AzTrials
AzTrials

Medical AbortionPhase 3NCT01612923

Safety and Efficacy of Medical Abortion Provided by Midlevel Providers or Physicians

A Phase 3 study testing Midwife in people with Medical Abortion, run by Kristina Gemzell Danielsson at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The physical examination before an abortion is usually performed by a physician. However, in many countries access to physicians is limited. To increase access to safe abortion this study wishes to examine if midlevel providers such as specially trained midwives can provide safe abortion services. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Medical Abortion
What is being tested?
Midwife
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,180 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Apr 2011to Jul 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • healthy women aged 18-45 with no contraindication to medical abortion

Who cannot join

  • any medical condition which contraindicates medical abortion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, 17177

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

The physical examination before an abortion is usually performed by a physician. However, in many countries access to physicians is limited. To increase access to safe abortion this study wishes to examine if midlevel providers such as specially trained midwives can provide safe abortion services. Midwives in study were specially trained to perform early pregnancy ultrasound and if needed to consult a physician. The midwife then provided the abortion service as well as the contraceptive advice. Women were randomized to receive the service from a midwife or a physician.

Being tested
Midwife
Keywords
abortion, medical abortion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MidwifeOther

    gynecological exam and ultrasound and contraceptive advice provided by midwife

Study groups in NCT01612923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
midwifeExperimentalGynecological exam and ultrasound performed by midwife, medical abortion service provided by midwife,contraceptive advice provided by midwife. Follow-up visit provided by midwife
Receives: Other: Midwife
PhysicianNo interventionGynecological exam and ultrasound and contraceptive advice provided by physician. Medical abortion service and follow-up visit provided by midwife

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. feasibility

    Successful completion of abortion without need for unscheduled visits or calls.

    Measured: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. efficacy

    complete uterine evacuation without the need for further medical or surgical intervention

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. acceptability

    as assessed by questionnaire

    Measured: 3 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01612923
Sponsor's protocol ID
W2010U
Status last verified
Jun 2012
First submitted
4 Jun 2012
Last updated
27 Aug 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kopp Kallner H, Gomperts R, Salomonsson E, Johansson M, Marions L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. The efficacy, safety and acceptability of medical termination of pregnancy provided by standard care by doctors or by nurse-midwives: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):510-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12982. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

    PubMed 25040643

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Midwife in people with Medical Abortion, run by Kristina Gemzell Danielsson at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

feasibility (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01612923, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in