AzTrials
AzTrials

DiabetesNCT01637935

Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Bladder Cancer in Patients With Type II Diabetes

An observational study of Diabetes and Bladder Cancer, run by Takeda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess the potential association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer compared with non-pioglitazone users among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes, Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
Pioglitazone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
193,099 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2004to Aug 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study was conducted within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), which provides comprehensive healthcare services to approximately 3.2 million members. The source population was identified from the KPNC diabetes registry, which was first constructed in 1993 and has been updated annually since then. The registry identifies patients primarily from four data sources: primary hospital discharge diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (since 1971); two or more outpatient visit diagnoses of diabetes (since 1995); any prescription for a diabetes-related medication (since 1994); or any record of an abnormal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test (>6.7%) (since 1991). The diabetes registry gathers data from a variety of KPNC electronic medical records (EMR) to build and follow the registry cohort across time. These data include cancer registries, pharmacy records, laboratory records, and inpatient and outpatient medical diagnoses.

Who may be able to join

  • The study cohort included both patients with an established diagnosis of diabetes mellitus prior to January 1, 1997 and those who were newly diagnosed prior to December 31, 2002. Patients were eligible for the study cohort if they met any of the following criteria:
  • As of January 1, 1997 they had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, were age 40 or older and were members of KPNC,
  • They had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, reached age 40 between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2002 and were KPNC members on their 40th birthday, or
  • Had diabetes mellitus and were age 40 or older when they joined KPNC between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2002.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of bladder cancer recorded in the KPNC cancer registry prior to entry to the cohort or within 6 months of entry into KPNC.

About this study

Official title: Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Bladder Cancer in Patients With Diabetes

To assess the potential association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer compared with non-pioglitazone users among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Read the detailed description

Following guidance from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency, the University of Pennsylvania and Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) designed and conducted this study using the KPNC database to assess the potential association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The study was conducted over the course of 10 years, with a series of interim analyses undertaken during this period and provided to the sponsor (Takeda) and the appropriate regulatory agencies.

In 2011, the planned 5-year interim analysis of this study was published in Diabetes Care. That report included data from 1 January 1997 to 30 April 2008. Following reporting of these data, there was a request from the FDA for an additional fourth interim analysis at 8 years including data from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2010.

In August 2011 the FDA requested inclusion of a sensitivity analysis to assess change of cohort entry criteria to minimize left censoring of exposure. Included in the FDA request was a duration analysis for other antidiabetic medications.

In August 2014, the final 10-year analyses were completed and submitted to the sponsor and regulatory agencies.

Interim results previously posted on clinicaltrials.gov are available in the public archive

Being tested
Pioglitazone
Keywords
Drug therapy
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01637935
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pioglitazone exposed groupDefined as those patients having filled at least two prescriptions for pioglitazone within a 6-month period. Patients in the pioglitazone group may also have exposure to other diabetic medications
Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone unexposed groupDefined as patients who did not fill at least two prescriptions for pioglitazone within a 6-month period. Patients in the pioglitazone unexposed group may have been exposed to other diabetic medications. This group also included diabetic patients without any diabetic medications.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer (10-year Analysis)

    Incident bladder cancers were identified from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012.

    Measured: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Time Since Starting Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)

    Measured: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

  2. Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Duration of Pioglitazone Therapy (10 Year Analysis)

    Measured: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

  3. Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Cumulative Dose of Pioglitazone (10 Year Analysis)

    Measured: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

  4. Stage of Bladder Cancer (10 Year Analysis)

    Measured: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2004
  3. Primary completionAug 2014
  4. Study completionAug 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
193,099 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01637935
Sponsor's protocol ID
01-03-TL-OPI-524
Other IDs
U1111-1132-3482
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
7 Jul 2012
Last updated
7 Mar 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lewis JD, Ferrara A, Peng T, Hedderson M, Bilker WB, Quesenberry CP Jr, Vaughn DJ, Nessel L, Selby J, Strom BL. Risk of bladder cancer among diabetic patients treated with pioglitazone: interim report of a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):916-22. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1068.

    PubMed 21447663
  • Lewis JD, Habel LA, Quesenberry CP, Strom BL, Peng T, Hedderson MM, Ehrlich SF, Mamtani R, Bilker W, Vaughn DJ, Nessel L, Van Den Eeden SK, Ferrara A. Pioglitazone Use and Risk of Bladder Cancer and Other Common Cancers in Persons With Diabetes. JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):265-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7996.

    PubMed 26197187

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetes and Bladder Cancer, run by Takeda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incident Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer (10-year Analysis) (time frame: January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01637935, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT01637935 | AzTrials