AzTrials
AzTrials

FractureNCT01605240

Ibuprofen Versus Codeine. Is One Better for Post-operative Pain Relief Following Reduction of Paediatric Forearm Fractures?

A study testing Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen and Codeine in people with Fracture and Pain, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

For simple fractures treated in the emergency department with cast immobilisation only, ibuprofen has been shown to be superior to, or a least or equivalent to codeine with less side effects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Fracture, Pain
What is being tested?
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen and Codeine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2012to Aug 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All paediatric patients presenting to the section of paediatric orthopaedics requiring a closed reduction of a forearm fraction under either sedation or general anaesthetic.
  • Patients who are able to return to follow up.

Who cannot join

  • Any children with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding or ulceration, a bleeding disorder, a history of a low platelet count, a history of kidney disease, an uncontrolled chronic disease, or regular use of or allergy to acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or codeine.
  • Children are also ineligible if they or their parents are unable to understand the consent process.
  • Any child requiring anything other than a cast to supplement the stability of the fracture or an open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture.
  • Open fractures.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Paul Jellicoe, MD contact

204-787-8948

James R McCammon, MD contact

204-779-8673

j_mccammon@hotmail.com

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Health Sciences Center

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

    Paul Jellicoe, MD, Ph: 204 787 8948, pjellicoe@exchange.hsc.mb.ca

    James R McCammon, MD, 204-779-8673, j_mccammon@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Ibuprofen vs. Codeine. Is One Better for Post-operative Pain Relief Following Reduction of Paediatric Forearm Fractures?

For simple fractures treated in the emergency department with cast immobilisation only, ibuprofen has been shown to be superior to, or a least or equivalent to codeine with less side effects. These and other studies have commented that their results may not be applicable to children who have fractures that require reduction. There is currently no literature on the management of postoperative pain following reduction of paediatric fractures. The investigators aim therefore is to investigate whether either of the two most commonly prescribed analgesics is superior to the other for postoperative pain management following closed reductions of paediatric forearm fractures. Also, if one agent has more side effects than the other.

Read the detailed description

This will be a prospective randomised controlled trial with the null hypothesis that there is no difference between ibuprofen and codeine in terms of pain relief or side effects.

Following ethics approval (submitted and approved) by the University of Manitoba ethics board a study group of fifty patients (25 in each arm) will be recruited to participate in the study.All patients will complete informed consent following both a verbal and written explanation of the study. Following the closed reduction they will all receive regular acetaminophen; (dose 15mg/kg) and either ibuprofen (10mg/kg) or codeine (1mg/kg) depending upon the group they were randomised to. This will have to be single blinding as the codeine formulation used by the hospital is a clear red liquid (5mg/ml) and the ibuprofen a cloudy colourless liquid (20mg/ml). They will also be given a "rescue" medication to be taken if the caregivers feel that the pain relief is not sufficient 1 hour after the study medication. This rescue medication will be the alternative medication in the study.

Conditions
Fracture, Pain
Being tested
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen and Codeine
Keywords
Fracture pain, Fracture reduction, Analgesia, Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, Codeine, Pediatric, Fracture Pain Analgesia in Pediatric population
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone, Pain, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acetaminophen and IbuprofenDrug

    Also called Ibuprofen (Advil)

    After their fracture is reduced, these patients will receive acetaminophen (15mg/kg) and ibuprofen (10mg/kg) at regular dosing intervals.

  • Acetaminophen and CodeineDrug

    After their fracture is reduced, these patients will receive acetaminophen (15mg/kg) and codeine (1mg/kg) at regular dosing intervals.

Study groups in NCT01605240
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acetaminophen and CodeineActive comparatorAfter their fracture is reduced, these patients will receive acetaminophen (15mg/kg) and codeine (1mg/kg) at regular dosing intervals.
Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen and Codeine
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenActive comparatorFollowing reduction of their fracture, these patients will receive acetaminophen (15mg/ml) and ibuprofen (10mg/ml) at regular dosing intervals.
Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Diary

    Caregivers, or the children if old enough, will be asked to keep a pain diary. This will consist of the times the analgesia was taken and a pain score at awakening, at bedtime and before and 1 hour after each dose of medication.

    Caregivers/children will also be asked to include any side effects noted to medication and whether play, school, sleep, and eating are affected by pain each day. Caregivers will record whether the function was increased, decreased, or unchanged.

    Measured: Two Weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Parent satisfaction will be measured each day with the use of a Likert 0-5 scale.

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01605240
Sponsor's protocol ID
H2012:092
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
22 May 2012
Last updated
25 Jul 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Drendel AL, Lyon R, Bergholte J, Kim MK. Outpatient pediatric pain management practices for fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Feb;22(2):94-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000199564.64264.f4.

    PubMed 16481924
  • Drendel AL, Gorelick MH, Weisman SJ, Lyon R, Brousseau DC, Kim MK. A randomized clinical trial of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen with codeine for acute pediatric arm fracture pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

    PubMed 19692147
  • Koller DM, Myers AB, Lorenz D, Godambe SA. Effectiveness of oxycodone, ibuprofen, or the combination in the initial management of orthopedic injury-related pain in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Sep;23(9):627-33. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31814a6a39.

    PubMed 17876251
  • Oakley EA, Ooi KS, Barnett PL. A randomized controlled trial of 2 methods of immobilizing torus fractures of the distal forearm. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Feb;24(2):65-70. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318163db13.

    PubMed 18277840
  • Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R, Gaboury I, Lawton L. A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):691-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0801.

    PubMed 16510648
  • Heidrich G, Slavic-Svircev V, Kaiko RF. Efficacy and quality of ibuprofen and acetaminophen plus codeine analgesia. Pain. 1985 Aug;22(4):385-397. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90044-2.

    PubMed 4047707
  • Clark E, Plint AC, Correll R, Gaboury I, Passi B. A randomized, controlled trial of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and codeine for acute pain relief in children with musculoskeletal trauma. Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):460-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1347.

    PubMed 17332198
  • Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion DG, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990 May;41(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9.

    PubMed 2367140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen and Codeine in people with Fracture and Pain, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Paul Jellicoe, MD (204-787-8948), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Diary (time frame: Two Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01605240, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in