Mobility LimitationVTTNCT01647802
Cross-over Study of Three Modular Devices for Aid in Patient Standing and Transfer
A study testing Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device and Standing attempts with the "Tina" device in people with Mobility Limitation, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to evaluate via a physiological analysis of the movements involved in standing, the level of forward flexion of the spine (in cm on the horizontal axis) obtained with the apparatus "Tina" and to compare levels obtained in the same patients with stander/transfer devices "Turner" and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 75 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mobility Limitation
- What is being tested?
- Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device and Standing attempts with the "Tina" device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 75 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is in stable medical condition (no complications in the last 10 days)
- The patient is unable to stand up by his/her self and requires help during transfers
- The patient has muscular force (quadriceps) > 3 out of 5.
Who cannot join
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
Show all 12Show fewer
- The patient has a limited support from at least one lower limb
- The patient has an unstable fracture
- The patient has a fragile heart
- The patient has joint pain localized in the knee, hip or ankle.
- The patient has already used one of three mechanisms to help with standing and transfer used in this study
- Behavioral problems (opposition, agitation)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The main objective of this study is to evaluate via a physiological analysis of the movements involved in standing, the level of forward flexion of the spine (in cm on the horizontal axis) obtained with the apparatus "Tina" and to compare levels obtained in the same patients with stander/transfer devices "Turner" and "Vertic'Easy".
Read the detailed description
Secondary objectives of this study are to compare the three devices in terms of:
- the level recovery of the spine on the vertical axis (vertical displacement C7, cm)
- standing time, defined by the time between the start of the forward flexion and the beginning of the vertical stabilization phase (seconds)
- the success rate of the verticalization of the patient (the attempt is considered successful when the vertical position is held for 10 seconds).
- Conditions
- Mobility Limitation
- Being tested
- Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Standing attempts with the "Tina" device
- Keywords
- standing devices, transfer devices
- Medical subject headings
- Mobility Limitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" DeviceDevice
Also called Vertic'Easy, Manufacturer : HMS-VILGO, Parc Eurasanté - 243, Rue Salvador Allendé 59120 LOOS LEZ LILLE,
Included patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes.
Standing attempts with the "Turner" DeviceDevice
Also called Turner, Manufacturer : ETAC AB, Suède ; distributed in France by : FRANCE REHAB, ZA du Serroir, 54690 LAY SAINT CHRISTOPHE
Included patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes
Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceDevice
Also called Tina, Manufacturer : ALTER ECO Santé, 9 Boulevard de Maurens, 31270 CUGNAUX
Included patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Turner-Vertic'Easy-Tina | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Turner; (2) Vertic'Easy; (3) Tina. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
| Turner-Tina-Vertic'Easy | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Turner; (2) Tina; (3) Vertic'Easy. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
| Vertic'Easy-Turner-Tina | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Vertic'Easy; (2) Turner; (3) Tina. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
| Vertic'Easy-Tina-Turner | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Vertic'Easy; (2) Tina; (3) Turner. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
| Tina-Turner-Vertic'Easy | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Tina; (2) Turner; (3) Vertic'Easy. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
| Tina-Vertic'Easy-Turner | Experimental | Standing will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Tina; (2) Vertic'Easy; (3) Turner. Receives: Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device; Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of forward flexion of the spine (position of maximum horizontal displacement of C7)
cm
Measured: Baseline (Day 0; cross-sectional study)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Level of standing (maximum vertical displacement C7)
cm
Measured: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Angle of hip flexion (angle formed by the line connecting the acromion and the greater trochanter with the line connecting the greater trochanter and the lateral femoral condyle)
degrees
Measured: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Standing time (time from start of forward flexion and the beginning of the vertical stabilization phase)
seconds
Measured: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Verticalization achieved (yes/no)
yes/no
Measured: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mobility LimitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emilie Viollet, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01647802
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LOCAL/2012/EV-03
- Other IDs
- 2012-A00638-35
- Acronym
- VTT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cross-over Study of Three Modular Devices for Aid in Patient Standing and Transfer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01647802
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VTT / LOCAL/2012/EV-03
- Conditions
- Mobility Limitation
- Keywords
- standing devices, transfer devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate via a physiological analysis of the movements involved in standing, the level of forward flexion of the spine (in cm on the horizontal axis) obtained with the apparatus "Tina" and to compare levels obtained in the same patients with stander/transfer devices "Turner" and "Vertic'Easy".
Detailed description
Secondary objectives of this study are to compare the three devices in terms of:
- the level recovery of the spine on the vertical axis (vertical displacement C7, cm)
- standing time, defined by the time between the start of the forward flexion and the beginning of the vertical stabilization phase (seconds)
- the success rate of the verticalization of the patient (the attempt is considered successful when the vertical position is held for 10 seconds).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Turner-Vertic'Easy-Tina | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Turner; (2) Vertic'Easy; (3) Tina. |
| Turner-Tina-Vertic'Easy | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Turner; (2) Tina; (3) Vertic'Easy. |
| Vertic'Easy-Turner-Tina | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Vertic'Easy; (2) Turner; (3) Tina. |
| Vertic'Easy-Tina-Turner | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Vertic'Easy; (2) Tina; (3) Turner. |
| Tina-Turner-Vertic'Easy | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Tina; (2) Turner; (3) Vertic'Easy. |
| Tina-Vertic'Easy-Turner | Experimental | Device: Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device, Device: Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceStanding will be attempted with the three devices in the following order: (1) Tina; (2) Vertic'Easy; (3) Turner. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 75 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is in stable medical condition (no complications in the last 10 days)
- The patient is unable to stand up by his/her self and requires help during transfers
- The patient has muscular force (quadriceps) > 3 out of 5.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" DeviceAlso: Vertic'Easy, Manufacturer : HMS-VILGO, Parc Eurasanté - 243, Rue Salvador Allendé 59120 LOOS LEZ LILLE,Included patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes. | Device | Tina-Turner-Vertic'Easy, Tina-Vertic'Easy-Turner, Turner-Tina-Vertic'Easy, Turner-Vertic'Easy-Tina, Vertic'Easy-Tina-Turner, Vertic'Easy-Turner-Tina |
| Standing attempts with the "Turner" DeviceAlso: Turner, Manufacturer : ETAC AB, Suède ; distributed in France by : FRANCE REHAB, ZA du Serroir, 54690 LAY SAINT CHRISTOPHEIncluded patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes | Device | Tina-Turner-Vertic'Easy, Tina-Vertic'Easy-Turner, Turner-Tina-Vertic'Easy, Turner-Vertic'Easy-Tina, Vertic'Easy-Tina-Turner, Vertic'Easy-Turner-Tina |
| Standing attempts with the "Tina" deviceAlso: Tina, Manufacturer : ALTER ECO Santé, 9 Boulevard de Maurens, 31270 CUGNAUXIncluded patients had never used any of the three devices evaluated in this study. Therefore the patient will make two attempts at standing on each device to enable him/her to get used to the device at the first attempt. A video recording will be made from a camera positioned laterally. Only the results of the second attempt will be a kinematic analysis and will be used for analyzes | Device | Tina-Turner-Vertic'Easy, Tina-Vertic'Easy-Turner, Turner-Tina-Vertic'Easy, Turner-Vertic'Easy-Tina, Vertic'Easy-Tina-Turner, Vertic'Easy-Turner-Tina |
Primary outcome
Level of forward flexion of the spine (position of maximum horizontal displacement of C7)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0; cross-sectional study)
cm
4 secondary outcomes
Level of standing (maximum vertical displacement C7)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Angle of hip flexion (angle formed by the line connecting the acromion and the greater trochanter with the line connecting the greater trochanter and the lateral femoral condyle)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Standing time (time from start of forward flexion and the beginning of the vertical stabilization phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Verticalization achieved (yes/no)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0; transversal study)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2015.
Related trials for Mobility Limitation
Not yet recruiting
Pilates vs. Core Stabilization for Balance and Mobility in Elderly Type 2 Diabetics
Mellitus Balance Deficits Postural Balance Mobility Limitation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Evaluation of Impaired Mobility in Chronic Illness Constitution of a Cohort
Joint Osteoarthritis, Atherosclerosis of the Distal Arteries, Without Gangrene
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of OSTENIL® TENDON in the Treatment of Pain and Restricted Mobility in Tendon Disorders
Tendinopathy
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Cyriax Approach With and Without Mobilization With Movement in Shoulder Restriction With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emilie Viollet, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standing attempts with the "Vertic'Easy" Device, Standing attempts with the "Turner" Device and Standing attempts with the "Tina" device in people with Mobility Limitation, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of forward flexion of the spine (position of maximum horizontal displacement of C7) (time frame: Baseline (Day 0; cross-sectional study)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2015.