SchizophreniaNCT01624831
Social Cognition in Longstanding Psychosis
An observational study of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Individuals with longstanding psychotic disorder (i.e., 5 years or longer in duration)
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder or an affective disorder with psychotic features per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) criteria using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV.
- Duration of psychotic symptoms greater than or equal to 5 years determined using the Symptom Onset in Schizophrenia Inventory
- Age 18-75
- No evidence of mental retardation.
- Able to provide informed consent as evidenced by passing the informed consent quiz with a score of 80% or greater.
- Fluent in English as assessed per self-report from participant
Who cannot join
- Unwilling or unable to complete study assessments (e.g., unable to read self-report questionnaires)
- Subject is currently pregnant per subject's report
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Arizona Department of Psychiatry
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
About this study
In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). The investigators will also explore the association between different domains of social cognition and outcomes relevant to psychotic disorder (e.g., symptomatology, social functioning, and vocational functioning).
Read the detailed description
There is growing evidence that individuals with longstanding psychotic disorders suffer from deficits in social cognition (i.e., the cognitive skills needed to successfully navigate social interactions). However, to date, there have been few attempts to measure multiple components of social cognition within the same population of individuals with psychosis. Thus, the interrelationships between various aspects of social cognition remain unclear. In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by NIMH as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). The investigators will also explore the association between different domains of social cognition and outcomes relevant to psychotic disorder (e.g., symptomatology, social functioning, and vocational functioning).
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features, Major Depression With Psychotic Features, Psychosis Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)
- Keywords
- Psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar disorder with psychotic features, Major depression with psychotic features, Psychosis NOS, Social Cognition
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, Mental Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Longstanding Psychosis | Individuals with symptoms of psychosis that have been present for 5 or more years |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Emotion Recognition
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to recognize emotions displayed by others assessed using the Facial Emotion Identification Test
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Attribution Style
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in tendency to attribute events that occur to situational, personal, or internal factors assessed using the Internal, Personal, and Situational Attributions Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Social Perception
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to understand concrete and abstract components of everyday social interactions assessed using the Social Cues Recognition Test
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Social Knowledge
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in knowledge of goals and actions associated with familiar and unfamiliar social activities assessed using the Situational Features Recognition Test
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Theory of Mind
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to identify the mental states of other individuals assessed using the Hinting Test
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
Anxiety
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in anxiety assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Depression
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in depression assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Psychosis
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in severity of positive and negative psychotic symptoms assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Social Functioning
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in level of social functioning assessed using the Social Functioning Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Service Utilization
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in utilization of medical services assessed using the Service Utilization Record Form
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Self-Determination Needs Satisfaction
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to fulfill basic needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness assessed using the Basic Psychological Needs Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Locus of Control
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in perception of one's ability to control events in the environment assessed using the Multidimensional Locus of Control Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Cognitive representation of illness
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in understanding of nature of psychotic illness assessed using the Illness Perception Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Emotional Awareness
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in awareness of one's own emotions as well as emotions of others assessed using the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Mindfulness
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in awareness and acceptance of feelings and events assessed using the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Medication adherence
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in adherence to psychiatric medication assessed using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Neuropsychological functioning
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in neuropsychological functioning assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Social Support
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in level of social support assessed using the Measure of Perceived Support
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Illness Uncertainty
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in uncertainty with regard to cause, course, and treatment of illness assessed using the Mischel Uncertainty in Illness Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Relationship with familial caregivers
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in relationship with familial caregivers assessed using the Perception of Parents Scale
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Self-efficacy
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in confidence with regard to control of psychotic symptoms assessed using the Self-Efficacy Scale for Schizophrenia
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Experience of Stigma
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in experience of stigma with regard to mental illness assessed using the Stigma Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
quality of life
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in quality of life assessed using the WHO Quality of Life Scale-Brief
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
stage of recovery
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in stage of recovery with regard to mental illness assessed using the Stages of Recovery Instrument
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Coping skills
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in level of coping skills assessed using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Time perspective
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in time orientation assessed using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Instrument
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Why it stopped: Lack of funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ArizonaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Arizona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicholas Breitborde, University of Arizona
- Investigators
- Nicholas Breitborde, Ph.D., Principal investigator, The Ohio State Univerity
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01624831
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- U. Az IRB 11-0567-02
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 21 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Social Cognition in Longstanding Psychosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01624831
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- U. Az IRB 11-0567-02
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features, Major Depression With Psychotic Features, Psychosis Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)
- Keywords
- Psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar disorder with psychotic features, Major depression with psychotic features, Psychosis NOS, Social Cognition
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of funding
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ArizonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). The investigators will also explore the association between different domains of social cognition and outcomes relevant to psychotic disorder (e.g., symptomatology, social functioning, and vocational functioning).
Detailed description
There is growing evidence that individuals with longstanding psychotic disorders suffer from deficits in social cognition (i.e., the cognitive skills needed to successfully navigate social interactions). However, to date, there have been few attempts to measure multiple components of social cognition within the same population of individuals with psychosis. Thus, the interrelationships between various aspects of social cognition remain unclear. In the current study, the investigators propose to measure the five domains of social cognition identified by NIMH as relevant to individuals with psychosis (i.e., theory of mind, attribution style, emotion recognition, social perception, and social knowledge). The investigators will also explore the association between different domains of social cognition and outcomes relevant to psychotic disorder (e.g., symptomatology, social functioning, and vocational functioning).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Longstanding Psychosis | – | –Individuals with symptoms of psychosis that have been present for 5 or more years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Individuals with longstanding psychotic disorder (i.e., 5 years or longer in duration)
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder or an affective disorder with psychotic features per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR) criteria using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV.
- Duration of psychotic symptoms greater than or equal to 5 years determined using the Symptom Onset in Schizophrenia Inventory
- Age 18-75
- No evidence of mental retardation.
- Able to provide informed consent as evidenced by passing the informed consent quiz with a score of 80% or greater.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unwilling or unable to complete study assessments (e.g., unable to read self-report questionnaires)
- Subject is currently pregnant per subject's report
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Emotion Recognition
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to recognize emotions displayed by others assessed using the Facial Emotion Identification Test
Attribution Style
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in tendency to attribute events that occur to situational, personal, or internal factors assessed using the Internal, Personal, and Situational Attributions Questionnaire
Social Perception
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to understand concrete and abstract components of everyday social interactions assessed using the Social Cues Recognition Test
Social Knowledge
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in knowledge of goals and actions associated with familiar and unfamiliar social activities assessed using the Situational Features Recognition Test
Theory of Mind
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 month assessment in ability to identify the mental states of other individuals assessed using the Hinting Test
21 secondary outcomes
Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Depression
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Psychosis
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Social Functioning
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Service Utilization
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Self-Determination Needs Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Locus of Control
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Cognitive representation of illness
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Emotional Awareness
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Mindfulness
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Medication adherence
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Neuropsychological functioning
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Social Support
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Illness Uncertainty
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Relationship with familial caregivers
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Experience of Stigma
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
quality of life
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
stage of recovery
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Coping skills
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Time perspective
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2020.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicholas Breitborde, Ph.D. principal investigator
The Ohio State Univerity
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Emotion Recognition (time frame: Baseline and 6 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2020.