Overactive BladderPhase 2NCT01642277
Bacterial Genomic Sequencing in Overactive Bladder
A Phase 2 study testing Solifenacin in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Loyola University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
No one really knows what causes overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). Urinary tract infection (UTI)causes similar symptoms to OAB with the difference being the presence of bacteria, as evidenced by routine microbiology cultures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 89 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder
- What is being tested?
- Solifenacin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Controls: Women without bother from urinary symptoms will be screened for potential study participation using the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI). Women with negative urinary responses will be further screened for participation using the following eligibility criteria:
- no anticholinergic medications for bladder conditions,
- no antibiotic exposure in the past 4 weeks for any reason,
- no immunologic deficiency,
- no pelvic malignancy or pelvic radiation, and
- Untreated symptomatic POP > POP-Q Stage II.
Show all 15Show fewer
- OAB cohort: Women with bother from overactive bladder symptoms will be screened for potential study participation using the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI). Women with positive urinary responses for urge predominant symptoms will be further screened for participation using the following eligibility criteria:
- willing to take Solifenacin as treatment for OAB,
- no neurological disease known to affect the lower urinary tract,
- no current UTI (based on urine dipstick) or recurrent UTI,
- no antibiotic exposure in the past 4 weeks for any reason,
- no immunologic deficiency,
- no pelvic malignancy or pelvic radiation,
- untreated symptomatic POP > POP-Q Stage II,
- no contraindications to receiving Solifenacin.
Who cannot join
- Women who are of child-bearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, intending to become pregnant during the study or not practicing a reliable form of contraception are also excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Short Term Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder on the Female Urinary Microbiome
No one really knows what causes overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). Urinary tract infection (UTI)causes similar symptoms to OAB with the difference being the presence of bacteria, as evidenced by routine microbiology cultures. Recent work by the group on the genitourinary microbiome (GUM) has shown that female urine, even in the absence of culture evidence of bacteria does have evidence of bacterial DNA. Bacterial 16S rRNA can be isolated from urine and sequenced to identify bacterial species present in urine. From this the investigators can hypothesize that urinary bacteria contribute to urinary symptoms and that there is a difference in the bacterial communities in the urine of women who respond to Solifenacin, a drug used to treat OAB, versus those that do not.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective study with two groups: Women who have accepted a clinical recommendation for OAB treatment with solifenacin and a comparator (control) group of women unaffected by OAB. All women will have a baseline urine assessment with bacterial genome sequencing. Solifenacin treated patients will also have urine assessments with bacterial genomic sequencing at 4 and 12 weeks on treatment.
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Being tested
- Solifenacin
- Keywords
- Overactive Bladder, OAB, Urinary Tract Infection, UTI, Microbiome, Bacteria, Solifenacin, 16S rRNA sequence
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SolifenacinDrug
Also called Vesicare
5 mg for 4 weeks with option to increase to 10 mg for an additional 8 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Women using Solifenacin for OAB treatment | Experimental | Solifenacin treated women: Women with OAB who are prescribed solifenacin Receives: Drug: Solifenacin |
| Control: Women without OAB | No intervention | Women without OAB who are not prescribed solifenacin. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bacterial Genomic Sequencing
Participants were classified into Low Biomass, Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Diverse, and Other urotypes based on the bacterial DNA at baseline.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Assessment of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABQ)
The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) was developed to assess symptom bother and the impact of overactive bladder (OAB) on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The instrument comprises 33 items. Response options for the symptom frequency and HRQL items are presented as 6-point Likert scales ranging from 'none of the time' to 'all of the time' for symptom frequency (and 'not at all' to 'a very great deal' for symptom bother). From these 33 items, six sub-scales are assessed separately: (1) OAB symptom severity, (2) Coping with OAB symptoms, (3) Concern for OAB symptoms, (4) Sleep as a function of OAB symptoms, (5) Social functioning as a consequence of OAB symptoms, and (6) Health related quality of life (HRQL) as a function of OAB symptoms. Each sub-scale score ranges from 0 to 100 (where higher scores indicate more severe OAB symptoms and lower scores indicate minimal symptom severity).
Measured: End of study (Week 12)
Assessment of Pelvic Floor Disease Inventory (PFDI) Questionnaire
The PFDI comprises 46 items on a 4-point symptom severity scale ranging from 1 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Quite a bit". From these items, 13 separate sub-scales are reported: (1) Obstructive discomfort, (2) Irritation, (3) Stress resulting from urinal distress, (4) A general sub-scale for pelvic organ prolapse distress, (5) An anterior sub-scale for pelvic organ prolapse distress, (6) A posterior sub-scale for pelvic organ prolapse distress, (7) An obstructive sub-scale for colorectal anal distress, (8) Incontinence, (9) Pain, and (10) A rectal prolapse sub-scale for colorectal anal distress. For each of these sub-scales, scores from from 0 to 100 (where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity). There are three additional sub-scales: (11) The urinary distress inventory, (12) The pelvic organ distress inventory, and (13) The colorectal distress inventory. Each of these ranges from 0 to 400 (with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity).
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Loyola University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alan J. Wolfe, Loyola University
- Investigators
- Alan J Wolffe, PhD, Principal investigator, Loyola University Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01642277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 204195
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 7 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
PubMed 19941278Hartmann KE, McPheeters ML, Biller DH, Ward RM, McKoy JN, Jerome RN, Micucci SR, Meints L, Fisher JA, Scott TA, Slaughter JC, Blume JD. Treatment of overactive bladder in women. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Aug;(187):1-120, v.
PubMed 19947666Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09993.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
PubMed 21231991de Boer TA, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Kelleher C, van Kerrebroeck P, Kirby MG, Koelbl H, Espuna-Pons M, Milsom I, Tubaro A, Wagg A, Vierhout ME. Pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):30-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20858.
PubMed 20025017Sajadi KP, Vasavada SP. Overactive bladder after sling surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Nov;11(6):366-71. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0136-2.
PubMed 20803179Mostwin JL. Pathophysiology: the varieties of bladder overactivity. Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5 Suppl 1):22-6; discussion 27. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01788-0.
PubMed 12493346Michel MC, Chapple CR. Basic mechanisms of urgency: roles and benefits of pharmacotherapy. World J Urol. 2009 Dec;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0446-5.
PubMed 19588154Ohtake A, Sato S, Sasamata M, Miyata K. The forefront for novel therapeutic agents based on the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction: ameliorative effect of solifenacin succinate (Vesicare), a bladder-selective antimuscarinic agent, on overactive bladder symptoms, especially urgency episodes. J Pharmacol Sci. 2010;112(2):135-41. doi: 10.1254/jphs.09r13fm. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
PubMed 20134114Hoffstetter S, Leong FC. Solifenacin succinate for the treatment of overactive bladder. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Mar;5(3):345-50. doi: 10.1517/17425250902762866.
PubMed 19331596Pelman RS, Capo JP Jr, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S. Solifenacin at 3 years: a review of efficacy and safety. Postgrad Med. 2008 Jul;120(2):85-91. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2008.07.1795.
PubMed 18654073Haab F, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Ridder AM; Solifenacin Study Group. Long-term open-label solifenacin treatment associated with persistence with therapy in patients with overactive bladder syndrome. Eur Urol. 2005 Mar;47(3):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.004. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
PubMed 15716204Santos JC, Telo ER. Solifenacin: scientific evidence in the treatment of overactive bladder. Arch Esp Urol. 2010 Apr;63(3):197-213. English, Spanish.
PubMed 20431184Oliver JD. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol. 2005 Feb;43 Spec No:93-100.
PubMed 15765062Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, Fitzgerald M, Mueller ER, Schreckenberger P, Dong Q, Nelson DE, Brubaker L. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1376-83. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05852-11. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
PubMed 22278835Thomas-White KJ, Hilt EE, Fok C, Pearce MM, Mueller ER, Kliethermes S, Jacobs K, Zilliox MJ, Brincat C, Price TK, Kuffel G, Schreckenberger P, Gai X, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. Incontinence medication response relates to the female urinary microbiota. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):723-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2847-x. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PubMed 26423260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Short Term Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder on the Female Urinary Microbiome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01642277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 204195
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Keywords
- Overactive Bladder, OAB, Urinary Tract Infection, UTI, Microbiome, Bacteria, Solifenacin, 16S rRNA sequence
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Loyola UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
No one really knows what causes overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). Urinary tract infection (UTI)causes similar symptoms to OAB with the difference being the presence of bacteria, as evidenced by routine microbiology cultures. Recent work by the group on the genitourinary microbiome (GUM) has shown that female urine, even in the absence of culture evidence of bacteria does have evidence of bacterial DNA. Bacterial 16S rRNA can be isolated from urine and sequenced to identify bacterial species present in urine. From this the investigators can hypothesize that urinary bacteria contribute to urinary symptoms and that there is a difference in the bacterial communities in the urine of women who respond to Solifenacin, a drug used to treat OAB, versus those that do not.
Detailed description
This is a prospective study with two groups: Women who have accepted a clinical recommendation for OAB treatment with solifenacin and a comparator (control) group of women unaffected by OAB. All women will have a baseline urine assessment with bacterial genome sequencing. Solifenacin treated patients will also have urine assessments with bacterial genomic sequencing at 4 and 12 weeks on treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Women using Solifenacin for OAB treatment | Experimental | Drug: SolifenacinSolifenacin treated women: Women with OAB who are prescribed solifenacin |
| Control: Women without OAB | No intervention | –Women without OAB who are not prescribed solifenacin. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 89 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Controls: Women without bother from urinary symptoms will be screened for potential study participation using the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI). Women with negative urinary responses will be further screened for participation using the following eligibility criteria:
- no anticholinergic medications for bladder conditions,
- no antibiotic exposure in the past 4 weeks for any reason,
- no immunologic deficiency,
- no pelvic malignancy or pelvic radiation, and
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women who are of child-bearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, intending to become pregnant during the study or not practicing a reliable form of contraception are also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SolifenacinAlso: Vesicare5 mg for 4 weeks with option to increase to 10 mg for an additional 8 weeks | Drug | Women using Solifenacin for OAB treatment |
Primary outcome
Bacterial Genomic Sequencing
Time frame: 12 weeks
Participants were classified into Low Biomass, Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Diverse, and Other urotypes based on the bacterial DNA at baseline.
2 secondary outcomes
Assessment of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABQ)
Time frame: End of study (Week 12)
Assessment of Pelvic Floor Disease Inventory (PFDI) Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Dec 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19941278Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
- Background: PubMed 19947666Hartmann KE, McPheeters ML, Biller DH, Ward RM, McKoy JN, Jerome RN, Micucci SR, Meints L, Fisher JA, Scott TA, Slaughter JC, Blume JD. Treatment of overactive bladder in women. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Aug;(187):1-120, v.
- Background: PubMed 21231991Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09993.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 20025017de Boer TA, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Kelleher C, van Kerrebroeck P, Kirby MG, Koelbl H, Espuna-Pons M, Milsom I, Tubaro A, Wagg A, Vierhout ME. Pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):30-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20858.
- Background: PubMed 20803179Sajadi KP, Vasavada SP. Overactive bladder after sling surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Nov;11(6):366-71. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0136-2.
- Background: PubMed 12493346Mostwin JL. Pathophysiology: the varieties of bladder overactivity. Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5 Suppl 1):22-6; discussion 27. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01788-0.
- Background: PubMed 19588154Michel MC, Chapple CR. Basic mechanisms of urgency: roles and benefits of pharmacotherapy. World J Urol. 2009 Dec;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0446-5.
- Background: PubMed 20134114Ohtake A, Sato S, Sasamata M, Miyata K. The forefront for novel therapeutic agents based on the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction: ameliorative effect of solifenacin succinate (Vesicare), a bladder-selective antimuscarinic agent, on overactive bladder symptoms, especially urgency episodes. J Pharmacol Sci. 2010;112(2):135-41. doi: 10.1254/jphs.09r13fm. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 19331596Hoffstetter S, Leong FC. Solifenacin succinate for the treatment of overactive bladder. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Mar;5(3):345-50. doi: 10.1517/17425250902762866.
- Background: PubMed 18654073Pelman RS, Capo JP Jr, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S. Solifenacin at 3 years: a review of efficacy and safety. Postgrad Med. 2008 Jul;120(2):85-91. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2008.07.1795.
- Background: PubMed 15716204Haab F, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Ridder AM; Solifenacin Study Group. Long-term open-label solifenacin treatment associated with persistence with therapy in patients with overactive bladder syndrome. Eur Urol. 2005 Mar;47(3):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.004. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 20431184Santos JC, Telo ER. Solifenacin: scientific evidence in the treatment of overactive bladder. Arch Esp Urol. 2010 Apr;63(3):197-213. English, Spanish.
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
RecruitingObservational study
Tensi+ European Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up
Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Symptoms Among People With Stroke
Stroke, Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruiting
Parasacral TENS Project
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
INTIBIA Pivotal Study
Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
A Real World Study of eCoin for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Post Approval Evaluation (RECIPE)
Overactive Bladder, Urge Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alan J Wolffe, PhD principal investigator
Loyola University Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Solifenacin in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Loyola University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bacterial Genomic Sequencing (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01642277, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2015.