Clostridium Difficile ColitisPhase 4COLITISNCT01630096
Clostridial Infection and Oral Lavage -Improving Treatment Before Illness Becomes Severe
A Phase 4 study testing Nu-Lytely in people with Clostridium Difficile Colitis, run by Ascension Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Once the lab test is positive for c. diff, the investigators will order the patient to have PEG 3350 solution, one 8oz glass every ten minutes until 6 liters are gone, but if still not clear 2 more liters may be ordered. At enrollment, the treatment arm will have an order for 500 cc Normal saline to be given I.V. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Clostridium Difficile Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Nu-Lytely
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years old or older male or female testing positive for c. diff
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy Less than 18 yrs of age Those sick enough to require surgery at diagnosis Severe ileus or small bowel obstruction
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Genesys Regional Medical Center
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439
Kimberly Barber, PhD, 810-606-7724
About this study
Official title: COLITIS: Clostridial Infection and Oral Lavage -Improving Treatment Before Illness Becomes Severe
Once the lab test is positive for c. diff, the investigators will order the patient to have PEG 3350 solution, one 8oz glass every ten minutes until 6 liters are gone, but if still not clear 2 more liters may be ordered. At enrollment, the treatment arm will have an order for 500 cc Normal saline to be given I.V. The patient will continue with antibiotic treatment as well. The investigators will plan to check c. diff tests daily to see when they become negative. The investigators will perform chart audit/review to track mortality, the length of stay, ICU days, surgical intervention, and APACHE scores (assessment of disease severity). Chart audit will be used to collect data on their diet and how they feel using a visual analog scale (collected by nursing staff daily as a standard procedure; see attached pain scale). Using chart audit, the investigators will record whether the patient is immunocompromised or not.
Read the detailed description
Project Summary:
Clostridium Difficile (c. diff) is a bacteria which causes much morbidity and mortality worldwide. It does so by causing diarrhea and abdominal pain. It can be mild and self-limited, to severe and lethal, even in developed countries. It can require removal of the colon to try to spare a victim's life. This isn't always successful. Current treatment is withdrawal of any unnecessary antibiotics, addition of one of two antibiotics that work pretty reliably against c.diff, hydration, and observation for signs the patient might need to be operated.
The investigators propose that instead of trying to kill the bacteria that are a problem, with limited antibiotic choices, the investigators can give the patient a bowel prep and quickly and reliably wash the bacteria, and the toxin that actually wreaks the havoc, out of their system.
The investigators will collect variables of mortality, LOS, ICU days, surgical interventions (colectomy or ileostomy and lavage), time to test negative after treatment starts, and APACHE scores. The investigators will track when regular diet is resumed. The investigators will track immunocompromised state and see the effect it has. The investigators will use a visual analog scale to assess time to feel better as well.
Project description:
Rationale- Clostridium difficile (c. diff) is a bacteria in the gut which has the ability to make us very sick by releasing toxins which cause colitis. It has traditionally affected the hospitalized and those who have recently had antibiotics. Recently the investigators have seen more community acquired cases as well as cases with no antibiotics preceding the infection. C. diff can produce self-limited diarrhea and bloating, or become very severe and include severe diarrhea, bowel necrosis, toxemia and death. Over the last four years at Genesys, death rates with c. diff (all cause mortality rates) have averaged 9.6% of those infected. The investigators have averaged over 230 cases per year of c. diff infections. Clearly this is a big problem.
Traditional treatment is IV fluids, one of two antibiotics (vancomycin or flagyl) along with bowel rest, and withdrawing any unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics (Cohen, 2010.) This helps most people, but can still progress in some cases. If the disease is or becomes severe enough, near total colon resection is required (surgery), but by that point in the disease process, 35-80% will die anyway (Neal, 2011.) Those that survive have a lot of morbidity from the ileostomy they now have (the hassle of stooling into a bag, and the dehydration that frequently accompanies the ileostomy). It's an extremely challenging problem which should be feared to worsen if and when it becomes resistant to the very few antibiotics that are currently effective. The investigators need to find a better way to treat it.
Recently out of Pittsburgh, a study was performed in which they took very sick patients to the operating room earlier and diverted the stool stream with an ileostomy and flushed Go-Lytely (polyethylene glycol) through the colon to clean it out of all the stool, bacteria, and toxin (but did not remove the colon), followed by antibiotics through the colon. They showed a reduction in the mortality rate after surgery from 50% down to 19% for a reduction of 62% (Neal, 2011). The results are very promising, but this process does require two operations - one to make the ileostomy and another to reverse the ileostomy later on. It also waits until the patients get very sick to clean out the GI tract of the bacteria and toxin.
A second paper reported two cases of chronic c. diff patients taking a bowel prep of Go-Lytely by mouth, and then being 'cured' after 36-48 months and counting (Liacouras, 1996).
In the investigators study, the investigators will still withdraw any unnecessary antibiotics, provide hydration, and treat with the same antibiotic regimen the admitting physician has decided on. But the investigators will also add a bowel prep of polyethylene glycol 3350 solution (PEG solution), to flush out the stool and bacteria. The investigators suspicion is that by giving c. diff patients a bowel prep of PEG solution orally (or nasogastric tube if unable to swallow), the investigators can wash out the c. diff bacteria and toxin they have already produced, instead of trying to kill the bacteria still in the colon. The investigators think the investigators can effectively treat even sick c. diff patients without an operation. In fact, the investigators can quite possibly prevent many mild cases from progressing to severe cases in the first place, thereby greatly decreasing the morbidity and mortality of this scary disease.
Objective- The investigators primary objective is to show that oral administration of polyethylene glycol bowel prep solution decreases mortality in clostridium difficile infected patients. Secondary objectives include showing decreased length of hospital stay, decreased ICU days, decreased time to test negative for c. diff toxin in the stool, and decreased surgical interventions, and better patient perceptions. The investigators will use a visual analog scale to track how quickly patients perceive they are better. The investigators will also determine if timing of diet resumption or immunocompromised status changes outcomes in the study.
Methodology- The study will be a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible patients will be assigned by a computer generated, randomized list to either standard treatment (IV fluids and vancomycin or flagyl) or the intervention treatment (IV fluids, vancomycin or flagyl, and oral bowel prep).
Study subject criteria includes: all adults greater than age 18, testing positive for c. diff as GRMC inpatients. Testing will be via either DNA amplification assay, or through flexible endoscopic diagnosis. The lab or endoscopist will contact Dr. Vance or Dr. Alvarez, and they will approach the patient to then consent, enroll, and randomize them.
There are no sex or ethnic background exclusion criteria, and health status of the patient will not alter patient selection. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 400 subjects.
Exclusion criteria include:
- Pregnancy
- Less than 18 yrs of age
- Mentally handicapped
- Those sick enough to require surgery at diagnosis shall not be enrolled, as they should be operated at that point.
- Patients in whom severe ileus or suspected small bowel obstruction is present.
Interventions- Nu-Lytely or Go-Lytely (polyethylene glycol 3350), produced by Braintree Laboratories, Incorporated, will be administered to the study patients. These two products are interchangeable at the investigators institution and work by the same mechanism of action as a mechanical bowel prep. They will be dosed at one 8oz glass, orally, every 10 minutes until 6 liters are ingested. If they are not having clear bowel movements at that point, then 2 more liters will be given. If there is difficulty drinking the solution, the investigators will offer to place a nasogastric tube to deliver the PEG solution to the GI tract. It is FDA approved for bowel cleansing, though not specifically for clearing c.diff. It has a long history of effective bowel prepping with good patient safety.
Because the PEG solution can be dehydrating to a degree, the investigators will plan to give a 500 mL IV bolus of saline with the start of the bowel prep to prevent this from being an issue. These patients are generally dehydrated from the disease process anyway, and IV fluids are generally a good idea. The investigators will monitor the patients' BUN and creatinine, blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output and treat additionally for dehydration as needed.
If a patient's electrolytes are significantly abnormal at enrollment, the investigators may order an additional chemistry panel that evening to ensure this is not worsening. The investigators expect this would already be ordered by the primary physician in most cases, even without the PEG solution, in routine patient care.
To accomplish the investigators secondary objective of time to test negative for c. diff, the investigators will also collect stool to test for c. diff daily, starting the day after enrollment until negative. This will be the Immuno card c. diff toxins A\& B test (available from Meridian Bioscience), as the DNA amplification method can yield false positive results with bowel preps.
Observations- The observations made by chart review after discharge will include mortality, length of stay, operative interventions, and presenting APACHE scores. Time to test negative after treatment starts will be assessed daily, and be based on stool testing results. Diet will be at the admitting physicians' discretion based on the patient status, but the investigators will monitor to see if it seems to affect successes in treating the c. diff. Additionally, the investigators will use a visual analog scale to determine when patients feel better. Nurses are required by standing policy to record visual analog pain scale responses (scale is attached). The investigators will use these responses for the study.
Sample size- To show that a mortality reduction of 70% is significant in a population with 10% mortality, a power analysis determined that 200 in each group is required to achieve 82% power detection. A total of 400 subjects will be enrolled into the study.
Data Management and Analysis- The primary hypothesis of comparing mortality between groups will be conducted using Chi square analysis. The secondary hypothesis of comparing mean days to negative test for c. diff toxin, will be analyzed using the Independent Students' t-Test for means (Mann Whitney-U test for comparing median number of days). Hospital and ICU LOS will be compared using Students' t-Test and patient perceived improvement will be compared using the Mann Whitney-U test. Surgical intervention rate will be compared by group with Chi-square analysis.
Ethical Considerations:
The study is ethical based on the possibility of a more effective way to treat a difficult disease, and the possibility of decreasing the patients' own mortality and rate of surgical interventions. The possible nausea, dehydration, abdominal bloating and discomfort will be treated symptomatically, and the rewards potentially much outweigh the risks.
Persons with mental disabilities will be excluded. If the study is a success, this may dramatically reduce mortality at Genesys and elsewhere. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that over 14,000 patients die in the USA annually from c.diff infection induced diarrhea. The investigators couldn't locate worldwide numbers, but clearly significant, and a reduction in those deaths through an effective, widely available, inexpensive treatment should be welcome everywhere.
Informed decision-making:
Study eligible patients will be approached by the study physicians. The study will be explained to the patient and their family when present. The consent form will be provided to the patient and they will be given time to ask questions and read over the consent form. The investigators informed consent form is attached. Patients who agree will be enrolled into the study by the study physicians.
Gender Issues:
The investigators plan to include women and men alike in the study. When the investigators analyze the data, the investigators will determine any significant differences in outcomes based on gender, and report these.
- Conditions
- Clostridium Difficile Colitis
- Being tested
- Nu-Lytely
- Medical subject headings
- Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nu-LytelyDrug
Also called Polyethylene Glycol 3350, PEG 3350
Bowl prep solution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nu-Lytely | Active comparator | Bowel prep solution. Receives: Drug: Nu-Lytely |
| Control | No intervention | Standard of care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of stay
Days
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Need for surgery
Did the subject have an operation, if so what was it (colectomy/illeostomy\&lavage).
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionJun 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Clostridium Difficile ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ascension Health
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mark Vance, Ascension Health
- Investigators
- Mark B. Vance, DO, Principal investigator, GRMC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630096
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GRMC 12 0008
- Acronym
- COLITIS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2012
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COLITIS: Clostridial Infection and Oral Lavage -Improving Treatment Before Illness Becomes Severe
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630096
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COLITIS / GRMC 12 0008
- Conditions
- Clostridium Difficile Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ascension HealthIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Once the lab test is positive for c. diff, the investigators will order the patient to have PEG 3350 solution, one 8oz glass every ten minutes until 6 liters are gone, but if still not clear 2 more liters may be ordered. At enrollment, the treatment arm will have an order for 500 cc Normal saline to be given I.V. The patient will continue with antibiotic treatment as well. The investigators will plan to check c. diff tests daily to see when they become negative. The investigators will perform chart audit/review to track mortality, the length of stay, ICU days, surgical intervention, and APACHE scores (assessment of disease severity). Chart audit will be used to collect data on their diet and how they feel using a visual analog scale (collected by nursing staff daily as a standard procedure; see attached pain scale). Using chart audit, the investigators will record whether the patient is immunocompromised or not.
Detailed description
Project Summary:
Clostridium Difficile (c. diff) is a bacteria which causes much morbidity and mortality worldwide. It does so by causing diarrhea and abdominal pain. It can be mild and self-limited, to severe and lethal, even in developed countries. It can require removal of the colon to try to spare a victim's life. This isn't always successful. Current treatment is withdrawal of any unnecessary antibiotics, addition of one of two antibiotics that work pretty reliably against c.diff, hydration, and observation for signs the patient might need to be operated.
The investigators propose that instead of trying to kill the bacteria that are a problem, with limited antibiotic choices, the investigators can give the patient a bowel prep and quickly and reliably wash the bacteria, and the toxin that actually wreaks the havoc, out of their system.
The investigators will collect variables of mortality, LOS, ICU days, surgical interventions (colectomy or ileostomy and lavage), time to test negative after treatment starts, and APACHE scores. The investigators will track when regular diet is resumed. The investigators will track immunocompromised state and see the effect it has. The investigators will use a visual analog scale to assess time to feel better as well.
Project description:
Rationale- Clostridium difficile (c. diff) is a bacteria in the gut which has the ability to make us very sick by releasing toxins which cause colitis. It has traditionally affected the hospitalized and those who have recently had antibiotics. Recently the investigators have seen more community acquired cases as well as cases with no antibiotics preceding the infection. C. diff can produce self-limited diarrhea and bloating, or become very severe and include severe diarrhea, bowel necrosis, toxemia and death. Over the last four years at Genesys, death rates with c. diff (all cause mortality rates) have averaged 9.6% of those infected. The investigators have averaged over 230 cases per year of c. diff infections. Clearly this is a big problem.
Traditional treatment is IV fluids, one of two antibiotics (vancomycin or flagyl) along with bowel rest, and withdrawing any unnecessary broad spectrum antibiotics (Cohen, 2010.) This helps most people, but can still progress in some cases. If the disease is or becomes severe enough, near total colon resection is required (surgery), but by that point in the disease process, 35-80% will die anyway (Neal, 2011.) Those that survive have a lot of morbidity from the ileostomy they now have (the hassle of stooling into a bag, and the dehydration that frequently accompanies the ileostomy). It's an extremely challenging problem which should be feared to worsen if and when it becomes resistant to the very few antibiotics that are currently effective. The investigators need to find a better way to treat it.
Recently out of Pittsburgh, a study was performed in which they took very sick patients to the operating room earlier and diverted the stool stream with an ileostomy and flushed Go-Lytely (polyethylene glycol) through the colon to clean it out of all the stool, bacteria, and toxin (but did not remove the colon), followed by antibiotics through the colon. They showed a reduction in the mortality rate after surgery from 50% down to 19% for a reduction of 62% (Neal, 2011). The results are very promising, but this process does require two operations - one to make the ileostomy and another to reverse the ileostomy later on. It also waits until the patients get very sick to clean out the GI tract of the bacteria and toxin.
A second paper reported two cases of chronic c. diff patients taking a bowel prep of Go-Lytely by mouth, and then being 'cured' after 36-48 months and counting (Liacouras, 1996).
In the investigators study, the investigators will still withdraw any unnecessary antibiotics, provide hydration, and treat with the same antibiotic regimen the admitting physician has decided on. But the investigators will also add a bowel prep of polyethylene glycol 3350 solution (PEG solution), to flush out the stool and bacteria. The investigators suspicion is that by giving c. diff patients a bowel prep of PEG solution orally (or nasogastric tube if unable to swallow), the investigators can wash out the c. diff bacteria and toxin they have already produced, instead of trying to kill the bacteria still in the colon. The investigators think the investigators can effectively treat even sick c. diff patients without an operation. In fact, the investigators can quite possibly prevent many mild cases from progressing to severe cases in the first place, thereby greatly decreasing the morbidity and mortality of this scary disease.
Objective- The investigators primary objective is to show that oral administration of polyethylene glycol bowel prep solution decreases mortality in clostridium difficile infected patients. Secondary objectives include showing decreased length of hospital stay, decreased ICU days, decreased time to test negative for c. diff toxin in the stool, and decreased surgical interventions, and better patient perceptions. The investigators will use a visual analog scale to track how quickly patients perceive they are better. The investigators will also determine if timing of diet resumption or immunocompromised status changes outcomes in the study.
Methodology- The study will be a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible patients will be assigned by a computer generated, randomized list to either standard treatment (IV fluids and vancomycin or flagyl) or the intervention treatment (IV fluids, vancomycin or flagyl, and oral bowel prep).
Study subject criteria includes: all adults greater than age 18, testing positive for c. diff as GRMC inpatients. Testing will be via either DNA amplification assay, or through flexible endoscopic diagnosis. The lab or endoscopist will contact Dr. Vance or Dr. Alvarez, and they will approach the patient to then consent, enroll, and randomize them.
There are no sex or ethnic background exclusion criteria, and health status of the patient will not alter patient selection. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 400 subjects.
Exclusion criteria include:
- Pregnancy
- Less than 18 yrs of age
- Mentally handicapped
- Those sick enough to require surgery at diagnosis shall not be enrolled, as they should be operated at that point.
- Patients in whom severe ileus or suspected small bowel obstruction is present.
Interventions- Nu-Lytely or Go-Lytely (polyethylene glycol 3350), produced by Braintree Laboratories, Incorporated, will be administered to the study patients. These two products are interchangeable at the investigators institution and work by the same mechanism of action as a mechanical bowel prep. They will be dosed at one 8oz glass, orally, every 10 minutes until 6 liters are ingested. If they are not having clear bowel movements at that point, then 2 more liters will be given. If there is difficulty drinking the solution, the investigators will offer to place a nasogastric tube to deliver the PEG solution to the GI tract. It is FDA approved for bowel cleansing, though not specifically for clearing c.diff. It has a long history of effective bowel prepping with good patient safety.
Because the PEG solution can be dehydrating to a degree, the investigators will plan to give a 500 mL IV bolus of saline with the start of the bowel prep to prevent this from being an issue. These patients are generally dehydrated from the disease process anyway, and IV fluids are generally a good idea. The investigators will monitor the patients' BUN and creatinine, blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output and treat additionally for dehydration as needed.
If a patient's electrolytes are significantly abnormal at enrollment, the investigators may order an additional chemistry panel that evening to ensure this is not worsening. The investigators expect this would already be ordered by the primary physician in most cases, even without the PEG solution, in routine patient care.
To accomplish the investigators secondary objective of time to test negative for c. diff, the investigators will also collect stool to test for c. diff daily, starting the day after enrollment until negative. This will be the Immuno card c. diff toxins A\& B test (available from Meridian Bioscience), as the DNA amplification method can yield false positive results with bowel preps.
Observations- The observations made by chart review after discharge will include mortality, length of stay, operative interventions, and presenting APACHE scores. Time to test negative after treatment starts will be assessed daily, and be based on stool testing results. Diet will be at the admitting physicians' discretion based on the patient status, but the investigators will monitor to see if it seems to affect successes in treating the c. diff. Additionally, the investigators will use a visual analog scale to determine when patients feel better. Nurses are required by standing policy to record visual analog pain scale responses (scale is attached). The investigators will use these responses for the study.
Sample size- To show that a mortality reduction of 70% is significant in a population with 10% mortality, a power analysis determined that 200 in each group is required to achieve 82% power detection. A total of 400 subjects will be enrolled into the study.
Data Management and Analysis- The primary hypothesis of comparing mortality between groups will be conducted using Chi square analysis. The secondary hypothesis of comparing mean days to negative test for c. diff toxin, will be analyzed using the Independent Students' t-Test for means (Mann Whitney-U test for comparing median number of days). Hospital and ICU LOS will be compared using Students' t-Test and patient perceived improvement will be compared using the Mann Whitney-U test. Surgical intervention rate will be compared by group with Chi-square analysis.
Ethical Considerations:
The study is ethical based on the possibility of a more effective way to treat a difficult disease, and the possibility of decreasing the patients' own mortality and rate of surgical interventions. The possible nausea, dehydration, abdominal bloating and discomfort will be treated symptomatically, and the rewards potentially much outweigh the risks.
Persons with mental disabilities will be excluded. If the study is a success, this may dramatically reduce mortality at Genesys and elsewhere. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that over 14,000 patients die in the USA annually from c.diff infection induced diarrhea. The investigators couldn't locate worldwide numbers, but clearly significant, and a reduction in those deaths through an effective, widely available, inexpensive treatment should be welcome everywhere.
Informed decision-making:
Study eligible patients will be approached by the study physicians. The study will be explained to the patient and their family when present. The consent form will be provided to the patient and they will be given time to ask questions and read over the consent form. The investigators informed consent form is attached. Patients who agree will be enrolled into the study by the study physicians.
Gender Issues:
The investigators plan to include women and men alike in the study. When the investigators analyze the data, the investigators will determine any significant differences in outcomes based on gender, and report these.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nu-Lytely | Active comparator | Drug: Nu-LytelyBowel prep solution. |
| Control | No intervention | –Standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 18 years old or older male or female testing positive for c. diff
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy Less than 18 yrs of age Those sick enough to require surgery at diagnosis Severe ileus or small bowel obstruction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nu-LytelyAlso: Polyethylene Glycol 3350, PEG 3350Bowl prep solution. | Drug | Nu-Lytely |
Primary outcome
Length of stay
Time frame: 30 days
Days
1 secondary outcome
Need for surgery
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2012.
Related trials for Clostridium Difficile Colitis
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Prevention of Recurrence of Clostridioides Difficile Colitis With Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UCDA) as a Supplement to Standard Therapy
Clostridioides Difficile Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REMBRANDT: REcovery of the MicroBiome fRom Antibiotics for Dental implanTs
Dysbiosis, Clostridium Difficile
RecruitingPhase 3
Vancomycin Taper to Prevent Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile
Clostridia Difficile Colitis
RecruitingPhase 2
Stool Transplants to Treat Refractory Clostridium Difficile Colitis
Clostridium Difficile Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Bile Acids and Microbiota in Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark B. Vance, DO principal investigator
GRMC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Nu-Lytely in people with Clostridium Difficile Colitis, run by Ascension Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of stay (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2012.