StrokeNCT01632865
Recanalization and Stenting for Non-acute Veterbrobasilar Artery Occlusion
A study testing stenting in people with Stroke, run by Zhengzhou University at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
To evaluate whether recanalization and stenting for symptomatic subacute and chronic veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is technically feasible, can prevent from recurrent ischemic events and promotes functional recovery of disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- stenting
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stroke or TIA (transient ischemic attack) due to the intracranial veterbrobasilar artery occlusion.
- Occlusions may be diagnosed by TCD (transcranial cerebral doppler), MRA (magnetic resonance angiography), or CTA (computed tomographic angiography) to qualify for angiogram performed as part of the study protocol but must be confirmed by catheter angiography for enrollment in the trial
- Time from imaging-documented occlusion and/or from aggravation of clinical symptoms (aggravation was defined as change in mRS [modified rankin scale]≥1 and/or NIHSS [national institutes of health stroke scale]≥4) to recanalization was greater than 24 hours. The reasons for delayed intervention were due to delayed diagnosis, interhospital transfer, or unsuccessful initial trial of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.
- Etiology was suitable for stenting, which was judged by at least a neurologist, a neurosurgeon and a neuro-interventionalist.
Who cannot join
- Unsuitable etiology.
- Stenting, angioplasty, or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days prior to expected enrollment date
- Any aneurysm without treatment proximal to or distal to occluded intracranial artery
- Intracranial tumor (except meningioma) or any intracranial vascular malformation
- CT or angiographic evidence of severe calcification at target lesion
- Brain infarct within previous 30 days of enrollment that is of sufficient size (> 5 cms) to be at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during or after stenting
Show all 20Show fewer
- Any hemorrhagic infarct within 14 days prior to enrollment
- Any hemorrhagic infarct within 15 - 30 days that is associated with mass effect
- Any history of a primary intracerebral (parenchymal) hemorrhage (ICH)
- Any other intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid, subdural, epidural) within 30 days
- Any untreated chronic subdural hematoma of greater than 5 mm in thickness
- Presence of any of the following unequivocal cardiac sources of embolism: chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis, mechanical valve, endocarditis, intracardiac clot or vegetation, myocardial infarction within three months, dilated cardiomyopathy, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, ejection fraction less than 30%
- Known allergy or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, metal, local or general anesthesia
- History of life-threatening allergy to contrast dye.
- Active peptic ulcer disease, major systemic hemorrhage within 30 days, active bleeding diathesis, platelets < 100,000, hematocrit < 30, INR [international normalized ratio] > 1.5, clotting factor abnormality that increases the risk of bleeding, current alcohol or substance abuse, uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic pressure > 180 mm Hg or diastolic pressure > 115 mm Hg), severe liver impairment (AST [aspartate transaminate]or ALT [alanine transaminase]> 3 x normal, cirrhosis), creatinine > 3.0 (unless on dialysis)
- Major surgery (including open femoral, aortic, or carotid surgery) within previous 30 days or planned in the next 90 days after enrollment
- Pregnancy or of childbearing potential and unwilling to use contraception for the duration of this study
- Life expectancy<1 year due to other medical conditions.
- Enrollment in another study that would conflict with the current study
- Other special conditions considered by neurological physician, neurosurgeon and neuro-intervention doctors, weren't suitable for recanalization procedure.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites
Henan Provincial People'S Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003
Henan provincial intervention therapy center
Zhengzhou, Henan
About this study
Official title: Recanalization and Stenting for Subacute and Chronic Veterbrobasilar Artery Occlusion
To evaluate whether recanalization and stenting for symptomatic subacute and chronic veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is technically feasible, can prevent from recurrent ischemic events and promotes functional recovery of disability.
Read the detailed description
Ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of cerebrovascular accidents. Of these, a part is the result of intracranial veterbrobasilar occlusion. Acute veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is a devastating disease with high mortality without successful treatment. A subset of patients can survive the acute phase and develop subacute or chronic veterbrobasilar artery occlusion. Due to the adequacy of collaterals, some patients can live without any or just very mild symptoms. On the contrast, lack of enough collaterals, another patients still presented with recurrent ischemic events and progressive disability despite intensive medical therapy. Prognosis is extremely poor. It is in this cohort that subacute or chronic revascularization is often considered. The optimal treatment in this cohort with non-acute veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is unknown, and there is little literature to guide therapy. Extracranial-intracranial bypass may revascularize the intracranial artery occlusion. However, bypass procedures are technically challenging and are associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Recurrent ischemic symptoms despite best medical treatment be indication for endovascular revascularization and stent remodeling. This study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and treatment effects of recanalization and stenting for veterbrobasilar subacute-chronic intracranial artery occlusion。
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- stenting
- Keywords
- occlusion, recanalization, stenting
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stentingDevice
Apollo stent (MicroPort Medical, China),Neuroform stent (Stryker/Boston Scientific, USA) or Wingspan stent (Stryker/Boston Scientific, USA), et al.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| recanalization and stenting | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: stenting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale at Six Months postoperative
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the level of disability
Measured: six months to two years
Changes from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at one year postoperative
Measured: one to three years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
- hemorrhagic or ischemic
- ipsilateral or non-ipsilateral
- disability or non-disability
- the causes
- others
Measured: up to three years
Changes from Baseline in NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) at Six Months postoperative
NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) is used to evaluate the severity of neurological deficit.
Measured: six months to two years
Rate of Successful Recanalization
Antegrade blood flow through the recanalized portion was assessed by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score or thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score. TIMI≥2 or TICI≥2b was defined as successful recanalization.
Measured: two years
Changes from Baseline in BI (Barthel Index) at Six Months postoperative
BI (Barthel Index) is used to evaluate activities of daily living.
Measured: six months to two years
Changes from Baseline in WHOQOL-BREF (The World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF)at Six Months postoperative
WHOQOL-BREF (The World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF) is used to evaluate the individual's perceptions in the context of their culture and value systems, and their personal goals, standards and concerns.
Measured: six months to two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhengzhou University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Henan provincial interventional therapy center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yingkun He, Henan Provincial People's Hospital
- Investigators
- Tianxiao Li, MD. PhD, Study chair, Henan provincial intervention therapy centerZiliang Wang, MD, Study director, Henan Provincial People's HospitalYingkun He, MD., Principal investigator, Henan Provincial People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01632865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 415807818
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Recanalization and Stenting for Subacute and Chronic Veterbrobasilar Artery Occlusion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01632865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 415807818
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- occlusion, recanalization, stenting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhengzhou UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Henan provincial interventional therapy center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital
- Study start
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate whether recanalization and stenting for symptomatic subacute and chronic veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is technically feasible, can prevent from recurrent ischemic events and promotes functional recovery of disability.
Detailed description
Ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of cerebrovascular accidents. Of these, a part is the result of intracranial veterbrobasilar occlusion. Acute veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is a devastating disease with high mortality without successful treatment. A subset of patients can survive the acute phase and develop subacute or chronic veterbrobasilar artery occlusion. Due to the adequacy of collaterals, some patients can live without any or just very mild symptoms. On the contrast, lack of enough collaterals, another patients still presented with recurrent ischemic events and progressive disability despite intensive medical therapy. Prognosis is extremely poor. It is in this cohort that subacute or chronic revascularization is often considered. The optimal treatment in this cohort with non-acute veterbrobasilar artery occlusion is unknown, and there is little literature to guide therapy. Extracranial-intracranial bypass may revascularize the intracranial artery occlusion. However, bypass procedures are technically challenging and are associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Recurrent ischemic symptoms despite best medical treatment be indication for endovascular revascularization and stent remodeling. This study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and treatment effects of recanalization and stenting for veterbrobasilar subacute-chronic intracranial artery occlusion。
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| recanalization and stenting | Experimental | Device: stenting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Stroke or TIA (transient ischemic attack) due to the intracranial veterbrobasilar artery occlusion.
- Occlusions may be diagnosed by TCD (transcranial cerebral doppler), MRA (magnetic resonance angiography), or CTA (computed tomographic angiography) to qualify for angiogram performed as part of the study protocol but must be confirmed by catheter angiography for enrollment in the trial
- Time from imaging-documented occlusion and/or from aggravation of clinical symptoms (aggravation was defined as change in mRS [modified rankin scale]≥1 and/or NIHSS [national institutes of health stroke scale]≥4) to recanalization was greater than 24 hours. The reasons for delayed intervention were due to delayed diagnosis, interhospital transfer, or unsuccessful initial trial of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.
- Etiology was suitable for stenting, which was judged by at least a neurologist, a neurosurgeon and a neuro-interventionalist.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Unsuitable etiology.
- Stenting, angioplasty, or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days prior to expected enrollment date
- Any aneurysm without treatment proximal to or distal to occluded intracranial artery
- Intracranial tumor (except meningioma) or any intracranial vascular malformation
- CT or angiographic evidence of severe calcification at target lesion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stentingApollo stent (MicroPort Medical, China),Neuroform stent (Stryker/Boston Scientific, USA) or Wingspan stent (Stryker/Boston Scientific, USA), et al. | Device | recanalization and stenting |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale at Six Months postoperative
Time frame: six months to two years
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the level of disability
Changes from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at one year postoperative
Time frame: one to three years
5 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time frame: up to three years
Changes from Baseline in NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) at Six Months postoperative
Time frame: six months to two years
Rate of Successful Recanalization
Time frame: two years
Changes from Baseline in BI (Barthel Index) at Six Months postoperative
Time frame: six months to two years
Changes from Baseline in WHOQOL-BREF (The World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF)at Six Months postoperative
Time frame: six months to two years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2017.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tianxiao Li, MD. PhD study chair
Henan provincial intervention therapy center
Ziliang Wang, MD study director
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Yingkun He, MD. principal investigator
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing stenting in people with Stroke, run by Zhengzhou University at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale at Six Months postoperative (time frame: six months to two years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.