EndometriosisPhase 3ELARIS EM-INCT01620528
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain
A Phase 3 study testing elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott).
Trial summary
A randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain in adult premenopausal female participants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- elagolix
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 872 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 22 May 2012to 28 Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Premenopausal female, between 18 and 49 years of age, inclusive, at the time of signing consent.
- Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis (laparoscopy or laparotomy) performed within 10 years of entry into Washout (if applicable) or Screening.
- Agrees to use required birth control methods during the entire length of participation in the study.
- Subject has a Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score total score of ≥ 6 at Screening with a score of at least 2 for dysmenorrhea AND at least 2 for non-menstrual pelvic pain. 5. Subjects must have at least two menstrual cycles 24 to 38 days within the Screening Period, prior to Day 1
Who cannot join
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the next 24 months or is less than 6 months postpartum, post-abortion, or post-pregnancy at the time of entry into the Screening Period.
- Subject has a history of previous non-response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, or aromatase inhibitors as assessed by subject report of no improvement in dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain (subject report of partial response to or side effects from these agents is not exclusionary).
- Subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis that requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.
- Clinically significant gynecologic condition identified on Screening transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy.
- Subject has a history of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
- Subject has a current history of undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain
A randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain in adult premenopausal female participants.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of two doses of elagolix versus placebo in premenopausal 18 to 49 year old women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. The study consists of 4 periods: 1) Washout Period (if applicable); 2) a Screening Period of up to 100 days prior to first dose; 3) a 6 month Treatment Period; and 4) a Post treatment Follow-up Period of up to 12 months (if applicable). An electronic diary will be dispensed and training provided to record endometriosis-associated pain, uterine bleeding, and analgesic medication use for endometriosis-associated pain on a daily basis. Pregnancy testing will be performed monthly throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Being tested
- elagolix, placebo
- Keywords
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist, Endometriosis associated pain, Dysmenorrhea (DYS), Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP), Elagolix
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
elagolixDrug
Also called ABT-620, elagolix sodium
oral tablet
placeboOther
oral tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Experimental | Elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period Receives: Drug: elagolix |
| Elagolix 200 mg BID | Experimental | Elagolix 200 mg twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period Receives: Drug: elagolix |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 3 of Treatment Period
Secondary outcomes (109)
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)
The DYSP pain scale ranges from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)
Permitted rescue narcotic analgesics included 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 2 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 4 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 6 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 for DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 for DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 for DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 for DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 for DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Measured: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score of DYSP
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 mg), the narcotic analgesics 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, and 30 mg codeine + 300 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Response to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 1
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 1 of Treatment Period
Response to PGIC at Month 2
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 2 of Treatment Period
Response to PGIC at Month 3
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 3 of Treatment Period
Response to PGIC at Month 4
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 4 of Treatment Period
Response to PGIC at Month 5
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 5 of Treatment Period
Response to PGIC at Month 6
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Measured: Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in NRS Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in NRS Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in NRS Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in NRS Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NRS Scores
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in the Pain Domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Pain Domain of the EHP-30
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Pain Domain of the EHP-30
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of the EHP-30
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domian is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism [working while sick]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Measured: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period
Number of Days of Hospitalization
Measured: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Measured: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study start22 May 2012
- Primary completion14 Nov 2014
- Study completion28 Sep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EndometriosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 872 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rachel Duan, MD, Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01620528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M12-665
- Acronym
- ELARIS EM-I
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 15 May 2012
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Kotarski J, Archer DF, Diamond MP, Surrey E, Johnson NP, Watts NB, Gallagher JC, Simon JA, Carr BR, Dmowski WP, Leyland N, Rowan JP, Duan WR, Ng J, Schwefel B, Thomas JW, Jain RI, Chwalisz K. Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):28-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700089. Epub 2017 May 19.
PubMed 28525302Beck D, Winzenborg I, Liu M, Degner J, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Shebley M. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01096-w. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
PubMed 34878624Abrao MS, Surrey E, Gordon K, Snabes MC, Wang H, Ijacu H, Taylor HS. Reductions in endometriosis-associated pain among women treated with elagolix are consistent across a range of baseline characteristics reflective of real-world patients. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01385-3.
PubMed 34134684Stodtmann S, Nader A, Polepally AR, Suleiman AA, Winzenborg I, Noertersheuser P, Ng J, Mostafa NM, Shebley M. Validation of a quantitative systems pharmacology model of calcium homeostasis using elagolix Phase 3 clinical trial data in women with endometriosis. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1611-1619. doi: 10.1111/cts.13040. Epub 2021 May 7.
PubMed 33963686Beck D, Winzenborg I, Gao W, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Chiuve SE, Owens C, Shebley M. Integrating real-world data and modeling to project changes in femoral neck bone mineral density and fracture risk in premenopausal women. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1452-1463. doi: 10.1111/cts.13006. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
PubMed 33650259Agarwal SK, Singh SS, Archer DF, Mai Y, Chwalisz K, Gordon K, Surrey E. Endometriosis-Related Pain Reduction During Bleeding and Nonbleeding Days in Women Treated with Elagolix. J Pain Res. 2021 Feb 2;14:263-271. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S284703. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33564263Pokrzywinski RM, Soliman AM, Snabes MC, Chen J, Taylor HS, Coyne KS. Responsiveness and thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in worst pain numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in women with moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
PubMed 33066973Abbas Suleiman A, Nader A, Winzenborg I, Beck D, Polepally AR, Ng J, Noertersheuser P, Mostafa NM. Exposure-Safety Analyses Identify Predictors of Change in Bone Mineral Density and Support Elagolix Labeling for Endometriosis-Associated Pain. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;9(11):639-648. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12560. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
PubMed 32945631Taylor HS, Soliman AM, Johns B, Pokrzywinski RM, Snabes M, Coyne KS. Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Patients With Endometriosis Treated With Elagolix. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):501-509. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003917.
PubMed 32769633Winzenborg I, Polepally AR, Nader A, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Effect of Elagolix Exposure on Clinical Efficacy End Points in Phase III Trials in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Application of Markov Model. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;9(8):466-475. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12545. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
PubMed 32621325Surrey ES, Soliman AM, Palac HL, Agarwal SK. Impact of Elagolix on Workplace and Household Productivity Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Patient. 2019 Dec;12(6):651-660. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00394-7.
PubMed 31654294Pokrzywinski RM, Soliman AM, Chen J, Snabes M, Diamond MP, Surrey E, Coyne KS. Impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain: estimates based on the results of two phase III clinical trials. Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.031. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
PubMed 31227284Surrey ES, Soliman AM, Agarwal SK, Snabes MC, Diamond MP. Impact of elagolix treatment on fatigue experienced by women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2019 Aug;112(2):298-304.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
PubMed 30992150Wang ST, Johnson SJ, Mitchell D, Soliman AM, Vora JB, Agarwal SK. Cost-effectiveness of elagolix versus leuprolide acetate for treating moderate-to-severe endometriosis pain in the USA. J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Apr;8(5):337-355. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0124. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
PubMed 30724096Winzenborg I, Nader A, Polepally AR, Liu M, Degner J, Klein CE, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Healthy Women and Women with Endometriosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Oct;57(10):1295-1306. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0629-6.
PubMed 29476499
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01620528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ELARIS EM-I / M12-665
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Keywords
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist, Endometriosis associated pain, Dysmenorrhea (DYS), Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP), Elagolix
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 872 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 May 2012
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Sep 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain in adult premenopausal female participants.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of two doses of elagolix versus placebo in premenopausal 18 to 49 year old women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. The study consists of 4 periods: 1) Washout Period (if applicable); 2) a Screening Period of up to 100 days prior to first dose; 3) a 6 month Treatment Period; and 4) a Post treatment Follow-up Period of up to 12 months (if applicable). An electronic diary will be dispensed and training provided to record endometriosis-associated pain, uterine bleeding, and analgesic medication use for endometriosis-associated pain on a daily basis. Pregnancy testing will be performed monthly throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: elagolixElagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period |
| Elagolix 200 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: elagolixElagolix 200 mg twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: placeboPlacebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Premenopausal female, between 18 and 49 years of age, inclusive, at the time of signing consent.
- Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis (laparoscopy or laparotomy) performed within 10 years of entry into Washout (if applicable) or Screening.
- Agrees to use required birth control methods during the entire length of participation in the study.
- Subject has a Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score total score of ≥ 6 at Screening with a score of at least 2 for dysmenorrhea AND at least 2 for non-menstrual pelvic pain. 5. Subjects must have at least two menstrual cycles 24 to 38 days within the Screening Period, prior to Day 1
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the next 24 months or is less than 6 months postpartum, post-abortion, or post-pregnancy at the time of entry into the Screening Period.
- Subject has a history of previous non-response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, GnRH antagonists, Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, or aromatase inhibitors as assessed by subject report of no improvement in dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain (subject report of partial response to or side effects from these agents is not exclusionary).
- Subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis that requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.
- Clinically significant gynecologic condition identified on Screening transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy.
- Subject has a history of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| elagolixAlso: ABT-620, elagolix sodiumoral tablet | Drug | Elagolix 150 mg QD, Elagolix 200 mg BID |
| placebooral tablet | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
Time frame: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)
Time frame: At Month 3 of Treatment Period
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
109 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
Time frame: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
Time frame: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
Time frame: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
Time frame: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of DYS
Time frame: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
Time frame: At Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
Time frame: At Month 2 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
Time frame: At Month 4 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
Time frame: At Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment of NMPP
Time frame: At Month 6 of Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 1 for DYSP
Time frame: At Month 1 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 2 for DYSP
Time frame: At Month 2 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 4 for DYSP
Time frame: At Month 4 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 5 for DYSP
Time frame: At Month 5 of the Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 6 for DYSP
Time frame: At Month 6 of the Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 4 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4 of Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 5 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 5 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 1 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 of Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 2 in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2 of Treatment Period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 28525302Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Kotarski J, Archer DF, Diamond MP, Surrey E, Johnson NP, Watts NB, Gallagher JC, Simon JA, Carr BR, Dmowski WP, Leyland N, Rowan JP, Duan WR, Ng J, Schwefel B, Thomas JW, Jain RI, Chwalisz K. Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):28-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700089. Epub 2017 May 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34878624Beck D, Winzenborg I, Liu M, Degner J, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Shebley M. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01096-w. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34134684Abrao MS, Surrey E, Gordon K, Snabes MC, Wang H, Ijacu H, Taylor HS. Reductions in endometriosis-associated pain among women treated with elagolix are consistent across a range of baseline characteristics reflective of real-world patients. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01385-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33963686Stodtmann S, Nader A, Polepally AR, Suleiman AA, Winzenborg I, Noertersheuser P, Ng J, Mostafa NM, Shebley M. Validation of a quantitative systems pharmacology model of calcium homeostasis using elagolix Phase 3 clinical trial data in women with endometriosis. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1611-1619. doi: 10.1111/cts.13040. Epub 2021 May 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33650259Beck D, Winzenborg I, Gao W, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Chiuve SE, Owens C, Shebley M. Integrating real-world data and modeling to project changes in femoral neck bone mineral density and fracture risk in premenopausal women. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1452-1463. doi: 10.1111/cts.13006. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33564263Agarwal SK, Singh SS, Archer DF, Mai Y, Chwalisz K, Gordon K, Surrey E. Endometriosis-Related Pain Reduction During Bleeding and Nonbleeding Days in Women Treated with Elagolix. J Pain Res. 2021 Feb 2;14:263-271. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S284703. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33066973Pokrzywinski RM, Soliman AM, Snabes MC, Chen J, Taylor HS, Coyne KS. Responsiveness and thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in worst pain numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in women with moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32945631Abbas Suleiman A, Nader A, Winzenborg I, Beck D, Polepally AR, Ng J, Noertersheuser P, Mostafa NM. Exposure-Safety Analyses Identify Predictors of Change in Bone Mineral Density and Support Elagolix Labeling for Endometriosis-Associated Pain. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;9(11):639-648. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12560. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32769633Taylor HS, Soliman AM, Johns B, Pokrzywinski RM, Snabes M, Coyne KS. Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Patients With Endometriosis Treated With Elagolix. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):501-509. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003917.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32621325Winzenborg I, Polepally AR, Nader A, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Effect of Elagolix Exposure on Clinical Efficacy End Points in Phase III Trials in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Application of Markov Model. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;9(8):466-475. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12545. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31654294Surrey ES, Soliman AM, Palac HL, Agarwal SK. Impact of Elagolix on Workplace and Household Productivity Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Patient. 2019 Dec;12(6):651-660. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00394-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31227284Pokrzywinski RM, Soliman AM, Chen J, Snabes M, Diamond MP, Surrey E, Coyne KS. Impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain: estimates based on the results of two phase III clinical trials. Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.031. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
Related trials for Endometriosis
Not yet recruiting
Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Women With Endometriosis
SIBO, Endometriosis
Recruiting
Endometriosis Transcriptomic Cell Atlas
Endometriosis, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Psychotherapy in Patients With Endometriosis: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Endometriosis, Adenomyosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of a Diagnosis or Lack of a Diagnosis of Endometriosis Via a Saliva Test on Pain Catastrophizing, Quality of Life, Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression, and Treatment Adherence
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
PRECISION-E2: Teverelix in Women With Endometriosis - Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Precision Medicine Correlates
Endometriosis Pelvic, Endometriosis Ovaries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachel Duan, MD study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS) (time frame: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01620528, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2018.