AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Thoroid Disease Requiring Total ThyroidectomyNCT01649154

Clinical Trial on Harmonic Focus Shears Versus Ligasure Small Jaw and Clamp-and-tie Technique for Total Thyroidectomy

A study testing Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus in people with Benign Thoroid Disease Requiring Total Thyroidectomy, run by Ospedale Regina Apostolorum at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Harmonic Focus and Ligasure small-Jaw are the last device designed for thyroid surgery. The aim is to assess: 1. decrease of operative time (minutes); 2. decrease of post-operative blood loss (milliliters); 3. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Apr 2011to May 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • thyroid benign disease

Who cannot join

  • malignant disease
  • thyroid malign disease requiring lymphadenectomy
  • coagulatory disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Ospedale Regina Apostolorum

    Albano Laziale, Rome, 00041

Other trials in Italy

About this study

The Harmonic Focus and Ligasure small-Jaw are the last device designed for thyroid surgery. The aim is to assess: 1. decrease of operative time (minutes); 2. decrease of post-operative blood loss (milliliters); 3. decrease of post-operative stay (days); decrease of post-operative complications (%, hypocalcemia, laringeal nerve demage), compared to traditional dissection in a prospective randomized trial of total thyroidectomy procedures, for benign disease.

Read the detailed description

A single-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary referral center. A total of 120 patients who required a thyroidectomy for thyroid benign disease, will be randomized to either Harmonic Focus or Ligasure small-Jaw or clamp-and-tie technique during thyroidectomy. The operative time (minutes), morbidity rate (%), post-operative blood loss (milliliters), hospital stay (days), post-operative hypocalcemia (%), and cost of thyroidectomy (euros) were compared between the three groups.

Being tested
Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic FocusProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01649154
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ligasure Small-JAWActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus
Harmonic FocusActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus
Clamp-and-Tie techniqueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement of post-operative outcomes (morbidity, hospital stay, costs) with new generation devices for total thyroidectomy.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Cost assessment of new generation devices in thyroid surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionApr 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01649154
Sponsor's protocol ID
8580/DS/CE
Status last verified
Jun 2012
First submitted
24 Jun 2012
Last updated
25 Jul 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total Thyroidectomy with cut and tie technique vs Total Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Small-JAW vs Total Thyroidectomy with Harmonic Focus in people with Benign Thoroid Disease Requiring Total Thyroidectomy, run by Ospedale Regina Apostolorum at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement of post-operative outcomes (morbidity, hospital stay, costs) with new generation devices for total thyroidectomy.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in