AIDSNCT01610427
Study to Optimize the Quality of Samples for Cell-mediated Immunity (CMI) in ART-naïve HIV-1-infected Subjects
A study testing Blood sample collection in people with AIDS and AIDS Vaccines, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate a combined set of parameters deemed to impact the quality of CMI analyses in terms of the proportion of viable lymphocytes in antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- AIDS, AIDS Vaccines
- What is being tested?
- Blood sample collection
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2012to 30 Oct 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- All subjects must satisfy all the following criteria at study entry:
- Subjects who the Investigator believes can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to any study procedure.
- A male or female between and including 18 and 55 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- Confirmed HIV-1 infection.
- ART-naïve and not eligible for ART treatment as per established guidelines. Subjects must never have received ART after HIV diagnosis, including lamivudine used for chronic hepatitis B infection. The exception to this is short-term ART for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) which must have been completed at least 360 days prior to enrollment.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Viral load level between and including 2,000 and 100,000 copies/mL at screening.
- CD4+ T cell count >500 cells/mm3 at screening.
- If the subject is female, she must be of non-childbearing potential, i.e., have a current tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovariectomy or be post-menopausal. Female subjects of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the subject:
- has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination, and
- has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and
- has agreed to continue adequate contraception during the entire study period.
Who cannot join
- The following criteria should be checked at the time of study entry. If any exclusion criterion applies, the subject must not be included in the study:
- Infection with HIV-2. This includes subjects with dual infection with HIV-1/HIV-2.
- Planned use of any hematotoxic product during the study period.
- Planned use of any investigational or non-registered product during the study period.
- Acute or chronic, clinically relevant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by physical examination, serology and/or medical history at screening.
- Grade 3 or grade 4 laboratory abnormalities, as defined by Division of AIDS (DAIDS) grading table, at screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the subject's adherence to the study protocol.
- Planned administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol during the period starting 30 days before the Sample Collection Visit (Visit 2). Vaccine can be administered as after sampling in Visit 2.
- Pregnant or lactating female.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Optimizing the Quality of Samples Used for the Evaluation of Cell-mediated Immune (CMI) Responses in Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)-naïve Human Deficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Infected Subjects
The purpose of this study is to investigate a combined set of parameters deemed to impact the quality of CMI analyses in terms of the proportion of viable lymphocytes in antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects.
Read the detailed description
This study will address the respective and combined impact of (i) timing between blood collection and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) processing ["time-to-process"] and (ii) timing of PBMC resting before stimulation ["resting -time"].
- Conditions
- AIDS, AIDS Vaccines
- Being tested
- Blood sample collection
- Keywords
- CMI, Antiretroviral therapy-naïve, HIV
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood sample collectionProcedure or surgery
Blood samples will be collected in all subjects at two time points, at the Screening Visit (Day 0) and at the Sample Collection Visit (Day 15)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 Group | Experimental | Antiretroviral Therapy-naïve HIV1-infected subjects, aged 18 to 55 years, from whom samples for cell-mediated immunity (CMI) were collected. No investigational vaccine was administered. Receives: Procedure: Blood sample collection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS): "Intercept" Parameter Estimate of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10^P/(1 + 10^P)*100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting the intercept i.e. expected mean value of Prediction when "TP" and "RT" = 0. The optimum of this Design of Experiment is presented in outcome 4.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Time to Process and Resting Time Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting "TP" and "RT" estimates expressed as log(hours). The optimum of this Design of Experiment (DOE) is presented in outcome 4.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: TP*RT, TP*TP and RT*RT Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting TP*RT, TP*TP and RT*RT estimates expressed as log(hours^2). The optimum of this DOE is presented in outcome 4.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Optimum Mean Cell Viability Estimate by the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. The optimum predicted mean cell viability of this Design of Experiment is presented in this outcome and expressed as percentage.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: "Intercept" Parameter Estimate of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting the intercept i.e. expected mean value of Prediction when "TP" and "RT" = 0. The optimum of this Design of Experiment is presented in outcome 8.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Time to Process and Resting Time Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting "TP" and "RT" estimates expressed as log(hours). The optimum of this Design of Experiment (DOE) is presented in outcome 8.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: TP*RT and RT*RT Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting TP*RT and RT*RT estimates expressed as log(hours^2). The optimum of this DOE is presented in outcome 8.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Optimum Mean Cell Viability Estimates by the Prediction Model -Condition "None" Resting Time Included.
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. The optimum predicted mean cell viability of this Design of Experiment is presented in this outcome and expressed as percentage.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percentage of Viable Lymphocytes in the CMI Samples, Post-overnight Incubation (Classic) Before ICS and Post-6 Hour Incubation Before ICS
The percentage of viable lymphocytes was determined by Forward Scatter/Side Scatter (FSC/SSC) and LIVE/DEAD gating during flow cytometry analysis for each incubation of time-to-time process (TP) = 2h, 7h and 24 h and resting time (RT) = 18h for the comparison of resting time = 18h and classic incubation time versus resting time = 18h and post-6h incubation time.
Measured: A Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Magnitude of HIV-1 RT Specific Cluster of Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L+) CD4+ T Cell Responses in the CMI Samples Post-overnight ICS/Post 6 Hour ICS, Expressing at Least One Cytokine
Data were collected but could not be reported as data were below level of detection.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Magnitude of HIV-RT Specific (Background Reduced) CD8+ T Cell Responses in the CMI Samples Post-overnight ICS/Post 6 Hour ICS, Expressing at Least One Cytokine
HIV-RT specific responses of CD8+ T cells expressing at least one cytokine, among: Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-gamma (IFN-g) and Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a),after stimulation with HIV-1 peptide pools for time-to-process (TP) (2, 7, 24 hours) and resting time (RT) (0,2,6,18 hours) post-overnight ICS and for time-to-process (7 hours) and resting time (18 hours) post 6 hours ICS.
Measured: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitali-zation or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity.
Measured: During the whole study period (From Day 0 to Day 15)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study start25 Jun 2012
- Primary completion30 Oct 2012
- Study completion30 Oct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01610427
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 116329
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 31 May 2012
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bourguignon P, Clement F, Renaud F, Le Bras V, Koutsoukos M, Burny W, Moris P, Lorin C, Collard A, Leroux-Roels G, Roman F, Janssens M, Vandekerckhove L. Processing of blood samples influences PBMC viability and outcome of cell-mediated immune responses in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Dec 1;414:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PubMed 25224748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing the Quality of Samples Used for the Evaluation of Cell-mediated Immune (CMI) Responses in Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)-naïve Human Deficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Infected Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01610427
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 116329
- Conditions
- AIDS, AIDS Vaccines
- Keywords
- CMI, Antiretroviral therapy-naïve, HIV
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate a combined set of parameters deemed to impact the quality of CMI analyses in terms of the proportion of viable lymphocytes in antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects.
Detailed description
This study will address the respective and combined impact of (i) timing between blood collection and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) processing ["time-to-process"] and (ii) timing of PBMC resting before stimulation ["resting -time"].
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 Group | Experimental | Procedure: Blood sample collectionAntiretroviral Therapy-naïve HIV1-infected subjects, aged 18 to 55 years, from whom samples for cell-mediated immunity (CMI) were collected. No investigational vaccine was administered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Subjects who the Investigator believes can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to any study procedure.
- A male or female between and including 18 and 55 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- Confirmed HIV-1 infection.
- ART-naïve and not eligible for ART treatment as per established guidelines. Subjects must never have received ART after HIV diagnosis, including lamivudine used for chronic hepatitis B infection. The exception to this is short-term ART for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) which must have been completed at least 360 days prior to enrollment.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- The following criteria should be checked at the time of study entry. If any exclusion criterion applies, the subject must not be included in the study:
- Infection with HIV-2. This includes subjects with dual infection with HIV-1/HIV-2.
- Planned use of any hematotoxic product during the study period.
- Planned use of any investigational or non-registered product during the study period.
- Acute or chronic, clinically relevant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by physical examination, serology and/or medical history at screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sample collectionBlood samples will be collected in all subjects at two time points, at the Screening Visit (Day 0) and at the Sample Collection Visit (Day 15) | Procedure or surgery | HIV-1 Group |
Primary outcome
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS): "Intercept" Parameter Estimate of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10^P/(1 + 10^P)*100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting the intercept i.e. expected mean value of Prediction when "TP" and "RT" = 0. The optimum of this Design of Experiment is presented in outcome 4.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Time to Process and Resting Time Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting "TP" and "RT" estimates expressed as log(hours). The optimum of this Design of Experiment (DOE) is presented in outcome 4.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: TP*RT, TP*TP and RT*RT Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting TP*RT, TP*TP and RT*RT estimates expressed as log(hours^2). The optimum of this DOE is presented in outcome 4.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Optimum Mean Cell Viability Estimate by the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=2h, 6h or 18h ["none" resting time not included]) conditions to select the best combination of these two parameters to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction.The optimum of the viability was predicted as P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + a*a*TP*TP + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the 3 first primary outcomes. And a and b are log-transformed parameters corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. The optimum predicted mean cell viability of this Design of Experiment is presented in this outcome and expressed as percentage.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: "Intercept" Parameter Estimate of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting the intercept i.e. expected mean value of Prediction when "TP" and "RT" = 0. The optimum of this Design of Experiment is presented in outcome 8.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Time to Process and Resting Time Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting "TP" and "RT" estimates expressed as log(hours). The optimum of this Design of Experiment (DOE) is presented in outcome 8.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: TP*RT and RT*RT Parameter Estimates of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Included
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. This outcome is presenting TP*RT and RT*RT estimates expressed as log(hours^2). The optimum of this DOE is presented in outcome 8.
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (Non-transformed Estimate) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before ICS: Optimum Mean Cell Viability Estimates by the Prediction Model -Condition "None" Resting Time Included.
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
The objective was to model lymphocyte viability according to "time-to-process" (TP=2h, 7h or 24h) and "resting time" (RT=0h) conditions in order to select the best combination of these two parameters with the aim to maximize the post-ICS viability in CMI samples collected from ART-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects. Viability (%) = 10 ^ P / (1 + 10 ^ P) * 100 with P for Prediction. The optimum of the viability was predicted as follows. P (LOGIT)= intercept + a*TP + b*RT + a*b*TP*RT + + b*b*RT*RT. Where "intercept", "TP", "RT", "TP*RT", "TP *TP", "RT*RT" are the parameters evaluated and presented in the primary outcomes 5, 6 and 7. And "a" and "b" are parameters (hour) corresponding respectively to the "TP" and the "RT" where the prediction has to be done. The optimum predicted mean cell viability of this Design of Experiment is presented in this outcome and expressed as percentage.
4 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Viable Lymphocytes in the CMI Samples, Post-overnight Incubation (Classic) Before ICS and Post-6 Hour Incubation Before ICS
Time frame: A Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Magnitude of HIV-1 RT Specific Cluster of Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L+) CD4+ T Cell Responses in the CMI Samples Post-overnight ICS/Post 6 Hour ICS, Expressing at Least One Cytokine
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Magnitude of HIV-RT Specific (Background Reduced) CD8+ T Cell Responses in the CMI Samples Post-overnight ICS/Post 6 Hour ICS, Expressing at Least One Cytokine
Time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: During the whole study period (From Day 0 to Day 15)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25224748Bourguignon P, Clement F, Renaud F, Le Bras V, Koutsoukos M, Burny W, Moris P, Lorin C, Collard A, Leroux-Roels G, Roman F, Janssens M, Vandekerckhove L. Processing of blood samples influences PBMC viability and outcome of cell-mediated immune responses in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Dec 1;414:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for AIDS
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
Multiple Interventions With Distinct Anti-reservoir Activities in People on Antiretroviral Treatment
HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus
RecruitingPhase 2
CASCADE 2002: PROTECT Study, "PRObiotics to TrEat Anal preCancer Trial
HSIL, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, HPV-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Recruiting
Improving Engagement in HIV and Cancer Care in Zimbabwe
Cancer, HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Immunologic Monitoring of Patients With Known or Suspected HIV Infection
HIV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood sample collection in people with AIDS and AIDS Vaccines, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lymphocytes Viability Prediction (LOGIT Transformed) in CMI Samples Post-overnight Incubation Time Before Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS): "Intercept" Parameter Estimate of the Prediction Model - Condition "None" Resting Time Not Included (time frame: At Day 15 (sample collection visit)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01610427, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2020.