Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 4NCT01639703
Hepatic Xenetix-CT Perfusion
A Phase 4 study testing Xenetix-CT perfusion imaging in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Guerbet at 5 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the diagnostic value of Xenetix-CT perfusion for the discrimination between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, in histo-pathologically proven HCC, and with the aim to cover the entire liver. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Xenetix-CT perfusion imaging
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2012to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects diagnosed for HCC and planned for surgery (lobectomy or transplantation) within a timeframe of 30 days between first imaging procedure used for the study and surgery.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have undergone prior TACE (TransArterial Chemo Embolization), prior RFA (Radio Frequency Ablation) or prior SIRT (Selected Internal Radio Therapy) within one year before inclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 4 countries.
5 sites in 4 countries
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Contribution of XENETIX® CT PERFUSION in Pre-therapeutical Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the diagnostic value of Xenetix-CT perfusion for the discrimination between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, in histo-pathologically proven HCC, and with the aim to cover the entire liver.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Xenetix-CT perfusion imaging
- Keywords
- CT perfusion, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Xenetix, Contrast agent
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Xenetix-CT perfusion imagingDrug
Injection of 50 ml of Xenetix
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CT perfusion | Experimental | arm with CT perfusion Receives: Drug: Xenetix-CT perfusion imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood Volume (BV) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow (BF) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface (PS) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Arterial Liver Perfusion (ALP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Portal Venous Liver Perfusion (PVP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Total Liver Perfusion (TLP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
TLP = ALP + PVP
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Hepatic Perfusion Index (HPI) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype.
Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype.
Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype.
Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category.
Measured: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2012
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Guerbet
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hatem Alkadhi, Principal investigator, Zurich University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01639703
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ISO-44-013
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Contribution of XENETIX® CT PERFUSION in Pre-therapeutical Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01639703
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISO-44-013
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- CT perfusion, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Xenetix, Contrast agent
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GuerbetIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the diagnostic value of Xenetix-CT perfusion for the discrimination between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, in histo-pathologically proven HCC, and with the aim to cover the entire liver.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CT perfusion | Experimental | Drug: Xenetix-CT perfusion imagingarm with CT perfusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects diagnosed for HCC and planned for surgery (lobectomy or transplantation) within a timeframe of 30 days between first imaging procedure used for the study and surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects who have undergone prior TACE (TransArterial Chemo Embolization), prior RFA (Radio Frequency Ablation) or prior SIRT (Selected Internal Radio Therapy) within one year before inclusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Xenetix-CT perfusion imagingInjection of 50 ml of Xenetix | Drug | CT perfusion |
Primary outcome
Blood Volume (BV) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Blood Flow (BF) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
Permeability Surface (PS) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site.
10 secondary outcomes
Arterial Liver Perfusion (ALP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Portal Venous Liver Perfusion (PVP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Total Liver Perfusion (TLP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Hepatic Perfusion Index (HPI) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31)
Time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study of ACC-1898 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study Protocol: LIVER-R
Hepatobiliary Cancers
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Long-Term Extension Study for Participants Previously Enrolled in an Exelixis-Sponsored Study
Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
Active, not recruiting
BioPearl™ Microspheres Loaded With Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Nivolumab With or Without Relatlimab for Patients With Potentially Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hatem Alkadhi principal investigator
Zurich University Hospital
5 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Xenetix-CT perfusion imaging in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Guerbet at 5 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in South Korea, Austria, Germany, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood Volume (BV) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation (time frame: Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2017.