Prostatic NeoplasmsNCT01640262
Evaluation of Modern MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in a Danish Setup
An observational study of Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Clinical staging of prostate cancer in Denmark is determined solely by digital rectal examination and sometimes by TRUS, even though the investigators know these examinations are inaccurate and have limitations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)
- How many people
- 170 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * Study 1 is offered to 140 patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer and is comparing mMRI to TRUS and DRE in the assessment of the clinical stage of prostate cancer. * Study 2 is offered to 55 patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer who have undergone Brachytherapy and is comparing MRI to CT scan performed 4 weeks after surgery in the evaluation of postoperative dosimetry (treatment effect). * Study 3 is offered to 55 patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings. Standardised TRUS-guided re-biopsies as well as TRUS biopsies of any MRI-suspicious lesion are performed in the same session and marked separately. The MRI-targeted biopsies are compared to the standard TRUS-guided re-biopsies to see if multiparametric MRI can detect prostate cancer invisible on transrectal ultrasound; in order to improve detection rate.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly diagnosed localized (T1-2) or locally advanced (T3)prostate cancer
- Patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent brachytherapy 4 weeks prior to MRI.
- Patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings.
Who cannot join
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- Prostate cancer treatment
- Known allergic reaction to Gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent
- Prostate biopsy during the last 21 days
- Impaired renal function with GFR < 30 ml / min
- pacemaker
Show all 30Show fewer
- Magnetic metal residues in the body
- Claustrophobia
- Psychiatric disorders
- Age under 18 years
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- Prostate cancer treatment other than Brachytherapy
- Known allergic reaction to Gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent
- Prostate biopsy during the last 21 days
- Impaired renal function with GFR < 30 ml / min
- pacemaker
- Magnetic metal residues in the body
- Claustrophobia
- Psychiatric disorders
- Age under 18 years
- Histological positive prostate biopsies and known prostate cancer
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- Known allergic reaction to Gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent
- Prostate biopsy during the last 21 days
- Impaired renal function with GFR < 30 ml / min
- pacemaker
- Magnetic metal residues in the body
- Claustrophobia
- Psychiatric disorders
- Age under 18 years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Department of Urology, Herlev University Hospital
Herlev, Herlev, 2730
About this study
Clinical staging of prostate cancer in Denmark is determined solely by digital rectal examination and sometimes by TRUS, even though the investigators know these examinations are inaccurate and have limitations. Since the majority of men diagnosed with prostate cancer will die with their disease and not of their disease, and the different treatment-options may imply greater side effects, it is important to improve the diagnostic localization and staging of the tumour for optimal clinical management and therapy selection.
The development of modern multiparametric-high-field-magnetic-imaging (mMRI) offers new possibilities and approaches in detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer due to its high resolution and soft-tissue contrast. mMRI can provide information about the morphological, metabolic and cellular changes and characterize tissue- and tumour- vascularity and correlate it with tumour aggressiveness. This helps to locate and stage a possible tumour and to guide targeted-biopsies towards disease-suspicious areas. Internationally published data support the rapidly growing use of multiparametric MRI, as being the most sensitive and specific imaging tool for prostate cancer patients.
While mMRI internationally is a well recognized and accepted method for detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer, the use of mMRI in the diagnosis of PCa in Denmark has never been applied. Therefore, this project is carried out in order to evaluate the use of modern mMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a Danish setup.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer (PCa) is now the most frequently diagnosed male malignant disease in Denmark with more than 4000 new cases each year. PCa is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in the western world. During their lifetime, one in six men will be clinically diagnosed with Prostate cancer and approximately one out of thirty will die of the disease. We know from autopsies that more than half of the male-population above the age of 60 is found to have histological cancer-changes. Therefore, the majority of men with histological proven cancer-changes will never develop a clinical disease that would affect their morbidity and mortality.
An elevated PSA (blood sample) and/or an abnormal rectal examination are indications of PCa. The diagnosis is made by trans-rectal-ultrasound guided biopsies (TRUS-biopsies) followed by histological examination. Each biopsy-session includes 10 to 12 biopsy-cores taken from standard locations throughout the prostate. Since over 40 % of the cancers are isoechoic on ultrasound and cannot be seen, there is a high risk that the tumour is either missed or that the most aggressive part of the tumour is not biopsied.
If you find a prostate cancer, it is important to know if the cancer is localized within the prostate or if it grows outside of the capsule. This is called staging and is essential in determine the best treatment-strategy and the patient's prognosis. In Denmark, staging is determined by digital rectal examination and sometimes by TRUS, even though we know these examinations are inaccurate and have limitations. It is important to improve the diagnostic localization and staging of the tumour for optimal clinical management and therapy selection.
The development of modern multiparametric-high-field-magnetic-imaging (mMRI) offers new possibilities and approaches in detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer due to its high resolution and soft-tissue contrast. mMRI can provide information about the morphological, metabolic and cellular changes and characterize tissue- and tumour- vascularity and correlate it with tumour aggressiveness. This helps to locate and stage a possible tumour and to guide targeted-biopsies towards disease-suspicious areas. Internationally published data support the rapidly growing use of multiparametric MRI, as being the most sensitive and specific imaging tool for prostate cancer patients.
The primary objective of this project is to investigate whether the use of modern MRI in Denmark can:
- Improve the diagnosis of Danish men suspected of prostate cancer and
- Improve the diagnosis and treatment planning of Danish men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer.
The secondary goal is to gain experience in the use of modern MRI in Denmark to evaluate prostatic tumors. This study forms the basis for investigating whether modern MRI should be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for selected patients in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
The project contains three separate studies evaluating the adjunct diagnostic value of mMRI to the conventional standard diagnostic evaluation and treatment.
The three studies:
- Study 1 is offered to patients with newly diagnosed localized non-metastatic prostate cancer and is comparing mMRI to TRUS and DRE in clinical classification of the cancer.
- Study 2 is offered to patients with newly diagnosed localized non-metastatic prostate cancer who underwent Brachytherapy and is comparing mMRI to CT-scan performed 4 weeks after surgery in the evaluation of postoperative dosimetry (treatment effect).
- Study 3 is offered to patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings to see if multiparametric MRI can detect prostate cancer invisible on transrectal ultrasound; in order to improve detection rate.
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)
- Keywords
- prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Staging
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)Other
A mMRI is performed before treatment of the patient and is compared to the standard diagnostic tools for evaluating the clinical stage and diagnose of prostate cancer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| localized prostate cancer | Danish men with localized prostate cancer Receives: Other: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the diagnosis and treatment planning based on MRI examination
Study 1: Change in clinical T-stage (TNM-classification) at baseline compared to the patological T-stage after curative treatment approx. 4 weeks later.
Study 2: Change in prostatic volumen expressed in milliliter(ml) on CT and MRI 4 weeks after brachytherapy-operation compared to the prostatic volumen on TRUS at baseline.
Study 3: Change detectionrate of prostatecancer using MRI-targeted biopsies.
Measured: The participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital diagnostic investagation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
To gain experience in the use of modern multiparametric MRI in Denmark to evaluate prostatic tumors.
This study forms the basis for investigating whether modern MRI should be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for selected patients in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostatic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lars P. Boesen, M.D., Principal investigator, Department of Urology and Radiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01640262
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-1-2011-066
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Modern MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in a Danish Setup
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01640262
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-1-2011-066
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Keywords
- prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Staging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital at HerlevUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical staging of prostate cancer in Denmark is determined solely by digital rectal examination and sometimes by TRUS, even though the investigators know these examinations are inaccurate and have limitations. Since the majority of men diagnosed with prostate cancer will die with their disease and not of their disease, and the different treatment-options may imply greater side effects, it is important to improve the diagnostic localization and staging of the tumour for optimal clinical management and therapy selection.
The development of modern multiparametric-high-field-magnetic-imaging (mMRI) offers new possibilities and approaches in detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer due to its high resolution and soft-tissue contrast. mMRI can provide information about the morphological, metabolic and cellular changes and characterize tissue- and tumour- vascularity and correlate it with tumour aggressiveness. This helps to locate and stage a possible tumour and to guide targeted-biopsies towards disease-suspicious areas. Internationally published data support the rapidly growing use of multiparametric MRI, as being the most sensitive and specific imaging tool for prostate cancer patients.
While mMRI internationally is a well recognized and accepted method for detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer, the use of mMRI in the diagnosis of PCa in Denmark has never been applied. Therefore, this project is carried out in order to evaluate the use of modern mMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a Danish setup.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer (PCa) is now the most frequently diagnosed male malignant disease in Denmark with more than 4000 new cases each year. PCa is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in the western world. During their lifetime, one in six men will be clinically diagnosed with Prostate cancer and approximately one out of thirty will die of the disease. We know from autopsies that more than half of the male-population above the age of 60 is found to have histological cancer-changes. Therefore, the majority of men with histological proven cancer-changes will never develop a clinical disease that would affect their morbidity and mortality.
An elevated PSA (blood sample) and/or an abnormal rectal examination are indications of PCa. The diagnosis is made by trans-rectal-ultrasound guided biopsies (TRUS-biopsies) followed by histological examination. Each biopsy-session includes 10 to 12 biopsy-cores taken from standard locations throughout the prostate. Since over 40 % of the cancers are isoechoic on ultrasound and cannot be seen, there is a high risk that the tumour is either missed or that the most aggressive part of the tumour is not biopsied.
If you find a prostate cancer, it is important to know if the cancer is localized within the prostate or if it grows outside of the capsule. This is called staging and is essential in determine the best treatment-strategy and the patient's prognosis. In Denmark, staging is determined by digital rectal examination and sometimes by TRUS, even though we know these examinations are inaccurate and have limitations. It is important to improve the diagnostic localization and staging of the tumour for optimal clinical management and therapy selection.
The development of modern multiparametric-high-field-magnetic-imaging (mMRI) offers new possibilities and approaches in detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer due to its high resolution and soft-tissue contrast. mMRI can provide information about the morphological, metabolic and cellular changes and characterize tissue- and tumour- vascularity and correlate it with tumour aggressiveness. This helps to locate and stage a possible tumour and to guide targeted-biopsies towards disease-suspicious areas. Internationally published data support the rapidly growing use of multiparametric MRI, as being the most sensitive and specific imaging tool for prostate cancer patients.
The primary objective of this project is to investigate whether the use of modern MRI in Denmark can:
- Improve the diagnosis of Danish men suspected of prostate cancer and
- Improve the diagnosis and treatment planning of Danish men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer.
The secondary goal is to gain experience in the use of modern MRI in Denmark to evaluate prostatic tumors. This study forms the basis for investigating whether modern MRI should be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for selected patients in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
The project contains three separate studies evaluating the adjunct diagnostic value of mMRI to the conventional standard diagnostic evaluation and treatment.
The three studies:
- Study 1 is offered to patients with newly diagnosed localized non-metastatic prostate cancer and is comparing mMRI to TRUS and DRE in clinical classification of the cancer.
- Study 2 is offered to patients with newly diagnosed localized non-metastatic prostate cancer who underwent Brachytherapy and is comparing mMRI to CT-scan performed 4 weeks after surgery in the evaluation of postoperative dosimetry (treatment effect).
- Study 3 is offered to patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings to see if multiparametric MRI can detect prostate cancer invisible on transrectal ultrasound; in order to improve detection rate.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| localized prostate cancer | – | Other: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)Danish men with localized prostate cancer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * Study 1 is offered to 140 patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer and is comparing mMRI to TRUS and DRE in the assessment of the clinical stage of prostate cancer. * Study 2 is offered to 55 patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer who have undergone Brachytherapy and is comparing MRI to CT scan performed 4 weeks after surgery in the evaluation of postoperative dosimetry (treatment effect). * Study 3 is offered to 55 patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings. Standardised TRUS-guided re-biopsies as well as TRUS biopsies of any MRI-suspicious lesion are performed in the same session and marked separately. The MRI-targeted biopsies are compared to the standard TRUS-guided re-biopsies to see if multiparametric MRI can detect prostate cancer invisible on transrectal ultrasound; in order to improve detection rate.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with newly diagnosed localized (T1-2) or locally advanced (T3)prostate cancer
- Patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent brachytherapy 4 weeks prior to MRI.
- Patients scheduled for re-biopsy due to continuing suspicion of prostate cancer after standard TRUS-guided biopsies with negative findings.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- Prostate cancer treatment
- Known allergic reaction to Gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent
- Prostate biopsy during the last 21 days
- Impaired renal function with GFR < 30 ml / min
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)A mMRI is performed before treatment of the patient and is compared to the standard diagnostic tools for evaluating the clinical stage and diagnose of prostate cancer | Other | localized prostate cancer |
Primary outcome
Change in the diagnosis and treatment planning based on MRI examination
Time frame: The participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital diagnostic investagation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Study 1: Change in clinical T-stage (TNM-classification) at baseline compared to the patological T-stage after curative treatment approx. 4 weeks later. Study 2: Change in prostatic volumen expressed in milliliter(ml) on CT and MRI 4 weeks after brachytherapy-operation compared to the prostatic volumen on TRUS at baseline. Study 3: Change detectionrate of prostatecancer using MRI-targeted biopsies.
1 secondary outcome
To gain experience in the use of modern multiparametric MRI in Denmark to evaluate prostatic tumors.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2016.
Related trials for Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lars P. Boesen, M.D. principal investigator
Department of Urology and Radiology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the diagnosis and treatment planning based on MRI examination (time frame: The participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital diagnostic investagation, an expected average of 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2016.