Type 2 DiabetesPhase 2NCT01625507
The Alberta Diet: Effectiveness Study
A Phase 2 study testing PANDA intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The study hypothesis is that individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who adhere to the PANDA intervention, will have improved compliance with the nutritional therapy recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- PANDA intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 73 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes, and speak/write English.
- Have attended a diabetes education session delivered by their healthcare provider.
Who cannot join
- Participants with type 1 diabetes, and those who are unable to speak English.
- People with end-stage renal disease or gastrointestinal diseases that require specialized diets will also be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Alberta Diet: a Proposal for Its Implementation
The study hypothesis is that individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who adhere to the PANDA intervention, will have improved compliance with the nutritional therapy recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association. Specific objectives of this proposal: The objectives of the investigators PANDA (Physical Activity and Nutrition for Diabetes in Alberta) are to (a) to devise and evaluate the efficacy of a multi-level, practical, nutrition intervention program that promotes the individual factors required for effective self-management practices AND that explicitly incorporate strategies to improve food availability, accessibility and acceptability and (b) to use these interventions as a means to examine the relationships between food availability, accessibility, acceptability, adherence to Nutrition Therapy Guidelines, and metabolic indicators of diabetes control in people with type 2 diabetes.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- PANDA intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PANDA interventionBehavioural
Participants will follow a menu plan and receive training in how to manage their diet in type 2 diabetes, following the recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association, 2008
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PANDA intervention | Experimental | 12 week nutritional intervention, including 6 classroom/community sessions, plus two sample collection visits. Receives: Behavioral: PANDA intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Total Energy Intake
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Measured: 4 months
Change in Macronutrient Intake
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Measured: 3 months
Change in Nutrient Intake
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
a surrogate of blood glucose control
Measured: 4 months
Program Retention
attendance at meetings
Measured: 3 months
Change in Body Mass Index
Actual weight and height used to calculate BMI pre- and post-intervention
Measured: 4 months
Body Composition
body fat and fat-free mass
Measured: 3 months
Change in Blood Biomarkers
blood lipids: triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol
Measured: 4 months
Change in Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire Score
Questionnaire assessing self-reported adherence to 9 criteria, whose individual scores (range 0-7) are summed to get the total score. Maximum total score is 63. Minimum total score is 0. A higher score means higher dietary adherence.
Measured: 4 months
Food Acceptability
questionnaire based on items related to personal and cultural acceptability of the recommended diet
Measured: 4 months
Food Accessibility
questionnaire of items related to financial and physical accessibility of foods in the diet recommended for diabetes
Measured: 4 months
Food Availability
questionnaire of items related to the availability in local stores of the food items recommended in the diet for diabetes.
Measured: 4 months
Change in Waist Circumference
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Catherine B Chan, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01625507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RES0013109
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Alberta Diet: a Proposal for Its Implementation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01625507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RES0013109
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study hypothesis is that individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who adhere to the PANDA intervention, will have improved compliance with the nutritional therapy recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association. Specific objectives of this proposal: The objectives of the investigators PANDA (Physical Activity and Nutrition for Diabetes in Alberta) are to (a) to devise and evaluate the efficacy of a multi-level, practical, nutrition intervention program that promotes the individual factors required for effective self-management practices AND that explicitly incorporate strategies to improve food availability, accessibility and acceptability and (b) to use these interventions as a means to examine the relationships between food availability, accessibility, acceptability, adherence to Nutrition Therapy Guidelines, and metabolic indicators of diabetes control in people with type 2 diabetes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PANDA intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: PANDA intervention12 week nutritional intervention, including 6 classroom/community sessions, plus two sample collection visits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes, and speak/write English.
- Have attended a diabetes education session delivered by their healthcare provider.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants with type 1 diabetes, and those who are unable to speak English.
- People with end-stage renal disease or gastrointestinal diseases that require specialized diets will also be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PANDA interventionParticipants will follow a menu plan and receive training in how to manage their diet in type 2 diabetes, following the recommendations of the Canadian Diabetes Association, 2008 | Behavioural | PANDA intervention |
Primary outcome
Change in Total Energy Intake
Time frame: 4 months
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Change in Macronutrient Intake
Time frame: 3 months
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
Change in Nutrient Intake
Time frame: 3 months
Measured using repeated 24 hour dietary recalls (pre and post-intervention)
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Time frame: 4 months
Program Retention
Time frame: 3 months
Change in Body Mass Index
Time frame: 4 months
Body Composition
Time frame: 3 months
Change in Blood Biomarkers
Time frame: 4 months
Change in Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire Score
Time frame: 4 months
Food Acceptability
Time frame: 4 months
Food Accessibility
Time frame: 4 months
Food Availability
Time frame: 4 months
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Satisfaction of Once-Weekly Tirzepatide in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Helping Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Use Their Health Data for Healthy Diabetes Self-Management
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Not yet recruiting
Care COMPASS Study
Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2), Hypertension
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Personalizing A1c Using Hematologic Indices and CGM for Accurate Diabetes Diagnosis
Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating the Link Between Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) and Muscle Wasting in Sarcobesity
Sarcopenia, Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine B Chan, PhD principal investigator
University of Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PANDA intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Total Energy Intake (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2017.