Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent AsthmaPhase 2NCT01634958
Dose Finding Study Depigoid Phleum: 4 Doses in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +-Asthma
A Phase 2 study testing Depigoid Phleum in people with Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent Asthma and Sensitization Against Phleum Pratense Pollen, run by Leti Pharma GmbH at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Specific immunotherapy for IgE mediated sensitization to grass pollen 4 concentrations of a modified pollen extract of Phleum pratense are applied to find out the optimum dose. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent Asthma, Sensitization Against Phleum Pratense Pollen, Dose-Finding Study
- What is being tested?
- Depigoid Phleum
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 308 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- appropriately signed and dated ICON prior to study specific action
- IgE-mediated Sensitization against grass pollen
- Perception of disease activity of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
- FEV1 or a PEFR value > 80% of predicted normal value
- Allergic rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (at least 2 years) with or without intermittent asthma symptoms verified by:
- suggestive medical history AND
Show all 16Show fewer
- specific IgE against grass pollen with CAP-RAST ≥ 2 AND
- a positive SPT (wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) AND
- a positive CPT for grass pollen
- Patients with co-allergies are allowed to enter the study:
- being asymptomatic against co-allergens such as tree or weed pollen, house dust mites, cat and dog, and other country specific allergens
- with CAP-RAST co-allergen < grass (detailed specifications given for Birch, HDM, animal dander, other country specific allergens)
- All other co-allergens: difference in CAP RAST co-allergen to grass of ≥ 2 and an SPT wheal diameter co-allergen < grass
- Females of non-childbearing potential must be postmenopausal for at least
- 1 year or surgically sterilized
- Females of childbearing potential must be non-lactating, non-pregnant and must correctly use an effective method of contraception during the study.
Who cannot join
- Acute or chronic infectious conjunctivitis
- History of significant clinical manifestations of allergy as a result of sensitisation against trees or weed pollen and perennial allergens (e.g., house dust mites)
- Patients are not allowed to enter into the study:
- with typical symptoms against co-allergens such as tree or weed pollen, HDM, cat and dog, and other country specific allergens
- with CAP-RAST co-allergen ≥ grass
- Persistent asthma, according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)
Show all 29Show fewer
- Acute or chronic inflammatory or infectious airways disease
- Chronic structural disease of the lung (e.g., emphysema or bronchiectasis)
- Autoimmune and/or immune deficiency
- Any disease that prohibits the use of adrenaline (e.g., hyperthyroidism)
- Severe uncontrolled disease that could increase the risk to the patients while participating in the study, including but not limited to: cardiovascular insufficiency, severe or unstable lung diseases, endocrine diseases, clinically significant renal or hepatic diseases or haematological disorders.
- Active malignant disease during the previous 5 years
- Significant abnormal laboratory parameter or alteration in vital signs that could increase the risk to the study patient
- Abuse of alcohol, drugs or medications within the past year
- Severe psychiatric, psychological or neurological disorder
- Immunotherapy against grass pollen within the last 5 years
- Systemic and/or topical treatment with β-blockers within 1 wk prior to V2
- Use of medication that may interfere with the immune system or has been using any medication which might still have an influence on the immune system at V2
- Use of tranquiliser or psychoactive drugs within 1 week prior to V1
- Use of systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to V1
- Immunization with vaccines within 7 days prior to V2
- Expected non-compliance and/or no cooperation
- Participation in another clinical study within 30 days prior to V2
- Prior participation in this study
- Employees at the investigational centre or first degree relative or partner of the investigator
- Planed donation of germ cells, blood, organs or bone marrow during the course of the study
- Contractually not capable
- A positive pregnancy test at V1
- Jurisdictional or governmentally institutionalised.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
Hippke, Ear-Nose-Throat specialist
Berlin, 10117
Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergie
Wiesbaden, 65183
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Four Concentrations of Depigoid® Phleum in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Intermittent Asthma
Specific immunotherapy for IgE mediated sensitization to grass pollen
4 concentrations of a modified pollen extract of Phleum pratense are applied to find out the optimum dose.
Read the detailed description
This is a dose finding study and no therapeutic study. Patients will receive in 4-weekly intervals 6x 0,5mL of one of 4 different concentrations of Depigoid Phleum. The study is performed outside the pollen season. Thus the aim of the study is not the therapeutic effect of the specific immunotherapy (effect on allergy specific symptoms during the pollen season) but the effect on the Conjunctival provocation test (CPT). According to the EMA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
For the CPT increasing doses of Phleum pollen solutions are applied to the eye and characteristic symptoms (eye redness, weeping, itching or burning, and nose dripping/blockage) are assessed at each concentration: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. At a score value of >=5/concentration the test is considered positive and finished.
It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
Furthermore comparative evaluation of the safety data (AEs) in the different dosage groups is a very important parameter for the evaluation of the outcome of the study.
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent Asthma, Sensitization Against Phleum Pratense Pollen, Dose-Finding Study
- Being tested
- Depigoid Phleum
- Keywords
- Allergic Rhinitis, Hayfever, Immunotherapy, Dose-Finding-Study
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Depigoid PhleumBiological
Also called Depigoid (R) Phleum, Depigmented and glutaraldehyde polymerized extract of 100% phleum pratense pollen adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide)
Suspension for subcutaneous injection Build-up phase (day 1): 0,1mL + 0,2mL + 0,2mL s.c.injections in intervals of 30 minutes Maintenance phase: 5x single s.c. injection of 0,5mL every 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 10.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 5.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 1.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 100 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT)
Comparison between dosage groups: percentage of patients who need an increased amount of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of the treatment (comparison slope of efficacy). It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
According to the EMA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
Measured: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT)
Analysis of individual results for allergen amount
Measured: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Overall assessment of safety (tolerability) at the end of the study
At the end of the study investigator and patient will give their general overall impression on the safety of the study treatment on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderated, unacceptable).
Results will be compared between dosage groups
Measured: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs are recorded at the study visits (patients are questioned and the patient diary - where specific allergic symptoms should be recorded by the patients during 48hrs after each injection of IMP - is assessed by the investigator and AEs recorded in the CRF if applicable) and at any time of the study when site becomes aware of an Ae/SAE.
AE/SAE rate is compared between treatment groups (safety profile. Also rates of local and systemic reactions will be calculated.
Measured: at 4-weekly intervals (retrospectively at study visits)
Patient diary: Allergy specific symptoms and concommitant medication (rescue m.) for 48hrs after application of IMP
Symptoms: - at injection site, - of the skin (not injection site), - of the nose, - of the eyes, - of the lung/respiratory system, other symptoms Symptoms documented in the diary will be judged and assessed by the investigator and - if applicable - transcribed as AE into the CRF.
Medication: Antihistaminics (eye drops, nose spray or tablet), Sultanol, oral corticosteroid and intake of other medication documented in the diary are to be transcribed to the CRF
Measured: 48hrs every 4 weeks after each application of IMP
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 308 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leti Pharma GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Oliver Pfaar, PD Dr. med., Principal investigator, Centre for Rhinology and Allergology of University Hospital MannheimAngelika Sager, Dr. med., Study director, Leti Pharma GmbH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01634958
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 6043-PG-PSC-192
- Other IDs
- 2012-000416-28
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Four Concentrations of Depigoid® Phleum in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Intermittent Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01634958
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 6043-PG-PSC-192
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent Asthma, Sensitization Against Phleum Pratense Pollen, Dose-Finding Study
- Keywords
- Allergic Rhinitis, Hayfever, Immunotherapy, Dose-Finding-Study
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 308 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leti Pharma GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Specific immunotherapy for IgE mediated sensitization to grass pollen
4 concentrations of a modified pollen extract of Phleum pratense are applied to find out the optimum dose.
Detailed description
This is a dose finding study and no therapeutic study. Patients will receive in 4-weekly intervals 6x 0,5mL of one of 4 different concentrations of Depigoid Phleum. The study is performed outside the pollen season. Thus the aim of the study is not the therapeutic effect of the specific immunotherapy (effect on allergy specific symptoms during the pollen season) but the effect on the Conjunctival provocation test (CPT). According to the EMA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
For the CPT increasing doses of Phleum pollen solutions are applied to the eye and characteristic symptoms (eye redness, weeping, itching or burning, and nose dripping/blockage) are assessed at each concentration: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. At a score value of >=5/concentration the test is considered positive and finished.
It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
Furthermore comparative evaluation of the safety data (AEs) in the different dosage groups is a very important parameter for the evaluation of the outcome of the study.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 10.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 5.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 1.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
| 100 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. | Experimental | Biological: Depigoid Phleum |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- appropriately signed and dated ICON prior to study specific action
- IgE-mediated Sensitization against grass pollen
- Perception of disease activity of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
- FEV1 or a PEFR value > 80% of predicted normal value
- Allergic rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (at least 2 years) with or without intermittent asthma symptoms verified by:
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Acute or chronic infectious conjunctivitis
- History of significant clinical manifestations of allergy as a result of sensitisation against trees or weed pollen and perennial allergens (e.g., house dust mites)
- with typical symptoms against co-allergens such as tree or weed pollen, HDM, cat and dog, and other country specific allergens
- with CAP-RAST co-allergen ≥ grass
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Depigoid PhleumAlso: Depigoid (R) Phleum, Depigmented and glutaraldehyde polymerized extract of 100% phleum pratense pollen adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide)Suspension for subcutaneous injection Build-up phase (day 1): 0,1mL + 0,2mL + 0,2mL s.c.injections in intervals of 30 minutes Maintenance phase: 5x single s.c. injection of 0,5mL every 4 weeks | Biological | 1.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj., 10.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj., 100 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj., 5.000 DPP/ml suspension for s.c. inj. |
Primary outcome
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT)
Time frame: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Comparison between dosage groups: percentage of patients who need an increased amount of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of the treatment (comparison slope of efficacy). It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT. According to the EMA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
4 secondary outcomes
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT)
Time frame: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Overall assessment of safety (tolerability) at the end of the study
Time frame: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time frame: at 4-weekly intervals (retrospectively at study visits)
Patient diary: Allergy specific symptoms and concommitant medication (rescue m.) for 48hrs after application of IMP
Time frame: 48hrs every 4 weeks after each application of IMP
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2013.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Oliver Pfaar, PD Dr. med. principal investigator
Centre for Rhinology and Allergology of University Hospital Mannheim
Angelika Sager, Dr. med. study director
Leti Pharma GmbH
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Depigoid Phleum in people with Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Intermittent Asthma and Sensitization Against Phleum Pratense Pollen, run by Leti Pharma GmbH at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) (time frame: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2013.