies in cancer patients who fail their initial treatment. Patients will be stratified by a risk model developed by our group and will be validate with this study. This new approach has the potential to improve the recovery of patients, to reduce death and disability due to clots in the veins of legs or arms and/or lungs.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cancer patients | – | –All cancer patients with a diagnosed acute symptomatic VTE episode. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Referrals of cancer patients to the Thrombosis clinic at each participating center at the time that an acute episode of VTE has been confirmed ( within 0 +/- 1 day) from the start of anticoagulation treatment. Our centers provide VTE treatment for all the cancer patients in our regions given the design of the Ontario Cancer Program, ensuring a generalizable patient population.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with any type of cancer (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) and at any stage of the disease or treatment
- Confirmed newly diagnosed acute symptomatic VTE (proximal DVT, PE, Arm DVT, Multiple SSPE only)
- Planned treatment of VTE with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
- Age 18 years old or older.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Planned cell transplant
- Patient receiving anticoagulation due to other clinical indications
- Patient who has received more than one therapeutic dose of LMWH
- Unable or unwilling to provide written, informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Relative changes on biochemical markers
Time frame: at initiation of anticoagulation (baseline); at 7-14 days; 21-35 days; 37- 44 days; 83-97 days; and 173-187 days after initiation of anticoagulation.
The following pro-coagulant and thrombin-generation markers will be measured: 1. Prothrombin fragments F1+2; 2. D-dimer, 3. thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) 4. Soluble P-selectin. For each patient, we will calculate baseline values and the relative changes (delta) of procoagulant and thrombin generation markers. The relative changes (delta) will be defined by the percentage of change in the marker at each visit relative to baseline measurement.
3 secondary outcomes
Rates of treatment failure
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation between treatment failure and markers
Time frame: 6 months after treatment failure
Compliance to anticoagulation treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 20386546Noble S, Pasi J. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of cancer-associated thrombosis. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 13;102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605599.
- Background: PubMed 16460435Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindier MJ, Osanto S, van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Mar;4(3):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01804.x.
- Background: PubMed 12393647Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A, Bernardi E, Simioni P, Girolami B, Marchiori A, Sabbion P, Prins MH, Noventa F, Girolami A. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood. 2002 Nov 15;100(10):3484-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0108. Epub 2002 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 20386545Coleman R, MacCallum P. Treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 13;102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605601.
- Background: PubMed 12853587Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M; Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer (CLOT) Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):146-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025313.
- Background: PubMed 12195692Weitz IC, Israel VK, Waisman JR, Presant CA, Rochanda L, Liebman HA. Chemotherapy-induced activation of hemostasis: effect of a low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin sodium) on plasma markers of hemostatic activation. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Aug;88(2):213-20.
- Background: PubMed 20458441Traby L, Kaider A, Schmid R, Kranz A, Quehenberger P, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. The effects of low-molecular-weight heparin at two different dosages on thrombin generation in cancer patients. A randomised controlled trial. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul;104(1):92-9. doi: 10.1160/TH09-12-0863. Epub 2010 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 18766191Kirwan CC, McDowell G, McCollum CN, Kumar S, Byrne GJ. Early changes in the haemostatic and procoagulant systems after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Oct 7;99(7):1000-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604620. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 22679142Louzada ML, Carrier M, Lazo-Langner A, Dao V, Kovacs MJ, Ramsay TO, Rodger MA, Zhang J, Lee AY, Meyer G, Wells PS. Development of a clinical prediction rule for risk stratification of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2012 Jul 24;126(4):448-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.051920. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Venous Thromboembolism
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philip S Wells, MD principal investigator
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 5 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relative changes on biochemical markers (time frame: at initiation of anticoagulation (baseline); at 7-14 days; 21-35 days; 37- 44 days; 83-97 days; and 173-187 days after initiation of anticoagulation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01602445, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2017.