Plaque-type PsoriasisPhase 3JUNCTURENCT01636687
Judging the Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Psoriasis Using AutoiNjector: a Clinical Trial Evaluating Treatment Results (JUNCTURE)
A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab 150mg and Secukinumab 300mg in people with Plaque-type Psoriasis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate efficacy of autoinjector administered secukinumab at Week 12 based on PASI and IGA response rates versus placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque-type Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Secukinumab 150mg and Secukinumab 300mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2012to 27 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate and severe plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months.
- Severity of psoriasis disease meeting all of the following three criteria:
- Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 12 or greater
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 or greater
- Total body surface area (BSA) affected of 10% or greater
- Inadequate control by prior use of topical treatment, phototherapy and/or systemic therapy.
Who cannot join
- Current forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type psoriasis (for example, pustular, erythrodermic, guttate).
- Current drug-induced psoriasis.
- Previous use of secukinumab or any drug that targets IL-17 or IL-17 receptor.
- Significant medical problems such as uncontrolled hypertension, congestive heart failure or a condition that significantly immunocompromises the subject.
- Hematological abnormalities.
- History of an ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease, or evidence of untreated tuberculosis.
- History of lymphoproliferative disease or history of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 5 countries.
39 sites in 5 countries
Germany16 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Augsburg, 86163
Novartis Investigative Site
Augsburg, 86179
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielefeld, 33647
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, 53105
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, 91054
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Novartis Investigative Site
Gera, 07548
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 22143
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 22391
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69115
Novartis Investigative Site
Münster, 48149
Novartis Investigative Site
Osnabrück, 49074
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
Novartis Investigative Site
Selters, 56242
Novartis Investigative Site
Tübingen, 72076
United States12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Novartis Investigative Site
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Novartis Investigative Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Novartis Investigative Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40291
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Novartis Investigative Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Novartis Investigative Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Novartis Investigative Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Novartis Investigative Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, New York, 14623
Canada6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Calgary, Alberta, T3A 2N1
Novartis Investigative Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1Z2
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1V6
Novartis Investigative Site
Mississauga, Ontario, L5H 1G9
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4
Novartis Investigative Site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4X7
France3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, 06202
Novartis Investigative Site
Poitiers, 86021
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31400
Estonia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 10134
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 13619
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Autoinjectors to Demonstrate Efficacy After Twelve Weeks of Treatment, and to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Usability and Long-term Efficacy in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate efficacy of autoinjector administered secukinumab at Week 12 based on PASI and IGA response rates versus placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.
- Conditions
- Plaque-type Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Placebo, Secukinumab 150mg, Secukinumab 300mg
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis, Skin condition, skin disease, itching condition, psoriasis vulgaris, relapsing/remitting psoriasis, immune-mediated systemic disease, skin lesions, red skin lesions, scaly patches, papules, plaques, itching
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis, Skin Diseases, Recurrence, Plaque, Amyloid, Pruritus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
2 injections of placebo to secukinumab 150mg per dose
Secukinumab 150mgDrug
Secukinumab 150mg: 1 injection of 150 mg secukinumab and 1 injection of placebo to secukinumab 150mg per dose. After Week 52 database lock, study is open label so only 1 injection of secukinumab 150mg per dose were administered
Secukinumab 300mgDrug
Secukinumab 300mg (2 injections of 150mg secukinumab per dose)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects who were in placebo at Week 52 cannot continue in the extension treatment period Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Secukinumab 150 mg | Experimental | After the data base lock of week 52 data has been performed, subjects received secukinumab 150 mg treatment as open label for the remainder of the extension treatment period. Receives: Drug: Secukinumab 150mg |
| Secukinumab 300 mg | Experimental | After the data base lock of week 52 data has been performed, subjects received secukinumab 300 mg treatment as open label for the remainder of the extension treatment period. Receives: Drug: Secukinumab 300mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response and Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response
Efficacy of secukinumab compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.
PASI score was based on assessment of the head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs for erythema, thickening (plaque elevation, induration), and scaling (desquamation). PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis, up to a theoretical maximum of 72.0. PASI-based secondary variables included absolute PASI score, response rates for PASI 75. PASI 50 and PASI 90 were defined as ≥ 50% and ≥ 90% improvement from Baseline in PASI score, respectively, while PASI 100 response corresponded to complete clearing of psoriasis (PASI = 0). IGA mod 2011 was used to evaluate the overall severity of psoriatic disease, with scores ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2011 0 or 1 score.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (20)
Percentages of Subjects With Successful Self-administration of Study Drug at Week 1
To assess the subject's ability to follow instructions for use with the secukinumab autoinjector
Measured: Week 1
Percentage of Subjects With Possible Use-related Hazards
To assess potential use-related hazards with the secukinumab autoinjector for the subject.
Measured: Week 1
Absolute Change From Baseline in Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
The three domains of the POST SIAQ are feelings about injections, self-image, self-confidence, injection-site reactions, ease of use, and satisfaction with self-injection. The SIAQ items are scored on a semantic Likert-type scale where lower numbers indicate a worse experience. Domain scores range from 0 to 10; "0" corresponds to worst experience while "10" corresponds to best experience. Subjects self-injecting at this visit completed this SIAQ questionnaire. The POST-SIAQ is taken after the injection at that visit.
Measured: Week 12
Absolute Change From Baseline in Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) Domain Scores at Week 48
The three domains of the POST SIAQ are feelings about injections, self-image, self-confidence, injection-site reactions, ease of use, and satisfaction with self-injection. The SIAQ items are scored on a semantic Likert-type scale where lower numbers indicate a worse experience. Domain scores range from 0 to 10; "0" corresponds to worst experience while "10" corresponds to best experience. Subjects self-injecting at this visit completed this SIAQ questionnaire. The POST-SIAQ is taken after the injection at that visit.
Measured: Absolute change from baseline at week 48
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response - Induction Period
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline.
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Measured: Week 12
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline.
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Measured: Week 12 up to Week 52
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score - Induction Period
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section(head:01, arms:0.2 body:0.3 legs:0.4)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section(head:01, arms:0.2 body:0.3 legs:0.4).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category - Induction Period
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe
Measured: Week 12
Percentages of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
The Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Measured: Week 52
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D up to Week 12 - Induction Period
ED-5Q: Participant rated questionnaire to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Five domains are assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each with three possible score: 1 indicates no problems, better state of health; 3 indicates worst state of health (example "confined to bed") A visual analog scale (VAS) assesses the health status from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state).
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period
ED-5Q: Participant rated questionnaire to assess health related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Five domains are assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each with three possible score: 1 indicates no problems, better state of health; 3 indicates worst state of health (example "confined to bed") A visual analog scale (VAS) assesses the health status from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state).
Measured: Week 52
Percentage Changes From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score - Induction Period
The DLQI is a quality of life measure used in the psoriatic The 10-item questionnaire has a score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst) with higher scores indicating poor quality of life. The instrument contains six functional scales (i.e., symptoms and feeling, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment). Each item has 4 response categories, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is also a valid response and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of the 10 questions.
A negative median percent change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, up to Week 12
Percentage Changes From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period
The DLQI is a quality of life measure used in the psoriatic The 10-item questionnaire has a score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst) with higher scores indicating poor quality of life. The instrument contains six functional scales (i.e., symptoms and feeling, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment). Each item has 4 response categories, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is also a valid response and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of the 10 questions.
A negative median percent change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 - Induction Period
The DLQI is a quality of life measure used in the psoriatic The 10-item questionnaire has a score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst) with higher scores indicating poor quality of life. The instrument contains six functional scales (i.e., symptoms and feeling, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment). Each item has 4 response categories, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is also a valid response and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of the 10 questions.
Measured: Week 12
Percentages of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 Over Time up to Week 52 - (Maintenance)
The DLQI is a quality of life measure used in the psoriatic The 10-item questionnaire has a score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst) with higher scores indicating poor quality of life. The instrument contains six functional scales (i.e., symptoms and feeling, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment). Each item has 4 response categories, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is also a valid response and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of the 10 questions.
Measured: Week 52
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response After Week 52 (Observed Data)
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline.
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Measured: Week 160
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score After Week 52 (Observed Data)
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section(head:01, arms:0.2 body:0.3 legs:0.4).
Measured: Week 160
Percentages of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category After Week 52 (Observed Data)
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Measured: Week 160
Number of Participants Developing Treatment-emergent Anti-secukinumab Antibodies
The development of anti-secunimubab anti-bodies decreases a participant's ability to respond to secukinumab treatment. The number of participants developing anti-secukinumab anti-bodies was measured from Baseline to week 216.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 12, 24, 52, 100, 148, 196, 208, and 216
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study start17 Oct 2012
- Primary completion27 Oct 2016
- Study completion27 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque-type PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01636687
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAIN457A2309
- Other IDs
- 2012-002609-22
- Acronym
- JUNCTURE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 27 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Sticherling M, Nikkels AF, Hamza AM, Kwong P, Szepietowski JC, El Sayed M, Ghislain PD, Khotko AA, Patekar M, Ortmann CE, Forrer P, Papanastasiou P, Keefe D. Secukinumab in Pediatric Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Safety Analysis from Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):821-835. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00782-8. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
PubMed 37341961Merola JF, McInnes IB, Deodhar AA, Dey AK, Adamstein NH, Quebe-Fehling E, Aassi M, Peine M, Mehta NN. Effect of Secukinumab on Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Inflammatory Biomarkers: Post Hoc Analyses of Pooled Data Across Three Indications. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Jun;9(3):935-955. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00434-z. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
PubMed 35305260Houghton K, Patil D, Gomez B, Feldman SR. Correlation Between Change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index in Patients with Psoriasis: Pooled Analysis from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Secukinumab. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1373-1384. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00564-2. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
PubMed 34110605Menter A, Cather JC, Jarratt M, Meng X, Guana A, Nyirady J. Efficacy of Secukinumab on Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis Affecting Different Body Regions: a Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):639-647. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0140-7. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
PubMed 27576559Kircik L, Fowler J, Weiss J, Meng X, Guana A, Nyirady J. Efficacy of Secukinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Head and Neck Psoriasis Over 52 Weeks: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0139-0. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
PubMed 27573260Paul C, Lacour JP, Tedremets L, Kreutzer K, Jazayeri S, Adams S, Guindon C, You R, Papavassilis C; JUNCTURE study group. Efficacy, safety and usability of secukinumab administration by autoinjector/pen in psoriasis: a randomized, controlled trial (JUNCTURE). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1082-90. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12751. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
PubMed 25243910
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Autoinjectors to Demonstrate Efficacy After Twelve Weeks of Treatment, and to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Usability and Long-term Efficacy in Subjects With Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01636687
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JUNCTURE / CAIN457A2309
- Conditions
- Plaque-type Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis, Skin condition, skin disease, itching condition, psoriasis vulgaris, relapsing/remitting psoriasis, immune-mediated systemic disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Sep 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate efficacy of autoinjector administered secukinumab at Week 12 based on PASI and IGA response rates versus placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSubjects who were in placebo at Week 52 cannot continue in the extension treatment period |
| Secukinumab 150 mg | Experimental | Drug: Secukinumab 150mgAfter the data base lock of week 52 data has been performed, subjects received secukinumab 150 mg treatment as open label for the remainder of the extension treatment period. |
| Secukinumab 300 mg | Experimental | Drug: Secukinumab 300mgAfter the data base lock of week 52 data has been performed, subjects received secukinumab 300 mg treatment as open label for the remainder of the extension treatment period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Moderate and severe plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months.
- Severity of psoriasis disease meeting all of the following three criteria:
- Inadequate control by prior use of topical treatment, phototherapy and/or systemic therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Current forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type psoriasis (for example, pustular, erythrodermic, guttate).
- Current drug-induced psoriasis.
- Previous use of secukinumab or any drug that targets IL-17 or IL-17 receptor.
- Significant medical problems such as uncontrolled hypertension, congestive heart failure or a condition that significantly immunocompromises the subject.
- Hematological abnormalities.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo2 injections of placebo to secukinumab 150mg per dose | Drug | Placebo |
| Secukinumab 150mgSecukinumab 150mg: 1 injection of 150 mg secukinumab and 1 injection of placebo to secukinumab 150mg per dose. After Week 52 database lock, study is open label so only 1 injection of secukinumab 150mg per dose were administered | Drug | Secukinumab 150 mg |
| Secukinumab 300mgSecukinumab 300mg (2 injections of 150mg secukinumab per dose) | Drug | Secukinumab 300 mg |
Primary outcome
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response and Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response
Time frame: 12 weeks
Efficacy of secukinumab compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. PASI score was based on assessment of the head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs for erythema, thickening (plaque elevation, induration), and scaling (desquamation). PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis, up to a theoretical maximum of 72.0. PASI-based secondary variables included absolute PASI score, response rates for PASI 75. PASI 50 and PASI 90 were defined as ≥ 50% and ≥ 90% improvement from Baseline in PASI score, respectively, while PASI 100 response corresponded to complete clearing of psoriasis (PASI = 0). IGA mod 2011 was used to evaluate the overall severity of psoriatic disease, with scores ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2011 0 or 1 score.
20 secondary outcomes
Percentages of Subjects With Successful Self-administration of Study Drug at Week 1
Time frame: Week 1
Percentage of Subjects With Possible Use-related Hazards
Time frame: Week 1
Absolute Change From Baseline in Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Absolute Change From Baseline in Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) Domain Scores at Week 48
Time frame: Absolute change from baseline at week 48
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response - Induction Period
Time frame: Week 12
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
Time frame: Week 12 up to Week 52
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score - Induction Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category - Induction Period
Time frame: Week 12
Percentages of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period (Observed Data)
Time frame: Week 52
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D up to Week 12 - Induction Period
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage Changes From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score - Induction Period
Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 12
Percentage Changes From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time up to Week 52 - Maintenance Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 - Induction Period
Time frame: Week 12
Percentages of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 Over Time up to Week 52 - (Maintenance)
Time frame: Week 52
Percentages of Participants With PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100 and IGA Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response After Week 52 (Observed Data)
Time frame: Week 160
Absolute Change From Baseline for PASI Score After Week 52 (Observed Data)
Time frame: Week 160
Percentages of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Category After Week 52 (Observed Data)
Time frame: Week 160
Number of Participants Developing Treatment-emergent Anti-secukinumab Antibodies
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 12, 24, 52, 100, 148, 196, 208, and 216
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37341961Sticherling M, Nikkels AF, Hamza AM, Kwong P, Szepietowski JC, El Sayed M, Ghislain PD, Khotko AA, Patekar M, Ortmann CE, Forrer P, Papanastasiou P, Keefe D. Secukinumab in Pediatric Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Safety Analysis from Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):821-835. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00782-8. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35305260Merola JF, McInnes IB, Deodhar AA, Dey AK, Adamstein NH, Quebe-Fehling E, Aassi M, Peine M, Mehta NN. Effect of Secukinumab on Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Inflammatory Biomarkers: Post Hoc Analyses of Pooled Data Across Three Indications. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Jun;9(3):935-955. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00434-z. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34110605Houghton K, Patil D, Gomez B, Feldman SR. Correlation Between Change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index in Patients with Psoriasis: Pooled Analysis from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Secukinumab. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1373-1384. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00564-2. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27576559Menter A, Cather JC, Jarratt M, Meng X, Guana A, Nyirady J. Efficacy of Secukinumab on Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis Affecting Different Body Regions: a Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):639-647. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0140-7. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27573260Kircik L, Fowler J, Weiss J, Meng X, Guana A, Nyirady J. Efficacy of Secukinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Head and Neck Psoriasis Over 52 Weeks: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0139-0. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25243910Paul C, Lacour JP, Tedremets L, Kreutzer K, Jazayeri S, Adams S, Guindon C, You R, Papavassilis C; JUNCTURE study group. Efficacy, safety and usability of secukinumab administration by autoinjector/pen in psoriasis: a randomized, controlled trial (JUNCTURE). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1082-90. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12751. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Plaque-type Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Serum Substance P, Neuropathic Pain, and Central Sensitization Across Treatment Groups in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Recruiting
Clinical Study on the Medical Devices PROXERA PSOMED 20 and PROXERA PSOMED 40 for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis and Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Plaque Type Psorisis, Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CMS-D001 Tablets in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 2
Acupuncture With Chinese Herbal Cream Compare With Acupuncture With Calcipotriol in Plaque Psoriasis.
Plaque Type Psorisis
RecruitingObservational study
SKIN Disease Profiling by an Exploratory, pRospective, Biomarker Study in dermatoloGY Practice (SKINERGY)
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU), Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
39 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab 150mg and Secukinumab 300mg in people with Plaque-type Psoriasis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in Germany, United States, Canada, France, Estonia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response and Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) Mod 2011 0 or 1 Response (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01636687, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2018.