Tobacco Use and Smoking BehaviorNCT01630356
Controlled Trial to Reduce Secondhand Smoke Exposure at Homes in Armenia
A study testing in-person counseling, Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution and Follow-up Counseling Calls in people with Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Armenia.
Trial summary
This study was designed to test the hypothesis whether a novel intervention that uses motivational interviewing along with immediate feedback and follow-up counseling calls is effective in educating the household members about the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and reducing children exposure… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior
- What is being tested?
- in-person counseling, Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution and Follow-up Counseling Calls
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArmenia
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least one child 2 to 6 years of age
- Non-smoking mother
- At least one daily smoker
- Child's exposed to second smoke of at least 1 cigarette per day
Who cannot join
- Mother's pregnancy
- Child's hair less than 2 cm in length after stretching out
- Residing out of Yerevan
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Armenia1 site
College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia
Yerevan, 0019
About this study
Official title: Monitoring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Buildings in Armenia: Controlled Trial
This study was designed to test the hypothesis whether a novel intervention that uses motivational interviewing along with immediate feedback and follow-up counseling calls is effective in educating the household members about the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and reducing children exposure to secondhand smoke at households in Armenia.
The study was a randomized control trial with two arms: intervention and control groups.
Read more
The sample population for the study included households with a non-smoking mother and at least one child 2 to 6 years of age residing with at least one daily smoker. The study team recruited the households through pediatrician's offices in polyclinics (primary healthcare facilities) utilizing multistage random sampling. Trained interviewers made two baseline (one week apart) and two 4-month follow-up household visits to conduct measurements, interviews and intervention. Measurements included surveys, air nicotine monitoring in homes and hair samples from children to assess changes in nicotine concentration over time.
SHS concentration was estimated by sampling vapor-phase nicotine using a filter badge treated with sodium bisulfate. Airborne nicotine monitors were used in all homes to measure SHS concentration at baseline and 4 month follow-up. At least one monitor was used in each home, preferably in the main room in which the family congregates.
Personal exposure to SHS in 2-6 years old children was assessed using biological samples of hair. A small sample of hair (approximately 30 - 50 strands, 2-3 cm) was cut near the hair root from the back of the scalp where there is the most uniform growth pattern between individuals which minimizes the variability of the results.
The intervention included an in-person counseling session with distribution of a tailored educational brochure and demonstration/feedback measurement of indoor PM2.5 (at second baseline visit); it also included one and two months follow-up counseling calls. The control group received only a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of second-hand smoke exposure.
- Conditions
- Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior
- Being tested
- in-person counseling, Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution, Follow-up Counseling Calls, Printed material
- Keywords
- Secondhand Smoke, Nicotine, Indoor Air Pollution
- Medical subject headings
- Tobacco Use, Smoking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
in-person counselingBehavioural
The interventionist provided in person counseling on eliminating child exposure to tobacco smoke to at least one daily smoker and a non-smoker mother in the household. The counseling session emphasized the following issues: a) importance of healthy environment at home, b) health dangers of smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke, c) why and how to quit smoking, and d) how to keep home air smoke-free.
Demonstration of PM2.5 PollutionDevice
The study team measured the particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air using the TSI AM 510 Aerosol SidePak to compare the quality of indoor air with outdoor air and demonstrate the effect of smoking on indoor air quality in the intervention households. After completing the Side Pack PM2.5 measurement, the interventionist immediately downloaded the data to a laptop to visualize the results through graphical presentation of the PM2.5 fluctuations to family members.
Follow-up Counseling CallsBehavioural
Interventionists made two follow-up counseling calls to the primary contact in the intervention households, usually a non-smoking mother at one and two months after the in-person counseling session. These calls aimed at a) assessing the progress in meeting the goals set earlier, b) counseling on barriers to the change, and c) encouraging study participants to maintain the success or to set new goals. These calls also provided opportunity for the participants to ask questions or clarify issues
Printed materialBehavioural
The intervention group families received the tailored and culturally adjusted educational brochure developed by the study team.
The control group received a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of SHS developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: in-person counseling; Device: Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution; Behavioral: Follow-up Counseling Calls; Behavioral: Printed material |
| Control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Printed material |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in child's hair nicotine concentration
Measured: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in air nicotine concentration
Measured: baseline and 4-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (3)
change in the respondents' knowledge on hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke
Measured: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in frequency of smoking in the presence of the child
Measured: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in household smoking restrictions
Measured: baseline and 4-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tobacco Use and Smoking BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American University of Armenia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frances Stillman, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Investigators
- Frances A Stillman, Ed.D, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630356
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB 00002501
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Wipfli H, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A, Kim S, Onicescu G, Yuan J, Breysse P, Samet JM; Famri Homes Study Investigators. Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):672-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126631. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
PubMed 18309121Al-Delaimy WK. Hair as a biomarker for exposure to tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 2002 Sep;11(3):176-82. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.176.
PubMed 12198265Hovell MF, Meltzer SB, Wahlgren DR, Matt GE, Hofstetter CR, Jones JA, Meltzer EO, Bernert JT, Pirkle JL. Asthma management and environmental tobacco smoke exposure reduction in Latino children: a controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):946-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.946.
PubMed 12415035Emmons KM, Hammond SK, Fava JL, Velicer WF, Evans JL, Monroe AD. A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):18-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.18.
PubMed 11433049Gehrman CA, Hovell MF. Protecting children from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure: a critical review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):289-301. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094231.
PubMed 12791524Harutyunyan A, Movsisyan N, Petrosyan V, Petrosyan D, Stillman F. Reducing children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1071-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2351. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
PubMed 24190686
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Monitoring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Buildings in Armenia: Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630356
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB 00002501
- Conditions
- Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior
- Keywords
- Secondhand Smoke, Nicotine, Indoor Air Pollution
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American University of Armenia
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was designed to test the hypothesis whether a novel intervention that uses motivational interviewing along with immediate feedback and follow-up counseling calls is effective in educating the household members about the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and reducing children exposure to secondhand smoke at households in Armenia.
The study was a randomized control trial with two arms: intervention and control groups.
The sample population for the study included households with a non-smoking mother and at least one child 2 to 6 years of age residing with at least one daily smoker. The study team recruited the households through pediatrician's offices in polyclinics (primary healthcare facilities) utilizing multistage random sampling. Trained interviewers made two baseline (one week apart) and two 4-month follow-up household visits to conduct measurements, interviews and intervention. Measurements included surveys, air nicotine monitoring in homes and hair samples from children to assess changes in nicotine concentration over time.
SHS concentration was estimated by sampling vapor-phase nicotine using a filter badge treated with sodium bisulfate. Airborne nicotine monitors were used in all homes to measure SHS concentration at baseline and 4 month follow-up. At least one monitor was used in each home, preferably in the main room in which the family congregates.
Personal exposure to SHS in 2-6 years old children was assessed using biological samples of hair. A small sample of hair (approximately 30 - 50 strands, 2-3 cm) was cut near the hair root from the back of the scalp where there is the most uniform growth pattern between individuals which minimizes the variability of the results.
The intervention included an in-person counseling session with distribution of a tailored educational brochure and demonstration/feedback measurement of indoor PM2.5 (at second baseline visit); it also included one and two months follow-up counseling calls. The control group received only a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of second-hand smoke exposure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: in-person counseling, Device: Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution, Behavioral: Follow-up Counseling Calls, Behavioral: Printed material |
| Control group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Printed material |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- At least one child 2 to 6 years of age
- Non-smoking mother
- At least one daily smoker
- Child's exposed to second smoke of at least 1 cigarette per day
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Mother's pregnancy
- Child's hair less than 2 cm in length after stretching out
- Residing out of Yerevan
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| in-person counselingThe interventionist provided in person counseling on eliminating child exposure to tobacco smoke to at least one daily smoker and a non-smoker mother in the household. The counseling session emphasized the following issues: a) importance of healthy environment at home, b) health dangers of smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke, c) why and how to quit smoking, and d) how to keep home air smoke-free. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Demonstration of PM2.5 PollutionThe study team measured the particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air using the TSI AM 510 Aerosol SidePak to compare the quality of indoor air with outdoor air and demonstrate the effect of smoking on indoor air quality in the intervention households. After completing the Side Pack PM2.5 measurement, the interventionist immediately downloaded the data to a laptop to visualize the results through graphical presentation of the PM2.5 fluctuations to family members. | Device | Intervention group |
| Follow-up Counseling CallsInterventionists made two follow-up counseling calls to the primary contact in the intervention households, usually a non-smoking mother at one and two months after the in-person counseling session. These calls aimed at a) assessing the progress in meeting the goals set earlier, b) counseling on barriers to the change, and c) encouraging study participants to maintain the success or to set new goals. These calls also provided opportunity for the participants to ask questions or clarify issues | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Printed materialThe intervention group families received the tailored and culturally adjusted educational brochure developed by the study team. The control group received a brief educational leaflet on the hazards of SHS developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency. | Behavioural | Control group, Intervention group |
Primary outcome
change in child's hair nicotine concentration
Time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in air nicotine concentration
Time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
3 secondary outcomes
change in the respondents' knowledge on hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke
Time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in frequency of smoking in the presence of the child
Time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
change in household smoking restrictions
Time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2012.
- Background: PubMed 18309121Wipfli H, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A, Kim S, Onicescu G, Yuan J, Breysse P, Samet JM; Famri Homes Study Investigators. Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):672-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126631. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 12198265Al-Delaimy WK. Hair as a biomarker for exposure to tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 2002 Sep;11(3):176-82. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.176.
- Background: PubMed 12415035Hovell MF, Meltzer SB, Wahlgren DR, Matt GE, Hofstetter CR, Jones JA, Meltzer EO, Bernert JT, Pirkle JL. Asthma management and environmental tobacco smoke exposure reduction in Latino children: a controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):946-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.946.
- Background: PubMed 11433049Emmons KM, Hammond SK, Fava JL, Velicer WF, Evans JL, Monroe AD. A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):18-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.18.
- Background: PubMed 12791524Gehrman CA, Hovell MF. Protecting children from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure: a critical review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):289-301. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094231.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24190686Harutyunyan A, Movsisyan N, Petrosyan V, Petrosyan D, Stillman F. Reducing children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1071-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2351. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
Related trials for Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Lung Health and Breath Biomarkers: Acute Effects of Inhaled Cannabis
Cannabis Use, Tobacco
Not yet recruiting
Impacto 2.0: Mobile Smoking Cessation Across Texas
Cigarette Smoking, Smoking Cessation
Recruiting
Communicating About Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes
Tobacco Products, Smoking Behavior
Recruiting
Young Adult Tobacco/Nicotine and Cannabis Co-use
Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Dependence
RecruitingObservational study
Salivary IL-8 and Serum IL-6 as Biomarkers for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Smokers and Never-Smokers
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders, Oral Lichen Planus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frances A Stillman, Ed.D principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing in-person counseling, Demonstration of PM2.5 Pollution and Follow-up Counseling Calls in people with Tobacco Use and Smoking Behavior, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Armenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Armenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in child's hair nicotine concentration (time frame: baseline and 4-month follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01630356, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2012.