Hepatitis C, ChronicPhase 2NCT01636778
Japanese Phase II Study of SB-497115-GR in Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients
A Phase 2 study testing SB-497115-GR in people with Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 16 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR to raise platelet counts in thrombocytopenic patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (platelet count <80,000 /μL, suggestive of compensated cirrhosis) to a level desirable to initiate antiviral therapy and to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- SB-497115-GR
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions and is likely to complete the study as planned, as well as provided a written consent.
- A subject age between ≥20 and <75 years at time of informed consent.
- A subject who applies to one of the following:
- Female subject with non-childbearing potential [i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, who: has had a hysterectomy, or had a bilateral oophorectomy (ovariectomy), or had a bilateral tubal ligation, or is post-menopausal for greater than one year].
- Female subject with childbearing potential, has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test at screening and within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR, and completely abstains from intercourse or agree to use two of the following acceptable methods of contraception for 14 days before exposure to SB-497115-GR, throughout the clinical trial, and for 24 weeks after completion or premature discontinuation from the study.
- Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the effectiveness criteria as stated in the product label.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Male partner sterilization prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject.
- Double-barrier contraception (condom with spermicidal jelly, or diaphragm with spermicide).
- Male subject with childbearing potential partner completely abstains from intercourse or agree to use condom and diaphragm with spermicide.
- Subjects who were diagnosed as hepatitis C or compensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A) without hepatic encephalopathy, or ascites. If there is a clear cirrhosis, treatment should be given with care as there is a potential of progressing to liver failure.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are appropriate candidates for Peg-IFN and RBV combination therapy for 48 weeks.
- HCV positive by TaqMan test at screening.
- Subject who fulfil all the organ functions below.
- Items Values Platelet <80,000 /μL Haemoglobin ≥12.0 g/dL Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500 /μL Creatinine clearance >50 mL/minute Total bilirubin <2.0 mg/dL Albumin >3.0 g/dL Prothrombin time >60%
- If the investigators consider the values are sufficient to give Peg-IFN/RBV, then a subject can be enrolled upon consulting the Medical Monitor.
Who cannot join
- Subject who relapsed or did not respond after 48 weeks of Peg-IFN/RBV therapy had been given with sufficient dose previously.
- Subject with history of IFN (including Peg-IFN) therapy or Peg-IFN/RBV therapy, but could not been treated with optimal Peg-IFN/RBV therapy due to the reasons other than thrombocytopenia.
- Subject who received IFN therapy (including Peg-IFN), antiviral therapy (excluding oseltamivir phosphate, etc.), immuno-modulatory treatment, radiotherapy or phlebotomy within 3 months (90 days) prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR.
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR or 5 half-lives of that investigational drug (whichever is longer).
- Subject with decompensated liver disease.
- Chronic liver disease other than chronic hepatitis C (e.g., autoimmune hepatitis, alcohol-induced hepatitis, drug-induced hepatitis, etc.).
Show all 26Show fewer
- Subject with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or active autoimmune disease.
- Subject who have had a malignancy diagnosed and/or treated within the past 5 years.
- Subjects who require endoscopic treatment for varices or documented history of clinically significant bleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices.
- Any disease condition associated with active bleeding or requiring anticoagulation with heparin or warfarin.
- Subject with serious cardiac, cerebrovascular, chronic pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease, or documented history of any of these diseases.
- Pre-existing cardiac disease (congestive heart failure in New York Heart Association Grade III/IV), or arrhythmias known to involve the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTcF >450 msec or if with bundle brunch block, QTcF >480 msec.
- Subject with depression, psychiatric disorder requiring treatment or suicidal ideation or suicide attempt history, or history of these.
- Subject with uncontrolled hypertension (≥160 mmHg systolic or ≥100 mmHg diastolic).
- Subject with diabetes mellitus that can not be controlled by treatment.
- Thyroid dysfunction not adequately controlled.
- Subjects with haemoglobinopathies.
- History or current condition of seizure disorder.
- Subject who was positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) antibody or Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) antigen.
- Subject with arterial or venous thrombosis history or evidence of portal vein thrombosis on abdominal imaging (e.g., by computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) within 3 months.
- History of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence.
- History of platelet clumping that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
- Subjects planning to have cataract surgery.
- History of major organ transplantation.
- Known hypersensitivity to SB-497115-GR ingredients, IFN (including Peg-IFN), nucleoside analogues or biological agents (i.e., vaccines).
- Pregnant or nursing women or a male subject with pregnant partner.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
Japan16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 467-8602
GSK Investigational Site
Fukui, 918-8503
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 803-8505
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 830-0011
GSK Investigational Site
Gunma, 370-0829
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 663-8501
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, 317-0077
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 760-0017
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 760-8557
GSK Investigational Site
Kagoshima, 899-5112
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 213-8587
GSK Investigational Site
Nagasaki, 856-8562
GSK Investigational Site
Ōita, 879-5593
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 540-0006
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 105-8470
GSK Investigational Site
Wakayama, 646-8558
About this study
Official title: Non-randomised, Open Label, Multi-centre Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of SB-497115-GR in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C and Compensated Liver Cirrhosis.
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR to raise platelet counts in thrombocytopenic patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (platelet count <80,000 /μL, suggestive of compensated cirrhosis) to a level desirable to initiate antiviral therapy and to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR to maintain platelet counts at a level sufficient to minimise dose reductions of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy with the expectation that a lower rate of Peg-IFN dose reduction and omission will translate to a higher rate of sustained viral response.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Being tested
- SB-497115-GR
- Keywords
- Thrombocytopenia, Hepatitis C, chronic
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic, Thrombocytopenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SB-497115-GRDrug
TPO receptor agonist to increase platelet count
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SB-497115-GR | Experimental | investigational product for thrombocytopenia Receives: Drug: SB-497115-GR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Whose Platelet Count Increased From a Baseline Count of < 80 Gi/L to a Count >=100 Gi/L During Part 1
Participants were assessed for a shift from a baseline platelet count of <80 Gi/L to a count >=100 Gi/L during Part 1(up to 9 weeks). Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Number of Participants Whose Platelet Counts Maintained at >=50 Gi/L During Part 2
Participants were assessed for continuously maintaining platelet counts >=50 Gi/L during Part 2.
Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline to up to Week 48 in Part 2
Secondary outcomes (56)
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1
Platelet counts were measured by blood draw
Measured: Baseline, Week1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1
Time in Weeks to Achieve Platelet Count >= 100 Gi/L
Participants were assessed for achieving platelet counts >=100 Gi/L during Part 1. Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Platelet counts were measured by blood draw
Measured: Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Platelet counts were measured by blood draw at specified timepoints.
Measured: Follow-up (FU) Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Minimum Platelet Count on Antiviral Therapy
Participants were assessed for platelet counts during antiviral therapy in Part 2.
Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline to up to Week 48 in Part 2
Dose of Eltrombopag That Enabled Initiation of Antiviral Therapy
Participants received eltrombopag at escalating dosages until a platelet count of >=100 Gi/L was achieved in Part 1. Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Number of Antiviral Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Number of reductions in Part 2 of either Peg-IFN or RBV. Participants were assigned a score equal to the number of times antiviral therapy was reduced (0=no dose reductions [DRs]; 1=one DR; 2=two DRs; 3=three DRs; >3=more than three DRs). Where possible, every effort was made to maintain the recommended dose of antiviral therapy. However, where dose modification of antiviral therapy was required due to safety concerns, it was performed by the Investigator as per the region-specific product labels of Peg-IFN and/or RBV.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of Peg-IFN Alpha-2a Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Participants were assigned a score equal to the number of times their Peg-IFN alpha-2a dose of antiviral therapy was reduced (0=no dose reductions [DRs]; 1=one DR; 2=two DRs; 3=three DRs; >3=more than three DRs). Where possible, every effort was made to maintain the recommended dose of antiviral therapy. However, where dose modification of antiviral therapy was required due to safety concerns, it was performed by the Investigator as per the region-specific product labels of Peg-IFN.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Participants were assigned a score equal to the number of times their Peg-IFN alpha-2b dose of antiviral therapy was reduced (0=no dose reductions [DRs]; 1=one DR; 2=two DRs; 3=three DRs; >3=more than three DRs). Where possible, every effort was made to maintain the recommended dose of antiviral therapy. However, where dose modification of antiviral therapy was required due to safety concerns, it was performed by the Investigator as per the region-specific product labels of Peg-IFN.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of RBV Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Participants were assigned a score equal to the number of times their RBV dose of antiviral therapy was reduced (0=no DRs; 1=one DR; 2=two DRs; 3=three DRs; >3=more than three DRs). Where possible, every effort was made to maintain the recommended dose of antiviral therapy. However, where dose modification of antiviral therapy was required due to safety concerns, it was performed by the Investigator as per the region-specific product labels of RBV
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Time to First Dose Reduction of Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time to first dose reduction was calucated as the time period from the first dose to the first dose reduction.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Dosing discontinuation is defined as the occurrence of stopping the medication. Dosing discontinuation of Antviral Therapy was assessed up to 48 weeks in Part 2
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Peg-IFN Alpha-2a Therapy in Part 2
Dosing discontinuation is defined as the occurrence of stopping the medication. Dosing discontinuation of Peg-IFN alpha-2a therapy was assessed up to 48 weeks in Part 2
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Therapy in Part 2
Dosing discontinuation is defined as the occurrence of stopping the medication. Dosing discontinuation of Peg-IFN alpha-2b therapy was assessed up to 48 weeks in Part 2
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Adherence to antiviral therapy was defined as receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of Peg-IFN alfa and at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of RBV, for at least 80% of the planned duration
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Peg-IFN Alpha 2a Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Adherence to antiviral therapy was defined as receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of Peg-IFN alfa-2a and at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of RBV, for at least 80% of the planned duration.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Adherence to antiviral therapy was defined as receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of Peg-IFN alpha-2b and at least 80% of the prescribed dose (investigator prescribed) of RBV, for at least 80% of the planned duration.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) in Part 2
Participants with SVR were defined as those with undetectable Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) at 24 weeks post-completion of treatment period Part 2
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Rapid Virological Response (RVR) and Extended RVR (eRVR) in Part 2
RVR is defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks of antiviral treatment. eRVR is defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA between 4 weeks and 12 weeks after antiviral treatment.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Early Virological Response (EVR) and Complete EVR (cEVR) in Part 2
EVR is defined as a clinically significant reduction from Baseline in HCV RNA (>=2 log10 decrease in HCV RNA or undetectable HCV RNA) after 12 weeks of antiviral treatment. cEVR, a subset of EVR, is defined exclusively as undetectable HCV RNA after 12 weeks of antiviral treatment.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With End of Treatment Response (ETR) for Undetectable HCV RNA at the End of Peg-IFN/RBV Treatment in Part 2
ETR is defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of Peg-IFN/RBV treatment.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Mean Serum HCV RNA at the Indicated Time Points In Part 2
The HCV is a small, enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. Log-Transformed HCV RNA was assessed at Screening, Antiviral Baseline, Part 2 week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and at withdrawal.
Measured: Screening, Antviral baseline; Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Serum HCV RNA at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
The HCV is a small, enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. Log-Transformed HCV RNA was assessed at FU Baseline, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 during Follow-up Period after Part 2
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part1
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death; was life threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: From Baseline up to week 9 in Part 1
Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death; was life threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE During Follow-up Period After Part 2
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death; was life threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: From FU Baseline up to FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
Participant's blood pressure was measured at the indicated time points during the study. Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, and FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Participant's blood pressure was measured at the indicated time points during the study. Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline
Measured: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Participant's blood pressure was measured at the indicated time points during the study. Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed.
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
The heart rate was measured in participants at the indicated time points. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Antiviral Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
The heart rate was measured in participants at the indicated time points. Mean change from Antiviral Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Antiviral Baseline.
Measured: Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
The heart rate was measured in participants at the indicated time points.
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
The weight of participants was recorded at the indicated time points. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
The weight of participants was recorded at the indicated time points. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Weight at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
The weight of participants was recorded at the indicated time points.
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
The Body temperature of participants was recorded at the indicated time points. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
The Body temperature of participants was recorded at the indicated time points. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline
Measured: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
The Body temperature of participants was recorded at the indicated time points..
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Periodc
The BMI for participants was calculated at the indicated time points as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in BMI at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
The BMI for participants was calculated at the indicated time points as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline
Measured: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean BMI at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
The BMI for participants was calculated at the indicated time points as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Measured: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Severity Grades for Clinical Chemistry Parameters Per Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) in Part 1
Blood samples for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters were taken at intervals in Part 1. Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), ALT, aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, potassium, sodium, and uric acid. Per DAIDS toxicity table, the grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 0=none, 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 9
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Severity Grades for Clinical Chemistry Parameters Per DAIDS in Part 2
Blood samples for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters were taken at intervals in Part 2. Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, ALP, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, potassium, sodium, and uric acid. Per DAIDS toxicity table, the grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 0=none, 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Severity Grades for Clinical Chemistry Parameters Per DAIDS During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Blood samples for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters were taken at intervals in Part 2. Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, ALP, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, potassium, sodium, and uric acid. Per DAIDS toxicity table, the grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 0=none, 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From FU Week 4 to FU Week 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shifts From BL in Severity Grades for for Hematology Parameters Per DAIDS in Part 1
Blood samples for the assessment of hematology parameters were taken at intervals throughout the study. Participants with the worst-case shift from BL in Part 1 are reported, per severity grades by DAIDS, for levels of hemoglobin (low=anemia), lymphocytes (low=lymphocytopenia), total neutrophils (low=neutropenia), and white blood cells (low=leukocytopenia). Per the DAIDS toxicity table, grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 9
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shifts From BL in Severity Grades for for Hematology Parameters Per DAIDS in Part 2
Blood samples for the assessment of hematology parameters were taken at intervals throughout the study. Participants with the worst-case shift from BL in Part 2 are reported, per severity grades by DAIDS, for levels of hemoglobin (low=anemia), lymphocytes (low=lymphocytopenia), total neutrophils (low=neutropenia), and white blood cells (low=leukocytopenia). Per the DAIDS toxicity table, grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shifts From BL in Severity Grades for Hematology Parameters Per DAIDS During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Blood samples for the assessment of hematology parameters were taken at intervals throughout the study. Participants with the worst-case shift from BL in Part 2 are reported, per severity grades by DAIDS, for levels of hemoglobin (low=anemia), lymphocytes (low=lymphocytopenia), total neutrophils (low=neutropenia), and white blood cells (low=leukocytopenia). Per the DAIDS toxicity table, grade ranges for each parameter are as follows: Grade (G) 1=mild; G2=moderate; G3=severe; G4=potentially life-threatening.
Measured: From FU Week 4 to FU Week 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at the Indicated Time Points in Part1 With Follow Up Period
Urinalysis parameters included: urine bilirubin (UB), urine occult blood (UOB), urine glucose (UG), urine ketones (UK), pH, urine protein (UP), urine specific gravity (USG) and urine urobilinogen (UU). The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UB was categorized as (-), negative (Neg). UOB was categorised as 1+, 2+, 3+, (-), Neg, trace. UG results were categorized as (-), 0.5, Neg. UK parameters were categorized as as (-), Neg. pH results were in the range of pH from 5-8.5 in increments of 0.5. UP was categorized as 1+, (-), Neg, trace. UU was categorized as 1+, 0.1, 1, 2, 4, Neg, trace, normal. USG results were in the range from 1.000-1.030 in increments of 0.001.
Measured: Screening, Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, Withdrawal, FU Week 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Urinalysis parameters included: UB, UOB, UG, UK, pH, UP, USG and UU. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UB was categorized as (-), negative (Neg). UOB was categorised as 1+, 2+, 3+, (-), Neg, trace. UG results were categorized as 1+, (-), 0.5, Neg. UK parameters were categorized as as (-), Neg. pH results were in the range of pH from 5-8.5 in increments of 0.5. UP was categorized as (-), Neg, trace. UU was categorized as 1+, 0.1, 1, 2, 4, Neg, trace, normal. USG results were in the range from 1.000-1.030 in increments of 0.001.
Measured: Antiviral Baseline,Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal
Number of Participants With the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Urinalysis parameters included: UB, UOB, UG, UK, pH, UP, USG and UU. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UB was categorized as (-), negative (Neg). UOB was categorised as 1+, 2+, 3+, (-), Neg, trace. UG results were categorized as 1+, (-), 0.5, Neg. UK parameters were categorized as as (-), Neg. pH results were in the range of pH from 5-8.5 in increments of 0.5. UP was categorized as (-), Neg, trace. UU was categorized as 1+, 0.1, 1, 2, 4, Neg, trace, normal. USG results were in the range from 1.000-1.030 in increments of 0.001.
Measured: FU Baseline and FU Week 24
Number of Participants Assessed as Abnormal (Clinically Significant [CS] and Not Clinically Significant [NCS]) for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at the Indicated Time Points
The number of participants with an ECG status of normal, abnormal, CS, or NCS, as determined by the Investigator, was reported. Normal= all ECG parameters within accepted normal ranges. Abnormal= ECG findings outside of normal ranges. CS= ECG with a CS abnormality that meets exclusion criteria. NCS= ECG with an abnormality not CS or meeting exclusion criteria, per Investigator, based on reasonable standards of clinical judgment.
Measured: Screening, Antiviral Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, Withdrawal
Number of Participants Assessed as Abnormal (Clinically Significant [CS] and Not Clinically Significant [NCS]) for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) During Follow-up After Part 2
The number of participants with an ECG status of normal, abnormal, CS, or NCS, as determined by the Investigator, was reported. Normal= all ECG parameters within accepted normal ranges. Abnormal= ECG findings outside of normal ranges. CS= ECG with a CS abnormality that meets exclusion criteria. NCS= ECG with an abnormality not CS or meeting exclusion criteria, per Investigator, based on reasonable standards of clinical judgment.
Measured: FU Baseline and FU Week 24
Number of Participants With Abdominal Ultrasound With Doppler at the Indicated Time Points
Abdominal ultrasound with doppler were taken at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, withdrawal (WD)/completion (comp). Questions were asked to assess masses suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ascites, portal vein thrombosis detected, possiblility to measure spleen breadth, and other clinically significant findings (OCSF).
Measured: Baseline; Week 24, Week 48, Withdrawal/Completion
Number of Participants With Abdominal Ultrasound With Doppler During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Abdominal ultrasound with doppler were taken during Follow-up Period after Part 2 at FU Week 24. Questions were asked to assess masses suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ascites, portal vein thrombosis detected, possiblility to measure spleen breadth, and other clinically significant findings (OCSF).
Measured: FU Week 24
Spleen Measurements as Assessed by Abdominal Ultrasound With Doppler in the Study
Abdominal ultrasound with doppler were taken at Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, WD/comp. Questions were asked to assess masses suspicious for HCC, ascites, portal vein thrombosis detected, possiblility to measure spleen breadth, and OCSF. Spleen measurements included spleen length and spleen width (breadth).
Measured: Baseline; Week 24, Week 48, Withdrawal/Completion
Spleen Measurements as Assessed by Abdominal Ultrasound With Doppler During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Abdominal ultrasound with doppler were taken during Follow-up Period after Part 2 at FU Week 24. Questions were asked to assess masses suspicious for HCC, ascites, portal vein thrombosis detected, possiblility to measure spleen breadth, and OCSF. Spleen measurements included spleen length and spleen width (breadth).
Measured: FU Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01636778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 116101
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kawaguchi T, Komori A, Fujisaki K, Nishiguchi S, Kato M, Takagi H, Tanaka Y, Notsumata K, Mita E, Nomura H, Shibatoge M, Takaguchi K, Hattori T, Sata M, Koike K. Eltrombopag enables initiation and completion of pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy in Japanese HCV-infected patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):596-604. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7616. Epub 2019 May 24.
PubMed 31258695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-randomised, Open Label, Multi-centre Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of SB-497115-GR in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C and Compensated Liver Cirrhosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01636778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 116101
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Keywords
- Thrombocytopenia, Hepatitis C, chronic
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Feb 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR to raise platelet counts in thrombocytopenic patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (platelet count <80,000 /μL, suggestive of compensated cirrhosis) to a level desirable to initiate antiviral therapy and to assess the ability of SB-497115-GR to maintain platelet counts at a level sufficient to minimise dose reductions of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy with the expectation that a lower rate of Peg-IFN dose reduction and omission will translate to a higher rate of sustained viral response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SB-497115-GR | Experimental | Drug: SB-497115-GRinvestigational product for thrombocytopenia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions and is likely to complete the study as planned, as well as provided a written consent.
- A subject age between ≥20 and <75 years at time of informed consent.
- A subject who applies to one of the following:
- Female subject with non-childbearing potential [i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, who: has had a hysterectomy, or had a bilateral oophorectomy (ovariectomy), or had a bilateral tubal ligation, or is post-menopausal for greater than one year].
- Female subject with childbearing potential, has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test at screening and within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR, and completely abstains from intercourse or agree to use two of the following acceptable methods of contraception for 14 days before exposure to SB-497115-GR, throughout the clinical trial, and for 24 weeks after completion or premature discontinuation from the study.
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Subject who relapsed or did not respond after 48 weeks of Peg-IFN/RBV therapy had been given with sufficient dose previously.
- Subject with history of IFN (including Peg-IFN) therapy or Peg-IFN/RBV therapy, but could not been treated with optimal Peg-IFN/RBV therapy due to the reasons other than thrombocytopenia.
- Subject who received IFN therapy (including Peg-IFN), antiviral therapy (excluding oseltamivir phosphate, etc.), immuno-modulatory treatment, radiotherapy or phlebotomy within 3 months (90 days) prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR.
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the first dose of SB-497115-GR or 5 half-lives of that investigational drug (whichever is longer).
- Subject with decompensated liver disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SB-497115-GRTPO receptor agonist to increase platelet count | Drug | SB-497115-GR |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Whose Platelet Count Increased From a Baseline Count of < 80 Gi/L to a Count >=100 Gi/L During Part 1
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Participants were assessed for a shift from a baseline platelet count of <80 Gi/L to a count >=100 Gi/L during Part 1(up to 9 weeks). Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Number of Participants Whose Platelet Counts Maintained at >=50 Gi/L During Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline to up to Week 48 in Part 2
Participants were assessed for continuously maintaining platelet counts >=50 Gi/L during Part 2. Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.
56 secondary outcomes
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1
Time frame: Baseline, Week1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1
Time in Weeks to Achieve Platelet Count >= 100 Gi/L
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Median Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: Follow-up (FU) Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Minimum Platelet Count on Antiviral Therapy
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline to up to Week 48 in Part 2
Dose of Eltrombopag That Enabled Initiation of Antiviral Therapy
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1
Number of Antiviral Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of Peg-IFN Alpha-2a Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With the Indicated Levels of RBV Therapy Dose Reductions in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Time to First Dose Reduction of Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Peg-IFN Alpha-2a Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Peg-IFN Alpha 2a Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants Achieving Adherence to Peg-IFN Alpha-2b Antiviral Therapy in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Rapid Virological Response (RVR) and Extended RVR (eRVR) in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Early Virological Response (EVR) and Complete EVR (cEVR) in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With End of Treatment Response (ETR) for Undetectable HCV RNA at the End of Peg-IFN/RBV Treatment in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Mean Serum HCV RNA at the Indicated Time Points In Part 2
Time frame: Screening, Antviral baseline; Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Serum HCV RNA at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: FU Baseline, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part1
Time frame: From Baseline up to week 9 in Part 1
Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2
Time frame: From Antiviral Baseline up to Week 48 in Part 2
Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: From FU Baseline up to FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, and FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Antiviral Baseline in Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Heart Rate at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Weight at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Period
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Mean Body Temperature at the Indicated Time Points During Follow-up Period After Part 2
Time frame: FU Baseline, FU Week 4, FU Week 12 and FU Week 24 after Part 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at the Indicated Time Points in Part 1 With Follow-up Periodc
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Withdrawal in Part 1 and FU Week 4, FU Week 12, FU Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in BMI at the Indicated Time Points in Part 2
Time frame: Baseline; Antiviral Baseline,Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, Withdrawal in Part 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31258695Kawaguchi T, Komori A, Fujisaki K, Nishiguchi S, Kato M, Takagi H, Tanaka Y, Notsumata K, Mita E, Nomura H, Shibatoge M, Takaguchi K, Hattori T, Sata M, Koike K. Eltrombopag enables initiation and completion of pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy in Japanese HCV-infected patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):596-604. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7616. Epub 2019 May 24.
Related trials for Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of HT-101 and HT-102 in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of TAF in Reducing Clinical Events in CHB Patients Beyond Treatment Indications by Current Guidelines
Chronic Hepatitis b
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing SB-497115-GR in people with Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 16 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Whose Platelet Count Increased From a Baseline Count of < 80 Gi/L to a Count >=100 Gi/L During Part 1 (time frame: From Baseline up to Week 9 in Part 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01636778, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.