ElderlyNCT01638845
Hip Fracture and Perineural Catheter
A study testing continuous perineural catheter in people with Elderly, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION: Hip Fracture is a public health problem because of its constantly increasing frequency and its high morbidity and mortality. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular decompensation, caused by painful phenomena associated with fracture and orthopedic surgery.With hip fracture, epidural local analgesia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Elderly
- What is being tested?
- continuous perineural catheter
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 166 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with an age greater than or equal to 60 years
- Patients who have written, informed consent was obtained
- Patients evaluated ASA 1, 2 and 3 according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (detailed below)
- Patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture
- Time less than 24 hours after a hip fracture
Who cannot join
- cons indication to regional anesthesia (constitutional or acquired disorder of coagulation, sepsis, local infection of the puncture area, history of vascular surgery prosthetic femoral neuropathy scalable, allergy to local anesthetics)
- weight <40Kg
- Patients receiving treatment hypocoagulable or antiplatelet therapy of type dipyridamole, ticlopidine and platelet αIIbβ3 receptor antagonists (excluding aspirin and clopidogrel)
- cons-indication for standardized anesthetic technique in this study
- cons-indication for analgesics used postoperatively (respiratory failure, severe liver failure, brain injury associated with intracranial hypertension, uncontrolled epilepsy, simultaneous treatment with MAOIs, hypersensitivity to opioids)
- Patient unable to give informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- adults under guardianship or curator
- persons not affiliated with a health insurance plan
- A person deprived of liberty
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
INTRODUCTION: Hip Fracture is a public health problem because of its constantly increasing frequency and its high morbidity and mortality. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular decompensation, caused by painful phenomena associated with fracture and orthopedic surgery.With hip fracture, epidural local analgesia techniques have proven their benefit in mortality but are associated with numerous side effects that prevent routine use. Peripheral analgesic techniques locoregional the lumbar plexus, much safer, cause a decrease in postoperative pain after surgery for hip fracture and a decrease in mortality at 6 months. Elderly patients suffering from a hip fracture, no study has investigated the effect of local analgesia continuous femoral perineural catheter on the incidence of cardiovascular events in the perioperative period.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this work is to show that perineural analgesia block continuous local anesthetic reduces the incidence of cardiovascular complications in the preoperative period of a patient with a hip fracture and fact, show that this technique decreases the incidence of mortality at one year of patients with a hip fracture (secondary objective).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, descriptive type. It compares two populations of patients: one has a perineural analgesia by continuous infusion via a catheter of ropivacaine (n = 157) associated with a systemic analgesia and the other only systemic analgesia without development of a catheter perineural (n = 157). The duration of patient participation will be 12 months. In the first 24 hours after a hip fracture after randomization, study participants will benefit from the installation under strict asepsis, a continuous block by catheter, placed by an anesthesiologist experienced control room post-interventional. The local analgesia will be provided by continuous administration via the perineural catheter, ropivacaine for 5 days for the treated group. Except the local analgesia protocol, the protocols pre-and postoperative systemic analgesia and general anesthesia will be identical for all participants of the 2 groups, similar to techniques proposed in the context of everyday clinical practice, ensuring analgesia optimal for all patients in the study. The main features will be found three bioassays Troponin IC and 3 electrocardiograms at the entrance to the hospital, J3 and J5 after inclusion. In addition, cardiovascular clinical monitoring and quantification of pain ( will be performed daily for 8 days after inclusion. Finally, an assessment of higher functions by ladder MMS will be conducted at the entrance, J3, J5 and J8. Moreover, a survey of survival at 1 month, 3 months and 1 year will be realized.
- Conditions
- Elderly
- Being tested
- continuous perineural catheter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
continuous perineural catheterProcedure or surgery
continuous perineural catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| continuous perineural catheter | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: continuous perineural catheter |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with cardiovascular events during the preoperative period
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ElderlyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, RouenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vincent COMPERE, Pr, Principal investigator, UH Rouen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01638845
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2008/072/HP
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Guay J, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 25;11(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3.
PubMed 33238043
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hip Fracture and Perineural Catheter
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01638845
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2008/072/HP
- Conditions
- Elderly
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION: Hip Fracture is a public health problem because of its constantly increasing frequency and its high morbidity and mortality. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular decompensation, caused by painful phenomena associated with fracture and orthopedic surgery.With hip fracture, epidural local analgesia techniques have proven their benefit in mortality but are associated with numerous side effects that prevent routine use. Peripheral analgesic techniques locoregional the lumbar plexus, much safer, cause a decrease in postoperative pain after surgery for hip fracture and a decrease in mortality at 6 months. Elderly patients suffering from a hip fracture, no study has investigated the effect of local analgesia continuous femoral perineural catheter on the incidence of cardiovascular events in the perioperative period.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this work is to show that perineural analgesia block continuous local anesthetic reduces the incidence of cardiovascular complications in the preoperative period of a patient with a hip fracture and fact, show that this technique decreases the incidence of mortality at one year of patients with a hip fracture (secondary objective).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, descriptive type. It compares two populations of patients: one has a perineural analgesia by continuous infusion via a catheter of ropivacaine (n = 157) associated with a systemic analgesia and the other only systemic analgesia without development of a catheter perineural (n = 157). The duration of patient participation will be 12 months. In the first 24 hours after a hip fracture after randomization, study participants will benefit from the installation under strict asepsis, a continuous block by catheter, placed by an anesthesiologist experienced control room post-interventional. The local analgesia will be provided by continuous administration via the perineural catheter, ropivacaine for 5 days for the treated group. Except the local analgesia protocol, the protocols pre-and postoperative systemic analgesia and general anesthesia will be identical for all participants of the 2 groups, similar to techniques proposed in the context of everyday clinical practice, ensuring analgesia optimal for all patients in the study. The main features will be found three bioassays Troponin IC and 3 electrocardiograms at the entrance to the hospital, J3 and J5 after inclusion. In addition, cardiovascular clinical monitoring and quantification of pain ( will be performed daily for 8 days after inclusion. Finally, an assessment of higher functions by ladder MMS will be conducted at the entrance, J3, J5 and J8. Moreover, a survey of survival at 1 month, 3 months and 1 year will be realized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| continuous perineural catheter | Active comparator | Procedure: continuous perineural catheter |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with an age greater than or equal to 60 years
- Patients who have written, informed consent was obtained
- Patients evaluated ASA 1, 2 and 3 according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (detailed below)
- Patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture
- Time less than 24 hours after a hip fracture
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- cons indication to regional anesthesia (constitutional or acquired disorder of coagulation, sepsis, local infection of the puncture area, history of vascular surgery prosthetic femoral neuropathy scalable, allergy to local anesthetics)
- weight <40Kg
- Patients receiving treatment hypocoagulable or antiplatelet therapy of type dipyridamole, ticlopidine and platelet αIIbβ3 receptor antagonists (excluding aspirin and clopidogrel)
- cons-indication for standardized anesthetic technique in this study
- cons-indication for analgesics used postoperatively (respiratory failure, severe liver failure, brain injury associated with intracranial hypertension, uncontrolled epilepsy, simultaneous treatment with MAOIs, hypersensitivity to opioids)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| continuous perineural cathetercontinuous perineural catheter | Procedure or surgery | continuous perineural catheter |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with cardiovascular events during the preoperative period
Time frame: 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33238043Guay J, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 25;11(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3.
Related trials for Elderly
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vincent COMPERE, Pr principal investigator
UH Rouen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing continuous perineural catheter in people with Elderly, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with cardiovascular events during the preoperative period (time frame: 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01638845, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2016.