AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT01607359

Dabigatran Versus Warfarin Anticoagulation Before and After Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Both warfarin and dabigatran have been used for stroke prophylaxis at the time of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Although the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with warfarin are well established, the relative risk and benefit of dabigatran in this setting are unknown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2012to 20 Apr 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Who may be able to join

  • All patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Who cannot join

  • none (retrospective trial)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Beaumont Health System

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073

Other trials in United States

About this study

Both warfarin and dabigatran have been used for stroke prophylaxis at the time of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Although the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with warfarin are well established, the relative risk and benefit of dabigatran in this setting are unknown. The purposes of the study are to assess the efficacy of warfarin versus dabigatran in the prevention of stroke and other systemic embolic complications before and after catheter ablation for AF, and to compare the prevalence of serious bleeding complications with the two OAC agents.

Read the detailed description
  • Data from patients collected from 4 US and 1 Canadian medical center
  • Retrospective record review of all patients that had undergone catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation during the time period beginning with the initiation of dabigatran therapy for stroke prophylaxis at each center and ending in November 2011.
  • Dabigatran study group comprised of all patients that received dabigatran for stroke prophylaxis during the study time period.
  • Warfarin comparison group to be selected from all patients that received warfarin for stroke prophylaxis during the identical study time period.
  • Warfarin patients will be numbered sequentially
  • A subgroup of warfarin patients identical in number to the dabigatran patients at each center will be selected using random number generator.

Patient data sets will be de-identified and compiled

  • Master data set to be stored in Excel file
  • Statistics to be performed with SAS (Cary, NC)
  • Continuous data to be expressed as means ± S.D., compared with unpaired t-tests
  • Categorical data will be compared with Fisher's exact test or Chi-square
  • Complications including any thromboembolic events or any bleeding events will be recorded and the prevalence compared.
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, dabigatran, warfarin, oral anticoagulation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01607359
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
dabigatran groupAll patients receiving dabigatran as periprocedural anticoagulation during the study time period
warfarin groupA randomly selected group of patients treated with warfarin during the study time period matching the number of dabigatran treated patients in the same time period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical stroke, TIA or systemic embolic complication

    Thromboembolic complication recorded in clinical records.

    Measured: 30 days before or after catheter ablation

  2. Bleeding complication

    Any bleeding causing additional intervention, hospitalization or pain and suffering including pericardial tamponade, large hematoma or other bleeding.

    Measured: 30 days before or after catheter ablation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Any significant complication

    Any significant complication that is related to the catheter ablation procedure or to the anticoagulation regimen

    Measured: 30 days before or after catheter ablation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completion20 Apr 2017

Why it stopped: Withdrawn: It was decided not to proceed with the study at this time.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01607359
Sponsor's protocol ID
2007088
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
24 May 2012
Last updated
11 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical stroke, TIA or systemic embolic complication (time frame: 30 days before or after catheter ablation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in