AzTrials
AzTrials

Long Term Safety of the AMS 1.0NCT01610102

PROGRESS-AMS 1.0 Clinical Long Term Follow-Up

An observational study of Long Term Safety of the AMS 1.0, run by Biotronik AG at 6 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to collect long term clinical follow-up data on all patients enrolled in the PROGRESS AMS-1.0 study to assess long term safety of the AMS-1.0 Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Long Term Safety of the AMS 1.0
How many people
55 participants
Where
6 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Jul 2011to Jun 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: 63 eligible patints previously enrolled in the PROGRESS AMS-1 study

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent form available prior to clinical long term follow-up

Who cannot join

  • Patent did not sign the informed consent form prior to clinical long term follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 5 countries.

6 sites in 5 countries

Switzerland2 sites
  • Luzerner Kantonsspital

    Lucerne

  • University Hospital Zürich

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Australia1 site
  • Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

Other trials in Australia

Belgium1 site
  • O.L.V. Ziekenhuis Aalst

    Aalst, 9300

Other trials in Belgium

Germany1 site
  • Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands1 site
  • Catharina Zieckenhuis

    Eindhoven, 5623

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Clinical Performance and Angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting With Absorbable Metal Stents, Clinical Long Term Follow-Up

The primary objective of this study is to collect long term clinical follow-up data on all patients enrolled in the PROGRESS AMS-1.0 study to assess long term safety of the AMS-1.0

Read the detailed description

The first clinical experience with AMS was in infrapopliteal arteries and demonstrated safety and acceptable patency rates up to 12 months post implantation. These encouraging results led to the initiation of the first trial to treat human coronary lesions with AMS named Clinical Performance and angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting with Absorbable Metal Stents (PROGRESS AMS-1). Although an ischemic driven target lesion revascularization rate of 26.7% (16/60) was observed during the PROGRESS AMS-1 study, it demonstrated that biodegradable magnesium stents can be implanted safely in coronary arteries, and the stents degraded as intended without causing stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction or death at one year. No adverse device effects from the absorbable nature of the stents or its constituents were detected. The continued clinical follow-up and retrospective evaluation of all angiographies and IVUS films on all eligible patients enrolled in the PROGRESS-AMS 1.0 will give important information on the long term safety of absorbable metal scaffolds and thus can support improvement of the device.

Keywords
clinical follow-up, up to 7 years, all patients enrolled in the main study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

    Composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization

    Measured: up to 7 years follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01610102
Sponsor's protocol ID
C1104
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
30 May 2012
Last updated
5 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Long Term Safety of the AMS 1.0, run by Biotronik AG at 6 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Target Lesion Failure (TLF) (time frame: up to 7 years follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in