AzTrials
AzTrials

Long-term Retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support SkillsNCT01646372

Does Instruction on Cognitive Aid Use Improve Performance and Retention of Skills?

A study testing Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching and Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training in people with Long-term Retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether formal instruction on the use of cognitive aids in managing a crisis will result in better longterm retention of knowledge and skills. In particular, this study examines the impact of cognitive aid teaching on the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching and Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2012to 31 Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Post-graduate Medical trainee in departments of Anesthesia, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine
  • Has taken ACLS Course at least once

Who cannot join

  • Never taken ACLS Course

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • The Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Does Instruction on Cognitive Aid Use Improve Performance and Retention of Skills? A Simulation Based Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether formal instruction on the use of cognitive aids in managing a crisis will result in better longterm retention of knowledge and skills. In particular, this study examines the impact of cognitive aid teaching on the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course.

Being tested
Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching, Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training
Keywords
Medical Education, Cognitive Aid, Crisis Resource Management, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Skills Retention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher TeachingOther

    45min-1 hour time. 15 minutes didactic review of 2010 ACLS guidelines followed by practice simulated megacodes

  • Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher trainingOther

    45min-1 hour time. 15 minutes didactic review of 2010 ACLS guidelines followed by simulated ACLS megacode practice focused on the use of Cognitive Aids to guide management.

Study groups in NCT01646372
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupActive comparatorThis group gets a simulation based ACLS refresher as treatment, but no access to cognitive aids for any of the tests.
Receives: Other: Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching
2nd Control GroupActive comparatorThis group receives a standard Simulation based ACLS refresher as the intervention, like the control group. No mention is made of Cognitive Aids in the teaching, but they are available during the post-test and retention post-test.
Receives: Other: Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching
Cognitive Aid GroupExperimentalThis group receives Cognitive Aid based teaching as the intervention. They also have access to cognitive aids for post-test and retention post-test
Receives: Other: Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ACLS Megacode Examination Scale Score

    Simulated scenarios will be videotaped. These will be scored according to the ACLS megacode testing checklist by trained video raters

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Anesthesia Non-Technical Skills Scale (ANTS)

    Simulated Scenarios will be videotaped. Videos will be scored by trained raters according to the validated Anesthesia Nontechnical Skills Scale.

    Measured: 6 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2016
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01646372
Sponsor's protocol ID
OHRI-20120006
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
16 Jul 2012
Last updated
28 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching and Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training in people with Long-term Retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ACLS Megacode Examination Scale Score (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in