AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT01617278

I-Scan Versus High-definition White Light

A study testing I-Scan 1, HD Colon and I-Scan 2 in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to assess whether the use of I-scan during colonoscopy leads to an increased yield of adenomas in the colon among a population at increased risk for CRC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 74 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
I-Scan 1, HD Colon and I-Scan 2
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2012to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All increased risk patients (Patients with family history or personal history of Colon Polyps or Colon Cancer and FOBT positive) referred for a screening colonoscopy at the Forzani and MacPhail Colon Cancer Centre will be considered for enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Average risk patients
  • Previous Colon surgery
  • Hereditary Polyposis syndromes
  • Suspected polyps or CRC before colonoscopy that have been suggested by another modality (Barium enema, Virtual colonoscopy, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, Alberta Health Services

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing High-definition White Light Colonoscopy to I-Scan Enhanced Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection in a Population at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer. (A Pilot Study)

The purpose of the study is to assess whether the use of I-scan during colonoscopy leads to an increased yield of adenomas in the colon among a population at increased risk for CRC.

Primary Outcome:

To estimate the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy for both high definition white light colonoscopy and I-scan enhanced colonoscopy

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. To estimate the recruitment rate
  2. Number of adenomas detected in the right colon during the second look
Read the detailed description

Colorectal Cancer is the third most common cause of cancer in Canada with an estimated lifetime risk of developing the disease of 6-7%. Each year there are approximately 21,000 new cases and 9,100 deaths attributable to this disease. Colonoscopy is one of several methods recommended for CRC screening by current guidelines. While colonoscopy is the most invasive, it offers high diagnostic accuracy and ability for therapy (biopsy and removal of adenomas) compared to other modalities. The emerging evidence regarding missed neoplastic lesions with colonoscopy has resulted in quality initiatives designed to improve colonoscopy performance. I-Scan (Pentax, Montvale, NJ) is a new method that uses post processing computer algorithms to revise the standard white light to highlight pit patterns and vascular surface patterns.The relevant I-scan settings in the colon are I-scan 1 and I-scan 2. The primary objective of the study is to compare the adenoma detection rate in the right colon using High-definition white light colonoscopy versus I-scan enhanced colonoscopy.

All patients referred for a screening colonoscopy at Forzani and MacPhail Colon Cancer Centre will be considered for enrollment.All eligible patients that are not part of another research study will be approached for enrollment into the study. During the pre-assessment at the clinic a study assistant will contact all the eligible patients to describe the study and provide an "Invitation to participate in a Research study" form. The study assistant will obtain a final consent if they agree. Those not interested will simply receive the Centre's standard protocol. There will be no coercion of any sort. Following Informed Consent, treatment allocation through computer generated randomization will be revealed. Patients will be allocated to one of the three study arms (HD Colon, I-scan 1 and I-Scan 2). Patients will receive a standard bowel preparation: Split dose Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) (2L at noon + 2L at 8 PM the day before) for morning procedures or (2L at 8Pm the day before and 2L at five hours before the procedure on the day of colonoscopy) for afternoon procedure. certified gastroenterologists will perform all of the procedures with the assistance of a nurse. The planned "second look" of the right colon will involve withdrawing from the Cecum to Hepatic flexure, then re-inserting to Cecum and finally withdrawing through the entire colon. The physician performing the procedure will then fill a "Colonoscopy Report Form" including the number of polyps detected, size, shape, polypectomy method and cleanliness of the bowel.

Being tested
I-Scan 1, HD Colon, I-Scan 2
Keywords
Colonoscopy, I Scan, High definition white light, Adenomas
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Adenoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • I-Scan 1Device

    I-Scan 1 has contrast enhancement (CE)and surface enhancement (SE). SE mode highlights light-dark contrast thereby providing more mucosal surface detail.CE mode digitally adds blue to darker areas providing detailed imaging of subtle mucosal irregularities.

  • HD ColonDevice

    High definition white light

  • I-Scan 2Device

    I-Scan 2 has contrast enhancement (CE), surface enhancement (SE) and tone enhancement (TE). SE mode highlights light-dark contrast thereby providing more mucosal surface detail.CE mode digitally adds blue to darker areas providing detailed imaging of subtle mucosal irregularities.TE provides a uniform colour image and is intended for detailed inspection of distinct lesions.

Study groups in NCT01617278
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
I-Scan 1ExperimentalI-Scan 1 modality will be used by the endoscopist for the entire procedure
Receives: Device: I-Scan 1
HD ColonExperimentalHigh definition white light modality will be used by the endoscopist for the entire procedure
Receives: Device: HD Colon
I-scan 2ExperimentalI-Scan 2 modality will be used by th endoscopist through out the procedure
Receives: Device: I-Scan 2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy

    The "Colonoscopy Report Form" completed by the Physician helps to assess the number of polyps and a endoscopic description (location, size, shape) of these lesions including. Following formal review by the pathologist the polyp classification (e.g. whether it is an adenoma) is determined.

    Measured: Colonoscopy report form provided to the physician will be filled out and collected after the procedure (1 hour). All polyps reviewed by pathologist (1 week).

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of adenomas detected in the right colon during the second look

    The planned "Second Look" of the right colon will involve withdrawing from the cecum to hepatic flexure, then re-inserting to the cecum and finally withdrawing through the entire colon. This is to determine if a "Second Look" in the right colon increases the mean number of adenomas detected compared with a single inspection irrespective of the imaging modality.

    Measured: Second look in the right colon and finally withdrawing through the entire colon (approximately 5 min)

  2. To estimate the recruitment rate

    Recruitment rates will be reported as follows:

    1. No. of patients given the study invitation letter
    2. No. of patients who return the form as interested
    3. No. of patients who provided informed consent
    4. No. of patients who complete the study protocol

    Measured: Upto 8 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01617278
Sponsor's protocol ID
23474-P
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
4 Jun 2012
Last updated
4 Jul 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing I-Scan 1, HD Colon and I-Scan 2 in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (time frame: Colonoscopy report form provided to the physician will be filled out and collected after the procedure (1 hour). All polyps reviewed by pathologist (1 week).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jul 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in